💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › georges-palante-individualism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:39:11. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Individualism Author: Georges Palante Date: June 15, 1911 Language: en Topics: individualism Source: Retrieved on 2016-10-28 from http://marxists.architexturez.net/archive/palante/1911/individualism.htm Notes: Source: L’Anarchie no. 323, June 15, 1911; Translated: by Mitch Abidor for marxists.org; CopyLeft: Creative Commons (Attribute & ShareAlike) marxists.org 2006.
As is the case elsewhere, the tendency to underestimate the individual
has made itself felt in the intellectual field. Solitary thought –
invention – has been depreciated to the profit of collective thought –
imitation – preached under the eternal word of solidarity. The horror of
the previously untried, of intellectual and esthetic originality, is a
characteristic trait of Latin races. We love regimented thought,
conformist and decent meditations. A German writer, Laura Marholm,
accurately analyzed this contemporary tendency: “Intellectual cowardice
is a universal trait. No one dares makes a decisive statement concerning
his milieu. No one any longer allows himself an original thought.
Original thought only dares present itself when it is supported by a
group: it has to have gathered together several adherents in order to
dare show itself. You must be one of many before daring to speak. This
is an indication of universal democratization, a democratization that is
still at its beginnings, and is characterized by a reaction against
international capital, which until now has had at its disposal all the
means of military and legislative defense. No one dares to rely on
himself alone. An idea that contravenes received ideas almost never
manages to make itself known. The propagation of an antipathetic idea is
circumscribed and hindered by a thousand anonymous censors, among which
the official censorship of he state has only a minor role.”
The result of this tendency is that we no longer exist and think for
ourselves. We think according to hearsay and slogans.
It is especially from the moral point of view that the crushing of
personal egoism by group egoism is intolerable. We too well know the
pettiness of the group spirit, the gregarious coalitions engaged, more
than anything, in fighting against superior individualities, the
solidarity in irresponsibility, all these forms of diminished humanity.
It is the same with perfect solidarity as it is with absolute justice,
absolute altruism, absolute monism. These are abstract principles
untranslatable in real terms. Each man has his special conception of
solidarity, justice, his way to interpret the fas and the nefas in
keeping with his coterie, class, etc. interests.
“As soon as an idea is set loose,” said Remy de Gourmont, “ if we thus
set it nakedly in circulation in its trip across the world it joins all
kinds of parasitic vegetation. Sometimes the original organism
disappears, entirely devoured by the egoistic colonies that develop
there. An amusing example of these deviations in thought was given by
the corporation of house painters at the ceremony called ‘The Triumph of
the Republic.” The workers carried around a banner where their demands
for justice were summed up in this cry: ‘Down with ripolin!’ You must
know that ripolin is a prepared paint that anyone can spread across
woodwork. We can thus understand the sincerity of this wish and its
ingenuity. Ripolin here represents injustice and oppression; it’s the
enemy, the devil. We all have our own ripolin and we color according to
our needs the abstract ideas that, without this, would be of no personal
use to us.”
The ideal is soiled in contact with reality:
Pearl before falling, and mire after.