đŸ Archived View for library.inu.red âș file âș malaginoo-fear-and-favor.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 12:41:37. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
âĄïž Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Fear and Favor Author: Malaginoo Date: May 4, 2020 Language: en Topics: journalism, Philippines, Bandilang Itim Source: Retrieved on 2020-05-04 https://bandilangitim.noblogs.org/post/2020/05/04/fear-and-favor-freedom-of-the-press-in-the-archipelago/
On May 3, the world observes the World Press Freedom Day, a day set
aside by the United Nations to commemorate the valiant duties and
efforts of the press. On this day, we reflect the role of journalism in
our lives, and remember the journalists who are persecuted and killed
for reporting the truth for the world to know. We are called to stand
for âJournalism Without Fear or Favorâ something that has been lacking
in our country, especially under our current government.
We have seen since the advent of the regime under President Rodrigo
Duterte that now more than ever, the freedom of the press in our country
is continually violated by the State. Journalists continue to be
attacked online, intimidate, and illegally arrested for being critical
of the government.[1] They are degraded through the words of a President
and his sycophants.[2] They are forced to recant and censor themselves
for criticizing the multiple wrongs of the State.[3] They are simply
banned from entering press briefings for asking questions too tough for
a spokesperson to bear.[4]
All of this while media outlets that offer a view counter to the
narrative of the regime are threatened and prosecuted by partisans of
administration.[5] What is worse is that the regime has already taken
steps to completely legalize criminalizing dissent with the passage of
the âAnti-Terrorism Billâ with provisions so vague that alternative news
organizations and their journalists can be red-tagged and marked as
terrorists to be put in jail indefinitely.[6]
Meanwhile, false information masquerading as news continues to be spread
on the internet, largely through accounts and pages supporting the
regime of the President.[7] News items calling opposition figures
âdestabilizers,â âcommunists,â and âtraitorsâ are shared and reposted,
tricking people into believing falsehoods and influencing them to
supporting whoever sponsored the disinformation campaign.[8]
However, this problem did not begin with the current administration. Not
in 2009, not in 1972, not even in 1896. In fact, for as long as
journalism has been around, news has never been without fear or favor.
Press freedom in the Philippines has always been under threat of
censorship. Before the Philippines was even independent, the freedom of
journalists, such as propagandists were stifled. Whether it be under the
Spanish or the Americans, periodicals remained tightly controlled by the
government, only allowing works that are neutral or outright supportive
of the ruling class of colonialists.[9]
After 1946, the pressâthough nominally independentâwas under the
influence of capitalists and politicians, such as the Lopezes of
ABS-CBN. However, the next violent wave of violations against press
freedom came under the rule of Ferdinand Marcos. Under that regime, all
media outlets, newspaper, radio, television, were taken over and
controlled by the government. All information was tightly controlled and
censored, and those who refused to relent were âundermining the
integrity of the governmentâ and summarily arrested.[10]
Even after the fall of Marcos, the press was still under threat from
both inside and outside government. Under the succeeding administration,
over 40 journalists were killed from 1987 to 2001.[11]
The most cases, however, happened under government of President Arroyo
where over 80 media workers were killed. Worse, under Arroyo the
attitude of the government towards the press chilled with battles in
court against periodicals and illegal actions against journalists of the
time.[12]
In 2009, the greatest attack on the press came with the Maguindanao
Massacre where 58 people were slainâ32 of which were journalistsâby
forces under the Ampatuan clan while part of Esmael Mangudadatuâs
convoy. Only 30 of the 155 accused were convicted.[13]
The problem with journalism is not exclusive to the Philippines, though
it is clearly exacerbated by the culture of impunity in this country.
Rather, it affects all communities, all people, because the press
continues to be driven by motives of profit and advantage.
For as long as the press is controlled by wealthy businessmen, the
journalism it produces will always be influenced by their interests.
Just as how entrepreneurs use their private property to earn from their
businesses, the wealthy use media to earn the attention and trust of the
people. As a result, they can choose the tone of their news, the
opinions of their writers, and which items would help or hurt their
reputation. This way, they can influence people to act for their
benefit, whether political or economical.[14]
This is not meant as an attack on media workers, since they themselves
work for these companies, and are subject to the whims of their bosses.
They have to work in mentally strenuous conditions, sometimes with
unfair pay, and even get laid off. Worse, the stories they follow can be
risky, leading to the threats, assaults, and killings we are all too
familiar with.
There also independent media agencies and publications, alternative news
networks and campus journalists that do not work for profit but simply
to tell the truth. They are made up of people who report on events
hidden or obscured by large outlets, and express opinions that would not
usually be broadcasted out of âneutrality.â
In fact, with the advent of social media, anyone with an account on
social media can report the news. Journalism, which used to be dominated
by a few firms competing, yet in collusion in establishing a system that
let them centralizing and monopolize information, has been liberated by
platforms with a near unlimited reach. This, of course, is liable to
abuse, as we have seen with the rise of fake news. However, were it not
for citizen journalists, we would not see the current shift from radio
and TV, to online news.
Of course, we cannot predict the future. We donât know what sources they
have for their news, or how they will report it to us. We can only act
today towards shunning the conventional and adopting alternatives that
work better for all of us. As libertarians, we organize and we act in
order to build a society where there is free exchange, even of ideas,
knowledge, and information.
Journalism in a libertarian society could be where media workers like
reporters, journalists, and investigators would be deeply embedded in
the community that they report to, so much so that the citizens
themselves become a vital part of the process. Surely, there will be
standards based on objectivity and quality, so that we will not repeat
the mistakes we are currently making.
However, at every turn, from gathering information, processing and
publishing news pieces, to spreading and disseminating it to local and
international outfits, it is necessary that media outlets are
transparent and accountable to the people they report to, by letting
them contribute as well. Instead of large media outlets using and
co-opting social media for their advantage, we can finally have a
âsocialâ media, a means for us to relay and communicate the truth from
ourselves, to ourselves, by ourselves.
Journalism without fear or favor will remain impossible so long as there
are people willing to use the press as a weapon against the truth and
against us.
The written word has long been used as a tool of oppression, as a way to
silence critics, hide the truth and influence others to do the same.
However, in the same way, it has also been used to give voice to
voiceless, to stand for those who cannot, and to bring the truth from
the darkness.
Especially during these tumultuous times, newsâespecially on social
mediaâhas been used to inform people in a time when society cannot
function face-to-face. It has been used to uncover the truth about the
incompetence and lack of action from an incompassionate government.
In response, the police retaliated the way they always would: with
terror, violence and fear. Journalists were among those arrested for
âviolating the Bayanihan Heal as One Actâ that governs the quarantine in
the country.[15]
If the government is willing to bring back Martial Law, then we should
also be willing to fight it, by supporting media workers who are âno
work, no pay,â journalists out on the street risking their health to do
their jobs, and those people who simply report the truth.
Our circumstances may be different in the coming days, months, and
years, but our goal should always be the same: Journalism in a world
without fear or favor.
[1] Allysa Mae Clarin, 128 cases of press freedom violations recorded by
media groups, (Bulatlat, 2019). Reporters Without Borders also tracks
these incidents, Reporters Without Borders, Philippines, (Reporters Sans
Frontieres, N.D.). Retrieved from:
[2] Paterno Esmaquel II, Catcalling: Duterte broke the law in own city,
(Rappler, 2016). See also Arianne Merez, Duterte calls journalist Ellen
Tordesillas a âprostituteâ; presidentâs âvulgarityâ hit, (ABS-CBN,
2019). See also CNN Philippines Staff, Panelo: Ressa wants special
treatment being a journalist, (CNN, 2019).
[3] Samantha Bagayas, UE campus journalist âforcedâ to apologize after
criticizing Duterte govât online, (Rappler, 2020).
[4] Rappler Editors, Rappler reporter now banned from entire Malacañang
complex, (Rappler, 2018).
[5] Darryl John Esguerra, Media groups: State agents behind 69 cases of
attacks vs journalists, (Inquirer.net, 2019).
[6] Ronalyn V. Olea, Why the anti-terror bill is sanctioned state
terrorism, (Bulatlat, 2020).
[7] Vera Files, A trail of false claims made and fake news shared by
Mocha Uson, (Vera Files, 2018.) See also, Victor Barreiro Jr. & Gelo
Gonzales, Fake account network massively pro-Duterte â report, (Rappler,
2019).
[8] Pathricia Ann V. Roxas, PNA hit for âred-tagging,â posting âfake
newsâ vs Makabayan solons, (Inquirer.net, 2019). See also Che de los
Reyes, Otso Diretso, ABS-CBN News âmost targetedâ by disinformation in
2019 elections â UP journ analysis, (ABS-CBN Investigative & Research
Group, 2019).
[9] Ferdinan S. Gregorio, In Defense of Freedom: Philippine Press
Through the Ages, (National Historical Commission of the Philippines,
2012).
[10] Jodesz Gavilan, From Marcos to Duterte: How media was attacked,
threatened, (Rappler, 2018).
[11] Ibid.
[12] GMA News, Journalists fight back, file P12.5M suit vs Mike Arroyo,
(GMA News, 2006). See also GMA News, SC hears âviolationsâ of PP1017,
questions arrests, Tribune raid, (GMA News, 2006).
[13] Ronalyn V. Orea, Court finds Andal Ampatuan et al. guilty,
(Bulatlat, 2019).
[14] This is based on analysis of Antonio Gramsci on how the media and
other cultural elements of society are used for domination and influence
by the ruling class in the Prison Notebooks. See: Antonio Gramsci,
Prison Notebooks.
[15] Reporters Without Borders, Two Philippine journalists face two
months in prison for coronavirus reporting, (Reporters Sans Frontieres,
2020).