💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › anarcho-syndicalist-review-trumpocolypse.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 07:40:21. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Trumpocolypse Author: Anarcho-Syndicalist Review Date: January 31, 2017 Language: en Topics: Donald Trump, apocalypse, Anarcho-Syndicalist Review Source: Retrieved on 28th January 2021 from https://syndicalist.us/2017/01/31/trumpocolypse-2/ Notes: From Anarcho-Syndicalist Review #69, Winter 2017
Despite losing the election, Donald Trump will be installed as U.S.
president on January 20. Just over 25 percent of eligible voters cast
ballots for Trump or Hillary Clinton, about 47 percent didn’t vote, and
the other 3 percent voted third party. (Millions more aren’t permitted
to vote.) Clinton – a right-wing politician with a long history of
war-mongering, mass incarceration, environmental devastation and
neoliberal economics – received some 2.7 million more votes than did
Trump. And exit polls and referendum results suggest that most voters
are far to the left of either party. Voters in several states raised the
minimum wage, legalized marijuana (not that this will stop the feds from
throwing potsmokers in jail), and rejected anti-labor measures.
Why, then, did Trump win the presidency (despite getting fewer votes)?
In large part, for the same reasons both houses of Congress are
dominated by Republicans despite Democratic candidates (as a whole)
receiving more votes. This is in large part an artifact of
gerrymandering, in individual districts and entrenched in an Electoral
College designed to ensure that popular revulsion could not force an end
to slavery. Also contributing was a barrage of voter suppression laws
that prevent millions from voting. In Wisconsin, for example, 10 times
as many voters were disenfranchised in the last few years as provided
Trump’s margin of victory.
But the main factor seems to have been widespread disgust. Voter
turn-out was down by 10 million since 2008, even though the number of
people eligible to vote is much higher. Trump received fewer votes than
did Mitt Romney four years ago (and also fewer than John McCain or John
Kerry), even though he ran slightly stronger (though still quite poorly)
among Black and Latino voters. But Trump did much better than Romney in
rural areas and in depressed mining and industrial regions.
While many pundits blamed white working class voters for Trump’s
victory, exit polls indicate that Clinton carried the votes of those
earning less than $50,000 a year, and Trump those earning more. But huge
numbers in both categories stayed home, unwilling to pull the level for
either of the millionaires on offer.
Since the election, we have seen waves of mass protests, calls for a
general strike on Inauguration Day (though no major union has endorsed
these), and nominations of right wing hacks and millionaires to serve in
the new Trump administration, including a climate change denier to head
the environmental protection agency, an anti-civil rights zealot to head
injustice, an anti-minimum wage fast food mogul to head labor, the man
responsible for killing coal miners at the Sago Mine to head commerce, a
charter school fanatic with no education experience to run education,
etc. Trump is sending a clear message that he intends an all-out assault
on the environment, on workers’ rights, on women and minorities, on our
very ability to survive as a species.
It is not enough to say – true though it is – that the majority have no
illusions that either political party serves their interests. The
question is what they are going to do about it – whether we can build a
movement inspired by a vision of the world that could be, and willing to
act to bring it into being. We asked several of our readers and
contributors to reflect on this challenge…