💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › a-morefus-liberation-not-organization.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 07:17:46. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Liberation, not Organization Author: A. Morefus Date: 2000s Language: en Topics: individualist, leftism, organization Source: Retrieved on October 5th, 2009 from http://www.greenanarchy.org/index.php?action=viewwritingdetail&writingId=238 Notes: from Back to Basics volume #2 — The PROBLEM of the Left
I desire liberation, not organization. While most leftists would claim
that the two go hand-in-hand, or at least that the second is necessary
to achieve the first (and for some the second might even “wither away”
sometime after “The Revolution”), to me, the two seem contradictory. I
am not fighting for a world which is run better (more efficiently and
more fairly), I am fighting for a world which doesn’t need running (one
which is radically decentralized). Here lies the contradiction between
the Left, and those fighting for autonomy and anarchy.
If the politics of the left (including leftist-anarchists) could be
distilled into one phrase, it might be “Social Justice” — a vague
longing for a social system which ensures equality (socially and
economically, although not necessarily politically) for everyone, and
the political apparatus necessary to ensure/enforce their particular
notion of what that would mean. But only by people controlling their own
lives, and all decisions which pertain to them, will people ever be
free. This should be a basic concept, at least for anarchists, but
unfortunately for those still tied to a leftist mode of operation and
thinking, it is not. In fact, this simple notion is attacked for being
too “individualist” or “unrealistic”. I guess some people just think
they know what is best, especially for the “lumpen” and “the masses.”
They wish to plug everyone into an infrastructure which adheres to the
“correct” ideology (a notion anarchists should reject at face value): as
Michael Albert (Z Magazine) has said, the “good morality”. These notions
of “the way” are an insult to independent thinking and openness, and
stand in direct opposition to anarchy, and deserve only disdain.
Only WE can fully understand what WE are fighting for, and our own
interests and skills. We waste too much time trying to form affinity and
artificial unity with those with whom there is very little meaningful
agreement. Decentralized autonomous groups, making all of their own
decisions, are the key to effectiveness and to staying motivated. Only
when resistance comes from our hearts can we have any chance of
fulfillment. I am not just “two arms for the revolution,” as some
guilt-ridden, uncritical, and uninspired leftists and leftist-anarchists
have proclaimed. I am not a foot soldier for a vanguard or an “oppressed
people.” And, the last thing we need is more standardization,
mechanization, and militaristic approaches...the logic which projects
this whole system forward.
I am fighting for my own liberation, and from this stems my support for
my family, my community, others’ struggles, and the rest of life. Does
this mean we cannot learn from others, share ideas, or join together in
projects of resistance? Certainly not, but these junctures MUST be
without coercion, manipulation, and domination. They should be seen as
temporary and organic, and their continued connection cannot be at the
expense of our autonomy. We need to prioritize the deep and meaningful
relationships over the superficial and political ones. We must avoid the
“lowest common denominator” approach to liberation, one which sums up
our collective desires and struggles in vague catchwords like “freedom”,
“equality”, and “justice”, or the “One Big Union” approach, which
superficially embraces diversity, yet in reality, works to diminish all
individuality and autonomy.
Some anarchists, and all leftists, propose large monolithic federations,
parties, and structures to “get shit done” and “hold people
accountable.” We must reject this fetishization of organization and
control. Our liberation should not be dependent on a political or
economic structure — it should come from our own desires and willingness
to fight for another world. A leftist-anarchist friend of mine wants to
know how we hold people accountable when they continually “flake.” To
which I respond, learn the patterns of those you work and live with, and
know what you can depend on, and what you cannot. If they are
continually unreliable, then don’t rely on them. It’s simple. It all
comes down to bringing about a deeper understanding of one another, not
some adjudication process to enforce agreements — that is how the state
works. Even in regard to abusers, some would like established policies
and rigid methods for dealing with people, but each scenario is
different, and each victim and community demands a different outcome. It
is taking the easy way out, when we attempt to programmatically apply a
solution to a problem. Taking responsibility for a situation and working
towards the most effective outcome takes time, energy, and commitment to
one another, and while it may seem difficult at the time, in the end it
is usually the most meaningful.
Smaller groups are more able to make decisions which are relevant to the
individuals involved, while large organizations require tremendous
amounts of resources and bureaucracy just to perpetuate themselves.
Constant decisions need to be made just to keep them “running,” and this
will inevitably lead to representation and hierarchy. The further we are
from any decision-making process, the more alienated we are from the
decisions it makes. This is not a healthy model for taking control of
our own lives, it is a model for being controlled. As anarchists, we
need to take responsibility for our own decisions and their outcomes.
This is not to say that we should only be concerned with decision-making
on an individual level (although there are certainly decisions which
only apply here), but also as small, decentralized communities. Here,
decisions are made face-to-face, with each member of our family, band,
or collective deeply entwined with one another and our environment — a
bio-regional perspective which reflects how natural ecosystems function.
We only need organizations and large structures if we want to keep most
of the racket known as civilization going (including technology,
production, the military, mass society, globalized reality, etc), but if
we reject all of this, we can bring our lives back to a human scale,
lives worth living.