💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › miguel-amoros-zad-s-victory.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 12:28:30. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: ZAD’s Victory
Author: Miguel AmorĂłs
Date: February 23, 2018
Language: en
Topics: ZAD, France, direct action, environment, occupations, resistance, self-management
Source: Retrieved on 11th May 2021 from https://libcom.org/library/zad-s-victory-miguel-amor-s
Notes: Translated in April 2018 from the Spanish text obtained from the author. See also (current as of April 2018): https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/04/13/is-may-1968-about-to-happen-again-or-be-surpassed-mass-strikes-occupations-and-the-fight-for-the-future-perfect-in-france/

Miguel AmorĂłs

ZAD’s Victory

On January 17, 2018, the French Prime Minister announced the

cancellation of the gigantic construction project to build a useless

airport on land in the municipality of NĂ´tre Dame des Landes. The joy

and happiness unleashed among the resisters of ZAD,[1] farmers,

occupiers, neighbors, friends and sympathizers, reached its clamorous

peak at the festival of February 10, the date marking the expiration of

the Declaration of Public Utility for the stillborn Nantes airport. It

was a moment to celebrate an indisputable victory and to enjoy something

that does not happen very often. Of course, everyone knows that the

struggle is not over, for the State will not allow its plans to be

stymied that easily and will attempt to reconquer the lost ground

sometime in the future, and will threaten legal action, plan

evacuations, and initiate divisive maneuvers and measures to normalize

the situation. Nonetheless, the 1,650 hectares of “bocage”, a kind of

rural landscape of hedgerows and sunken lanes characteristic of the

Atlantic seaboard, will be preserved, and with them, the commons, the

new ways of life and social relations alien to the logic of the

commodity that have been established among its inhabitants. The ZADist

defenders have resolved to build barricades every time that the powers

that be try to recover the territory, and to build a more free future

around an Alternative Agricultural Zone.

The airport project is as old as the protest that has always accompanied

it, but the protest took a qualitative leap forward by abandoning

legalistic procedures and engaging in creative occupation instead. In

the summer of 2009, the name, ZAD—Zone to Defend—was popularized, and

since then the repression directed against the occupiers and the local

inhabitants was enforced in earnest, until its culmination on October

16, 2012 with “Operation Caesar”, a deployment of police forces that

failed miserably and only served to increase the local people’s

solidarity with the resistance. Against all odds, the inhabitants of the

area have been able to reconcile their interests, overcome their

disagreements and present a united front against all the anti-ZAD

initiatives of the multinational corporation, VINCI, its local

cheerleaders, judges and authorities. A community of struggle was

consolidated, supported by numerous committees all over France. In one

way or another, over the years, solidarity proved decisive at crucial

moments, mobilizing huge demonstrations, and it is this persistence that

forced the State to yield. ZAD was victorious. The largest and

longest-lasting occupation in Europe succeeded.

The struggle against the project has now reached a new stage: what is

needed now is to preserve and extend the legacy of the struggle, develop

alternative infrastructures, and engage in self-management of a

liberated territory. The main thing is: to maintain and to reinforce the

institutions of self-government, to avoid institutional traps and to

resist the pressures of the market economy. In short, to forge links, to

establish moral bonds of commitment, cooperation and mutual aid: what

the sociologists call the social fabric. The struggle has ceased to be a

principally defensive one, and has now become a constructive action

based on non-developmentalist relations. Much has been accomplished

(support networks, workshops, collective gardens, kitchens, radio, seed

banks…), but there is still much to do.

It is also necessary to prevent ZAD from degenerating into a marginal

gesture, or from succumbing to its internal contradictions. A “customary

assembly” was created in December of 2017 to mediate internal conflicts

that arose as a result of divergent practices. The same assembly drafted

a list of delegates to represent the different components of the

resistance in order to meet with the emissaries of the State. These

delegates cannot make decisions, but are limited to expressing the

mandates of the assembly (a document that consists of six points). The

assembly makes the decisions. It demanded, for example, amnesty for

those who were threatened by expropriation or expulsion for defending

the bocage, the unhindered right of the occupiers to remain to

participate in the struggle, and a moratorium on the purchase and sale

of land for at least three years, in order to prevent privatization that

would militate against the collective experience. All to bring about a

future without an airport based on the mutual respect of coexistence

amidst a diversity of opinions.

The ZADists do not devote much energy to negotiations; they know that

they are swimming against the current and that the most they can hope

for is to keep the enemy at bay, and gain time to posit new, more

firmly-rooted forms of coexistence on the terrain. They are aware of the

fact that the mobilizations have not ended, and that there are still

problems that divide the occupiers, such as, for example, the question

of the creation of a legal entity to represent the movement; and

finally, they know that the movement’s internal equilibrium is fragile

and the enemy’s resolve is strong. Without mentioning any other

incidents, yesterday the gendarmes evicted the occupiers of the Lejuc

forest, who were trying to stop a project to bury nuclear wastes in Bure

(Meuse). No one can ignore the fact, however, that the movement has

proven that it can stand up to adverse conditions; that it can

concentrate sufficient forces to resist and turn the tide of events; and

finally, that fighting is not a waste of time, and that, sometimes, you

can even win.

Viva ZAD!

For a free and self-managed society!

[1] Zone to Defend [translator’s note].