đŸ Archived View for library.inu.red âș file âș against-tradition-magical-context.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 07:41:01. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
âĄïž Next capture (2024-06-20)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Against Tradition: Anarchism in a Magical Context Author: Dr. Bones Date: April 10th 2016 Language: en Topics: Occult, paganism, spirituality. Magic, Insurrection, tradition Source: https://godsandradicals.org/2016/04/10/against-tradition-anarchism-in-a-magical-context/
It was a dream of fervent reality, of intense meaning, the kind of dream
that inspires prophets and builds religions. I could literally feel it
interrupt the visions I had been having, as if someone had changed the
channel my brain was viewing.
Suddenly before me in a forest scene is a Caucasian woman dressed in
brown clothing, simple yet complex in itâs unspoken elegance. Plain
though her clothes may be, every cell in my body is screaming that this
is no straightforward dream image, no mere human. An unknown aspect of
my own dream body makes a startling proclamation: This is Hestia.
Hestia, the Greek Goddess of the Hearth and Home, two subjects I had
been fanatically reading about for a week. For whatever reason I was
compelled to study the traditions of Hearth-Witchery, something far
removed from my own tradition; to this day I still have a spot on my
âfamilyâ altar for our homeâs Kobolds. I had thought it all simple
research, just something I had a passing interest in, but the somehow
ârealer-than-realâ Goddess that stood before me made it very clear that
perhaps my literary wanderings were being led all along.
After it was clear I understood just who and what she was she pointed to
a clearing in the forest. There a circle of woman danced semi-nude
around a fire, singing some kind of joyous song. My attention was again
drawn back to the Goddess. Her face wasâŠhaunting; beautiful yet
otherwordly. Hestia stated in no uncertain terms that she desired I
become her devotee and build her an altar in my home. Most might
consider this a special calling, perhaps even destiny.
I told her no.
Well, I politely told her I really appreciated the offer but could not
in good conscious become the servant of any god or goddess. I told her
Iâd give her special thanks and always remember to think of my home as a
place her spirit was welcomed and then went on my marry way. The forest
scene ended and I returned to my former nocturnal excursion.
When I tell this tale to the few pagan-oriented folk I know I often get
shocked looks and gasps. An ancient Greek goddess comes calling to you
and you deny her? You had been chosen and you said no? You denied the
will of the Gods?
Yes I had, just as easily as I will deny the Will of the State and
Society.
DR. BONES APRIL 10, 2016 12 COMMENTS
It was a dream of fervent reality, of intense meaning, the kind of dream
that inspires prophets and builds religions. I could literally feel it
interrupt the visions I had been having, as if someone had changed the
channel my brain was viewing.
Suddenly before me in a forest scene is a Caucasian woman dressed in
brown clothing, simple yet complex in itâs unspoken elegance. Plain
though her clothes may be, every cell in my body is screaming that this
is no straightforward dream image, no mere human. An unknown aspect of
my own dream body makes a startling proclamation: This is Hestia.
Hestia, the Greek Goddess of the Hearth and Home, two subjects I had
been fanatically reading about for a week. For whatever reason I was
compelled to study the traditions of Hearth-Witchery, something far
removed from my own tradition; to this day I still have a spot on my
âfamilyâ altar for our homeâs Kobolds. I had thought it all simple
research, just something I had a passing interest in, but the somehow
ârealer-than-realâ Goddess that stood before me made it very clear that
perhaps my literary wanderings were being led all along.
After it was clear I understood just who and what she was she pointed to
a clearing in the forest. There a circle of woman danced semi-nude
around a fire, singing some kind of joyous song. My attention was again
drawn back to the Goddess. Her face wasâŠhaunting; beautiful yet
otherwordly. Hestia stated in no uncertain terms that she desired I
become her devotee and build her an altar in my home. Most might
consider this a special calling, perhaps even destiny.
I told her no.
Well, I politely told her I really appreciated the offer but could not
in good conscious become the servant of any god or goddess. I told her
Iâd give her special thanks and always remember to think of my home as a
place her spirit was welcomed and then went on my marry way. The forest
scene ended and I returned to my former nocturnal excursion.
When I tell this tale to the few pagan-oriented folk I know I often get
shocked looks and gasps. An ancient Greek goddess comes calling to you
and you deny her? You had been chosen and you said no? You denied the
will of the Gods?
Yes I had, just as easily as I will deny the Will of the State and
Society.
Source: http://drachenmagier.deviantart.com/
This is not to say Iâm assuming I did so without consequences. Iâm very
well aware my own magic has limits and extra-dimensional entities that
are thousands of years old can turn me into a chew toy. People still
disappear with the faeriesâŠor worse. Put on your wizard goggles and
become acquainted with the mysterious death of Elisa Lam. Better yet
watch the last known video of her alive.
Sometimes we forget in magic is that weâre dealing with creatures quite
capable of making you disappear into a water tank, or better yet making
your whole town go poof. The world of the Occult is not underwater
basking weaving. We are fully aware we may not escape with our sanity,
much less our lives.
Itâs the same challenge any radical faces when confronting the American
Imperium. I was cornered by a random university student after I covered
a Bernie Sanders rally and told in hushed tones that I needed to be
careful, to be aware that I was surely on a âlist.â Iâve had family warn
me of the same thing, to be careful what I post online, to be careful
what I say. Even staunch patriots seem very aware of Black Site prisons
where âenhanced interrogationâ means rape and beatings. Liberals chide
the revolutionaries âHave you seen the kind of firepower the government
has? What theyâre capable of? Weâd never win. Theyâll simply mow us down
and declare martial law!â
Which could be true. The two possibilities of the Fedâs raiding my home
and making me disappear or a pissed off Goddess striking me blind could
have all happened. I could have and still can pay dearly. There is a
chance The Good Doctor will cross the Veil far quicker than most.
Yet while I can understand this, even accept that the risk as too great
or the outcome too certain, I refuse to be forced to obey these
circumstances because of what the other party is or what they can do. I
weigh probabilities but I do not take orders. My spiritual power and
psychical energy are MINE to be given freely as I desire. To have that
taken by office or custom is to lose what truly makes us human in the
first place.
To quote Nietzsche âwherever authority still forms part of good bearing,
where one does not give reasons but commands, the logician is a kind of
buffoon.â We follow goddessesâ and godâs, spiritâs and powerâs for
specific reasons whether a personal affinity, an unconscious spiritual
resonance or even simple tactical desires. But is it truly a
relationship when the two of us are simply forced to act a certain way,
when one party calls all the shots and the other simply follows? When
such behavior goes beyond simply âbecause it worksâ to âthis is the only
way?â
ââŠit is always the principle of useful suffering and willing sacrifice
that forms the most solid base for hierarchical power.â â Raoul
Vaneigem, Treatise On Living For The Use of the Young Generation
Perhaps this is the philosophical split between Occultism and the more
hierarchical forms of Polytheism or even militant radicals and mere
liberals: for some âthe lineâ extends as far as theyâve been told, for
others nothing will do unless they draw the line themselves. Few pagan
faiths allow priestesses or priests self-initiation. Magic is
practically rife with it and for good reason.
Gordon White in his new book The Chaos Protocols(review forthcoming)
notes:
âBoiled down to its essence, a self-initiation is a declaration to the
universe that you have a seat at the table, that your Highest is united
with your Lowest, and you expect the cosmic croupier to deal you in. It
is a fundamentally radical act, a transgressive move. It runs counter to
almost two thousand years of social, economic, and religious diktat.
There is a lot to burn through, which is why you must persist in your
transgression until the volume of High Strangeness in your life is so
extreme it cannot be interpreted as anything other than contact.â
Self-initiation? The individual bypassing years of established protocol
and getting direct contact with the spirit world? You canât do that! By
the Gods, what about our traditional hierarchies?
Only you can. And we have. Many times before.
I remind you it was this exact kind of transgression that started the
myriad of spiritual traditions we see in the world today, people called
by the spirits or seeking them out on a hunt for knowledge and power.
From Muhammed to Crowley a million times over âholy lawsâ or âspiritual
taboosâ were either broken or trampled on to amazing effect. Wicca,
Santeria, Thelema, Hoodoo, and any kind of magical activity pre-1800âs
was seen as a supreme violation of social mores and spiritual canon for
itâs host culture. In a world still dominated by Abrahamic faiths each
âholy hierarchyâ of every alternative faith has been born in blasphemy
and raised in rebellion. That they now put on an air of purity is either
foolishness or at worse hypocrisy.
There is no such thing as purity. Each magical order, each sacred
tradition, is founded on the last crime against the order before it. The
idea then that things must be âjust soâ too often is not founded on
practice but unquestioned doctrine.
Was not the first sorcerer, the first shaman, the prime transgressor?
That lonely human who wandered into the woods, quite possibly with a
head full of mushrooms, and decided that she would of her own accord
seek congress with the Those Who Dwell Outside? How many laws and divine
ordinances were shattered by that first contact?
The spirits of the Congo and West Coast of Africa were called up by
foreign names and drawn as European saints. This never stopped them.
Brigid too found herself petitioned for aid in cathedrals based upon a
Middle East religion. Never once did she falter. Isis and the Virgin
Mary, Thoth and Hermes, the pantheons of extra-dimensional intelligences
seem quite willing to change shape and change tastes.
Yet we alone remain locked rigidity.
Iâm not against limits because as a finite being no matter of philosophy
or esoteric know-how will allow me to walk on the sun. What I am
suspicious of is anybody or anything telling me such a thing is
unthinkable. Restrictions in liberty are a part of the natural world,
but the restriction of my Owness is what these rules and regulations aim
at. And for what? My benefit, the spirits, or the benefit of the
tradition itself?
Unique!â
There is a key difference between actual intercourse and mere
repetition. Individual-to-individual action on terms decided between two
intelligences often yields the strongest results and the most steadfast
allies because it is based on a legitimate relationship. We learn the
quirks of certain spirits, they get to know ours and over time a clearer
connection is made literally. In The Chaos Protocols Gordon White
provides the example of the Scole Experiments in which researchers had
to build a rapport of intercourse with twice-weekly seances for a year
before the earth-shattering manifestations began.
This was not the work of any community, lodge, or specific tradition.
This was a union of individuals united in purpose, creating an energetic
and personal relationship with the spirits themselves.
This connection between the individual and the Spirit World seen so
often is the lifeblood of magic: the better the connection, the better
the wet-ware âmelds,â the better weâll find the communication and
results. Established practice and well-worn paths make establishing this
connection easier. There is a moment however where, to preserve itself,
the tradition begins to take control of these pathways to communication.
The Anarchist Philosopher Max Stirner says:
âIf a union [Verein] has crystallized into a society, it has ceased to
be a coalition⊠it has become a unitedness, come to a standstill,
degenerated into a fixity; it is â dead as a union, it is the corpse of
the union or the coalition, i.e. it is âsociety, community.â
What heâs saying is that the minute our relationship to the Spirits
crystallizes into something non-organic, something that exists for itâs
own sake rather than our own, we lose something significant: ourselves.
We become mere cogs in the clockwork, a living breathing mechanical
device for the propagation of our tradition. Bound in the psychical
armor of law, custom, and oath we become storm-troopers, true believers,
mere vessels to be filled by things other than ourselves. The community
owns us rather than us owning it.
Stirner:
âEvery community has the propensity, stronger or weaker according to the
fullness of its power, to become an authority to its members and to set
limits for them: it asks, and must ask, for a âsubjectâs limited
understandingâ; it asks that those who belong to it be subjected to it,
be its âsubjectsâ; it exists only by subjection. In this a certain
tolerance need by no means be excluded; on the contrary, the society
will welcome improvements, corrections, and blame, so far as such are
calculated for its gain: but the blame must be âwell-meaning,â it may
not be âinsolent and disrespectfulâ â in other words, one must leave
uninjured, and hold sacred, the substance of the societyâŠ.
There is a difference whether my liberty or my ownness is limited by a
society. If the former only is the case, it is a coalition, an
agreement, a union; but, if ruin is threatened to ownness, it is a power
of itself, a power above me, a thing unattainable by me, which I can
indeed admire, adore, reverence, respect, but cannot subdueâŠand that for
the reason that I am resigned. It exists by my resignation, my
self-renunciation, my spiritlessnessâ
This tightening of ideological control naturally begins to extend to the
spirits themselves. We are told we must act this-and-that way, say
spells or pray in this specific manner because it ends up serving the
interests of the community itself. It grants it an air of sacredness.
Why must I obey the Police Officer? Because he is a servant of the
âLaw.â Why must I call Legba in this manner? Because that is the way of
Vodun. We become servants to these spiritual ideologies, their
territorial maps and nested practices. We become more invested in the
trappings than ourselves and the actual spirits. We trade union for
society.
From the North Pole to Australia we have seen that spirits work in a
million different ways. These societies whether covens, lineages, or
âschoolsâ in reality are only tools, styles, well worn paths spirits
recognize, nothing else, just like nations, cultures, and âpeoples.â
Nobody has a monopoly on the âTruth,â nobody has âthe one true path,â
nobody is anymore âspecialâ than anybody else. Every âspiritual lineageâ
today could be wiped off the globe tomorrow in a host of nuclear fire
and provided there were still people around a million more would replace
them.
The sanctity of tradition is an illusion, much like the unquestionable
nature of the Gods themselves.
Perhaps itâs only a leap from believing a traditionâs word is law to
believing the forces serviced by those traditions are just as
untouchable. We regard the spirits as something alien to ourselves,
something purer and wiser. We instead would do better to acknowledge we
are cut from the same cloth as they, existing for a moment in a
different realm. One day we shall return.
Though spirits may have far greater power or greater reach than we do
this does not automatically mean they know whatâs best for us.
The cosmic myths of the Gnostics had as a stated goal to âliberateâ
themselves from the powers of the Zodiac, Ceremonial Magicians bound
goetic princes so that they might be free from their influence, and
anybody with a Ouija board can tell you that quite often spirits lie.
So why grovel?
I freely acknowledge powers and intelligences larger and stronger than
my own, but I will not give over MY own power to question them, to
analyze and make my own choices regardless of how they might feel. I do
not give whatever food my actions might be to spirits simply because
they say so or worse, because this is how it must be done. Dogmatism and
an unthinking faith are the tools of slavemasters, whether they come
from a hammer and sickle or a pentagram.
We must not forget then that we have just as much right to say no, to
decline the will of the spirits as freely as they can decline ours. We
seek etheric unions, not spiritual servitude. And if these choices bring
situations where the spirit decides to force our hand? We will charm,
cleanse, pray, and work ourselves out of them! Failing that, we will
loudly intone the words of Insurrectionist Marius Jacob when he was
brought before the court of the French State:
âI donât ask for either pardon or indulgence. I donât go begging to
those I hate and hold in contempt. You are the stronger. Dispose of me
as you wish; send me to a penal colony or the scaffold. I donât care!â
Hundreds of years of peasants putting the statues of hesitant saints
upside down to make them work speaks volumes on the two-way nature of
force between worlds. We were not built to be mere worshipers.
Iâm not advocating storming heaven. Remember: spirits kill people for
much less. Iâm merely reminding you the right to live isnât begged for,
itâs taken.
From The Chaos Protocols:
âIf any of this sounds too much like bullying spirits, I recommend
taking the ayahuasca/shamanism route mentioned at the top of this
chapter instead. It may serve to re-frame your opinion away from cartoon
fairies at the bottom of an Edwardian garden more toward the intense and
occasionally unpleasant realities of extradimensional contact. The
spirit world is certainly holy, but that does not mean it is nice.
Shamanism, for instance, is better described as âwrangling and tradingâ
with the spirit world than anything we might consider worship.â
If a spirit bothers you, remove it and seal your home against it. If a
particular goddessesâ game plan does not suit you, walk off the field.
If you seek knowledge and magic, go out and find it yourself. If you
like to work with poppets more than candles donât let anyone or anything
tell you that you canât. Go out and find the ways you can. Hell if it
suits your fancy join a long standing current, school, lodge or
tradition. Limit yourself to a cultural pantheon you find particularly
appealing if you want.
There are no judges, no laws, no rules in this world. There is only
force and the powers that can wield it.
Never forget that youâre such a power too...