💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › donald-rooum-the-ethics-of-egoism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 09:17:04. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: The Ethics of Egoism
Author: Donald Rooum
Date: 1962
Language: en
Topics: egoism, individualism, individualist anarchism, Émile Armand
Source: Retrieved on September 2, 2016 from [[http://libcom.org/library/anarchy-022]]
Notes: Published in  *Anarchy: A Journal of Anarchist Ideas*  #22

Donald Rooum

The Ethics of Egoism

Émile Armand, in his youth, joined the Salvation Army. Then he studied

Tolstoy and became a Christian anarchist. Finally, still in his youth,

he became an anarchist individualist, and so remained until he died, at

the age of 90. I am told by one learned in such matters, a Freudian

could deduce, from the above facts alone, that Émile Armand had a strong

father fixation. This gives me the confidence to voice a speculation of

my own, formulated while I was reading a new pamphlet of translations

from his work.[1]

I reckon he shared, with many saints of several religions, a profound

longing to define what was admirable in human behaviour, and make this

the pattern of his own behaviour. The strict moral code was what

attracted him to the Sally Bash. He resigned to become a Christian

anarchist when Tolstoy showed him how quasi-military ritual actually

hindered strict ethical behaviour. And finally, when the study of

Stirner and Nietzsche showed him that external moral forces also

hindered personal responsibility, he gave up Christianity itself.

The essays in Sid Parker’s pamphlet are translated by three different

writers and taken from two different periodicals. But all of them are on

the subject of ethics. (The essays from Resistance, titled “The Future

Society”, is about “the future humanity that individualists want.”)

Instead of a mere memorial to a prolific anarchist writer, Parker has

assembled a coherent and timely work on anarchism as a way of life.

Armand was a thorough-going anarchist; an honest believer in individual

aspiration as the source of social harmony; one of those referred to by

Bob Green in Anarchy 16 as, “the egotistic (sic) anarchists whose

declared over-riding concern is with Number One.” His “individualism”

was synonymous with Stirner’s “conscious egoism,” and the “egoism in

sense 2” which the Shorter Oxford Dictionary defines as “Ethics. The

theory which regards self-interest as the foundation of morality. Also,

in practical sense; regard to one’s own interest, systematic

selfishness.”

“Our kind of individualist,” he wrote, “recognizes as a motive nothing

outside himself.” Presumably he preferred the word “individualism”

because “egoism” is so easily confused with “egoism in senses 1, 3, and

4” (to say nothing of “egotism”), besides being open to deliberate

misrepresentation.

There would appear to be a section of self styled anarchists who have

taken over from the authoritarian socialists, who in turn adopted it

from the Christians, the equation of selfishness with cynical

sensuality. These are the woolly-minded anarchists who think the egoist

doesn’t give a damn for anyone else. They might be surprised to find

Armand, who openly “recognizes as a motive nothing outside himself,”

boasting that “our conception of comradeship raises itself like a

lighthouse to remind the world that there are still persons capable of

resisting the seductions and gross appetites of our philistine society.”

Yet he shows quite clearly how self-interest leads to propaganda and the

practice of mutual aid:

“Tending to live his own individual life at the risk of clashing

intellectually, morally, and economically with his environment, the

anarchist individualist tries to create in the same environment, by

means of selection, individuals like himself are free from the

prejudices and superstitions of authority, in order that the greatest

possible number of men may actually live their own lives, uniting

through personal affinities to practise their conceptions as far as

possible. As individuals of his own “species” increase, so the power of

environment over his own life diminishes.”

That “the egoist is more willing and eager than the humanist to give

free reign to his aggressive impulses” is clearly shown to be a

misunderstanding; and the question of how Armand’s anarchist would

choose “given a clear choice between personal happiness and the

happiness of others” is one which cannot arise. Were any man to

“niggardly of heart,” so lacking in common sympathy as to be aware of

such a choice, “he would feel himself incomplete,” and could not be an

egoist. For the egoist must feel self-sufficient.

“This explains his plan for freeing his world of useless and avoidable

suffering. He knows that this is possible when one prefers agreement to

struggle, abstention to the unlatching of actions dictated by

bitterness, animosity, or spite.”

Armand admits the existence of “armchair Nietzscheans or weekend

Stirnerites” whose conception of egoism does not include a strict code

of personal integrity, but he rejects them:

“The individualist as we know him abominates brutes, cretins, schemers,

rogues, twisters, skunks, and so forth, no matter with what ideology

they wish to conceal themselves.”

The integrity he wants, however, is strictly a matter of self-interest,

quite different from submission to collective morality.

“The anarchist regulates his life not according to the law, like the

legalists, nor according to a given collective mystique like the

religious, the nationalists, or the socialists, but according to his own

needs and personal aspirations. He is ready to make the concessions

necessary to live with his comrades or his friends, but without making

an obsession of these concessions….

“Instead of postponing individual happiness to the socialist or

communist calends, he extols his present achievement of it by

proclaiming the joy of living….

“The anarchists go forward, and by living for themselves, these egoists,

they dig the furrow, they open the breach through which will pass the

unique ones who will succeed them.”

[1] Anarchism and Individualism, three essays by É. Armand; published by

S.E. Parker.