💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › kevin-carson-strawman-alert.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 11:48:08. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Strawman Alert
Author: Kevin Carson
Date: April 28, 2005
Language: en
Topics: environmentalism, green technology
Source: Retrieved on 4th September 2021 from https://mutualist.blogspot.com/2005/04/strawman-alert.html

Kevin Carson

Strawman Alert

Tim Worstall comes out ahead in a dustup with George Monbiot over wind

farms. Of course, it helps if you can put words in your opponent’s

mouth. Monbiot, in this article, writes:

In other words, there is no sustainable way of meeting current

projections for energy demand. The only strategy in any way compatible

with environmentalism is one led by a vast reduction in total use.

Worstall comments:

Yup, George wants us all to go back to being medieval peasants. Good

one.

Of course--it’s that simple! Current levels of energy consumption are

absolutely necessary to maintain the present standard of living. It

couldn’t be possible that subsidies to transportation and energy

consumption make large factories thousands of miles away artificially

competitive against small ones where we live, or that such subsidies

combined with zoning laws and FHA redlining reduce the market incentive

to live where you work and shop. When it comes to technological

determinism, nobody comes close to a state socialist or a technocratic

liberal for sheer, crude materialism--except a corporate capitalist,

that is! Worstall sounds like Friedrich Engels, Art Schlesinger, or J.K.

Galbraith at their worst.

Here’s another Monbiot quote, to put the one above in context:

Wind farms, while necessary, are a classic example of what

environmentalists call an “end-of-the-pipe solution”. Instead of

tackling the problem — our massive demand for energy — at source, they

provide less damaging means of accommodating it. Or part of it. The

Whinash project, by replacing energy generation from power stations

burning fossil fuel, will reduce carbon dioxide emission by 178,000

tonnes a year. This is impressive, until you discover that a single

jumbo jet, flying from London to Miami and back every day, releases the

climate-change equivalent of 520,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year.

One daily connection between Britain and Florida costs three giant wind

farms.

If anything is a prime candidate for free-market problem solving, it’s

the fuel-guzzling jumbo jets Monbiot complains of. The civil aviation

system in the U.S., jumbo jets and all, is almost entirely a creature of

the state. The airport infrastructure of the 20^(th) century was built

mostly with government funds, with heavy use of eminent domain. No

attempt was made until the 1970s to run airports on aviation fuel tax

revenue--and even then, the operating cost didn’t figure in amortization

of previous government loot. Had the system been built from the first

entirely with voluntary user fees, and voluntary sales of land, we’d

have a civil aviation system several orders of magnitude smaller--and

“air freight” would probably mean shipping by zeppelin. Even today, if

the system had to forego eminent domain and operate entirely on user

fees, it would be frozen at its present scale. For example, see “On

Airports and Individual Rights,” by Tibor Machan:

Some people will say that stringent protection of rights would lead to

small airports, at best, and many constraints on construction. Of

course—but what’s so wrong with that?

As for those jumbo jets themselves, they are a spinoff of Cold War

military production. The aircraft industry was spiralling into red ink

with the postwar demobilization, and did not regain solvency until the

uptick in military spending of the late ‘40s. [Frank Kofsky, Harry S.

Truman and the War Scare of 1948] What’s more, the machine tools for

producing large airplanes were so complex and expensive that the

production runs for civilian airliners alone wouldn’t pay for

them--which is where heavy bomber production came into the picture.

[David Noble, America by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of

Corporate Capitalism]

If it weren’t for the state’s role in subsidizing those airports and

freeways, we’d be consuming most of our stuff from factories a lot

closer to home, and shipping most of the rest by rail. We don’t need the

government to knock this crap down; we just need it to stop propping it

up.

Granted, Monbiot probably isn’t thinking primarily of market forces or

cost internalization as a way to produce present levels of consumption

goods with less energy input. But nothing in the phrase “vast reduction

in total use” is inconsistent with that. In fact, I sent Mr. Monbiot the

following email a while back, and got a pretty favorable response:

I believe the solution to the crisis is already built in. There’s no

need for government-imposed austerity measures. The price of oil itself

will lead to the austerity measures. Such a scenario was depicted over

twenty years ago by Warren Johnson in Muddling Toward Frugality: rising

fuel prices make transportation-intensive forms of production less and

less competitive, and force a radical decentralization of the economy.

As it is, the corporate economy exists at the present level of

concentration only because of state capitalist intervention in the free

market. The government absorbs (or rather transfers to the taxpayers)

all the inefficiency costs of large-scale production, so that big

business can operate at many times the peak economy of scale. But the

more fuel prices rise, the less feasible subsidies to transportation and

fuel consumption become. Eventually the breaking point will be reached

at which the state can no longer absorb the costs of subsidizing

inefficiency.

Such subsidies lead to fundamental irrationality by distorting the

function of the market price system as a feedback mechanism: when

allowed to operate without interference, it coordinates supply to demand

by telling the consumer the real cost of providing a resource, and

enabling him to make a rational decision about how much to consume.

Interference with price-feeback produces the same results as a

distortion of the hormonal feedback mechanism in the human body:

gigantism and collapse. In the case of transportation, we have demands

on highways and airports increasing many times faster than new capacity

can be built, and existing structures decaying faster than money can be

appropriated to replace them.

When we have a genuine free market, and big business has to internalize

all its operating costs, we will also have an end to corporate

capitalism.