💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › insurrection-and-utopia-part-two.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:52:27. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Insurrection and Utopia, Part 2: “You say you want a Revolution?” “Not exactly…”
Author: Dr. Bones
Language: en
Topics: ideology

Dr. Bones

Insurrection and Utopia, Part 2: “You say you want a Revolution?” “Not

exactly…”

“Magick is the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity

with Will.” Isn’t that what they say?

If the entire world, from human culture to technology, is the byproduct

of the Ruling Ideology and is literally shaped and molded by it we must

do nothing less then change everything; reform is not an option because

the sheer act of of working “within the system” actually reinforces

existing ideologies. That’s been the key to the whole thing: each

generation fine tunes and updates the existing ideological experience,

making it bearable and palatable to them and thus preserves it. It’s the

reason identity politics and purely social revolutions are so eagerly

supported. The people at the top don’t really care if the definition of

marriage is broadened or restricted as long as we keep depending on them

to do it, they don’t care if there’s a black or female president as long

as we still keep electing presidents. But the moment we begin to dream

or to live lives outside this mental space the jackboots come crashing

down because the minute we do so we are, in effect, creating a new

mental space for ourselves and others to live in. Don’t think so? It’s

through this process that we ended up with the world we have today:

This is not an intended or natural element of human life; rather, it is

an artificial arrangement constructed by those who wish to own the

world. ‘One thing, however, is clear – Nature does not produce on the

one side owners of money or commodities, and on the other men possessing

nothing but their own labour-power,’ explains Marx. ‘This relation has

no natural basis, neither is its social basis one that is common to all

historical periods. It is clearly the result of a past historical

development, the product of many economic revolutions, of the extinction

of a whole series of older forms of social production.

This ideological battle ground is the key. It’s the reason they laughed

at Occupy and than brutally broke it’s back, it’s the reason Food Not

Bombs is more aggressively treated than Neo-Nazi rallies, it’s the

reason why the authority of a police officer must never be questioned,

it’s the reason homeless people are not allowed to build semi-permanent

structures and must rely on socially stigmatized “aid.” We are

confronting virtual structures, living symbols that power the entire

artifice.

Money powers everything. Not having Money is bad. Obey what we deem to

be Authority. Break these symbols and you break the spell we’ve all

fallen under. Break the spell and you might start casting some yourself.

Because you see things like Capitalism, Hierarchy, these are things not

just in the world but that live within our heads. They are ideas,

constructs, “spooks” as the Anarchist philosopher Max Stirner referred

to them. As long as we still have them there they’ll continue to exist

out here, and if they exist out here they will mold and shape our

thoughts and actions out there.

“Ideology is a process accomplished by the so-called thinker

consciously, indeed, but with a false consciousness. The real motives

impelling him remain unknown to him, otherwise it would not be an

ideological process at all. Hence he imagines false or apparent motives.

Because it is a process of thought he derives both its form and its

content from pure thought, either his own or that of his predecessors.

He works with mere thought material which he accepts without examination

as the product of thought, he does not investigate further for a more

remote process independent of thought; indeed its origin seems obvious

to him, because as all action is produced through the medium of thought

it also appears to him to be ultimately based upon thought.”-Engels

How many times have you heard “this is as good as it gets?” Or “this is

the only world possible?” Is this the same species that went from riding

in horse drawn carriages to landing on the moon in the space of about 70

years? To imagine that we’ve hit some built-in wall in human development

is insane. This, comrades, is the Spell of Ideology. Of course this is

“as good as it gets” if the mental structures rattling around in your

head confirm that it is indeed so. You will literally make that world,

you will live it, because your mind is convinced that is what you, in

the Nietzschean sense, Will to Create. We’re stuck bargaining for bits

and pieces of the pie because we can’t fathom ever owning it all.

Joseph McMoneagle in his book “Mind Trek” talks about how before a

Remote Viewing session the investigator would spend about an hour

talking with the subject about various psychic and paranormal topics.

The reason? It prepped the subjects mind into believing Remote Viewing

was possible. If they thought it was quite real and possible they, as if

by magic, were able to do it. Beginner’s usually had better luck than

trained users because they lacked the mental data to disprove or doubt

the whole experience.

The witches and wizards amongst you should have bells and whistles going

off in your head.

We’re talking about people moving their consciousness outside of space

and time to view events, places, and people, all through a tiny shift in

ideology; in believing such a thing was not only possible but probable.

If this recognition of probable possibilities can do THAT, what kind of

world can we create with it?

Towards a New Utopia

“So the paradox is that it’s much easier to imagine the end of all life

on Earth than a much more modest radical change in capitalism, which

means that we should reinvent Utopia, but in what sense? There are two

false meanings of Utopia. One is this old notion of imagining an ideal

society, which we know will never be realized. The other is the

capitalist Utopia in the sense of new perverse desires that you are not

only allowed but even solicited to realize. The true Utopia is when the

situation is so without issue, without a way to resolve it within the

coordinates of the possible, that out of the pure urge of survival you

have to invent a new space. Utopia is not kind of a free imagination.

Utopia is a matter of innermost urgency. You are forced to imagine it as

the only way out, and this is what we need today.” –Slajov Zizek

Let me give you an example of how this dreaming works. Driverless cars

are being tested and developed. Uber’s costs are primarily paying the

driver. No driver and the cost goes down immensely, so low in fact it

will be cheaper to simply grab a self-driving car for a ride then

actually owning one.

So we have two potential futures:

A) Rentable self-driving cars become the wave of the future, eliminating

vehicle ownership. You cannot get anywhere without paying a fee for it,

the companies can charge whatever they like, and the minute a big car

crash happens they will decry person-driven cars as “dangerous” and

lobby the State to ban them on major roads “for our safety,” thus

creating a privately-owned technological monopoly. All transit becomes

commercialized and a matter of transactions.

B) We create socially funded free transportation for all.

Both options are entirely possible, both sitting in that hazy realm of

possibility so frequently added to and pulled from by the magically

inclined. Which one will be born? The one that is summoned by the

prevailing ideology. There are literally thousands of these questions

answered everyday on the micro and macro level, questions we may not

have even thought to ask; the world is created at each second, so too

it’s future.

So we must begin to dream again, to evoke and invoke a world as yet

unborn; we must remake our utopia. We must imagine and desire a world

beyond capital and devoid of hierarchy, as impossible as it sounds,

because by dreaming it we unconsciously strive towards it. And it’s been

done successfully before. Let your forgotten history be recalled by the

great Murray Bookchin.

The Paris Commune ran an entire city based on neighborhood councils with

the communicative speed of horseback; Mahkno’s Ukraine created freely

run Anarchist communes and schools, all without police, jails, or

borders; areas of Anarchist Spain completely abolished money altogether,

actually living “from each according to their ability, to each according

to their need.” These are things we’ve been told time and time again

were impossible, went against “human nature,” and yet there they stand,

only being overcome when the literal weight of the world was put against

them…because they knew, just as the Powers That Be do today, to admit

them victory would call the entirety of “what’s possible” into question.

The Zapatistas and Rojava cantons are proving the power to dream, that

the unconscious sorcerous summoning of new worlds is still as dangerous

and effective as it once was.

Partisans of a World Not Yet Born

So we dream new worlds. Is that enough? You can burn candles all day to

get a new job, you still have to actually looking. Is revolution the

answer? Max Stirner didn’t think so.

The revolution aimed at new arrangements; insurrection leads us no

longer to let ourselves be arranged, but to arrange ourselves, and sets

no glittering hopes on ‘institutions’. It is not a fight against the

established […] it is only a working forth of me out of the established.

What is “the revolution?” It’s a dream that has no legs to walk one, a

fight we’re always going to have at sometime in the future. The dream

betrays itself. By always seeing it as in the future we damn it to be

so, it will also be some hazy future off in the distance, a utopia of a

future conflict to possibly change things. Dangerous thinking lies here!

We are dreaming of a future possibility, a mere chance to change things

rather than changing them now. “Ho ho, just you wait. When the

revolution comes around things are going to be different. Yessir. Now,

how may I take your order?”

And if the chance does come around, what then? We inherit a world soaked

in a conflicting ideology, a machine geared impossibly away from the

kind of lives we seek to create. And since THE revolution has occurred

we become immediate conservatives; there is no room for things to adapt,

to change, to grow, because the “Event” in Zizek’s terms has already

happened. We become the kings, queens, and keepers of the very thing we

sought to destroy. The physical map may change but the mental

co-ordinates are still the same. From Anarchopdia:

“Stirner recognises the importance of self-liberation and the way that

authority often exists purely through its acceptance by the governed. As

he argues, “… no thing is sacred of itself, but my declaring it sacred,

by my declaration, my judgement, my bending the knee; in short, by my

conscience.” [Ibid. p. 72] It is from this worship of what society deems

“sacred” that individuals must liberate themselves in order to discover

their true selves. And, significantly, part of this process of

liberation involves the destruction of hierarchy. For Stirner,

“Hierarchy is domination of thoughts, domination of mind!,” and this

means that we are “kept down by those who are supported by thoughts”

[Ibid., p. 74], i.e. by our own willingness to not question authority

and the sources of that authority, such as private property and the

state.”

We can have no change, no “revolution,” if the old order and old systems

we seek to destroy are still acting as “spooks” in our heads. Any

physical change in the balance of power must first be won in the world

of ideas: a Jungian, Alchemical, inner-revolution. Freed from the

“spooks” of capitalism and hierarchy the newly awakened individual

recreates the world around her on the basis of a new ideology. Mahkno

writes:

“The free man, on the other hand, has thrown away the trammels of the

past together with its lies and brutality. He has buried the rotten

corpse of slavery and the notion that the past is better. Man has

already partially liberated himself from the fog of lies and brutality,

which enslaved him from the day of his birth, from the worship of the

bayonet, money, legality, and hypocritical science. While man frees

himself from this insult he understands himself better, and once he has

understood himself, the book of his life is opened to him. In it he

immediately sees that his former life was nothing but loathsome slavery

and that this framework of slavery has conspired to stifle all his

innate good qualities. He sees that this life has turned him into a

beast of burden, a slave for some or a master over others, or into a

fool who tears down and tramples on all that is noble in man when

ordered to do so. But when freedom awakes in man, it treads all

artificialities into the dust and all that stands in the way of

independent creativity. This is how man moves in his process of

development…

“The man of protest, who has fully grasped his identity and who now sees

with his eyes fully open, who now thirsts for freedom and totality, now

creates groups of free men welded together by the ideal and by the

action. Whoever comes into contact with these groups will cast off his

status of lackey and will free himself from the idiot domination of

others over him. Any ordinary man who comes from the plough, the

factory, the bench of the university or from the bench of the academic

will recognize the degradation of slavery. As man uncovers his true

personality, he will throw away all artificial ideas, which go against

the rights of his personality, the Master/Slave relationship of modern

society. As soon as man brings to the fore the pure elements in his

personality through which a new, free human community is born, he will

become an anarchist and revolutionary. This is how the ideal of

anarchism is assimilated and disseminated by men; the free man

recognizes its deep truth, its clarity, and its purity, its message of

freedom and creativity.”

Utopian Insurrectionists

So, putting it all together, what is it we must do?

We must be crafters and dreamers, builders and thinkers. We must learn

to identify the prevailing ideology and how it infects and moves in us

as well as others, even objects and concepts. Then me must break those

bonds within that mental space; we must kill our Inner Fascist. And when

we do that, and the symbols of Capitalism, State, and Hierarchy have

been disenchanted we can begin to evoke our Utopia, our dreams into

reality. We can engage in conversations and do things that challenge the

prevailing ideas of what is possible; we can fight for and create

liberated spaces where this world can begin to manifest.

There are ways to do this today. Here’s 42 of them. We can start our

Insurrection now.

Rather than dogmatically hold on to one method or tactic or we should

instead follow Stirner’s advice to “have no wish to become a slave to my

maxims, but…rather subject them to my ongoing criticism” as the struggle

continues to evolve. We have no idea how things might change or in what

ways things might manifest, when situations might become more heated or

more cool. Rosa Luxemborg stated there were no “perfect” or “objective”

times for any historical condition, they only appear so when viewed as

something in the past; that each “premature” attempt at the working

people seizing power existed to further train the people as a whole, who

could only reach the “mature conditions” necessary for widespread

societal change by the very education gained in these earlier,

“premature,” struggles. We must regain that old revolutionary patience,

fighting for a world we may never get to see; but while we live, rather

than simply “reacting” to things or trying to “fix” the world, we need

to build our own.

Any action that moves towards a new way of thinking, by it’s sheer

existence, forces others to have an interior conversation with

themselves. This descent into Spookland causes long-held and prevailing

ideas to be questioned or thrown away altogether. Ideology informs and

molds reality. Change one and you change the other. Victor Serge in

“Birth Of Our Power” described the situation in a conversation between

his characters:

Rather than wait for a future conflict to bring the chance of change we

must act and fight as if the world of our dreams is but a hair’s breadth

away today.

Because if we do, one day we’ll wake up in it.