💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › crimethinc-insurrection-is-not-a-game.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 08:35:56. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Insurrection is Not a Game Author: CrimethInc. Date: June 4, 2018 Language: en Topics: games, interview, insurrection Source: Retrieved on 17th June 2021 from https://crimethinc.com/2018/06/04/insurrection-is-not-a-game-play-resistance-and-designing-the-game-bloc-by-bloc
What is an anarchist game? Is it a game that promotes anarchist values?
A game that depicts anarchist activities? A game that subverts and
destabilizes power structures? What can gaming theory teach
anarchists—and what can anarchists teach through games? To explore these
and other questions, we conducted the following interview with TL, game
designer and artist of Bloc by Bloc: The Insurrection Game.
Why do you think creative activity is important for anarchists?
Creative resistance is one of the essential elements of a thriving
anarchist movement. Play and imagination allow for the kind of
experimentation that can reveal cracks in the systems of control.
Anarchists need to be able to imagine other worlds and other forms of
life in order to position their activities in opposition to this one.
When creativity is allowed to flourish in anarchist spaces, it’s easier
to neutralize stifling and toxic modes of social organization.
Is Bloc by Bloc just a form of entertainment? Or are there other
dimensions to the project and what you hope it will accomplish in the
world?
Bloc by Bloc is a tabletop game that simulates the urban rebellions that
we have seen in cities around the world over the past 10 or 15 years.
The goal of this project is to produce a fun and educational gaming
experience. I don’t want to pretend this is anything more than that.
That’s one of the reasons the graphics in Bloc by Bloc are playful,
reminiscent of colorful cartoons. It’s important that we don’t take the
project too seriously or overstate its political impact. That would be
misleading and disrespectful to everyone who has been out there in the
streets in real struggles that have real consequences.
But games can be powerful tools for exploring complex ideas. That’s one
of the main reasons I continue to work in this medium.
When we play games, we create stories out of the interaction between
players, game mechanics, and components. The best games craft rich and
emergent stories that change each time we play them. These stories
mirror archetypical narratives that we find throughout society. This is
why games can feel so meaningful: they create a temporary space in which
we can safely explore the stories that define our lives. This space is
referred to as “the magic circle.”
Bloc by Bloc creates a magic circle in which players can explore stories
of contemporary revolt and resistance. It’s a response and a challenge
to the ubiquitous narratives of colonization, industrialization,
statecraft, authoritarian hero-worship, and chauvinist violence that
dominate much of tabletop gaming—and digital gaming even more so. In
this way, it can be understood as an anarchist intervention in the world
of gaming.
Does Bloc by Bloc have antecedents? What were your points of reference
when you were designing it?
A group of us first started brainstorming ideas for an insurrection
board game in the summer of 2010. None of us were experienced gamers; we
had very little to draw on in terms of antecedents. Our points of
reference were the struggles and insurrections we had been following
very closely. The uprising initiated by a teachers strike in Oaxaca,
Mexico during the second half of 2006 had a major impact on these early
conversations that would eventually shape the contours of what we now
call Bloc by Bloc. The youth revolt that spread across all of Greece
following the police murder of the young anarchist Alexis Grigoropolous
in the Exarcheia neighborhood of Athens in December 2008 was another
point of inspiration. Here in Oakland, the protests and riots in
response to a white police officer killing a young Black man named Oscar
Grant in January 2009 gave us firsthand experience with some of the ways
these moments can unfold.
Based on these recent historical events, we stitched together the
general framework for the game. We knew that all the players would need
to be factions of the insurrection and that the game would somehow play
the role of the state. We also decided that the game would be a race
against time until the military or some kind of federal force intervened
to reestablish order. And finally, we came up with a list of actions
that players should be able to take: barricading, looting, occupying,
and clashing with police. This laid the foundation for the game; all of
these ideas are central to Bloc by Bloc 8 years later. Probably due to
our limited knowledge of game mechanics and theories of gaming, we
didn’t get very far in the actual game development process back in 2010.
“The Insurrection Game,” as we called it at the time, sat on the shelf
for years. It wasn’t until after another round of even larger uprisings
around the world between 2011 and 2014 in places like Cairo, Istanbul,
and Ferguson that I felt motivated to circle back to the project. I
studied some contemporary tabletop games like Settlers of Catan,
Pandemic, Forbidden Desert, and Dead of Winter, and I read up on
theories and approaches to game design.
In early 2015, we began playtesting the first working prototypes of Bloc
by Bloc. At first, the game was unplayable. But the iterative process
was in motion.
Since then, I have learned more about the history of subversive and
anti-authoritarian tabletop games out there in the world. Suffragetto is
a game from 1909 that simulates women’s suffrage protestors clashing
with police. What we now know as the game Monopoly was originally a game
called The Landlord’s Game that critiqued real estate speculation and
finance capitalism. Class Struggle, Chicago Chicago, and Mai 68 Le jeu
are a few other titles from the 1970s and ’80s that attempted to
simulate popular uprisings. A few years ago, some Italian comrades
created a game called Riot that features anarchists, autonomists,
police, and nationalists fighting each other in the streets. It’s
interesting to note that most of these games assume that one player
needs to take on the role of the police. This is something we knew from
the very start we would not be including in the framework for Bloc by
Bloc.
What are the advantages of the tabletop game format for telling these
stories, as opposed to, say, a novel, a film, a video game, an oral
history?
Creating Bloc by Bloc allowed us to explore social upheaval through the
lens of systems thinking. A game is a great way to simulate the
cybernetic forms of control exercised by institutionalized power. And it
allows players to experiment with emergent forms of cooperative strategy
to liberate themselves from these oppressive systems. There really isn’t
another medium out there that enables this sort of emergent systems
approach to telling these stories.
Another important way that tabletop games are great for telling these
stories is that they are inherently social. There’s something powerful
about exploring the dynamics that shape social insurrections through
discussion, play coordination, and conflict with others face to face
around a table.
However, this format also comes with drawbacks. A game is itself a sort
of cybernetic system made up of various positive and negative feedback
loops. The necessity of creating a stable gaming system that functions
as a fun game makes it impossible to fully simulate real world events,
which are defined by their chaotic and ever-changing nature.
Tell us about some of the specific components and dynamics of the game,
and how you crafted them to convey strategic lessons about real life.
One of the most important changes in the second edition of the game is
an improved semi-cooperative mode. In Bloc by Bloc, each player has a
secret agenda card. The majority of these cards are social agendas.
Players with social agendas are in solidarity with each other and must
work together to defeat the state and win the game cooperatively.
However, there are also vanguardist and nihilist agenda cards. Players
with these cards have to secretly undermine the social insurrection;
they are playing to win the game alone.
It’s possible to remove the vanguardist and nihilist cards and play the
game in fully cooperative mode. This is probably the best way to play
your first game; it’s how most people chose to play the first edition.
But that’s not the experience we originally set out to create with Bloc
by Bloc. A simulation of urban insurrection should include the internal
tensions that one always experiences within social movements and
uprisings. This semi-cooperative experience also creates a more dynamic
play space that allows for deeper strategy. And it prevents the
problematic behavior of alpha players who dictate what other players
should do on their turns. This tends to happen in almost all fully
cooperative games. Ironically, by introducing an element of uncertainty
and suspicion among players, you protect their individual agency.
Another mechanic in the game that people are often surprised by is how
movement works. Most games force you to move your pieces one space at a
time or to count the number of spaces you are able to move. In Bloc by
Bloc, movement is restricted by access, not distance. If there is an
open pathway using roads, highways, and metro stations, you can move
your blocs as far as you want with one action. Even the largest cities
in the world can still be crossed in a few hours as long as the
corridors of movement are open. As the game deploys police and they move
throughout the city, this access becomes increasingly restricted. This
is a reflection of how we are able to move within contemporary cities.
Zones of exclusivity and institutional power are not protected from
popular uprisings by their distance from those who have the potential to
rise up. They are protected by security forces and systems of control
that limit access and control space.
Just about every mechanic in Bloc by Bloc can be understood as the
intersection between some kind of strategic lesson and the necessity of
balancing the game to create a stable system full of emergent potential.
It’s possible to read into each of these mechanics and draw conclusions
about real world insurrections. But at some point, remember, this is
just a game! A PDF of the Bloc by Bloc 2^(nd) edition rulebook is
available online for anyone interested in taking a closer look at the
game’s mechanics.
How do your values shape how you approach game design? Is there an
ideological dimension to this project?
I try very hard to avoid taking a dogmatic approach to this work. Games
are a great way of letting people explore interconnected ideas and
systems without being overly didactic. However, I’m sure it’s apparent
to everyone that this project is grounded in political ideas.
I would say that the game development process for Bloc by Bloc was
guided by a specific ethical framework. A crucial part of that framework
is that it centers those who struggle under capitalism, white supremacy,
patriarchy, and the state as the protagonists. I refer to these
protagonists of resistance as “social antagonists.” The blocs are those
who organize themselves to rise up from below. This isn’t a game that
places the conquerors or the powerful at the center of the narrative.
Another important element of this framework is an understanding of the
importance of social insurrection. If we take a moment to reflect on the
past two decades, we see an impressive array of uprisings and rebellions
around the world. Social insurrection is a defining feature of our time.
It is a crucial form of resistance and joy in a diverse array of cities
in these first decades of the 21^(st) century. Insurrections sustain
social movements and they have reshaped the political map. But they also
bring with them the potential for severe repression and reactionary
backlash. So it’s important to not romanticize these moments of conflict
and to understand their consequences.
It’s also important not to fetishize the violence involved in these
uprisings. Destruction and popular expropriation are necessary parts of
sustained insurrection. But the success of these uprisings is not
determined by their ability to destroy or kill. Urban insurrection is
most effective when it transforms social relationships across a whole
city and repurposes urban space. We can see this most clearly when an
insurrection is an expression of everyday resistance and organizing.
This creates the social fabric from which an insurrection can draw the
power to reshape entire cities and societies.
Is this an anarchist game?
I think that’s debatable. Bloc by Bloc is a game for gamers more than it
is a game for anarchists. We’ve always wanted this project to stand on
its own as a game that people can enjoy even if they’re unfamiliar with
or uneasy about the theme. As I said before, it’s an intervention in the
world of gaming in that it challenges the usual narratives of oppression
and exploitation.
There are a few other ways that it differs from most games. We have
attempted to manufacture the game in a relatively ethical fashion here
in the US. The vast majority of games are manufactured in China to take
advantage of cheaper labor. And all of the files one needs to create DIY
printed copies of Bloc by Bloc 2^(nd) edition will be released online
for free, as we did with the first edition. But overall, Bloc by Bloc
doesn’t attempt to break out of the specific form set by the standards
of contemporary tabletop gaming.
The question of what an anarchist game could look like is very
interesting. Maybe Bloc by Bloc is a step in this direction. But a truly
anarchist game would likely take place in the everyday terrain of our
lives. It would craft a magic circle that empowers the participants to
subvert real forms of control and domination. And it would be easily
replicable, even for those with limited resources. Maybe anarchists and
other social antagonists already play games of this sort all the time
without specifically referring to them as games?
My hope is that this project can be part of a much larger creative
process that utilizes play and imagination to unleash our collective
potential to fight back and reshape the world.