💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › jean-grave-colonization.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 11:16:39. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Colonization
Author: Jean Grave
Date: 1912
Language: en
Topics: colonialism, colonization, imperialism
Source: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k81936b/f1.item
Notes: This pamphlet, published in 1912 as "La Colonisation", is a modified version of the 13th chapter of Jean Grave's "Moribund Society and Anarchy" (1893). This translation is mostly taken from the translation of that book available on https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/jean-grave-moribund-society-and-anarchy][theanarchistlibrary.org]] , with changes and additions made by João Black according to the 1912 version, accessed on [[https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k81936b/f1.item

Jean Grave

Colonization

Colonization is extending too widely, in the present epoch, for

anarchists not to have their say on this question. At a time when the

so-called civilized nations are disputing areas of influence in Africa —

in Tripolitania, in the Congo, in Morocco — dividing up the peoples like

cattle, all of this hiding the most shady financial schemes, the pastors

of peoples being no more than the business managers of financial sharks,

tampers of crooked businesses, we must rise up against this hybrid

product of patriotism and mercantilism combined — brigandage and highway

robbery for the benefit of the ruling classes.

A private individual goes into his neighbor’s house, breaks everything

he lays his hands on, seizes everything he finds convenient for his own

use: he is a criminal; “Society” condemns him. But if a government finds

itself driven to a standstill by an internal situation which

necessitates some external diversion; if it be encumbered at home by

unemployed hands of which it knows not how to rid itself, of products

which it cannot get distributed; let this government declare war against

remote peoples which it knows to be too feeble to resist it, let it take

possession of their country, subject them to an entire system of

exploitation, force its products upon them, massacre them if they

attempt to escape this exploitation with which it weighs them down,—oh,

then, this is moral! From the moment you operate on a grand scale it

merits the approbation of honest men. It is no longer called robbery or

assassination; there is an honorable word for covering up the

dishonorable deeds that government commits: this is called “civilizing”

undeveloped peoples.

And let no one deem this exaggeration. No nation is reputed to be a

colonizing one save when it has succeeded in getting out of a country

the maximum product it is capable of yielding. Thus England is a

colonizing country, because she knows how to “reward” her colonies with

the prosperity of the people she sends out to rule them, how to gather

back into her coffers the taxes with which she burdens them.

In the Indies, for instance, those whom she sends out make colossal

fortunes. The country, to be sure, is completely ravaged from time to

time by frightful famines that decimate hundreds of thousands of people.

But of what moment are the details so long as John Bull can market his

manufactured products and thereby succeed in obtaining, for his own

advantage, what the soil of Great Britain could not produce? Such are

the benefits of colonization!

Today, it is true, one must be disillusioned. India competes with the

products of the “Motherland”. Never mind, the capitalists will transport

their capital and factories there, and since the Hindus feed on a

handful of rice, fortunes can still be built; too bad if the English

workers pay the difference. In order to make them patient, they will be

promised the empire of the world, and they will be launched against the

Boers or the Germans.

In France it is different; we are not colonizers. Oh, reassure yourself;

that is not to say we are any the less brigands, that our conquered

people are less exploited! No; only we are less “practical.” Instead of

studying the peoples we conquer we deliver them over to the caprices of

the sword; we subject them to the regime of the “mother country;” if

these peoples cannot bend to it, so much the worse for them! They will

disappear little by little under the degenerating influence of an

administration to which they are not accustomed. What of it? If they

revolt we hunt them like wild beasts, track them like deer, and pillage

in that case is not only tolerated but approved; it is called a “raid.”

The ferocious beast which we train and keep, under the name of

“soldier,” is let loose upon inoffensive peoples. The latter behold

themselves delivered over to every excess which these unchained brutes

can conceive: women are raped, children’s throats are cut, whole

villages are given to the flames, entire populations are driven into the

plains where they are destined to perish miserably. Is that all? Let it

pass; it is a civilized nation carrying civilization to savages!

Certainly, upon thorough examination of what goes on around us there is

nothing illogical or abnormal in all this; it is, in fact, the result of

our present organization. It is nothing astonishing that these «high

feats» of arms obtain the approval and applause of the bourgeois world.

The bourgeoisie is interested in these strokes of brigandage; they serve

as a pretext for maintaining permanent armies; they occupy the

praetorians who, during these slaughters, set their hands to more

serious “labor;” these armies themselves serve to unload a whole pack of

idiots and worthless persons by whom the bourgeoisie would be much

embarrassed, and who, by virtue of a few yards of gilt stripes, are made

their most furious defenders. These conquests facilitate an entire

series of financial schemes by means of which they may skim off the

savings of speculators in search of doubtful enterprises. They will

monopolize the stolen or conquered lands. These wars cause massacres of

workers whose excessive numbers embarrass them; the conquered countries

being in “need” of an administration, there is a new market for a whole

army of office-seekers and ambitious persons whom they thus harness to

their chariot, whereas had these latter remained unemployed its route

might have been hampered thereby.

Still better, there are peoples to exploit, to be yoked in their

service, upon whom their products may be forced, whom they may decimate

without being held accountable to any one. In view of these advantages

the bourgeoisie need not hesitate; and the French bourgeoisie have so

well understood this that they have launched headlong into colonial

enterprises.

But what astonishes and disheartens us is that there are workers who

approve of these infamies; who feel no remorse in lending a hand to

these rascalities, and do not understand the flagrant injustice of

massacring people in their own homes, in order to mould them to a way of

living not natural to them. Oh, we know the ready-made rejoinders which

it is customary to make to those who become indignant at too flagrant

injustices: “They have revolted, they have killed our people; we cannot

endure it. . . They are savages, they must be civilized. . . The needs

of commerce require it. . . Yes, perhaps it was wrong to go among them

in the first place, but the colonies have cost us too many men, too much

money, to abandon them now,” etc.

“They have revolted; they have killed our men!” Well, what else? What

were we doing in their country? Why did we not let them alone? Did they

ever come and ask anything of us? We have tried to impose laws upon them

which they do not want to accept. They have revolted; they have done

well. So much the worse for those of us who perish in the struggle; they

should have refrained from participating in these infamies.

“They are savages; they must be civilized.” Let any one take up the

history of conquests, and then tell us which were the most savage,—those

who were called so, or the “civilized.” Which are in greatest need of

being civilized, the conquerors or the inoffensive peoples who generally

welcomed their invaders with open arms, and as the reward for their

advances have been tortured and decimated? Take the history of the

conquests in America by Spain, of India by England, of Africa, Cochin

China, and Tonquin by France, and then boast about “civilization.”

Remember, too, that in these histories you will find recorded only the

“great events,” whose importance has left traces; but if you were to

picture to yourself all the “little events” of which these are composed

and which pass by unperceived; if you were to bring to light all the

turpitudes which are absorbed in the imposing mass of the principal

facts, then what would it be? You would recoil affrighted before these

horrors!

For ourselves, having spent some time in the naval service, we have

listened to the description of numbers of scenes which prove that when a

soldier arrives in a conquered country, he considers himself, by that

mere fact, absolute master therein; for him the natives are beasts of

burden, which he may order about at will; he has the right to seize upon

every object which suits him; woe to the native that would oppose him!

He will not be slow in teaching that the law of the sword is the only

law;—the institution which protects property in Europe does not

recognize it in another latitude. And in all this the soldier is

encouraged by the officers who preach by example, by the administration

which puts the cudgel in his hand that he may superintend the natives it

employs upon its works.

How many repugnant actions are naively recounted to you as altogether

natural occurrences! If you happen to say of some native who revolted

and killed his oppressor, that he did well, you should hear the cries of

stupefaction which greet your remark! “What! Since we are the masters,

since we command them, they must obey us; if we let them alone they

would all revolt, they would drive us out! After having spent so much

money and so many men, France would lose the country! She would have no

more colonies!”

Behold what an effect military discipline and brutalization have upon

the minds of the workers. They endure the same injustices, the same

turpitudes, with which they are helping to burden others; and they no

longer feel the ignominy of their conduct; they have come to serve,

unconsciously, as the instruments of despotism and to boast of this

role, not realizing its baseness and infamy.

The European civilizers, Italian, French or others, would do much better

to take advantage of the land that is uncultivated at home, before going

to steal those of others.

As to “the needs of commerce,” here, indeed, we have the genuine motive.

Messieurs the bourgeois being embarrassed with products which they

cannot dispose of, find nothing better to do than to go and declare war

against poor devils powerless to defend themselves, in order to impose

these products upon them.

To be sure it would be easy enough to come to an understanding with

them; one might traffic with them by means of barter, not being

overscrupulous, even, about the value of the objects exchanged; these

latter being valueless to them save when attractive to the eye, it would

be easy enough to get the best of them and realize fine profits

therefrom. Was it not thus before the dark continent was penetrated?

Were we not, through the intermediary of the coast tribes in

communication with the tribes of the interior? Did we not get the same

products then as we get now?

“Yes, it is possible that it was so, but the devil of it is that to

operate in such a way takes time and patience; it is impossible to go in

on a grand scale; one must figure on competition; ‘commerce must be

protected.’”—We know what that means: two or three fast iron-clads, in

double-quick order, half-a-dozen gun-boats, a body of troops to be

landed—salute! Civilization is going to perform its work! We have taken

a people, strong, robust, and healthy; in forty or fifty years from now

we shall have them turned into a horde of anæmics, brutalized,

miserable, decimated, corrupted, who will shortly disappear from the

surface of the globe. Then the civilizing job will be finished!

If any one doubt what we here assert let him take the accounts of

travelers, let him read the descriptions of those countries in which

Europeans have installed themselves by the right of conquest: everywhere

the native populations decrease and disappear; everywhere drunkenness,

syphilis, and other European importations mow them down in great swaths,

atrophy and anæmiate those who survive. And can it be otherwise? No, not

when such means are employed! Here are peoples who have another mode of

life than ours, other aptitudes, other needs; instead of studying these

needs and aptitudes, seeking to adapt them to our civilization

gradually, insensibly, not demanding that they take any more of it than

they can assimilate, we try to bend them to it at a single blow, we

break everything asunder; and not only do they become refractory but the

experience is fatal to them.

How glorious might the role of the so-called civilized man have been,

had he but understood it, and had not he himself been afflicted with

these two pests, government and mercantilism,—two frightful plagues, of

which he would do well to consider how to rid himself before seeking to

civilize others.

The education of undeveloped tribes might go on peacefully and bring

into civilization new elements, capable in the course of their

adaptation, of putting new life into it. Let no one talk to us of the

duplicity and ferocity of the barbarians. We have but to read the

accounts of those truly courageous men who have gone into the midst of

unknown tribes, urged on solely by the ideal of science and the desire

for knowledge. Such persons have succeeded in making friends of these

people, have gone among them, having nothing to fear; duplicity and

ferocity came in only with these miserable traffickers who falsely

decorate themselves with the name of travelers, seeing nothing in their

travels but a good commercial or political deal. They have excited the

animosity of these peoples against the whites by cheating them in their

exchanges, by failing to keep their agreements, by massacring them, if

need be, when they could do it with impunity.

Should we bring facts? Let’s read the books by Octon Vigné, and Chez les

Hova by Jean Carol. The atrocities of the Chanoines and the Voulets are

not so far from us that we still cannot remember them. As for the

exploits of the Italian “civilizers” in Tripolitania, they are of the

present day.

Go to, go to, philanthropists of commerce, civilizers by the sword!

Forbear your tirades on the benefits of civilization! That which you

call thus, that which you disguise under the name of colonization, has a

name perfectly denned in your code, when it is the act of a few obscure

individuals: it is called “pillage and assassination by armed bands.”

But civilization has nothing in common with your highway-robber

practices!

What the ruling classes must have is new markets for their products and

new peoples to exploit; for this they send out their Solcillets, their

de Brazzas, their Crampels, Triviers, etc., in search of unknown

territories, there to open up factories which shall deliver these

countries over to their unlimited exploitation. They commence by

exploiting commercially and finish by exploiting in every way, when once

these tribes have been brought under their protectorate. What they stand

in need of is immense tracts of earth which they may gradually annex

after having depopulated them;—do they not need plenty of room where

into they may divert the surplus population which embarrasses them, and

buy the parliamentarians who become their accomplices in the House [of

representatives]?

You, rulers, are civilizers? Come on! What have you done with those

tribes that inhabited America and which disappear every day decimated by

betrayals, those tribes of which, in defiance of the sworn faith, you

tear off, little by little, the hunting grounds that you had recognized

as theirs? What have you done with the tribes of Polynesia, which all

travelers agreed in depicting to us as strong and vigorous peoples, and

who are now disappearing under your rule?

You civilizers? But at the rate your civilization is going on, if the

workers are bound to succumb to the struggle to which you deliver them

up, you, in your turn, will not be long in succumbing likewise under

your indolence and laziness, even as fell the Greek and Roman

civilizations, which having reached the pitch of luxury and

exploitation, having lost all the faculties of struggle, in preserving

the faculty of enjoyment, succumbed much more under the pressure of

their own bloated nervelessness than to the blows of the barbarians,

who, entering into the struggle in the fullness of their strength, had

no great trouble to overturn this rapidly decaying civilization.

As you have undertaken to destroy these races, not inferior, but merely

latecomer, you tend in like manner to destroy the working class, which

you also qualify as inferior. Day by day you seek to eliminate the

worker from the workshop, replacing him by machines. Your triumph would

be the end of humanity; for, losing little by little the faculties

acquired by the necessity for struggle, you would return to the most

rudimentary ancestral forms of society and humanity would soon have no

other ideal than that of an association of digestive sacs commanding a

nation of machines, waited upon by automatons, having nothing human left

but the name.