💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › cesar-de-paepe-anarchy.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 08:26:53. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Anarchy
Author: CĂ©sar de Paepe
Date: 1898
Language: en
Topics: democracy, introductory
Source: https://www.libertarian-labyrinth.org/anarchist-beginnings/cesar-de-paepe-anarchy-1891/
Notes: An excerpt from the speech published as “Discours du citoyen César de Paepe prononcé á Patignies (Namur) en 1863” in 1898. Shawn P. Wilbur's translation includes some remarks on the transition to anarchy not included in the 19th century translation.

CĂ©sar de Paepe

Anarchy

The ideal of democracy can only be anarchy; not anarchy in the sense of

disorder, or confusion, but anarchy as indicated by the etymology of the

word (de a, privative, and archi, commander, authority, power,

government.) An-archy, then, is the absence of all government, of every

power. Yes, anarchy, that is where the aspirations of man, toward an

always increasing liberty and an increasingly rigorous equality, must

ultimately lead us. Yes, anarchy, where we must end up one day, carried

by the power of the democratic principle, by logic, by the fatality of

history.

Humanity, starting from absolute monarchy, the primitive and most

expressive form of government, advances, passing through constitutional

monarchy, through presidential power, through the government of the

assembly, through direct legislation, towards anarchy, the final and

most elevated form of liberty. Such are the destinies of humanity, and

such are the revolutionary tendencies that are inherent in man.

What indeed is a revolution, if it is not the constant lessening of

authority for the benefit of liberty, the progressive destruction of

power for the benefit of the emancipation of individuals? And what is

constitutionalism, the presidency, parliamentarianism, universal

suffrage, if not the stages of the revolution, that eternal traveler?

And what, finally, is direct legislation, if it is not a bridge pitched

between governmentalism and an-archy, between the old governmental

society and the new industrial and economic world?

It is an incontestable historical face that liberty increases to the

degree that governmental power is decreased, and vice-versa, power

increase in inverse proportion to liberty. So in order to bring liberty

to its highest degree (and this is the tendency of democracy), we must

reduce government to zero.

But it is nevertheless true that humanity in its present phase, given

the moral and economic disorder that reigns everywhere, still needs to

be governed; the government and laws are still for it elements of order

and security. Anarchy could only be established after a social

reorganization that would eliminate poverty and emancipate the

proletariat through free credit, the formation of workers’ associations

and the transformation of property, in short, by reestablishing balance

between the economic forces. then, but only then, the government could

be dissolved into the industrial organism; for, as Henri Saint-Simon

said, the one whom Béranger calls the prophet: “the human race has been

destined to pass from the governmental or military regime to the

administrative or industrial regime, after having made sufficient

progress in the sciences and industry.”

And since this is the case, since humanity cannot yet se passer encore

de government, what is the government that it must choose and that it

must accept in the last analysis? The one that is least contrary to the

democratic principle, to direct legislation, but taking care to give the

minority the greatest possible guarantees and to put above the right of

the majority, as absolutely inviolable, the following rights, in their

fullness, without the least restriction:

Right of each to propose and amend the law without the intervention of

representatives.

Freedom of conscience.

Freedom of education.

Freedom of the press.

Freedom of association.

Right of assembly.

With the use of these liberties, the minority can work to become the

majority in its turn; and if it has truth of its side, it will succeed

sooner or later. These guarantees, without destroying the vices of the

system, still reduce them a tiny bit.

As for administrative tasks, they will be done in each commune by some

employees under the immediate jurisdiction of the people, revocable at

any time, who will be vested with no authority, but will be quite simply

the servants of the commune. It is useless to add that it will be in the

interest of each commune to simplify, as much as possible, the work of

administration.

In summary:

No more absolute monarchy.

No more constitutional monarchy.

No more inheritance.

No more presidency.

No more representation or alienation of powers.

No more political or administrative centralization.

We want:

Direct legislation of the people by the people.

Guarantees for the minority.

Political and administrative decentralization.

Communal independence.

The federation of communes.

But the eventual aim pursued by the revolution is the annihilation of

every power, it is — after a transformation of society — the elimination

of politics through social economy, of governmental organization through

industrial organization, it is anarchy.

Anarchy, dream of the lovers of complete liberty, idol of the true

revolutionaries! Long have men slandered and shamefully insulted you; in

their blindness, they have confused you with disorder and chaos, while,

on the contrary, government, your sworn enemy, is only a result of

social disorder, of economic chaos, as you would be the result of order,

harmony, balance and justice. But already the prophets have glimpsed you

under the veil that covers the future and have proclaimed you the ideal

of democracy, the hope of liberty, the ultimate aim of the revolution,

the sovereign of future times, the promised land of regenerated

humanity!.. It is for you that the Hebertists succumbed in 1793, they

did not dream that your time had not come! And in this century, how many

thinkers have had a premonition of your coming and have descended into

the grave saluting you as the dying patriarchs saluted the redeemer! Let

your reign arrive, Anarchy!