💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › we-are-all-going-to-die.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 14:39:09. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: We Are All Going to Die
Author: Black Oak Clique
Date: 3/28/2019
Language: en
Topics: green anarchy, anti-civ, insurrection, climate offensive, extinction rebellion, earth strike, nonviolence
Source: [[https://heresydistro.noblogs.org/files/2019/03/we-are-all-going-to-die.pdf]]

Black Oak Clique

We Are All Going to Die

When the world ends, people come out of their apartments and meet their

neighbors for the first time; they share food, stories, companionship.

No one has to go to work or the laundromat; nobody remembers to check

the mirror or scale or email account before leaving the house. Graffiti

artists surge into the streets; strangers embrace, sobbing and laughing.

Every moment possesses an immediacy formerly spread out across months.

Burdens fall away, people confess secrets and grant forgiveness, the

stars come out over New York City...and nine months later, a new

generation is born.

CrimethInc. Collective

We’re going to die?

The Earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it

have names and addresses.[1] But us – me, you, even those who are

killing the earth? We’re going to die.

In the worst case scenario, you drown, you starve, or you succumb to

heat stroke. Not figuratively. You will drown, you will starve, you will

succumb to heat stroke. Perhaps there’s the small chance that you will

survive the mass migration to the last reaches of habitable land in and

around the poles.

Perhaps.

But let’s be realistic here: In all likelihood, you’re going to die. A

slow, horrible, excruciating death at that. We would like to say this is

the future we’re hurtling towards at an ever-increasing rate. But it

isn’t: it’s the present, the material, graspable present. Islands are

sinking into the ocean. The poverty-stricken are freezing to death on

the streets. People are burning to death in gigantic wildfires.

The collapse is not to be a single event. It’s a process, and it’s

currently underway.

In the best case scenario, death is liberation. Perhaps the real “you” –

your body, your consciousness, your soul, what have you – won’t die, per

se: instead, the abstract “you” – your way of life, your social

relationships under capitalism, your system of meaning that’s been

drilled into your head since day one – will die.

Can’t we reform the system?

No. We can’t. The system is the problem, and the system runs deep. The

problem isn’t just capitalism. It’s also the state, but it also isn’t

just the state. It’s the ideology of consumption itself: that beings –

plants, animals (including humans deemed to be *sub*human), fungi, even

inanimate natural “resources” – are objects to be bought, sold, and

eventually, consumed. This ideology is perhaps the deepest ideology we

have. It permeates every form of knowledge: from science, to art, to

politics. It seeps through our language (one must think how often we

refer to feeling, living beings – ones with the capacity to suffer – as

“it.”) It permeates our relationships. It is the very basis of our

societies, if it cannot be deemed our “society” itself – the group of

capital-h Humans deemed to be worthy enough to be circumscribed by the

abstract Community, that constructs itself in opposition to literally

everything else.

Your favorite pet politician isn’t immune to this. Not Alexandria

Ocasio-Cortez, not Bernie Sanders, not Jill Stein. Not the Democratic

Socialists, not the Green Party, not the CPUSA, and not anyone else,

either.

Perhaps their hearts are in the right place – but sadly, that isn’t

enough.

To quote the amazing piece Anarchy Works by Peter Gelderloos:

Some people oppose capitalism on environmental grounds, but think some

sort of state is necessary to prevent ecocide. But the state is itself a

tool for the exploitation of nature. Socialist states such as the Soviet

Union and People’s Republic of China have been among the most ecocidal

regimes imaginable. That these two societies never escaped the dynamics

of capitalism is itself a feature of the state structure — it

necessitates hierarchical, exploitative economic relationships of

control and command, and once you start playing that game nothing beats

capitalism.

What about nonviolence?

Concerning nonviolence: it is criminal to teach a man not to defend

himself when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks.

Malcolm X

The struggle against ecocide was never nonviolent, and it never will be,

because it cannot be. That’s because ecocide is violence: violence

against me and you, against animals (wild and domestic,) against the

trees and the grass and the water and the mountains.

Climate insurrection is self-defense.

Strict adherence to nonviolence – that is, the rejection of violence –

is complicity in the face of ecological destruction. It is not

“offensive,” it is not “rebellion,” and it’s not a “strike” at climate

change.

Many of us do not have the privilege of being nonviolent – namely, those

of us who already marginalized. We will be the first to go. We’re the

rural farm workers and their families being sprayed with pesticides.

We’re the houseless freezing to death in polar vortices. We’re the

indigenous peoples whose homes are being swallowed by the sea. We’re the

poor who will not have the capital necessary to complete the long trek

north to the last remaining habitable lands.

If we aren’t violent – if we don’t rebel against the system that

oppresses us – we will be crushed. Don’t be complicit in our death, in

your death.

What’s climate insurrection?

Perhaps the only hope me or you have. It’s destroying that which

destroys us — by any means possible.

Wouldn’t that hurt the movement?

No. A better question would be: what has “nonviolent” protest won us in

the long run? The answer: absolutely nothing. Many supposedly

“nonviolent” movements, such as the Civil Rights Movement, were

incredibly violent. There were hundreds of riots throughout the United

States, and of course, the existence of armed paramilitary groups such

as the Black Panthers, or the Brown Berets. One could make the argument

that this narrative of nonviolence is pushed by the very people whose

power would be threatened by violence, because violence means (perhaps

immediate) change. Hence: why those in the US celebrate Martin Luther

King Day, a federally recognized holiday; but not Malcolm X Day.

Even the most-oft example of nonviolent resistance, the Indian

independence movement, was not so. Bhagat Singh, who after his execution

became a folk hero of the cause, was inspired by French anarchist

Auguste Vaillant to bomb the British Raj’s Central Legislative Assembly.

Less than a year before, he had assassinated a British police officer in

retaliation for the death of the nationalist leader Lala Lajpat Rai.

Wouldn’t it be counterproductive?

Counterproductive to what? Getting meaningless reforms passed? Getting

empty pyrrhic victories in the legal circuit? Performing impotent

marches through major cities that don’t achieve anything other than

receiving lukewarm press from second-rate newspapers?

Ask the battery hen liberated from cramped cages by animal activists, or

the old-growth forest protected indefinitely by logging saboteurs (and

all the animals who call those forest home): is direct action

productive?

Anarchist action — patient, hidden, tenacious, involving individuals,

eating away at institutions like a worm eats away at fruit, as termites

undermine majestic trees — such action does not lend itself to the

theatrical effects of those who wish to draw attention to themselves.

Anonymous (in Desert)

To quote the great illusionist Georges Méliès, “I must say, to my great

regret, the cheapest tricks have the greatest impact.”

If insurrection is so great, how come people aren’t doing it now?

They are. You just haven’t heard of it because the media is smart enough

to hide it. Hearing about the heroic stories of those who fight back

would be too dangerous for most to hear – it runs the risk of

radicalizing them. Movements like the Animal and Earth Liberation

Fronts, have been waging war against ecocide since the 1970s.

I don’t want to go to prison.

We dream of a world without prisons.

I’m scared.

We’re scared too, friend. We should be, but we should be strong, too.

What can we do?

We’ll let the great animal activist Keith Mann speak for us.

Labs raided, locks glued, products spiked, depots ransacked, windows

smashed, construction halted, mink set free, fences torn down, cabs

burnt out, offices in flames, car tires slashed, cages emptied, phone

lines severed, slogans daubed, muck spread, damage done, electrics cut,

site flooded, hunt dogs stolen, fur coats slashed, buildings destroyed,

foxes freed, kennels attacked, businesses burgled, uproar, anger,

outrage, balaclava clad thugs.

What if I don’t have the ability to fight?

You do, even if you can’t physically. Despite the tone of this letter,

we aren’t totally opposed to above-ground action. In fact, in some

cases, we think it’s necessary.

Groups like the Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Group and the Animal

Liberation Front Supporters Group are active in representing and

advocating for operatives. As Sinn FĂ©in, the Irish political party once

associated with the militant IRA has been described:

Both Sinn FĂ©in and the IRA play different but converging roles in the

war of national liberation. The Irish Republican Army wages an armed

campaign... Sinn FĂ©in maintains the propaganda war and is the public and

political voice of the movement.

What happens next?

We don’t know. But with any luck, we’ve laid out our options.

[1] A faumous quote from Utah Philips