💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › osugi-sakae-social-idealism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:09:57. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Social Idealism Author: Ōsugi Sakae Date: 1920 Language: en Topics: Japan, idealism, japanese anarchists Source: From Robert Graham (Ed.), Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas; Volume One: From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939). https://libcom.org/library/anarchism-documentary-history-libertarian-ideas-volume-1-2
After the execution Kōtoku Shūsui in 1911 , Ōsugi Sakae (1885–1923)
became one of the leading anarchists in japan. He had escaped arrest in
the high treason trial that sent Kōtoku, Kanno and the others to their
deaths because he was already in prison for his anarchist activities. He
advocated and practiced free love, and was an early Japanese proponent
of anarcho-syndicalism. Initially sympathetic to the Russian Revolution,
he became a critic of Bolshevism and translated essays by Emma Goldman
and Alexander Berkman exposing the Bolshevik dictatorship. III 1 923,
Ōsugi, his lover, the anarchist feminist Ito Noe, and Ōsugi’s six year
old nephew were brutally murdered by the Japanese military police. The
followillg excerpts are from Yoshiharu Hashimoto‘s translation of
Ōsugi’s declaration from 1920, “A So cialized Idealism,” in A Short
History of the Anarchist Movement in Japan (Tokyo: Idea Publishing, 1
979). The translatioll has been modified by the editor for stylistic
reasolls.
---
KROPOTKIN OFTEN SAID THAT A WORKER ought to have an idea of the society
of the future that he intends to construct. Unless he grasps this
notion, the worker will be an instrument of revolution, never a master
of it.
In truth, up till now, the worker has been used in every revolution as
an instrument to destroy the old regime, and has had no share in the
construction of the new society. Indeed, the workers have destroyed most
of the old, but left the rest in others’ hands, so that the so-called
new society belongs to others, like the former society ...
Suppose, however, that the worker had no notion or a new social
organization: if he could participate in the destruction of the old
society as well as in the construction of the new one, he would be
master of the revolution.
Suppose that the worker had an idea, but it was the product of someone
else’s knowledge: he could not be a true master of the revolution ...
Therefore, when the worker wants to be a true master of the revolution,
in other words, to construct a new society for himself, he should
cultivate his autonomy; above all, the emancipation of the worker is the
task of the worker himself...
You may complain that “we do not understand what idea or ideals we
should hold whatever notion or ideal of a new social organization you
may suggest.” There are many examples put before the worker: anarchism,
social democracy, syndicalism and guild socialism. However, the worker
does not know which is the better choice at the present time. Each of
them has a plausible rationale. Thus, the worker does not understand, in
truth, which is best. Moreover, he must think about advancing his own
life before examining an idea or ideal by comparing these different
examples. While he is engaged in his own urgent business, he gradually
conceives of his position in relation to that between capitalist and
worker, then between the government and the capitalist. Even he realizes
the fundamental defect in the present social order. Further, he awakens
his free spirit, which is even stronger than the conception of his
position that he develops during his efforts to change working
conditions. It is a fact that I have seen among the workers, that the
worker tries to link his free spirit to the social knowledge that he has
obtained before accepting the social idea or ideal as it is presented to
him. The worker has been preparing his conclusions under the influence
of the various examples presented to him instead of acquiring his own
....
An idea or ideal is a great power or light as it is. But such power or
light will decrease when it is separated from the reality where it is
cultivated ...
It is the same with an idea or ideal of the future society that the
worker undertakes to construct. The anarchist, social democratic and
syndicalist ideas or ideals of a future society may imply a power or
light constructed by Western or American workers. It is better for them
to advance under their own power or light. Yet there is a considerable
distance between their reality and that of a Japanese worker ...
There is no other means than to promote the reality conforming to their
temperament and surroundings, while we seek our own idea or ideal.
Then we can make it our motto: to act like a believer, to think like a
sceptic.