đŸ Archived View for library.inu.red âș file âș flat-oak-society-militant-eco-action.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:14:42. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
âĄïž Next capture (2024-06-20)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Militant Eco-action Author: Flat Oak Society Date: 1996 Language: en Topics: eco action, militancy, United Kingdom, Organise! Source: Retrieved on May 13, 2013 from https://web.archive.org/web/20130513173827/http://www.afed.org.uk/org/issue42/militant_eco-action.html Notes: Published by the Anarchist Communist Federation in Organise! Issue 42 â Spring 1996.
The following is an article sent to us by Andy, an ecological activist
involved with the Flat Oak Society, a direct-action orientated
environmentalist group based in Kent. We are publishing it as we feel it
opens up some interesting debates on the nature of the present activist
green movement, particularly those around opposition to road building.
We welcome comment from our readers.
---
The direct action environmental movement in the UK has got its act
together. Growing from being small isolated groups protesting against
road schemes and mining operations, with their only goal being to cost
the companies responsible as much as possible, now there is talk of real
opportunities for damaging schemes to be stopped.
Earth First!âs recent Whatley Quarry action was well organised, planned
and executed. ÂŁ250,000 of criminal damage was reported to have been done
and twenty metres of railway track âdisappearedâ; the control panel for
video monitoring of the plant fell apart and a 2 story crane pulled
itself to bits; 3 control rooms dismantled themselves ansd several
diggers and conveyor belts âbroke downâ[1]. Newbury has been an
inspiration with direct action stopping security getting to work. Thames
Valley Police have estimated the policing costs of the whole protest may
be ÂŁ12,000,000! Protests at the Thanet Way have cost the council about
ÂŁ8,000,000; 1.3 million on fencing; 3 million on security and
approximately 4 million on delayed work. The last eighteen months have
seen the three largest post-World War Two evictions, at Claremont Road,
Stanworth Valley and Brigghenlys. The arguments being put forward by the
anti-roads movement (in particular) are very encouraging. Gone are the
arguments that you shouldnât put this oad here simply because it will
destroy beautiful countryside. Along with this attitude was a
deep-rooted âcosmicâ consciousness; Mother Earth would avenge herself on
the earth-rapists, even going so far as to striking down chainsaw
operators at Twyford Down! Nice idea though... Now roads have been put
in a social context. Claremont Road was a reclaimed, car-free zone, room
to show what a radically changed world might be like. Reclaim The
Streets have continued this message, with their enormously successful
Street Parties. Selar and Brynhellysâ success was because of strong
local support. They only had this level of support because the open-cast
mines were criticised in the context of deep-mine closures as well as
environmental destruction.
To a certain extent this shift in attitude is a response to the stateâs
attacks on the movement. With increasing arrests and prison sentences
since the Criminal Justice Act was passed, eco-activists have been
forced to question the whole system. There is a growing awareness that
it is Capitalismâs nature to pollute and destroy the environment. For a
long time the police were seen to be really âimpartial keepers of the
peaceâ. This is being replaced with open hostility and defiance of the
law. When people were arrested at Whatley Quarry and in Glastonbury at
the Survival of the Tribes [2] activists attempted to block the police
vans and sabotaged their vehicles.
Environmental concern is no longer seen as a single issue. To many
activists in the eco-action movement âthe environmentâ now means manâs
(sic) environment as well as saving the natural world. Earth First! UK
have adopted a more social analysis, organising around the Job Seekers
Allowance and prisoner support, particularly MOVE prisoners in the USA.
The Earth Liberation Frontâs annual Earth Nights in October calls for
economic sabotage to all environmentally damaging projects, fascists and
oppressive employers and institutions. The Earth Liberation Prisoners
Support Group is â an International network for prisoners of conscience,
be they fighting for Earth, Human or Animal Liberation, those basically
are attempting to save the planet from self-destructionâ. The ELP
editorial sets out a very good analysis, âwe at ELP believe that we all
have a common enemy, i.e. multinationals, big business, state control;,
fascism, call it what you will, each wants power, and pursues this
selfish interest to the detriment of othersâ[3].
But with the rise of support and success of the movement came the
predictable political leeches. For once it was not Militant or the SWP
who tried to hijack the protests, but liberal green groups like FOE,
Greenpeace and the Green Party. When Twyford Down was being defended
Friends of the Earth (FOE) said they could not support breaking the law
and condemned the protesters. Now they are throwing money and support at
Newbury. While many of their members are genuinely supportive and
involved in the campaigns, it is hard not to be cynical about their
change of attitude. Was the growing support for EF! draining FOEâs
membership and therefore income?
Greenpeace have always been about a team of hand-picked (and paid!)
activists doing daring actions. Individual members are expected to pay
their dues, turn up to a few media friendly stunts and organise
fund-raising. They are not allowed to campaign on any issues except for
official Greenpeace ones, such as their blatantly xenophobic âNON!â
campaign against French nuclear testing.
Recently a meeting was held between FOE, Greenpeace and leading members
of Road Alert!, EF! and Reclaim The Streets. It was agreed that
Greenpeace and FOE would help and support the other groups more in the
future. While this may be seen as those groups going âsoftâ, none of the
people involved in the meetings are âleadersâ of any groups. The loose
network nature of EF! etc. means that it contains a whole range of
opinions, from reformist to revolutionary. So these meetings only
indicate the opinions of the individuals involved. Most of the activists
neither sanctioned or agreed with any part of it.
Unfortunately there are too few people prepared to get involved in
environmental actions and offer a class based revolutionary analysis of
society to counter FOE etc. There is a lot of prejudice on the anarchist
âsideâ against environmental activists. They sneer at what they see as
âfluffyâ actions and tactics, when if they talked to those involved,
they would find a suprising level of militancy [4]. Not all anti-roads
protesters are drum-banging, stoned hippies, this is âjustâ one of the
media images of them (mainly the liberal media i.e. Guardian,
Independent), and anarchists fall for this bullshit! It is nearly always
the working-class who suffer most from environmental destruction, so why
arenât we organising around these issues? A lot of radical
âeco-activistsâ show interest when offered a coherent analysis of
capitalism and the class system. But we are in danger of losing ground
to the ideas of FOE and Greenpeace. Get out there, get involved, get
talking to people and spreading anarchist ideas. A huge breach has
appeared in capitalismâsâ armour due to EF! and others, we must exploit
this weakness and use it to attack capitalism further.
[1] EF! Action Update. NO 23, December 1995. Available from Action
Update PO Box 7, Cardiff, CF2 4XX, send a SAE.
[2] Survival of the Tribes was a gathering and meeting of environmental
protesters in September 1995. The local cops were spoiling for a fight,
as were the local beer boys. Hassle started on the high street between
protesters, cops and the local heavies. Seven people were arrested, so
everyone sat down in front of the cop van and the cops started getting
heavy. More people sat down, including shoppers and their kids. The
Bristol riot cops were then called in.
[3] Earth Liberation Prisoners, Spring 1995. Contact ELP c/o Box 23, %
High Street, Glastonbury, Somerset.
[4] There has been loads of controversy in the anarchist press about
âKeep it Fluffyâ leaflet distributed at an anti-CJA demonstration. The
leaflet was the work of one individual and distributed by the Freedom
Network, only due to them being (in part) a distribution group. Anyone
could have easily put out a âKeep it Spikyâ leaflet through them! Too
much time and energy has been wasted arguing about this and other
pathetic issues. It would been far more productive and much less
damaging to just treat this leaflet with contempt and put energy into
something more useful.