💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › ole-birk-laursen-finding-acharya.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:07:29. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Finding Acharya
Author: Ole Birk Laursen
Date: March 20, 2018
Language: en
Topics: M. P. T. Acharya, archives
Source: Retrieved on 31st March 2021 from https://olebirklaursen.wordpress.com/2018/03/20/finding-acharya-an-indian-anarchist-in-the-archives/

Ole Birk Laursen

Finding Acharya

The Indian anarchist M. P. T. Acharya passed away on 20 March 1954 in

Bombay (Mumbai). He had been ill for the last six years, suffering from

tuberculosis since 1948, and his wife Magda Nachman Acharya, had died in

January 1951. In his obituary in Freedom, Albert Meltzer recalled: “He

remained an uncompromising rebel, and when age prevented him from

speaking, he continued writing up until his death”. A prolific writer

and agitator, however, Acharya has remained an obscure figure within the

international anarchist movement until recently, and his writings even

more unknown.

To bring his thoughts and ideas to a wider audience, I am currently

editing a collection of Acharya’s essays to be published by AK Press.

Comprising 50 essays on anarchism, pacifism and the Indian independence

movement, as well as a critical biographical introduction to Acharya,

the essays open a window onto the global reach of anarchism in this

period and enables a more nuanced understanding of Indian anti-colonial

struggles against the totalized oppression of the state, be it

imperialist, Communist or capitalist.

Finding Acharya and his essays, however, has been difficult, as there is

no central archive or repository dedicated to Acharya’s papers. He lived

in Berlin from 1922 to 1935, but there is almost no trace of him in

intelligence reports from that period. In fact, when the British

Government put pressure on the German Ministry for Foreign Affairs to

deport Acharya and a number of Indians in Berlin in 1925, the Germans

noted that: “it is not possible to discover any activities of the person

named”. What is more, while Acharya had attended the founding meeting of

the International Working Men’s Association (IWMA) in December 1922 and

wrote extensively for IWMA-affiliated papers such as Rabochii put, Die

Internationale and La Voix du Travail, his name rarely appears in

official documents from the IWMA. Adding to this problem, most of the

IWMA archives were lost when the Nazis came to power and banned the

organization in 1933. In many other cases, it is difficult to assess

Acharya’s involvement in certain organizations – for instance, the War

Resisters’ International, the League Against Imperialism, the Indian

Press Service, and the Indian Independence Union – and extensive

research into the archives of these organizations has lead almost

nowhere.

Upon his return to India in 1935, Acharya focused more on Indian

politics, pacifism and the labour movement, and he lost touch with the

international anarchist movement during the Second World War. Acharya’s

role in the Indian Institute of Sociology and its successor the

Libertarian Socialist Institute during those years remains unclear,

except from Victor Garcia’s brief account of Acharya. It is, however,

from this later period that the only pictures of Acharya have been

found.

Tracing Acharya under such circumstances has required a historical

methodology of reading between dominant narratives. His name

occasionally crops up in correspondence between other prominent figures

such as Alexander Berkman, Tom Keell, Augustin Souchy, Guy Aldred, E.

Armand, Hem Day, James Dawson, and Nicolaas Steelink, as well as in a

surprising letter to Leon Trotsky from 1931. Yet, Souchy, for instance,

does not mention Acharya in his autobiography Beware! Anarchist! (1977),

and neither does Acharya appear in many other “official” papers.

Instead, I have relied greatly on help from Prof. Lina Bernstein, who is

writing a biography of Acharya’s wife, Magda Nachman Acharya, and

numerous archivists across India, Britain, Europe, and North America,

who have assisted in finding letters and correspondence for me.

Furthermore, various grassroots organizations and historians have

recently digitized anarchist periodicals, and I have benefitted greatly

from that. What is more, I have relied on help from friends and

colleagues to translate Acharya’s essays from German, French, and

Spanish into English. Indeed, finding Acharya when there is no single

archive has demanded a practice of mutual aid, a collaborative effort,

all in the spirit of bringing this Indian anarchist out of the archives

and into the public eye.