đž Archived View for library.inu.red âş file âş anonymous-fundamentals-of-anarchism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 06:55:07. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
âĄď¸ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Fundamentals of Anarchism Author: Anonymous Language: en Topics: introductory Source: From Anarchy is Order CD
Solidarity or empathy for those who are treatedunfairly is considered to
be a form of natural morality (see Kropotkin, Anarchist Morality and
Mutual Aid).
âauthoritarianâ (see Bakunin, Law and Authority).
workplace as part of the cost of production
Anarchism is not chaos, violence or an âalternative lifestyle.â We have
a specific understanding of what authority is, how it leads to injustice
and how we can organize society without it; based on freedom, social
equality and cooperation:
Government, The State â direct democracy, elimination of
parliamentary/representative government and all dictatorships,
collectivization of all government services, replacement of the Welfare
State with Mutual Aid associations, no taxes.
Cops, Courts â social peace should be maintained by Mutual Aid1,
conflicts should be resolved by creating a culture of cooperation,
wrongdoing should be discouraged by giving economic opportunity to
everyone and discouraging exploitation and fraud (parasites), abolition
of all institutions of coercion, no cops, no judges, no lawyers,
neighborhood watches chosen by lottery will bring accusers and people
accused of wrongdoing before juries chosen by lottery to review all
complaints and right wrongs, civil courts will be replaced by
arbitration, investigations of wrongdoing will be by forensic
collectives.
Laws, Prisons â current laws should be replaced with community standards
against murder, violence, coercion, rape, stealing, fraud and other
actions deemed socially repugnant, infractions dealing with so-called
victimless âcrimesâ should be decriminalized, social problems should be
dealt with through counseling and mutual aid, persons in prison for
victimless âcrimesâ and economic offenses should be released, economic
wrongdoing should be compensated by restitution rather than
incarceration, political prisoners should be freed, prisons will be
closed, persons who commit murder, rape or other violent acts against
others should be treated at specialized mental health facilities until
it is safe for them to return to society.
Banks, Finance â creation of Mutualist community credit unions,
abolition of capitalism (no stocks or arbitrage), abolition of banks and
all usury (interest), spending by debit, creation of local currencies
backed by credit unions (like travelers checks) creation of barter
services, service exchanges and free commerce, no checks, no credit
cards, no âunsecuredâ credit.
Property, Land Use â collectivization of all real property (real
estate), no landlords, no rents, exclusivity of property use while you
use it (but it is not a ârightâ which you can buy, sell or own), no
inheritance (everyone has the right to whatever they can earn in a
single lifetime), land development decisions (for new housing, etc.)
would be a community decision, decisions affecting more than one
community whould be made cooperatively by the communities affected (or
by negotiation or arbitration if there were a disagreement), creation of
common lands for parks, community gardens and natural preserves.
Work, Production â elimination of all bosses (scheduling should be done
by clerks, budgeting by accountants), collectivization of production by
workplace, worker self-management (work could be organized as a
Syndicalist unionoperated enterprise, collective, commune, partnership,
family enterprise or self-directed enterprise), reorganization of
bureaucracy into working groups (project or task oriented), preservation
of professional expertise through on the job training within working
groups2, economic cooperation among work places.
Gender, Family â social equality for women and men, gender relationships
based on free association and mutual respect without dependency or
control, abolition of civil marriage and divorce, sexual freedom and
self-determination, universal availability of birth control information,
contraception and abortion, free health care, free child care3,
compensation for child care like other work, elimination of poverty
through universal employment, increase in leisure/family time and
activities by shortening the work day, paid maternity/paternity leave
from work.
Children, Education â children are best raised with love and attention
rather than regimentation and harsh discipline, they should be
introduced to learning as early as possible, their interests and
creativity should be encouraged so they can develop their full
potential, schooling should be in a tutorial style with small teaching
groups so children can receive adequate attention, learning should be by
doing rather than rote memorization, gender and ethnic biases should be
eliminated from education, all education should be free3.
We are told that without governments, cops, laws, corporations, parental
discipline and all the other instruments of coercion that are used to
control and exploit us that society would be in chaos, that we would be
terrorized by crime and that we would constantly be in fear for our
lives. We are told that without strong âleadersâ telling us what to do,
bosses supervising our work and teachers telling us how to think that we
could never solve our problems or manage our own lives. We are told that
without a lot of rules, regimentation of society and churches to tell us
right from wrong that we cannot be moral and know to live together with
peace, freedom and social justice for all. But these things are all LIES
told to us by the most privileged members of society who expect to get
rich off our labor, get powerful from our votes and send us to die in
their wars the next time they fight a war with each other to try to get
even more wealth, power and social privilege than anyone could ever use
in a lifetime. They tell us to do what we are told because they need us
to OBEY in order to ACCEPT living to serve their interests, BELIEVE that
we are still free and HOPE that if we work hard and follow all their
rules that WE will be rewarded with wealth, comfort and social privilege
one day. In a society where the richest 10% of the population owns about
90% of all business and 68% of ALL wealth, this is a fantasy.
Authority is so entrenched in our society that many people do not
realize the extent to which it influences their lives. We begin being
brainwashed to OBEY as soon as we are born. As a child our parents often
ignore our interests and aptitudes and try to make us be just like them
or accomplish something they wish they had done when they were young.
They blame us for our problems and try to take credit for our
accomplishments. Many of the stereotypes and prejudices people have are
drilled into them by their parents. We are punished until we do what we
are told. We are harassed and belittled if we show independence or
creativity. When we go to school, parental authority is supplemented by
the regimentation of teachers and the indoctrination of public or church
education. We are taught to try to follow âleadersâ, obey the government
and to accept the values âleadersâ think are best for us. When we get
out of school we are told to obey our boss or loose our job and go
hungry. We are told that voting for our masters makes us âfree.â We are
told to die for âourâ country. Until life gets really hard, most people
take this nonsense for granted and consider it ânormalâ and even a
source of personal security.
The advocates of modern government and corporate authority want us to
believe that we canât live without them, but capitalism was only
invented in the 1700s and most modern nation-states didnât exist before
the 1800s! For thousands of years people lived in relative peace
organizing their communities democratically, cooperating economically
and respecting the well-being of others and the environment. Great
civilizations like the Iroquois Confederation of eastern North America,
The Ibo and Yoruba of western Africa and the Celtic culture of Europe
and southwest Asia (which stretched from Portugal to Ireland, Germany,
the Balkans and Turkey when Romans were still living in mud huts) were
organized without kings, leaders, bureaucracies, social classes or
patriarchal families. Then self-serving people began to say âworship our
god or dieâ, âobey our leaders or dieâ, and âwork to make us rich or
die.â Organized protection rackets by gangs of thieves turned into
walled forts on trade routes, cities and eventually empires, monarchies
and modern nation-states. All modern nation states have been built with
authority based on coercion. Capitalism is an economy based on the
coercion of labor. Religion is a culture based on the coercion of
individual self-esteem.
Anarchists believe that the idea of Authority is at the heart of much of
the social problems, injustices and hopelessness in modern society. In
order to have hope that our live can be rich and meaningful, we need to
have the freedom to make our own decisions and benefit from our own
efforts. In order to solve our problems, we must take care of them
ourselves.
In order to have justice, we need to trust in our own inherent sense of
right and wrong when we see others being hurt. Authority only guarantees
freedom, justice and prosperity to those with the authority. If we want
a society where everyone can have these things, then it must be
democratic and equitable rather than authoritarian. But if we want a
better life, we cannot wait for someone to give it to us or for another
âleaderâ to tell us what to do, we need to take the initiative
ourselves. Anarchists are spontaneous. Instead of âtell us what to doâ
we say âdo it yourself!â Anarchists believe in Direct Action. Instead of
demanding that the people running the system change, WE CHANGE THE
SYSTEM OURSELVES!
Authority can only exist if the rest of us allow someone else to tell us
what to do, what to think and how to live. Although those with authority
use coercion to maintain power over our lives, we have something more
powerful than their coercion:
That is our refusal to OBEY them, to ACCEPT their system or to BELIEVE
what they tell us. But it only works IF WE WORK TOGETHER. It only works
if we reject the materialism, exploitation, and bigotry of those who now
have authority. It only works if we take personal responsibility for our
own actions and practice Mutual Aid (we help each other when we need
help, we object to injustice when we see others wronged and we work
together when a job is to big for any of us alone).
The alternative to authority is cooperation. Anarchists believe that we
can guarantee freedom, justice and opportunity for each of us by working
together to insure it for everyone. We believe that we can create a
culture of freedom and social equality to replace the current culture of
violence, obedience, and exploitation. Successful Anarchist societies
have existed in modern times in Spain during the Spanish Civil War and
in the Ukraine during the Russian Revolution.
This flier is based on an essay by Rob Sparrow from the Rebel Worker
Group in Australia.
âDirect Actionâ is the distinctive contribution of Anarchists in the
realm of political method. Ideally, Anarchist political activity
promotes Anarchism and attempts to create an Anarchist society. It seeks
to establish a society without Capitalism, the State or Patriarchy where
people govern themselves democratically without domination or hierarchy.
This is an activity which is inescapably revolutionary in nature and
which is best carried out collectively in an organization dedicated to
that purpose.
Anarchist show that their methods and ways of organizing work by
practicing them. The best advertisement for Anarchism is the
intelligence of the contributions of our activists and the success of
our methods. Anarchists strive to provide living examples of Anarchism
in action. Direct Action is one of the best possible ways of doing this.
Direct Action aims to achieve our goals through our own activity rather
than through the actions of others. It is about people taking power for
themselves. In this it is distinguished from most other forms of
political action such as voting, lobbying, attempting to exert political
pressure though industrial action or through the media. All of these
activities are based on the falsehood that we are incapable of improving
our own lives and must rely on others to achieve our goals for us. They
concede our power to existing institutions which work to prevent us from
acting ourselves to change the status quo. Direct Action repudiates such
acceptance of the existing order and suggests that we have both the
right and the power to change the world.
It demonstrates this by doing it. Examples of Direct Action include
blockades, pickets, sabotage, squatting, tree spiking, lockouts,
occupations, rolling strikes, slow downs, the revolutionary general
strike. In the community it involves, amongst other things, establishing
our own organizations such as food co-ops and community access radio and
TV to provide for our social needs, blocking the freeway developments
which divide and poison our communities and taking and squatting the
houses that we need to live in. In the forests, Direct Action interposes
our bodies, our will and our ingenuity between wilderness and those who
would destroy it and acts against the profits of the organizations which
direct the exploitation of nature and against those organizations
themselves. In industry and in the workplace direct action aims either
to extend workers control or to directly attack the profits of the
employers. Sabotage and work slow-downs are time-honored and popular
techniques to deny employers the profits from their exploitation of
their wage-slaves. Rolling and âwildcatâ strikes are forms of open
industrial struggle which strike directly at the profits of the
employers.
As the examples of Direct Action in the community above suggest, there
is more to Direct Action than responding to injustices or threats by the
state. Direct Action is not only a method of protest but also a way of
âbuilding the future nowâ. Any situation where people organize to extend
control over their own circumstances without recourse to capital or
state constitutes direct action. âDoing it ourselvesâ is the essence of
Direct Action and it does not matter whether what we are doing is
resisting injustice or attempting to create a better world now by
organizing to meet our own social needs. Direct Action of this sort,
because it is self-directed rather than a response to the activities of
Capital or State, offers far more opportunities for continuing action
and also for success. We can define our own goals and achieve them
through our own efforts. One of the most important aspects of Direct
Action is the organization involved in order for it to be successful. By
organizing to achieve our goals ourselves we learn valuable skills and
discover that organization without hierarchy is possible. Where it
succeeds, Direct Action shows that people can control their own lives â
in effect, that an Anarchist society is possible. We can see here that
Direct Action and Anarchist organization are in fact two sides of the
same coin. When we demonstrate the success of one we demonstrate the
reality of the other.
Anarchists donât ask if the ends justify the means. We believe that the
means used to achieve our goals affect the ends that are ultimately
achieved. Our methods and objectives are compatable. History proves that
a free society cannot be built with authoritarian methods. This is why
we have historically opposed terrorism and other forms of random
violence, even though the capitalist media sometimes tries to label them
as âAnarchy.â Anarchist politics offer people genuine hope and success
in their struggle for a better world because they focus on people
achieving what they desire through their own efforts. Direct Action is a
crucial component of such a politics. Direct Action is also a way we
demonstrate that Anarchist organization and methods are an effective
means of constructive social change. We demonstrate this by applying our
efforts to the political and economic realities of the society we live
in. We donât want to lead a revolution, we want to create it ourselves.
We call discovering what we are capable of by doing it ourselves
âcapacitationâ and demonstrating to others the possibilities of what can
be done by what we ourselves do âpropaganda by the deed.â
Direct Action must be distinguished from symbolic actions. Its purpose
is to exercise power and control over our own lives rather than merely
voice resentment over things we donât like. Direct Action is bolting a
gate rather than tying a yellow ribbon around it. This distinguishes it
from actions like the âbanner dropsâoften staged in by Greenpeace, that
look militant but arenât.
These actions do not directly attack the injustices they highlight, but
attempt to persuade politicians to act by playing to the media and
hoping to shape public opinion. They discount the independent political
and economic interests of these institutions and may put activists in
the ridiculous role of begging their exploiters to support changes
contrary to their interests.
Direct Action must also be distinguished from moral action. It is not
moral protest. By moral protest I mean protest which seeks to change the
behavior of an institution by challenging the morality of its conduct or
demonstrating that an injustice has been done by it. Moral protest
usually takes the form of a boycott of a product or refusal to
participate in some institution.
Moral protests are based on the myth that corporations and governments
can be reformed by persuading them to change their conduct. Anarchists
realize that nothing really changes unless we change it ourselves.
Direct Action has an immediate effect on the problem in question and
does not rely on affecting the behavior of others. Our own action should
have such an affect that we can point it out to others as an example of
how they can change â and not just protest â those things which concern
them.
The first implication of the politics of Direct Action with regards to
our relations with the police is that, wherever possible, we should
disregard the authority of the police. Direct Action is action which
acknowledges our own power and right to exercise it. To the same extent
that we recognize the authority of the police and obey their
instructions we are relinquishing our own right and power to act as we
would wish to. So it is actually essential to direct action that we do
not concede the right of the representatives of the state to restrict
our activities. Of course, for tactical reasons, we may have to
acknowledge the consequences that may occur when we ignore the law and
may even have to negotiate with police in the attempt to minimize these.
But it is important that, in doing so, we remember at all times that
although they have the means to do so, they have no right to restrict us
in our liberty. Any strategy of dealing with the police must take
account of their role as a political â and ultimately a class â force.
The police force exists to defend the status quo and the interests of
the ruling class. Once we recognize the police force as a political
institution and that its members therefore necessarily stand in a
certain political relation to us then a number of things become clear.
Firstly, any attempt to âwin overâ the police, one by one, is doomed. We
can win the cooperation of the police for precisely as long as we fail
to genuinely threaten the existing social order. As soon as our
activities begin to threaten the interests of the state or the profits
of the ruling class the police will move to disperse/arrest/beat us, as
sure as night follows day. They exist to defend all that we wish to
destroy. In their defense of private property and the state, the police
are backed up by the armed force of the state. Behind the police lies
the military who, as numerous historical examples illustrate, are ready
to step in and restore âorderâ if the civilian population becomes too
unruly.
Secondly, the fact that the police are ultimately backed by the armed
force of the state determines that any attempt to resist or overcome the
police through violence will ultimately fail. While the state and ruling
class are secure politically and can succeed in maintaining the
passivity of the majority of the population, they can defeat any attempt
to threaten them through violent means. The state has more repressive
force at its command than we can ever hope to muster. This is not a
pacifist position. We have every right to employ force in the attempt to
resist the violence of the state. Where a specific act of violence
against the state will achieve a particular tactical objective, without
provoking crippling repression or a disastrous political backlash, then
we would be justified in committing it. But as a political strategy, in
a non-revolutionary period, attempting to overcome the state through
force is doomed. There may be tactical advantages to not antagonizing
the police.
But in our care to avoid creating unnecessary trouble for ourselves we
must remember that the source of the confrontation and violence which
sometimes occurs around the police is the police themselves in their
attempts to protect an unjust â and ultimately itself violent â social
order.
Anarchists should neither ignore the media or perform for it. Instead we
should remain true to our own politics and seek to achieve our ends
through our own efforts. While we do so we should welcome media
attention which might spread news of our activities and so help build an
Anarchist movement. When we cooperate with the media we should do so
without compromising the integrity of our own politics and without
distorting either ourselves or our message. We must also remember that
the capitalist media represent multinational corporations with their own
political agenda which often âblack outâ or âspinâ (manipulate, distort,
censor, etc.) the news to influence public opinion. Rather than relying
on them to communicate our message to the people we should do it
ourselves. Community papers, zines, tabling projects, free radio
(micropower radio) and low watt community television broadcasting are
themselves examples of Direct Action in the media.
Free Association is the idea that we cannot be free as individuals
without having free relationships with others, that no one person can be
free unless we are all free and that for each of us to be free we must
work together to insure that everyone else is free. In an Anarchist
society people would cooperate with each other to achieve the following:
Complete Social Freedom Including Sexual Freedom and Reproductive
Freedom: People associate because all participants want to.
Freedom of Speech, Press and Information to include all forms of
communication and education.
Complete Cultural Freedom including the freedom of individual tastes,
lifestyle, entertainment and other preferences.
Freedom of Movement: All people must be allowed to live where they
chose, travel where they chose, shop where they chose (e.g. do business
where you chose), recreate where you chose, etc.. This includes the
freedom to migrate and immigrate without being restricted or
discriminated upon because of your place of birth or the place of birth
of your ancestors.
Complete Economic Freedom Which can only exist if all persons retain
control of their labor power, enter productive relationships
voluntarily, and are compensated for the full value of their productive
activity: All forms of economic exploitation must be destroyed including
capitalism, debt slavery, and theft. Full compensation for child rearing
as a job.
Freedom to Assemble Peacefully With Other Persons for Common Purposes,
Collective Organization and Joint Petition for Redress: All people must
be allowed to associate freely with the groups they chose and to
disassociate themselves when they chose. All people must be allowed to
organize in their place of work and in their community. All people must
be entitled to work together for the purpose of rendering Mutual Aid and
to receive Mutual Aid when they need it.
Completely Cooperative Relationships for Production, Companionship,
Reproduction, Exchange, Recreation, etc.: The elimination of all
authoritarianism and coercion, non-violent conflict resolution, and
intolerance of predatory, parasitic or obstructionist behavior through
Mutual Aid.
Direct Democracy and Majority Rule for All Political, Economic, and
Military Collective Activities (e.g. âNew England Town Hall Meetingâ,
âSyndicalist Unions/Free Sovietsâ, âPopular Militiasâ), Individual
Selfdetermination, and Community Self-Determination: No Government, No
Political Parties, No Leaders, No Corporations, No Police and No Church.
Personal responsibility and accountability rather than coercion.
The Destruction of all Forms of Bigotry: Bigotry is intended to limit
individual freedom by excluding persons or groups of persons, by
creating unnatural divisions and conflicts between groups of persons and
by distracting persons from the exploitations of the ruling class, their
political system, and their social control mechanisms. This means that
gender bias, ethnic bias, heterosexist/homosexist bias, class
bias/privilege, etc. must never be tolerated. This also means the
rejection of any cultural or religious values which advocate bigotry.
Personal Privacy including freedom from unreasonable search and seizure,
surveillance or intrusion into your domestic or personal affairs,
relationships, and activities.
A Minimum Quality of Life For Everyone including food, clothing,
shelter, health care, sanitation and a healthy environment necessary for
everyone to be free to live for reasons other than just survival.
Education, job training, child care, transportation and work for
everybody. Mutual Aid for workers who are sick or injured. Mutual Aid
for those who are to young, old or infirmmed to work. Everyone should be
able to chose when to end their life.
Anarchism is the philosophy of freedom. We believe in a society where
the freedom of each person is limited only by the freedom of everyone.
We are born free yet everywhere we are enslaved. This is because the
idea of âfreedomâ in a capitalist society is confused with âSocial
Darwinismâ; the idea that a few people should be allowed to dominate,
terrorize and exploit everyone else. While this may be the fantasy of
the rich, it is not true freedom. Freedom cannot be achieved by taking
over the government or becoming a new ruling elite because, so long as
one group of people try to place themselves above everyone else, then
everyone else will still not be free.
True freedom is also not defined by âCivil Rights.â âRightsâ are a
perversion of true freedom invented to trick us into believing that we
owe our freedom to governments. In truth, we are born free and the
purpose of governments is to take that freedom away in order to protect
the money, property and privileges of the rich; the Ruling Class. All
âCivil Rightsâ are is a system by which the government rations a portion
of our freedom back to us (after they have stolen it in the first place)
in order to create the illusion of freedom or convince us that we are
freer than others who are also enslaved by the coercion of legislatures,
cops, armies, courts and prisons which await those who ask why some are
more free than others. The truth is that if we allow ourself to be
dependent upon coercive institutions (like courts) created by the rich
and coercive authorities appointed by the rich for a measure of freedom
defined by THEIR interpretation of our ârightsâ then we are no more free
than animals in a zoo whose zookeepers decide how large our cages are or
how long our chains should be so that we can believe we are free, but
still be under their control.
True freedom is not measured by the power or authority the rich allow us
to have, but by the ability to govern ourselves. If we allow ourselves
to believe that THEY give us freedom then we are giving up our freedom
any time they chose to take it away or anytime they threaten to take it
if we donât do what they say.
True freedom is not measured by the money, property or consumer goods
the rich allow us to have, but by controlling the wealth created by our
own labor ourselves. The ability to have a credit card, a car or a big
screen television is no more a measure of freedom than the ability to
have a full stomach and a place to live on welfare. It does not change
the fact that the rich steal the value of what we produce with our labor
and only allow us a portion of it. It does not change the fact that
whether we work or are on welfare we are in a coercive relationship
where our ability to eat and have a home is tied to our obedience to a
boss or the government.
True freedom begins when we take responsibility for our own actions.
This means that we are not willing to let other people tell us what to
think or how to live. We question what we have been taught by parents
and social institutions. We question the motives and agenda of
politicians, bosses and the capitalist news media. We question the
injustice we see in the World around us and reject the excuses for it
given by people with wealth and social privilege.
PERSONAL freedom is a lifelong pursuit of understanding yourself and the
World around you through self-education, personal experiences and
introspection (thinking about what you have read and experienced,
comparing it to things you learned before and trying to understand
more).
Anarchists believe that to have PERSONAL freedom we must also have
SOCIAL freedom. Most people do not live alone. We are one person in a
community of people. We are one worker in a group of workers at a
workplace. Our ability to have PERSONAL freedom is dependent upon our
ability to cooperate with others in our community and our workplace in
order to make collective decisions about things which affect everyone in
the group so that we can live in ways where everyone benefits from their
labor and has their interests taken into consideration and injustices
are weeded out by the group. SOCIAL freedom begins when we recognize
that no individual, clique or social class can have power over us or
take advantage of us if everyone else refuses to obey them. We recognize
that our refusal (our âFree Willâ) is more powerful than their coercion
if we exercise it as a group. This means that instead of letting the
rich trick us into competing with each other over a small portion of the
freedom or wealth they steal from us, we get together and decide not to
let them steal it in the first place and we all end up with more than
any individual who plays their game.
SOCIAL freedom also means that we reject the ideas the rich invent to
trick us into competing, so we donât work together. Anarchists believe
that to be free we must replace the idea of âsurvival of the fittestâ
with the practice of Mutual Aid: âAll for one and one for allâ and âAn
injury to one is an injury to all.â People have a natural feeling of
compassion every time they see someone wronged because they know it
could happen to them. We believe that this idea of âSolidarityâ and the
willingness of people to cooperate in groups for the benefit of everyone
are the keys to enabling the greatest PERSONAL freedom for everyone.
âIn The Descent of Man, [Charles Darwin] gave some powerful pages to
illustrate its proper, wide sense. He pointed out how, in numberless
animal societies, the struggle between separate individuals for the
means of existence disappears, how struggle is replaced by co-operation,
and how that substitution results in the development of intellectual and
moral faculties which secure to the species the best conditions for
survival.
He intimated that in such cases the fittest are not the physically
strongest, nor the cunningest, but those who learn to combine so as to
mutually support each other, strong and weak alike, for the welfare of
the community.
âThose communities,â he wrote, âwhich included the greatest number of
the most sympathetic members would flourish best, and rear the greatest
number of offspringâ (2^(nd) ed., p. 163).â [Peter Kropotkin, Mutual
Aid: A Factor In Evolution, 1902]
MUTUAL AID is the idea that the evolution of Humanity as a sentient
species and the emergence of Human Civilization were the result of
solidarity for the needs of our fellow community members, cooperation
and mutual support to overcome our mutual obstacles, defend against our
mutual adversaries and create a society in which all who cooperate will
mutually benefit. Mutual Aid is the basis of the village community, the
labor syndicate (Union), cooperative and collective businesses,
mutualist credit unions, mutual insurance and various mutual aid
societies where people volunteer to help others.
The idea that human evolution was shaped by unlimited selfishness and
the desire to dominate and exploit others is a Capitalist lie. Modern
Anthropology has disproved myths like this one and the one that
primitive people were chiefly macho hunters: the truth is that people
were scavengers who mostly gathered plants for food and had to rely on
their wits and each other to survive.
âThe small strength and speed of man, his want of natural weapons, etc.
are more than counterbalanced, firstly, by his intellectual facilities;
and secondly, by his social qualities, which led them to give and
receive aid from his fellow manâ [Darwin, The Descent of Man, 2^(nd)
ed., pp. 63â64].
Primitive humans were under 5 feet tall at a time when most predatory
animals were trice their current size. To imagine that a single person
could have dominated social groups without the aid of their fellows to
survive is merely the fantasy of 19^(th) Century aristocrats who wanted
to rationalize their ideology of exploitation. Natural human social
behavior is evident in primitive tribal groups where even among
cannibals âweak people are usually supported; sick people are very well
attended to; they are never abandoned or killedâ [Kropotkin, Mutual Aid:
A Factor in Evolution, 1902]. Within the tribe, the rule of âone for all
and all for oneâ is the highest value because it is essential to their
survival.
This value is reflected in the village society which was the predominant
form of human social organization up through the Middle Ages. Modern
Mutual Aid groups have their origin in the traditional village community
where people with mutual interests grouped together to provide for their
collective needs without imposing on the individual or family and
provided for their mutual defense, support and justice. Villages were
democratically run by what was called the âFolkmøteâ in Scandinavia:
This was the early equivalent of the New England Town Meeting where
decisions were made collectively by all the members of the community.
The village dwellers worked together to grow food on land that was used
by all but owned by none. They stood together to defend their village
against human or animal predators and any quarrel among them was
considered as a community affair.
âIf a quarrel ended in a fight and wounds, the man who stood by and did
not interpose was treated as if he himself had inflicted the woundsâ
[Kropotkin, Mutual Aid: A Factor in Evolution, 1902].
Cooperation, not competition, has been the driving force of human
development and improvements in our quality of life. Most inventions
throughout history have been the product of work by many people who
shared their ideas and not the lone genius of Capitalist mythology. Even
in the Middle Ages when scientists and doctors were burned by the Church
for heresy and witchcraft, secret societies were formed to exchange and
pass along knowledge. A group which is willing to work together on a
project and make the successful completion or operation of the project a
priority over personal differences with other members of the group is
more effective than any bureaucracy provided that it is democratic and
everyone shares the benefits of the work they do.
During the Middle Ages, cities grew where there was trade and groups of
craftspeople formed labor associations called âGuildsâ though which to
trade knowledge, improve their products/skills and train new apprentices
so they could become craftspeople. Guilds were formed around every
skilled profession from metalworking to shipping. At that time, all the
people on a ship had equal status and shared in the benefit of a trading
venture (the era of kidnaped crews being whipped into submission by
tyrannical captains was a product of Capitalism). The guilds traded with
others for food and other necessities and every guild member shared the
benefits of what the guilds produced. Guilds established funds to pay
for the loss of a home by their members, care for the ill or to take
care of the family of a guild member who died. Within the guild, all
persons were equals in their mutual relations who agreed to aid each
other and settle their disputes through âjudgesâ elected by all of them.
Guilds in the same cities cooperated with each other to provide for the
mutual defense of the City and each guild often had its own militia
which was a unit in the Cityâs defense force.
The Renaissance and the explosion of knowledge, invention and creative
arts which characterized it was a product of the guild system where
workers owned and managed their own work places and cooperated with each
other.
Capitalists have always tried to prevent working people from cooperating
because they know that it would enable us to get rid of them and create
an equitable society. In the Middle Ages, bands of gangsters were
anointed as âkingsâ by the Church in exchange for their promising to
help the Church get rich off the people they would ârule.â The gangsters
eventually stole the common land farmed by villagers and gave it to
their supporters who became wealthy aristocrats by forcing people to pay
rent to live on what used to be their own land. The aristocrats were
jealous of the wealth and freedom of the guilds and persuaded the kings
to make guilds illegal and let them steal the property of the guilds.
They eventually became so obscenely wealthy that they had money they
could never spend. The Church supported the rich by calling rebellion
against the king a âmortal sinâ punishable by death. Kings gave
exclusive trading monopolies to their friends who then shared the profit
with other aristocrats by selling part of the profit (the shares were
called âstockâ or âcapitalâ) or by renting the money from other
aristocrats through a bank (the rent was called âusuryâ or âinterestâ).
Later, during the Industrial âRevolutionâ these practices were used to
build factories. Since the land and crafts which people had used to
support themselves were stolen by the rich, people were forced to work
for the âCapitalistsâ for almost nothing or starve. The âCapitalistsâ
created governments which made it possible for them to kill or imprison
anyone who objected to being exploited or tried to organize their fellow
workers. Workers have been fighting to regain their freedom and the full
value of their own labor ever since they were first stolen.
Anarchist Morality is the morality found in nature. The original human
ideas about morality were based on watching animals and are simply that
you should âdo to others what you would have them do to you in the same
circumstancesâ [Kropotkin, Anarchist Morality, 1892]. We donât need 10
Commandments to tell us right from wrong. We are bothered when we see
others wronged because it disturbs our natural feelings of empathy:
because we know how it would feel if it happened to us. We have a
natural desire for equality in mutual relations. Therefore, an injury to
one is an injury to all because each time one of us is wronged, we are
all threatened.
The great sources of moral depravity in modern society are Capitalism,
religion and government because they create and maintain a system of
inequality through which people are robbed of their freedom and the
fruits of their labor.
Capitalism robs us and government and religion rationalize it through
laws and religious codes which pervert natural morality by equating it
with subservience, obedience and humility. By ridding ourselves of
Capitalism, religion and government we can regain the natural morality
which they try to distort. We have a right to dispossess our exploiters
because we would expect the same to be done to us if we tried to take
advantage of others.
âIt is in the ardent revolutionist to whom the joys of art, of science,
even of family life, seem bitter, so long as they cannot be shared by
all, and who works despite misery and persecution for the regeneration
of the worldâ [Kropotkin, Anarchist Morality, 1892].
Anarchists donât believe that people are naturally good or evil, but
that we are born free to choose. We believe our behavior is not
influenced by supernatural forces, but only by ourselves and, thus, we
alone are responsible for our actions. We do not believe that moral
behavior can be enforced by coercion or religion, but only by the desire
of the individual to respect the freedom of others rather than exploit
them for their personal benefit. This is why coercion doesnât stop
violence, stealing or other exploitation and unfair treatment of people.
Social peace and moral conduct in the community can only be assured by
an agreement among the members of the community that participation in
the community requires a respect for others and that the community will
confront anyone who doesnât voluntarily respect others (e.g. who wrongs
another) in the community and, if necessary, remove them from the
community in order to protect the freedom and safety of everybody else.
Anarchists believe in Free Association which is also the freedom to
disassociate. They believe that the Freedom of the individual should
only be limited by the freedom of others: this means that âFreedomâ does
not include the freedom to exploit others. This also means that the
freedom of the individual is maintained by the willingness of others to
defend it by coming to the aid of anyone who is wronged and restoring to
that person what was taken from them. Those who insist on exploiting
others, or whose wrongs cannot be made right, are enemies of freedom and
we chose to disassociate with them by removing them from our society.