💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › seaweed-an-open-invitation.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:51:01. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: an open invitation
Author: seaweed
Date: 2012
Language: en
Topics: green anarchy, subsistence, survival, insurrection
Source: open

seaweed

an open invitation

An incredible voyage

This is an encouragement for local, anti-authoritarian secessionist

activity aimed at acquiring land bases. Ecological insights and

awareness, an inspiration from primal ways and a desire for autonomy,

both individual and collective, would characterize this push for

different ways of living.

Secessionist action is not aimed at establishing new, smaller

nation-states, but toward the creation of stateless zones. The actions

aim for a decisive break from a world that damages and stunts us.

Secessionists secede not only from nation states but ideology as well.

This type of rupture is based in a desire for new relationships, between

each other, within ourselves and with the world that surrounds us.

This is about notions of regeneration and renewal, a call to look to the

time after the death and darkness of authoritarian civilizations as one

when life will return and growth will begin anew. It is an appeal for a

persistent, global May Day, to ideas and actions inspired by the

midpoint between the spring equinox and the summer solstice, the time

when the sun is set free to bring the pleasurable warmth of summer back

to earth once again.

Numerous ancient cultures were suffused with anarchic qualities.

Sexuality and fertility were viewed as joyous expressions of wild

nature, of creation. Ecstatic community dances rejoicing in the many

cherished wonders of life were common. Let our rebellions aim for

planetary rejuvenation, let them signal a time to celebrate abundance

and fecundity, let them be yearnings for new life and blissful days in

the pleasing heat of our new season.

Humans are at a juncture. We can continue to be conned, obedient

citizens who venerate the market and respect the institutions of

capitalist civilization or we can try to put into practice new ways of

living, ways that implicitly acknowledge the rich potential that comes

with freely-chosen communalism, that honor earth wisdom and continued

renewal. The techno-utopian argument remains wholly unconvincing. Who

wouldn’t rather have clean rivers flowing with abundance, intact

mountains and healthy forests teeming with wildlife and purifying our

air, than polluted rivers supporting only a few contaminated fish,

mountains cleaved in half for coal and minerals and forests reduced to

monoculture or scraped into clearcuts?

intimacy

These attempts would be highlighted by the widespread sharing of skills,

resources and burdens now carried by individuals and families locked

into their private lives. They would involve the creation of common

lands, gardens and gathering spaces, collective child rearing and

collective responsibility for shelters. Subsistence activities would be

explored and practiced. Secessionists would consciously aim at

permanently freeing their territory, their habitat, from political

power.

In the beginning, openness for intimacy with others, with strangers,

will be essential, because we have all become strangers to each other.

Ultimately these local movements aim for true kinship, authentic

community, genuine inter-relationships that allow each individual to be

all that she can be yet part of a whole. These expressions of collective

will would involve measures of offense and defense, for there are those

who cannot accept community autonomy, who fear individual freedom or who

have an interest in maintaining control from the top.

Many people now assume that a pitiless chaos is on the horizon. A chaos

birthed and driven by a social system based on hierarchy and

exploitation. Our fragile biosphere is sick. Its health is deteriorating

fast. Desertification of vast areas, global warming, diminishing

sunlight, widespread cancer and daily extinctions are but a few of the

symptoms. Our planet’s diversity of life forms is in peril.

This crisis has been caused by the institutions of the state and the

urban ways of industrial capitalism. It is maintained by ideologies,

especially the ideology of Progress. Our way out is to collectively

de-urbanize and de-industrialize. It is to relearn how to feed and

shelter ourselves without governments or markets. It is to create our

habitats as we are simultaneously created by them, thus re-establishing

a healthy relationship with our environment.

Unfortunately every crisis is compounded by the existence of yet other

crises on our horizon: nuclear waste waiting to sit up like a corpse and

spread its death, the ongoing possibility of nuclear war, the

disappearance of the protective ozone layer, scarcity of potable water

and even complete ecological meltdown. The warning lights are blinking

wildly, the alarms are getting louder and the elders are warning us;

it’s urgent.

Our future is shrinking.

Will there always be seeds of the old world in the revolt for the new?

Perhaps, but a genuine rebellion won’t be fertile ground for them to get

established. Liberating humans from alienated and massified life is

possible. We are all potential agents of change. By emphasizing local

resistance, our strengths become more obvious and defeatism wanes. We

need not prolong the time it takes to travel from the possible to the

impossible.

This isn’t to say that an international anti-authoritarian uprising

can’t or won’t happen. It is to ask how might this come about if we

recognize that institutions of domination are complex and global, and

that there are too many variables for any particular minority group to

grasp and control in order to strategically and intentionally instigate

such a global process. Many Marxists hold that planned, coordinated

revolutions are possible by putting our power into the hands of a

specialized intelligentsia and often the political party they work for,

but history has shown us the misery and repression waiting for us when

we do allow them to hijack our insurgencies.

The breaks I am encouraging don’t require the permission of parents,

parties, or productive forces. There is no need to wait for history, god

or material conditions to authorize them. I’m exploring willful ruptures

among friends, neighbors, fellow conscripts and comrades, ruptures and

breaks that are valid adventures unto themselves, yet journeys and

breakaways that might coalesce into something larger, something

planetary even.

Where do authentic rebellions originate? Most often they originate where

people spend a lot of time together and therefore know each other enough

to have shared their misery and their desires, to have built some trust:

ghettos, neighborhoods, factories, universities, prisons, reservations.

Frequently rebellions happen along tribal, ethnic or kinship lines.

Of course any individual who wants to make a break, who wants to live an

intense life can. This is making one’s life a cause sufficient unto

itself. These folks can inspire others, can implicitly give others

permission to stand up and shine and flourish. But when such individuals

are embedded somewhere, are surrounded by friends and neighbors with

whom they have tried to have real relationships, the virus can take

hold, the contagion can spread. If they are entrenched only in a milieu,

then the infection will likely be contained by its typically narrow

demographic limits. Occasionally anti-authoritarian elements from these

sub-cultures can intervene in various oppositional struggles in order to

try and push trhem deeper or further, or to question the notions of

directors and representatives, but these opportunities aren’t always

present and nevertheless we shouldn’t be basing the realization of our

dreams and desires on a strategy of joining others in their reformist

and thus limited revolts.

The endless stream of ecological and social catastrophes can be stopped.

When you’re in a battle you don’t have many choices: continue to fight,

surrender or retreat and regroup. It would be wise to look at all the

means at our disposal, to honor all the paths that offer us euphoria,

that can take us to an oasis, to a place and time where self-organized

people can create the lives they choose.

If we exclude surrendering, what’s left?

Fighting includes riots, sabotage, insurrections and other forms of

self-organized mutiny. Some may be spontaneous, like waves that seem to

swell up suddenly wherever you live that you can participate in. Others

might involve instigation and intent like blockades and occupations.

We can withdraw, drop out, encourage absenteeism, stop participating and

refuse various forms of conscription. We can regroup, build trust, come

to some agreements, and then perhaps lay some plans.

We can also plant seeds for the future. This sometimes involves making

attempts at creating a different world here and now. Other times it

means acquiring skills and tools that may be useful for sustenance

should a cataclysm turn the world upside down. This would help ensure

that the Old World doesn’t immediately return, preventing genuine New

Ones from taking hold. It often prioritizes withdrawal over direct

attacks. Sharing skills, growing food, hunting and fishing, prioritizing

conviviality, pirate radios, gatherings and communal child rearing are

just some examples of this approach. Finally we can share our world

views, put alternative perspectives in the public arena for debate.

There is no approach that guarantees that we can realize a more

unprejudiced and authentic world, a world without commodities or money,

without states or wage labor, without prisons and politicians. In fact,

the most we can likely hope to intentionally accomplish is to free,

temporarily or permanently, our home, the place where we live, of these

institutions and ways and values.

Of course we want our rebellions to be global because our adversary is

global, yet we must avoid being paralyzed by an attitude that views all

local attempts and activity as marginal and ineffective. We have to

counter all of the doctrines that promote a view of humans as helpless,

powerless objects of history. History can be a story that we all have a

voice in authoring. It is our activities, taken collectively, that

create history. It’s just that right now our powers are under the

control of malevolent, impersonal institutions which we ironically

reinforce by continuing to not only obey, but believe in, as though they

were gods. There are gods, but they are you and me. We are just afraid

of our powers, of the possibilities they might unleash.

One thing is certain: waiting, either for ecological or economic

collapse, for global rebellion or local insurrection, shouldn’t be the

main choice. We can change the world because we can change our world,

the place where each of us lives.

A new world can’t be created by the activities of a small group of

radicals. However, there is no megalomania in considering critically the

possibility of initiating and participating in a local, organically

self-organized thrust aimed at freeing the place where they live from

the selfish, myopic bullies that enforce injustice, ecological plunder

and exploitation. And this process could be healing, because it would

likely create the space and the possibility for better relations between

us and these new relations would in turn create the possibility for a

complete rupture with the current reality of sickness and domination.

Yet, it isn’t just an economic class and their henchmen and police that

need to be confronted, but the values that permeate authoritarian

societies generally. In other words, each of us must also wage an

internal struggle and in the process free ourselves and help create an

atmosphere that supports others doing the same.

The organic world consists of paradoxes, chaos, spectrums and

gradations, not engineered grids, predictable patterns and axioms. No

person or world view or ideology has all the answers. By trusting our

instincts and our desires, new possibilities will open. We can make

public what Power wants to keep private: our dreams, our visions, our

unhappiness and our anger.

The thousand-mile journey begins with the first step; an old truth. Or,

if you never take the first step, you will never get there.

Authoritarian civilization is founded on our systematic self-enslavement

and self-exploitation. Humans are at the helm, our fathers, brothers,

sisters and mothers are at the helm. Almost every one of us contributes

to reproducing this authoritarian, destructive, unjust, oppressive and

unimaginative planetary realm. It is hegemonic and therefore difficult

to live outside of.

Yet one persistent mutiny on this global slave ship could unlock all the

doors, could let loose the animals, could let us all find our wings and

our immortality once again. Any generation can change the world. But one

generation must soon, because there may not be a future one healthy

enough to do it.

This transformation would create the possibility of authentic, intense

lives lived in genuine, autonomous communities embedded in healthy

habitats.

And having a healthy habitat in which to live offers the possibility of

having a sense of place. A sense of place in turn offers the opportunity

for rediscovering feelings and experiences of awe, reverence and wonder,

not for science and technology, but for nature and its marvels.

The simple proposal is this: a widespread insurgency, based on a

multitude of local rebellions, each one demanding enough land to sustain

its inhabitants. More specifically, occupying or re-occupying territory

with the explicit view that it becomes our habitat. And these

withdrawals, while ends in themselves, as far as flourishing under

adversarial conditions goes, are also only a means to a much greater

vision. We withdraw to build strength, to succeed for ourselves but also

in order to offer assistance to other revolutionary projects and

attempts, to intertwine our liberated spaces with the struggles of

others who want to make a final break with global institutions of

domination.

Yes, we have much anger and rage toward the class of rulers, yes we are

inspired by expressions of hatred and destruction aimed at the bullies

who organize society. But here I suggest that we emphasize, among

ourselves, fraternity and cooperation. This proposal is about intent,

about not waiting for the right conditions, about consciously taking

advantage of the cracks and fissures in the dominant reality wherever

you live, prying them open, creating space for ourselves. It is from

many of these free camps that capitalism might potentially be attacked

as rebels and dreamers join with others for whom life under the

civilized order is unbearable.

In the long term, acquiring a home, a habitat, is essential. This means

freeing up colonized land, rehabilitating plundered land or seizing

land. In the short term it might mean rent strikes or squatting. It

could involve wilderness camps, fishing shacks, shared berry patches,

collective harvesting of wild foods and group gardening and

permaculture, etc. Learning from and being in solidarity with people of

the land, elders and traditionalists among indigenous people for

instance, who may live nearby, might be a priority. It seems obvious

that acquiring food in groups, sharing food among many, are possible

foundation stones. From every angle, a land base becomes essential.

In a small but significant way it is a proposal to take the initiative,

because we can’t win if we are always on the defensive.

These organically self-organized subsistence movements are autonomous

but linked, small but many, local but together spread out and therefore

occupy great amounts of territory. They don’t want new popes or

statesmen, better governments or better representation, new countries or

new republics. They aim for a world of ungoverned individuals, clans,

free wanderers, nomads and villages.

This strategy doesn’t aim for a mass movement, but for a dynamism of

local rebellions that offers to sweep up everyone who isn’t afraid of

being energized and carried by it.

There are no books necessary to read, no leaders to follow, no

traditions or jargon or vocabulary to adopt. You don’t have to live in

the countryside or in the city. It is homegrown, like a euphoric weed

that grows everywhere and spreads easily. It is against the laws of the

unjust, the arrogant and the elite, the powerful, the intolerant and the

unimaginative. It is strengthened by critical observation. It has no

room for bullies. It is intuition and rationality hand in hand. This

effort would be courageous and celebratory. It would succeed through

persistent self-directed activity by people without labels.

It promises to be an incredible voyage and you are invited!

Any authentic anti-authoritarian resistance should be an offer. An open

offer to all who cherish freedom, sharing, giving, healthy habitats,

mutual aid, cooperation and voluntary association.

It isn’t just for the ultra-exploited or the severely marginalized. It

isn’t open only to the excluded or the imprisoned or the hungry and

poor. But it listens carefully to all these voices because they know

firsthand of the most brutal hardships authoritarian systems impose on

their inhabitants. It doesn’t scapegoat or blame one demographic. It

isn’t led by victim-politicians and morality. We are all in this mess

together, and we should make room for all of us to contribute

meaningfully to a way out. Our solidarity is an invitation to all.

But History has created identities marked by privilege for some,

victimization and powerlessness for others, and the rebellions are

determined to free everyone from these chains. In the meantime there can

be no place for those who want power, who want to control others.

An anarchic rebellion aimed at healthy habitats and free, unique

individuals embedded in authentic communities makes room for the old and

the frail, for the young and the strong, for the impatient and the

patient, for those who are repulsed by violence and those who view its

use as another weapon in our arsenal. Morality and dichotomous world

views cannot choke it, because it is an organic, site specific impetus.

Each region, each town, neighborhood, affinity-culture or clan can base

its secession from the nation-state on their own desires, tenets and

dreams.

Starting from a circle of friends – or a neighborhood, an eco-village,

an island, a commune, an ethnic group, part of a city, a city, a region,

a clan, a reserve, a cult - its ultimate aim is always access to

territory from which the group can sustain itself. This means that it

always seeks access to land. Naturally there is room for wandering lone

wolves, nomadic families and hobo tribes as long as free villages and

liberated zones aren’t viewed as mini welfare states for them to depend

on.

Do you know how to grow or gather food? Do any of your neighbors? I

don’t mean a weekend garden, but enough to sustain you and your extended

family over a winter. Should the capitalist market collapse, and the

stores all get looted, what would you eat? Do you have seeds, a fishing

rod or a hunting weapon? Do you know how to use any of these? Is there a

place unpolluted enough that you could go to for food? Are you part of a

tribe, a community or a clan? Are you woven tightly enough into any

social group that would be willing to help each other out in a time of

crisis, or are you an atomized individual whose social group consists

mostly of your immediate family, with a few friends you see occasionally

at work or at play?

The vast majority of Europeans and North Americans, and of urban

dwellers everywhere, are just like you. They have no seeds, no survival

skills and no fishing rod or hunting weapon, belong to no genuine

community, haven’t a garden or access to an unpolluted place from which

they can gather food or medicine. You aren’t alone, at least in your

predicament.

One doesn't always have the option of joining in social disturbances,

most often you have to take responsibility and help create them. This

isn’t as difficult as you might think at first. It involves taking time

away from work. It means saying hello to a stranger. It asks you to turn

off your TV and other weapons of social control. Where possible it

involves exploring the wilderness and countryside closest to you.

Revolt requires being optimistic in the face of the nearly

insurmountable. It means viewing privacy not as something to preserve

and protect, but to unburden oneself from. It demands that you spend

more time with children, not only yours, but children in general. It

requires you to envision humans as a collection of individual life-forms

each an integral part of a natural home.

Cities are not habitats. City folk can, indeed must, participate in a

push against urban living because city ways are one of the roots of our

predicament and it is city inhabitants who will suffer the most in the

coming years.

Obviously, hundreds of millions of people obviously can’t move out of

cities overnight. So perhaps bringing some wilderness to the city might

be part of the route back home. Cities must be de-citified. It will take

insurgent imagination and imaginative insurgencies. Cities can become

partly abandoned, partly re-created into a collection of autonomous

villages and zones separated by vast tracts of orchards, gardens,

re-emerging forests and re-establishing wild nature, the whole region

healed by becoming a sort of vast permaculture zone.

And cities don’t end where the suburbs dissipate into farmland. Rural

living presently is but the flip side of the same coin of capitalist

civilization. Rural people also work and shop and pay rent or mortgages

and live out atomized lives. The air is cleaner and at least one might

spot a deer and watch the stars at night, but private property, work and

cops also control the countryside. There too habitats are invaded,

plundered, polluted. Country folk are also incarcerated, carcinogized,

monitored and punished.

Our destruction of urban life entails the destruction of rural life. The

goal is a geography where villages and clans and groups of friends

dominate the social landscape, not vast tracts of farmland that feed

cities or country estates that the privileged and lucky retreat to. The

goal is healthy natural homes, the creation of healthy environments and

the healing of sick ones that can sustain all the life forms that live

within them.

Imagine your city neighborhood without cars. The sounds are returning:

birds, leaves rustling, children laughing and squealing. The smells are

returning too. In springtime and summer the perfumes of buds and

blossoms and new growth fill the air, the haze from automobile pollution

is beginning to dissipate and the sky is visible again. It’s so much

safer to be outside without two ton machines whizzing by at 60

kilometres an hour. Most of the roads are breaking up from the new

shoots pushing through the pavement and concrete. There are footpaths

everywhere. Even bicycles seem strangely out of place.

Parks have become community gardens and orchards. Creeks and small

rivers are beginning to form and re-form here and there. Someone claims

that a salmon was spotted moving up a regenerating creek during spawning

season. Life is returning!

Sharing and giving have become the preferred way of circulating

everything. You don’t get up and head to work in a factory or a mine or

in a store or for someone else’s profit. You pack a lunch and head to

the garden. It’s a long day, but an enjoyable one.

There are over a hundred people in your vast community garden. Today you

are all weeding and watering and mulching and repairing fences and water

catchment systems. There is a playground inside it where the children

play. But in every place some food is also wild crafted, gathered and

fished and hunted, depending on where the city was located and on the

level of knowledge of its inhabitants. Gardens need fences and constant

attention. As subsistence skills spread and grow, gardens and orchards

contract, making room for the expansion of dream and play time, for the

nurturing and blossoming of carnal and ludic adventures.

Tomorrow is music day in the field just outside the garden. There will

be a bonfire with wild meat and fish and herbs shared. What used to be a

dead zone, a polluted, homogenized, top down city, a habitation without

wildness, an insane density of atomized people is turning into a

fascinating collection of autonomous neighborhoods and villages.

If you walk an hour south you enter what used to be just another aspect

of the same standardised urban life of producers and consumers that

existed everywhere before the rupture succeeded. Now it is like going to

another realm. A different etiquette, different ways of food gathering

and preservation, different approaches to sexuality, perhaps even a

different dialect have all been slowly emerging. Everything there is

different because individuality was allowed to blossom and communal

identities only take hold organically and voluntarily. One doesn’t have

to travel to a faraway place for adventure, in search of diversity or

difference anymore. Walk to any other village, only a couple of hours or

so away and you enter a unique zone.

In the countryside, subsistence might immediately be the primary way of

living. In the healing zones of formerly urban centers, permaculture

might take center spot. Permaculture is a set of practices that

emphasize efficiency in our food production activity. Composting human

waste into manure, for instance would be such a practice. Within

permaculture philosophy and practice, various food preservation

techniques need to become a widespread set of cultural skills. In this

sense, permaculture might be a stepping stone while crossing the

turbulent waters of post-urban living.

And there are places inside the city walls where no one enters anymore.

These are the dead zones. They are so polluted and ugly and unsafe to be

in that long ago we piled up a mountain of rubble around them and made

sure that everyone knew to stay away; a chemical factory, a prison,

places of psychological ugliness and ecological sickness. This is why

specific physical areas of cities will need to be abandoned, not just

the urban ways that sustained them.

Whether cities were just a bad experiment and shouldn’t be repeated, or

whether they were an imposition of forces opposed to genuine living,

re-forming them can’t be part of the solution. Transformation will be

the healing medicine this time. Our land bases will be places where

experiments in living are a constant opportunity.

What is subsistence? Subsistence means committing to a place and the

people who live there. It means generally getting food from your region

because that is the geographical area that you understand and are

familiar with and therefore you know when and how much of each item or

animal is acceptable to gather or hunt.

Subsistence means fishing with friends. It means preserving food with

others in your group or village or clan or whatever. Subsistence is

getting together, voluntarily, with folks that you have an affinity

with, to provide yourself with food and shelter and musical instruments

and friendship.

Subsistence means abundance and balance, it means wildness and harmony

at once. Subsistence is not an impoverished, depleted existence.

Time spent repairing the fishing nets or pickling vegetables or building

a communal smokehouse isn’t alienated time. It is meaningful and joyous.

In some places likely characterized by songs and mead, in others by

quiet satisfaction. It means providing for yourself where you live.

Subsistence is participatory. It involves understanding your habitat and

finding a healthy place within it.

Subsistence could be the bedrock upon which an anarchic culture’s ways

rest on. It is the foundation of a healthy, independent, autonomous set

of living practices. Subsistence assumes that you are familiar with the

cycles of the place where you live. Sense of place. Sensual wisdom.

This doesn’t mean that primal people don’t make mistakes. But overall,

they rely on directly lived experience complimented by generations old

wisdom to make their decisions.

Life in nature isn’t nasty brutish and short. This is a lie of the

fearful and the fear mongers, of ruling classes set on the conquest of

land based people.

Subsistence means no or very little material waste; no dumpsites, no

burning piles of garbage, no necessity of a recycling industry and no

mountains of appliances, gadgets and plastic. It is based in the natural

cycles of your group’s land base. It means respecting nature where you

live and all of the life forms that you share your habitat with, even

the ones that are threatening to you, because we are all interconnected.

Subsistence isn’t about dumpster diving, scams, food banks, stealing and

welfare cheques. It is directly participating in a collectivity’s future

and thus ensuring your own.

For now, a group of five or ten folks acquiring food and shelter

together is a form of surviving or pioneering. Fifteen or twenty people

providing food and shelter for themselves, communally rearing their

children and generally taking care of each other is perhaps the ember of

a clan, but true kinship probably takes a few generations.

When fifty or more people spend their lives, within the context of a

successful break from the current world of hierarchy and private

property and ideology, making sure that everyone within their group is

fed and sheltered and nurtured and have built an infrastructure of ways

and tools to assist them, anarchy begins to take hold.

This speculative glimpse is just my notion of how an urban area might

de-urbanize should the present social order get cast overboard. Today,

inhabitants of rural communes and eco-villages can practice some

subsistence skills, but these are generally projects of the fortunate,

out of reach of the majority, and can’t be viewed as the primary tactic

of a thrust toward autonomous, genuine communities embedded in nature. A

rural intentional community based around principles of mutual aid,

cooperation and ecology might be a qualitatively superior place to live

than most others, but truly self-directed people embedded in a habitat

requires secession from private property and a refusal to obey the laws

of both the market and the nation-state.

In the countryside practicing subsistence ways can immediately be part

of our means, but in the city, challenging urban ways is the necessary

first step.

Power abhors subsistence. Capitalism depends on obedient producers and

consumers spending our lives shopping and at work, not friends and

neighbors practicing communal self-reliance within a shared habitat. But

together we can say no, we can disobey, and in this negativity there

will birth a positive and creative force.