đŸ’Ÿ Archived View for library.inu.red â€ș file â€ș workers-solidarity-movement-capitalism-in-crisis.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 14:52:21. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

âžĄïž Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Capitalism in Crisis
Author: Workers Solidarity Movement
Date: 2009
Language: en
Topics: financial crisis, capitalism, Red & Black Revolution, neoliberalism
Source: Retrieved on 15th November 2021 from http://www.wsm.ie/c/neoliberal-origin-global-capitalist-crisis
Notes: Published in Red & Black Revolution No. 15 — Spring 2009.

Workers Solidarity Movement

Capitalism in Crisis

The neoliberal origins of the global capitalist crisis

The neoliberal model that global capitalism has depended upon for its

growth over the last three decades has collapsed in spectacular fashion.

The collapse has been remarkable for the astonishing speed with which it

has spread all over the world and into every corner of the global

economy.

The roots of this crisis are found in the basic structure of the

neoliberal economic system. Neoliberal economics first came into vogue

in the late 1970s. They represented a reaction by the powerful against

social democracy and the wave of radical social movements — anti-

colonial, civil-rights, feminist, socialist — that flourished in the

post-war period. At its essence neoliberalism amounted to a very simple

strategy — to remove as many constraints as possible governing how

capital could be employed. To this end, from the 1980s onwards, having

gained ideological control of the political systems of the major

economies, neoliberal financial, legal and diplomatic measures were

introduced to progressively facilitate the free movement of capital

around the globe. The mobility and freedom from regulation and oversight

that such reforms allowed effectively removed any prospect of democratic

forces influencing the running of the economy.

If any population even looked like they might have the temerity to

impose restrictions on capital movements, the markets would move and

capital would leave, destroying the economy in the process, long before

the local population could act. If any workforce became too assertive

and started organising to achieve better pay and conditions, production

could move overseas, closing their factories and eliminating the

workers’ jobs. Thus, the basic neoliberal principles, when translated

into policies, were very effective in increasing the power of those who

owned significant capital and, conversely, decreasing the power of the

masses who did not. For example, the rising tide of Third World

nationalism and anti-colonialism was militarily impossible to defeat in

the 1960s and 70s. However, the Third World debt crisis of the early

1980s managed to quash the threat, with an effect that lasted for

decades. Similarly, neoliberal deregulation allowed the industrial

barons of the US auto-industry to move production away from the

heavily-unionised and militant cities of Detroit and Pittsburgh. The

economic dereliction that they left behind still serves as a potent

warning against any would be imitators of the militant Detroit workers.

The major problem, however, for the ruling class with this strategy is

that the regulations that neoliberalism tore up were put there for a

reason and they were largely put in place by the ruling class in their

own interests. During the 19^(th) century — the era of classic

liberalism — ‘laissez faire’ economic ideas were in vogue. The

unregulated economy experienced regular, cataclysmic crises, frequent

cycles of boom and bust, social upheavals, resource wars and even

revolutions. That economic period culminated in the apocalypse of the

First World War and the Russian revolution. The economic mess that

ensued led to the Second World War and another surge of social upheaval.

The economic regulations, put in place as part of the post-war

settlement — which neoliberalism shredded were put in place for a

reason.

There are various different theories that explain why markets are prone

to cycles of boom and bust. Regardless of the ultimate cause, however,

what is clear is that, when people interact through markets, crises

invariably occur. The severity and disruption caused by these crises

depends on the presence of regulations and mechanisms for preventing

them and counter-acting them when they occur. Without any regulation or

oversight, markets will frequently collapse completely and will simply

cease functioning. In general, regulations that have been put in place

exist because, without them, significant problems may occur that

threaten the survival of the system. The neoliberal crusaders who

constructed the financial infrastructure of the modern economy were

presumably at least vaguely aware of the structural problems inherent in

deregulated markets. However, they were able to delude themselves into

imagining that modern fiscal and monetary policy mechanisms were of such

sophistication and power that the government would be able to prevent

the system from ever descending into crisis. This belief was seductive

too. Neoliberalism delivered almost three decades of solid growth in

profits. The frequent crises that appeared, in accordance with their

fears, were managed, contained and isolated from the rest of the global

economy by the International Financial Institutions. The major economies

were largely able to avoid recessions — they were contained within

developing regions such as East Asia or Latin America.

However, this apparent success in staving off busts in the major

economies was based on a serious dose of both voodoo economics and

wishful thinking. Every time that the markets got into trouble, central

banks would lower interest rates, making it easier for people to borrow

money to keep investments flowing. While it might have looked like it

was working at the time, this simply amounted to moving bubbles around

and keeping on inflating them whenever they looked like bursting. The

dotcom bubble was moved into housing and financial services and, all the

while, underlying debt was building up. The entire financial system

eventually became little more than a massive pyramid scheme. What made

the problem worse was that neoliberalism attacked workers’ incomes and

conditions as part of its drive to deliver profits to capitalists. Since

modern economies such as that of the US are heavily reliant on consumer

spending by workers, this creates a basic contradiction. Thus, during

the neoliberal era, a large proportion of consumption as well as

investment was fuelled by credit. Low interest rates allowed this

dependence on credit to mushroom into a huge bubble.

Credit bubbles can only grow so large. At some stage, debt grows to such

a stage that the debtors can’t afford to service their debt. Thus, when

interest rates increased in 2007, a chain reaction of debt-defaults was

set in motion all across the global economy. It became clear that,

rather than having conquered the boom- bust cycle, neoliberalism had

simply managed to build up the greatest boom of all time, and its

unwinding would be similarly the greatest bust. The immediate factor

that triggered the rise in interest rates and the onset of the bust was

the increase in commodity prices in 2007 (food, energy, minerals...).

This represented a new, underlying and extremely serious long term

threat to capitalist growth — the supply of commodities is inherently

finite, but capitalist growth demands ever more resources as time goes

on. At some stage the raw materials available from the earth will fall

below demand. The commodity price bubble of 2007 represented the

market’s opinion that the rates of growth were not sustainable in the

long term due to the finite nature of supply.

Although the prices of commodities collapsed along with the credit

bubble, the spectre of resource shortages hangs over the system. Any

recovery of capitalist growth is likely to lead to another explosion in

commodity prices.Thus, overall, it is fair to say that the crisis of

2007/2008 represents an enormous and unprecedented challenge to the

world’s economic order. As of March 2009, there is no prospect of

recovery on the horizon and the pace of the crisis is, if anything,

increasing over time, despite the best efforts of bankers and

politicians.

Despite the fact that the crisis has and will continue to cause great

suffering for ordinary people all over the world, this is a good time to

be a revolutionary. The neoliberal capitalist ideological orthodoxy,

which reigned supreme for over three decades has been smashed to

smithereens and will never return. Suddenly, there is space for new

economic visions that are not based upon capitalist greed and growth.

Ordinary people are willing to consider different ideas as to how we

should run our economy and in many cases, the impossible circumstances

that they find themselves in will force them to seek out such

answers.Nobody can be sure exactly how the current crisis will play out.

We know that it will be severe and prolonged, but exactly what will

happen is impossible to know. However, it is obvious that the crisis

represents a real opportunity for anarchists and other socialists to

rebuild support for alternative economic visions.

A new era of revolutionary possibilities lies before us.

The development of the capitalist crisis: 2008 to 2009

The first 18 months of the crash from the Credit Crunch to the spread to

the ‘real economy.

Financial Crisis: August 2007 — September 2008

In August 2007 the world’s financial systems started grinding to a halt

as financial institutions began to realise that they had no real idea of

the risks that were contained within the complex financial instruments

that they owned. Since the bankers couldn’t work out exactly how risky

their own securities were, they certainly weren’t going to trust the

assurances of other institutions. Due to the complexity of the

inter-relationsshps within the financial sector, this resulted in the

credit market basically shutting down. The financial institutions were

no longer willing to lend money to any of their peers as they thought it

was far too risky. This was known as the Credit Crunch.

As 2008 progressed, the credit market remained closed and it became ever

more apparent that the reluctance of the bankers tomake loans to one

another was well-founded.

In March 2008, Bear Stearns, one of the world’s largest investment

banks, collapsed under the weight of its bad loans. Then, in September

2008, another Wall Street bank, Lehman Brothers, collapsed. Rather than

bailing it out, or transferring its assets elsewhere, the US government

allowed it to declare bankruptcy. This almost led to a total collapse of

the global financial system, as Lehman’s bad debts rippled through it.

Lehman’s bankruptcy shone a light on the vast web of deals between banks

which meant that the entire system was dependent on the value of assets

that were known to be ‘toxic’. As of March 2009, the financial system

continues on a downward spiral — the injection of trillions of dollars

of public money has merely slowed the collapse. The basic problem is

that almost all of the banks are insolvent. The financial system is dead

and will not be revived in the same form ever again.

Crisis in the Real Economy: September 2008 — Spring 2009

Although world stock-markets had been in retreat since November 2007, it

wasn’t until September 2008 that the full effects of the crisis started

to be felt in the real economy. There were two basic reasons for this

spread. Firstly, it became more difficult for businesses to access

credit. This was particularly problematic as, during the era of

neoliberalism, it became standard practice for companies to borrow

heavily in order to minimise the tax liabilities of their owners. Many

businesses were heavily dependent on cheap credit and when it

disappeared, they faced an immediate crisis and had to close or downsize

to survive.

Secondly, the crisis was ultimately triggered by the fact that workers

were unable to service their debts. This meant that there was going to

be less consumer spending and companies were going to sell less

products. This caused share prices to collapse and companies to cut back

even further. These effects combined in a negative feedback loop —

rising unemployment and less credit caused companies to cut back even

further as spending collapsed, leading to a runaway economic crisis.

Global Political Repercussions of the capitalist crisis

As soon as the scale of the crisis became clear, all rhetoric about

free-markets and competition vanished. Bankers, capitalists and right

wing politicians were all suddenly huge believers in the role of the

state and the importance of regulation.

It took no time at all for the bankers and various other troubled

industries to start demanding public money to bail them out. This showed

just how thin capitalism’s ideological layer is — they will believe

anything and say anything as long as it is in their own immediate

interests to do so. Thus far, the neoliberal governments of the world,

with their hatred for government interference have poured more than $10

trillion into bailing out their banks. However, the chain reaction of

the collapse in the real economy has caused even more fundamental shifts

in economic policy.

Keynsianism

The U.S. government amongst many others has responded to the crisis by

adopting programs of economic stimulus. This amounts to a re-birth of

the economic thinking of John Maynard Keynes, whereby countries spend

their way out of recessions by borrowing heavily and using the money to

provide jobs and capital to ‘stimulate’ the economy, in order to

counteract the negative feedback loops that recessions cause.

Keynsianism was traditionally associated with Social Democratic policies

and the welfare state, so its new popularity marks a fundamental shift

from neoliberalism. However, the scale of the crisis and the fact that

it is occurring on a global level means that such responses, alongside

the cost of the bank bailouts, have caused an explosion in demand for

international credit at precisely the time when it is least available.

China

Due to its large export sector, China is one of the principal creditors

between states. However, the slow-down in the Chinese economy is likely

to cause unrest amongst the huge and volatile Chinese working class.

Whether China can continue to serve as a major international creditor in

the long term is uncertain.

USA

The massive cost of the crisis will put pressure on the imperial role of

the US. Their public finances will increasingly constrain their ability

to serve as the “world’s policeman.” Significant changes are in motion,

exactly how they will turn out is impossible to say, but the world will

be different.