💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › elisee-reclus-why-are-we-anarchists.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 09:48:37. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Why Are We Anarchists?
Author: Elisée Reclus
Date: 1899
Language: en
Topics: Libertarian Labyrinth, introductory
Source: https://www.libertarian-labyrinth.org/working-translations/elisee-reclus-why-are-we-anarchists-1899/
Notes: La Société nouvelle, année 5 no. 2, 1889 [Working Translation by Shawn P. Wilbur]

Elisée Reclus

Why Are We Anarchists?

The few lines that follow do not constitute a program. Their only

purpose is to explain the usefulness of elaborating a draft program

which would be submitted to the study, the observations and the

criticisms of all the communist revolutionaries.

Perhaps, however, they contain one or two considerations that could find

their place in the proposal for which I call.

We are revolutionaries because we want justice and because we see

injustice reign everywhere around us. The products of labor are

distributed in reverse proportion to labor. The idler has all the

rights, even that of starving his fellow, while the worker does not

always have the right to die of starvation in silence: he is imprisoned

when he is guilty of the strike. People who call themselves priests try

to foster believe in miracles so that intelligence can be enslaved to

them; people called kings claim to descend from a universal master in

order to be master in their turn; people armed by them cut, slash and

shoot as they please; people in black robes who call themselves the

justice par excellence condemn the poor, absolve the rich, often selling

convictions and acquittals; merchants distribute poison instead of food;

they kill at retail instead of killing in bulk and thus become honored

capitalists. The sack of gold coins is the master, and he who possesses

it holds in his power the destiny of other men. All this seems to us

infamous and we want to change it. Against injustice we appeal to the

revolution.

But, we are told, “justice is nothing but a word, a pure convention

pure.” “What exists is the right of the strong!” Well, if that is the

case, we are no less revolutionary as a result. One of two things is

true: either justice is the human ideal and, in this case, we demand it

for all; or else force alone governs societies and, in that case, we

will use force against our enemies. Either the liberty of equals or the

law of the talion.

But why rush, say all those who, in order to dispense with acting

themselves, wait all the time. The slow evolution of things being

sufficient for them, the revolution frightens them. Between them and us,

history has made its decision. No progress, whether partial or general,

is accomplished by simple, peaceful evolution; it is always made by

sudden revolution. If the work of preparation occurs slowly in minds,

the realization of the ideas takes place abruptly: evolution is

accomplished in the brain, and it is arms that make the revolution.

And how to carry out this revolution that we see slowly preparing itself

in Society, the coming of which we aid with all our efforts? Is it by

grouping ourselves in bodies subordinated to one another? Is it by

forming ourselves on the model of the bourgeois that we combat in a

hierarchical ensemble, having its responsible masters and its

irresponsible inferiors, held like tools in the hands of a boss? Would

we begin by abdicating in order to become free? No, for we are

anarchists, men who want to maintain full responsibility for their acts,

who act by virtue of their individual rights and duties, which give a

being its natural development, who have no one for master and are

masters of no one.

We want to free ourselves from the embrace of the State, to no longer

have above us superiors who can command us and put their will in the

place of our own.

We want to tear up all external law, keeping only to the conscious

development of the internal laws of our nature. By eliminating the

State, we also eliminate all official morals, knowing in advance that

there can be no morality in obedience to poorly understood laws, in the

practical obedience that we do not even seek to understand. There is

morality only in liberty. It is also through liberty alone that rrenewal

remains possible. We want to keep our minds open, lending itself in

advance to all progress, to every new idea, to every generous

initiative.

But, if we are anarchists, the enemies of every master, we are also

communist internationals, for we understand that life is impossible

without social grouping. Isolated, we can do nothing, while through

close union we can transform the world. We associate with one another as

free and equal men, laboring at a common work and governing our mutual

relations by justice and reciprocal benevolence. Religious and national

hatreds cannot separate us, since the study of nature is our only

religion and because we have the world for a homeland. As for the great

cause of ferocity and meanness, it will cease to exist among us. The

earth will become collective property, the barriers will be removed and

from now on the soil, belonging to all, could be developed for the

pleasure and well-being of everyone. The products demanded will be

precisely those that the earth can best furnish, without anything every

being lost as occurs in the disorganized labor that is performed today.

As well, the distribution of all this wealth among men will be taken

from the private exploiter and will be made part of the normal

functioning of Society as a whole.

We do not have to draw a picture of the future society in advance: It is

up to the spontaneous action of all the free men to create it and give

it its form, which will, incidentally, be constantly changing, like all

the phenomena of life. But what we know is that all injustice, every

crime of reason humanity, will always find us standing to combat it. As

long as iniquity endures, we, international anarchist-communists, will

remain in a state of permanent revolution.