đŸ Archived View for library.inu.red âș file âș andrew-flood-the-german-revolution.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 06:59:20. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
âĄïž Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: The German revolution Author: Andrew Flood Date: 2001 Language: en Topics: Germany, Left Communism, revolution Source: Retrieved on 2nd August 2020 from https://web.archive.org/web/20070612102425/http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/history/german_rev.html
Looking back it is sometimes hard to realize the panic the European
ruling class was in at the end of the First World War. From 1918 to 1924
Workers councils had appeared in Germany, Russia and Hungary, factory
committees in Italy, and armed industrial war was being waged in
Barcelona. Even in Ireland the War of Independence included a massive
radical mass element with the Limerick soviet, workplace occupations a
general strike and tens of thousands taking part in May Day
demonstrations even in small rural towns. With this in mind it is
unsurprising that the British Prime Minister Lloyd George could write to
the French Premier Clemenceau saying âThe whole existing order is
questioned by the masses from one end of Europe to the otherâ
For many, particularly on the pre-War Marxist left it was widely
expected that the German working class would initiate the world
revolution. Anarchists as it happened were correct in generally looking
to Russia but it was easy to see why many pin pointed Germany to play
this role. Germany did indeed see a revolutionary upheaval in these
years but as we shall see what many had seen as its strength, its
disciplined working class loyal to the SPD turned out to be its major
weakness.
The German Social Democratic Party (SPD) was the largest and most
influential left organisation in the world before WW1. In 1914 it had
one million members and 90 daily papers. It had hundreds of full time
officials and a huge range of social and sports clubs. It was said that
it was possible to live entirely within the party. The Erfut program of
1891 on which it was based declared it to be revolutionary with no
illusions in parliament. And as the Prussian State had never allowed it
into power it had yet to betray this trust. Indeed its members were
subject to significant repression, from 1890 â 1912 SPD members were
sentenced to a total of 1,244 years in prison.
However the party did little apart from engage in propaganda and
education of its members. Despite its revolutionary language it was
largely based around winning elections and indeed had led the push in
the 1890âs to get the anarchists physically thrown out of the second
international on just this issue. There was a low level of industrial
struggle in Germany but in any case the party didnât intervene in such
struggles. Self-activity of the working class was never even an issue on
the agenda of the SPD or any of the loose oppositions within it. It was
firmly leadership based, seeing the introduction of socialism as being
the SPD coming to power and legislating on behalf of the workers.
In the period before World War One it vigorously opposed at least in
print and at rallies the move towards war. Tens of thousands of German
workers at mass SPD meetings voted never to fight their fellow workers
of France in the interests of German imperialism. And initially the SPD
greeted immediate preparation for war with anti-war demos, there were27
in Berlin alone. But by 4^(th) August in an atmosphere of national
hysteria all the SPD deputies voted to support it. It was not till
November/December that SPD deputy Karl Liebknect voted against war
credits, and shortly afterwards he was joined by the SPD deputy (and
later anarchist) Otto Ruhle.
The trade union bureaucracy was if anything worse. The unions declared a
âsocial truceâ for the period of the war and some elements even
speculated about the advantages for German workers in German imperialism
winning additional markets for their goods. This capitulation without
significant opposition is part of the reason why many of the left came
to reject work in the unions completely.
It is important to state that in this the SPD deputies and union
bureaucrats were probably being swept along on a genuinely popular wave
of German nationalism and jingoism that swept the German working class
in the same way that it swept other European countries. In the early
days of the war to take a public stand against it was not only to
guarantee popularity but risk attacks by nationalistic mobs. However as
elsewhere in Europe as the âVictory by Christmasâ failed to materialize
mass enthusiasm for the war was rapidly diminished especially as its
cost began to bite not only in terms of lives lost but in real suffering
in the cities. By late 1916 the meat ration was 1/3 of the pre war
level, and the weekly diet was only 1300 calories well below that
required for even easy work. By early 1917 food distribution was in
danger of breaking down completely in the cities leading to the period
known as the Turnip winter.
The left inside the SPD that opposed the war consisted of little more
then handfuls of individuals with no public voice. Because the pre-War
left had been obsessed with the Party taking power they remained loyal
âinternal oppositionsâ convinced that there was no political life
outside the mass party. This left them without the experience or
structures needed when they needed to break with the SPD and its pre-war
line. Locally groups of militants did come together leading to several
anti-war left groups mostly confined to specific geographical areas and
around particular pre-war publications
The war also rapidly undermined the organisations of the left, even of
the SPD that supported it. Military law introduced for workers in 1916
and some 66% of SPD members ended up at the front. Union membership
halved in the early war years. For the anti-war activists things were
far worse as the state conscripted their activists into the army and
commonly assigned them to punishment battalions or the most dangerous
sections of the front.
Initial nationalist enthusiasm for the war began to fade quite rapidly,
in particular when the hope of a quick victory vanished and the economic
costs began to be felt. The winter of 1915/16 saw the first bread
demonstrations and by December 1915 19 of the SPD deputies were voting
against war credits. In the summer of 1916 55,000 Berlin workers struck
when Karl Liebkencht was put on trial for his anti-war activity.
Because of the size of the pre-war left some socialists who were
conscripted started to develop underground rank and file organisations.
These were particularly strong in the fleet, which was confined to port
and where the sailors faced pretty miserable conditions while the
officers lived in luxury. In June and July of 1917 the sailors started
to demand recognition for their committees, this movement was put down,
two sailors were executed and total sentences of 360 years hard labour
given out to the ringleaders.
1917 also saw the formation of the Independent Social Democrats, who had
been expelled from the SDP for their anti-war stance. These were to be
the largest of the left groups outside the SDP but were never very
revolutionary. More importantly August 1917 saw 200,000 Metal workers
strike against cut in bread ration, large-scale strikes were to become
common over the next years and in particular under the influence of the
Russian revolution they became increasingly radicalized.
In January 1918 250,000 workers went on strike in Vienna and elected
workers councils to represent them. There were also mass strikes in
Budapest at this time as active opposition to the war spread across
Europe.
This encouraged the Spartakus League (a Berlin spilt from the SDP) to
call for a strike in Berlin. This met with some success encouraging
500,000 to strike. The strikes spread outside Berlin and were to see a
meeting of over 400 factor delegates in Berlin but the SDP was able to
use its influence amongst the workers to defuse the strike. Afterwards
the strikes 1 Berlin worker in 10 was sent to the front. Rosa Luxemburg
would become the best known of the Spartakus League leaders.
The German High Command strategy in 1918 with Russia out of the war was
to bring the war to a swift conclusion by a mass offensive, which would,
smash through the allied lines. This failed with considerable losses to
the German army. After the collapse of this Summer offensive the
military command looked for an end to the war and sought to bring the
SPD into government to ensure stability in the post war period.
However the Allied terms were considered too harsh so in a desperate
last bid the High Command ordered the mostly undamaged fleet to sea. But
the sailorâs underground organisations were prepared for this. They
responded by electing councils, taking over their ships and the
surrounding ports and barracks.
This was the November revolution, which spread rapidly all over the
country. By the 8^(th) it had reached Berlin. Mass demonstrations took
place with the left seeing an opportunity for revolution. The SDP
however succeeded in heading off this movement, although in the process
it was forced to proclaim the republic in order to forestall the
proclamation of a workers republic.
This period showed the problem that was to continue to dog and
eventually defeat the German revolution. The workers looked to âthe
leftâ parties and in particular the SPD for leadership rather then
looking to their power and carrying out the transfer of power directly
into their organisations. The popular concept of socialism for almost
all was limited to getting âtheirâ party into power. Hence it was easy
for SPD to take charge of revolt in region after region. The Spartikists
and others did not put forward a radically different strategy; they just
sought to have themselves rather then the SDP appointed as the workers
representatives.
The 10 November saw the formation of ârevolutionary governmentâ but also
a meeting of delegates of workers and soldiers councils. The SDP
controlled this by setting up councils itself. It ended up that there
were more delegates who were party officials then there were delegates
who were workers! 18 of the 24 delegates on the Berlin executive of the
Councils were SDP. By mid December this led to power being handed back
to the Reichstag.
The situation in 1918 was that the SDP leaders controlled both the
government and the congress of councils. The left had significant
numbers of members, well into the hundred thousands but not the support
of masses who remained loyal to the SDP. In addition the councils were
only weakly coordinated and while some were genuine many were creations
of the various parties. Some councils in the army were even controlled
by the officer core which had decided to was better to try and
incorporate army councils by leading them rather then trying to openly
oppose them. What was lacking was a strong network of independent
councils that could have put forward an alternative to the various
schemes for party rule.
In this sort of situation the control of the military was vital to all
sides. The left set up the League of Red Soldiers to win the army rank
and file over to the side of revolution. The SDP leaders sought to
construct forces loyal to its government like the Republican soldierâs
corp. They were aided in this by foreign capital, which saw them as the
best hope of staving off revolution. However while these were based on
conservative SDP members who would suppress the left they proved to be
opposed to open counter-revolution.
The SDP need a force which could be used to roll back the revolution so
in addition they set up the Noske guard, (named after the SDP leader).
It was composed of the old officer corp and the units of Storm Troopers
(elite assault troops) from the war. However it was to be remembered in
history as the Frei Korps and was to become the direct fore runner of
the Nazis.
Nov and Dec saw many Spartakist demos in Berlin, in particular daily
demos of the Red Soldier League. The Spartakus League had 3000 members
at this stage. On Dec 23^(rd) widespread fighting broke out in Berlin.
This revealed the government had almost no reliable troops there, a
situation similar to the eve of the October revolution in Russia in
1917.
The Spartakus League and the Bremen Left Radicals met to form KPD
(German Communist Party) at end of December. Rosa warned the new party
that they must win over the masses rater then organise a putsch but she
still saw the revolution in terms of the party taking power. Rosa and
Levi argued that they should take part in elections to the national
assembly but were defeated on this indicating a large number of members
were open to a different approach.
The unions were to treble in numbers in the first year of the
revolution. Many KPD members wanted to raise the slogan âout of the
unionsâ but no decision was made on this. The Revolutionary Shop
Stewards movement refused to join because of the Spartakus League
continued use of putchism.
As we can see politics in the KPD at this stage was very complex, but
still focused on seizing power despite some rhetoric to the contrary.
On Jan 4 1919 the Government provoked a crisis by announcing that the
revolutionary Eichorn was dismissed as police chief. They wanted to
provoke a premature rising. The KPD called a âpeaceful demonstrationâ
which 100,000âs attended but a small group stormed the SDP newspaper
building and dumped copies of the paper in river.
At a meeting after this the USP, Revolutionary Shop Stewards, and
Spartakus League delegates decided it was now possible to overthrow the
government. and to put themselves in power. They called a rising. At
first things went well and they rapidly controlled the center of Berlin
but many on the Revolutionary Committee had acted without the backing of
their organisations.
In this situation the committee spent the next day and night debating
while 200,000 armed workers waited outside in the freezing streets. No
military preparations made except by isolated groups of workers. Again a
key weakness was the lack of self-organisation by the workers. In
addition many workers and soldiers took neither side, instead calling
for âleft unityâ. This shows the revolutionary left had not seriously
exposed the real role of the SDP leadership in any way.
Perhaps the revolutionary left could have seized power in Berlin if they
had acted decisively but even then without workers self activity they
could have simply created a second state capitalist regime. As it was
workers started to return home, the SPD leaders got organised and even
before the Frei Korp entered the city on the 13^(th) the revolutionary
forces had largely evaporated. The Frei Korp proceeded to massacre those
that remained including, with the support of the SPD paper, Rosa and
Liebknecht. The SDP paper âVorwartsâ was the first to announce that Rosa
had been âkilled by the peopleâ (16^(th)).
Many Leninists due to their misunderstanding of the October revolution
(as a âplannedâ event rather then the outcome of the crumbling of
support for Kerensky) see the small size and lack of discipline of the
KPD as the core weakness. In fact it was lack of self-activity of
workers that meant they waited for orders while their leaders debated
tactics. The Berlin rising was probably premature but it was also the
case at this stage that the government had very little loyal forces.
Elections were called which saw the SDP getting 11.5 million votes (of
the 30 million electorate) while the USP only got 2.3 million. The SDP
now set about using the Frei Korp to smash the workers councils, which
were the only power in many areas. Over the next few months they marched
around Germany smashing the Councils. The Frei Korp went from Bremen â
Ruhr -Central Germany â Berlin â Ruhr â Central Germany â Munich
&endash; Hamburg.
Bremenâs council declared itself an independent socialist republic on
Jan 10^(th) due to KPD influence but by 21^(st) voted to set up new
authority through âcitizens electionsâ reflecting the lack of support
from workers. On 28 Frei Korp attacked Wilmshaven and on 3^(rd) Feb
Bremen was attacked fierce fighting followed but without support from
the army the workers were defeated.
The Ruhr was dominated by SDP councils, which had used its militia
against strikers in Dec. and Jan. leading to some councils being
replaced by the left. Plans for the socialisation of mines were being
made when in February the Frei Korp arrived and began the killings. This
led to the formation of first Ruhr Red army which temporarily halted the
Frei Korps but the SDP undermined this Red Army.
Next Frei Korp went to central Germany to smash a general strike. It
returned to Berlin in March in the midst of a massive general strike
supported by the SPD rank and file. The Frei Korp crushed the pro-SPD
forces (with the backing of the SPD leaders) with 1500 to 2000 killed.
In April the Frei Korp was in the Ruhr to smash a 800,000 strong strike
for the 6-hour day.
The overall picture was of the SDP ensuring until the autumn that the
resistance was uncoordinated so that the Frei Korps could dismantle the
councils one by one. Throughout this period the revolutionary left
continued to grow in numbers.
In Bavaria on 21 Feb the assassination of Eisner led to workers and
solders dissolving the parliament and handing power to a council, but as
it was mostly SDP dominated it voted to reconvene the parliament as soon
as possible. In fact it was March before this was possible. By April
discontent had grown and government power collapsed to the point where
some anarchists and SDP members proclaimed a soviet republic. This seems
to have been putchism and lasted less then a week. In its defense
against a coup however a second KPD dominated soviet republic was
formed, this time based on armed factory committees. This 2^(nd) one was
also doomed as it to was isolated to Munich so it seems the KPDâs real
objection to the first one was that they would not control it. Due to an
economic blockade the KPD fast lost support and resigned from the
government. On the 1^(st) May the Frei Korp arrived and 600 died in the
fighting that followed and 186 executions
Although the KPD grew to 100,000 members in 1919 the USP grew much
faster. In October 1919 the KPD leadership though a carefully rigged
conference made acceptance of electoralism and the existing unions a
condition of membership and then proceeded to expel over 50% of the
local organisations. This was part of an international process led by
Moscow where local Communist Parties were forced to comply with the
Moscow line.
On the 13 March 1920 some of the military organised a putsch under Kapp
to take over from the SDP. Most of the military and parties remained
neutral but the coup was defeated by a massive general strike.
Everywhere workers armed themselves and set up councils but in
particular in the Ruhr, central Germany and northern Germany.
Although this was sometimes with the support of the local SDP leadership
for the first time it was heavily dependent on self-organisation. In the
Ruhr at least its probable that the 200,000 strong FAUD
(anarcho-syndicalist organisation) played an important role. I have
found no detailed anarchist sources in English on this though and the
various Leninist texts only hint at the role the anarchists played!
The Ruhr Red army was 50,000 strong with artillery and forced the
Reichweir (German army) to withdraw after five days. This Red army was
formed from the base up, which meant it lacked co-ordination initially.
This was to prove a disaster later as the Eastern RA negotiated a
cease-fire (and handed over much of its weapons) while the western RA
fought on and so provided the excuse to bring the troops in.
The SDP took back power and did their best to end the strike and
rehabilitated many of the coup leaders and supporters! They then offered
a âworkers governmentâ of the SDP, KPD and the USP. Both the other
parties rejected this after some discussion but in a confused fashion,
which allowed the SDP back into power without needing to take specific
action against the right.
The KPD had little influence in events outside of one or two areas. In
Berlin it actually opposed the general strike for the first couple of
days. This was in fact the end of the mass period of the revolution,
however the KPD was yet to perform two additional tragedies
In April 1920 the KPAD formed with 38,000 members as a left break from
the Moscow line of the KPD, this included the council communists. Within
6 months it had lost half this membership. In the summer of 1920 at the
urging of the (Moscow based) Third International the left of the USP
expelled the right and then merged with the KPD to give it 500,000
members
In March of 1921 the KPD tried to take advantage of its much greater
size when the SPD moved against its central German strongholds. The KPD
called for workers everywhere to arm themselves and for a general strike
in Central Germany. A KPD guerilla army under Hoelz was briefly active
but the police alone managed to crushed this. When the KPD called a
general strike only 200,000 responded despite the fact that the KPD
supposedly had 400,000 members. In some places the KPD resorted to an
âarmed strikeâ i.e. trying to physically intimidate and prevent workers
going to work.
This resulted in many militants being imprisoned, papers banned and half
the membership of the KPD leaving. The farcical nature of the rising
meant the KPD may simply have been acting on the orders of Moscow.
Indeed the KPAD refused to support the March action as it saw it as
being designed to take attention away from the Kronstadt rising in
Russia. In Kronstadt workers and sailors who were demanding new and free
elections to the soviets were brutally crushed by the Russian Red Army
at the behest of Lenin and Trotsky.
1923 saw the start of the great economic crisis in Germany and
hyperinflation. The French were occupying the Ruhr and the far right was
growing in the south. The KPD proposed a united front with the SPD
against the violence of the far right but the SPD leadership choose to
put their faith in the state. Nevertheless this enabled the KPD to bring
its membership up to 220.000 and for it to gain some influence in the
factory councils and the unions. In response to the far right the
âProletarian hundredsâ were set up linked to the factory councils but
probably under KPD control. Union membership in this period halved.
May, June and July 1923 saw a massive strike wave as inflation bit into
workers living standards. This also crippled the SPDâs network of full
timers and papers as they lost the income needed to pay for them. The
KPD began to catch up on the SDP in the union and parliamentary
elections. It also recruited another 70,000 members.
By this time the Soviet Union was helping the German army secretly
re-arm. The KPD was also coming close to supporting the German
nationalists and after June leading figures of the KPD intended to enter
into public debate with the Nazis, but the Nazis called off these
debates.
The start of August saw a massive and militant strike wave with armed
workers dragging the bosses from the factories. In Berlin the union
leadership refused to strike so on the 11 Aug some 2000 delegates from
the Berlin factory councils met calling a general strike and calling for
the downfall of the (Cuno) government. The SPD again saved the day
joining a government of national unity including the far right The
strike ended despite efforts by the KPD to keep it going.
At the point the second tragedy starts to unfold. The Moscow leadership,
in particular Trotsky, decided the moment was ripe for revolution. He
even demanded that a date be set for it to coincide with the anniversary
of the Russian revolution! Red Army officers were sent to Germany to
help prepare the âProletarian hundredsâ for the rising.
In September the far right came to control Bavaria and then threatened
to march on Berlin. Moscow decided that the threatened advance of the
right on Saxony would be used to launch a revolutionary counter
offensive. This way they hoped to win over the SPD rank and file. The
3^(rd) International was told defense of the German revolution would
soon be a central task.
On Oct 21^(st), earlier then planned, the army started to enter Saxony.
The KPD tried to get a pre-arranged joint delegate conference with the
SPD to call for a general strike of all Germany. The KPDâ secret plan
was to turn this general strike into a revolution but the SPD delegates
refused to support this as they said this was the role of the Saxon
government (which the KPD had entered).
The KPD thus called off the general strike and with it the revolution
except in Hamburg where the party was never told and a few hundred
communists seized half the city center police stations. This Hamburg
rising marked the end of the revolutionary period in Germany.