💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › moxie-marlinspike-the-promise-of-defeat.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 12:46:21. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: The Promise of Defeat
Author: Moxie Marlinspike
Language: en
Topics: anti-capitalism, squatting, illegalism

Moxie Marlinspike

The Promise of Defeat

Sometimes I think about my life as a series of schemes, plans, plots,

and experiments. Everything I've tried, every hare-brained scheme I've

hatched, every implausible thought I've run with up until this moment.

And if I'm really honest with myself, the trail of ideas that disappears

into the horizon behind me is completely and utterly mined over with

failures. Comic failures, tragic failures, dramatic failures — failures

of all types.

Anarchists are best known for their failures. They lost the Spanish

Civil War, the Soviets prevailed in Hungary '56, the Paris communards

were shot to death, and the status quo continued after May '68. And yet,

far from trying to suppress these histories, these are the stories that

anarchists recount. Even anarchist holidays tend to commemorate moments

of dazzling defeat: Haymarket, Sacco & Vanzetti, Berkman's botched

assassination, etc...

This is unusual. American Patriots do not speak, with a gleam in their

eyes, of the incredible number of battles that George Washington lost

(and he lost almost as much as anarchists do). Instead he's there, at

the bow of that boat, guiding the way through the expansive darkness, as

he crosses the Delaware river to victory. The prevailing holidays of the

various nation states, religions, and authoritarian movements that we've

grown up with do not generally harp on their failures. Instead, they

choose to celebrate Independence Days, Resurrections, and the Wars They

Won.

The difference between the ways Nationalists and Anarchists talk about

their histories seems critical. Of course, it's very possible that

anarchists talk about defeat simply because they have no other histories

to choose from. But I like to think that it's because Anarchists see

past the tendency towards quantifiability. That they know there are

moments in time, even preceding defeat, where people learn more about

themselves, and feel a greater sense of inspiration from what they're

experiencing, than from all the George Washingtons victoriously sailing

across all the Delaware rivers of the world.

Here's a story about defeat.

I live in a city that some people would call a "high pressure zone" — a

place with a thriving service sector and a centrality to the workings of

the global economy. Real estate values here have been exploding for

decades now, and the difficulty that this presents is something that I'm

almost constantly dealing with.

The ways that we choose to respond to difficulty are interesting.

Cultures of all types are constantly institutionalizing certain

responses, and to some extent the responses we choose often reflect

cultural rules as much as anything else. Anarchists are not immune to

this. If you're hungry, the anarchist answer is dumpster diving. If you

need space, the anarchist answer is squatting. But maybe it shouldn't be

as simple as this. We live complex lives in the midst of complex

situations, which to some degree will always defy recipes and

generalized responses. Besides, trying the same things over and over

again causes them to eventually lose their charm. Shouldn't the

anarchist response embody inspiration, dynamicism, and experimentation

in an unpredictable way?

At some point I started to think critically about my strategies for

dodging the high rents and impossible space constraints in the city

where I live. The anarchist recipe of trying to squat the few empty

buildings I could find didn't really work for me in a town where the

pressure is so high.

Instead I started to wonder about the possibilities of the ocean; where

the harsh lines of property ended, and an apparent sense of possibility

began. The idea seemed obvious: pirates. Here it was, the experiment

that I'd been looking for all along. The story I'd known about since the

naive Halloweens of my childhood. A floating piece of autonomy, off the

shores of capitalism, but still within cannon range.

I didn't know anything about boats, sailing, or what might lay beyond

the horizon. But I suspected that, like anything, the secret was to

begin.

And so with only a sense of inspiration under our belts, some

co-conspirators and I started to try and make this happen. We found a

very old, very derelict, 55' triple-masted schooner. Finding this boat

was like finding another world, and the shape of my time changed

completely. Suddenly I was fiberglassing, caulking, and epoxying. I was

sanding, painting, and scraping. I was cursing dry-rot as my sworn

enemy, and finding a friend in fungus-hunting epoxy. I was going to

sleep with sunburn on my face and waking up with sawdust in my hair. I

felt strong at the end of the day with engine grease on my hands and

soot on my neck.

I would question the whole ocean experiment when, in time, I would find

myself alone on a boat in the Pacific Ocean, with no land in sight,

trying to repair the rigging as I swung violently from the top of the

mast. Or in the Caribbean, when I finally saw Haiti emerge from the

horizon, only to spend two days completely becalmed before it under the

blazing hot sun. It was easy to start questioning where I was going, and

why I was traveling by the slowest means possible. But it felt right. I

learned about survival, isolation, and adversity. I came to know things

about the ocean, the wind, and the sky. I even learned a little about

insanity.

Years later, after being out of town for a few months, I once again

found myself without a place to live upon my return. Rather than pass

the time as a houseguest, I started sleeping on the roof of a large

building. It was just before an anarchist bookfair, though, and so I was

preparing zines and CDs to table there. As the inventory of my

possessions on-hand grew far beyond the size of my backpack, I found

myself in an increasingly absurd situation. Every night, as stealthily

as possible, I'd carry spools of three hundred CDRs, an external hard

drive, a desktop inkjet printer, and a bike up to the roof of this

building. It was the kind of situation where, rather than going to sleep

with the anxiety of being caught, I'd doze off while chuckling about the

image of what that would look like. There I would be, caught squatting a

rooftop, surrounded with the accouterments of a full CD pressing

operation.

Not to mention that I'd finally broken down and gotten an electric

toothbrush for my ever-depleting gum line. I mean, it's acceptable to

charge your cellphone in a cafe, but your toothbrush? People were

constantly looking at me like "Is that you're toothbrush you're

charging?" And I'd give them a look that says "Fuck yeah, that's my

toothbrush. Sonicare 2000."

It couldn't continue, though. The weather was preparing to change, and

there were things that I wanted to do which required more space

consistency than what my rooftop provided. Instead, as a part of all

that I'd discovered off-shore in my sailing experiments, I resolved to

try building a floating house along the derelict waterfront of my city.

Something that would provide a lot of room and remain more-or-less

stationary, but which I could dock more mobile boats to. The home base

for an emerging armada, with room for friends to build their own

adjacent floating islands.

I talked with some friends who were excited about trying the same thing.

We didn't know anything about building floating houses, but decided to

test a design and see if it worked. So we drew up a rough sketch that

was essentially a series of 12'x8' platforms, each floating on six

sealed 55-gallon barrels. The idea was that the 12x8 platforms could be

built and floated one at a time. Then they would be joined together once

they were in the water. From there, we could build structures on top of

them.

Scotch and I went out together on the late-night material scavenging

missions. We rode our bikes through unknown parts of the city,

discovering strange abandoned warehouses on collapsing piers that have

become islands in themselves, surreal concrete anomalies, and mazes of

unusual relics from a long-past shipping industry. Our shadows played

over the wreckage of the forgotten landscape under the late-night sodium

lamps, as we clambered over fences, crouched in the dark, and stared in

wonder through broken windows. It's amazing how something as simple as

scouting for active construction sites can shake up your sense of

geography so significantly, by forcing you to take the roads you don't

normally take, and to go slow enough to really look at the things around

you.

We'd have races up the hill to the bike cart while carrying sheets of

plywood, our lungs stinging with the cold night air. We'd do our best to

stifle laughter every time we'd drop something with a dramatic crash, or

every time the bike cart toppled the entire load into the street.

There's nothing quite as funny as watching your friend try to quietly

throw an empty 55-gallon steel drum over a razor-wire fence. And it's

hard not to smile when you realize that there's nothing quite as

conspicuous as towing a bike trailer down empty city streets at 3am,

with ten 16' lengths of 2x4 extending far into the road behind you.

Our days were spent down at the abandoned waterfront with a brace

(manual drill / screw driver) and hand saw, where we'd assemble the

platforms and attach the sealed barrels to them. The work was fun, we

were by the ocean, and we ended up meeting a number of interesting

characters. All the construction was happening on a giant piece of

concrete embedded into the shore, which had a number of small holes in

it. One day a guy suddenly appeared behind me out of nowhere, and when I

turned around he scared the daylights out of me. He explained that he

lived below the shore, and motioned to one of the holes in the concrete.

I looked down into the dark depths below, and he offered to take me in

and show me around.

We both barely fit through the hole, but it opened up into a large cave

that echoed with the lapping sounds of the ocean. My new friend liked to

drink gin, and he told me all kinds of stories about that section of the

waterfront, everything he's seen, and the various riff-raff (referring

to me) that he'd encountered over the years. I asked if my construction

project was disturbing him, and he assured me that he was interested in

seeing me carry the thing through.

So a few nights later, some friends and I floated the first section —

all alone on the derelict shore, with only the moonlight glinting off

the water to help us. It took five of us to flip it over and get it

poised above the rising tide. It went in with a splash, and rode high.

Seeing it actually float was amazing, and we all looked at each other

with huge grins. We jumped on it, danced on it, and eventually just sat

on it together as we talked and looked out over the bay. When it got

late, we rowed it a little ways off shore and anchored it, where it

would wait for other platforms to join it.

And so I spent the next week, gradually getting to know some of the

other strange characters who had made this wreckage their home. The

platforms slowly came together as we managed to find more and more

barrels.

One day I came down to the shore, ready to put the finishing touches on

another platform. But when I looked up, I noticed that the entire

floating apparatus was gone. All that remained was an empty patch of

water. With a shock, I searched up and down the shore, but didn't see

signs of it anywhere. Eventually I found some people fishing, who said

that they saw a boat full of people with orange vests arrive, unmoore

it, and tow it away.

I called the police and the coast guard, before eventually determining

that it had been done at the behest of a man named Hadley Prince, from

the Port Authority.

Hadley Prince.

The name alone conjured images of some robber baron industrialist,

twirling his handle-bar mustache with menace and condescendingly

adjusting his top-hat. In reality, he was your average looking

bureaucrat with a demeanor that embodied the typical lack of sympathy.

He admitted to having been the one who ordered the hit on my floating

house, and when I showed him the relevant sections of the state and city

code (which prohibited him from taking such an action), he was very

clear about his ability to do whatever he wanted — regardless of the

law. When I pressed the matter even further, he looked down at my

highlighted stack of paper, paused, then stood up abruptly and shouted

"Get the fuck out of my office!"

I wasn't entirely surprised, but it felt terrible.

Objectively, this was defeat. In one swift move, my whole project had

been destroyed by the Port Authority. There was not even any sign that

my floating island had ever rested amongst the odd pilings and concrete

slabs along that waterfront. And they had laughed in my face as they did

it. It made me incredibly angry, and I did my best to portray that

contempt.

But in a way I was prepared for it. Just like with the task of

destroying capitalism, there were dizzying odds against me that I

couldn't ignore.

For anarchists, I think that victory is a kind of anathema. Will there

ever be a night — one glorious evening — when the world is won? Where

suddenly civilization, the spectacle, class, racism, and patriarchy all

simultaneously topple and remain in ruins?

Will there ever be a day when my housing desires are sated? Where I

suddenly come into possession of a palace — under a maze of linked

treehouses and a large skylab telescope — with room for all my friends

and loved ones? Where property tax is on holiday, and all the building

inspectors are out on permanent leave? Where me and all my housemates

have finally overcome all our neuroses, mental anguish, and trauma to

live with perfectly fulfilling relationships?

It seems unlikely to happen in one moment.

The George Washingtons of the world offer success. This is based on

"realism" and the logic of quantifiability, where it is necessary to

make compromises, pass laws, and assert control. Because these are the

things that can be won; this is where success is found. According to

them, at the end of this experiment I was left with nothing, and so it

would have made more sense to sell my soul to a mortgage for a mediocre

house (that doesn't even float!) or pay rent as best I can for the rest

of my life.

Anarchy, by contrast, offers us defeat. This is a logic that transcends

quantifiability, emphasizes our desires, and focuses on the tensions we

feel. Anarchists are such failures because, really, there can be no

victory. Our desires are always changing with the the context of our

conditions and our surroundings. What we gain is what we manage to tease

out of the conflicts between what we want and where we are. What I "won"

were the wistful moon-light bike rides, the realization of hidden

geography, the time spent with friends, the dance parties, the nights of

discovery, the chance to be in control of my surroundings, and those

fleeting moments of elation. Not to mention the opportunity to give

Hadley Prince the contempt that he deserves.

I wish that they hadn't destroyed my project. Longevity by itself,

though, says very little. The state has been around longer than I can

remember, and capitalism has been around for quite a while as well. Not

to mention, how many anarchist infoshops or community centers have been

around for years, but have lost the spark they'd started with long ago?

This is to say that we should never cease, even if all the banks burn

and the dams of the world over come crashing down. It's what allows us

to resist the institutionalization of our desires, the creeping

bureaucracy, the language of patriarchy, or whatever we might find. My

wish is to always hold that tension with me.

This is not to say that we should all sacrifice ourselves by hurling our

bodies indiscriminately against the crushing walls of capitalism. Just

the opposite. That given the anathema of victory, it's important to

consider just how defeat should look.

Remember that success is a word used to measure. It describes dollars

made, people counted, votes cast. In other words, it's a swindle. The

rejection of quantification, the emphasis on the role of the individual,

is what makes anarchism unique. There is no one battle I can fight to

win this, even if I were to sail across the Delaware to fight it.