💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › laurence-cox-building-an-antiwar-movement.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 11:59:53. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Building an antiwar movement
Author: Laurence Cox
Date: October 2001
Language: en
Topics: anti-war
Source: Retrieved on 16th December 2021 from http://struggle.ws/issues/war/afghan/pamwt/antiwar.html
Notes: Laurence Cox (Dublin) has been involved in social movements for nearly 20 years, including opposing the Falklands War, the nuclear arms race and the second Gulf War. He’s an academic specialist in social movements research, currently studying working-class community politics in Ireland.

Laurence Cox

Building an antiwar movement

It’s easy to feel despair, isolation and frustration at what’s presented

to us as an inevitable drive into an indefinitely long war. The key

ingredients of success in building a successful anti-war movement are

confidence in ordinary people’s potential, solidarity with each other

and a long-term view: we have not been able to prevent the first bombs

falling, but over time we can reverse the dynamic and stop the war.

Historical experience — desertion and mutinies at the end of World War

I, the international movement against the war in Vietnam, the

anti-nuclear movement of the 1980s — shows that movements can stop or

divert even large-scale processes of militarisation, but only when large

numbers of ordinary people are actively involved. The experience of

active involvement in turn gives people more confidence in their own

capacities to think and act for themselves, which is an important

element in building a better world. This means:

on expressing only the most radical line will isolate activists at the

very time when many ordinary people are looking for a way out. To insist

on being as “mainstream” as possible will stop the movement developing

and restrict participation to a small section of the population. So a

good “platform” will include as wide a range of anti-war voices as

possible. This enables the movement to speak to different people and is

part of learning from each other.

take part in. It’s important to remember that most actions don’t have an

immediate chance of stopping the war; but if they give people a chance

to learn how to become active, to gain confidence and to develop their

own understanding, they can help build a movement that does have a

chance.

people to the exclusion of everyone else. While activists may have

particular skills, their job is to share them and pass them on. Stopping

this war is likely to be a long campaign, so we will need to develop

everyone’s ability to take part at every level.

In terms of strategy, it’s important for people to mobilise within their

own everyday contexts, both to root the movement in the real world and

to change the existing social relationships that ultimately give rise to

war. While the movement will also need to reach out into public space

and develop a “political” face, this shouldn’t become separate from the

rest of the movement. The point is for ordinary people to politicise

themselves, not to develop a separate political Ă©lite. In practice, what

we need to do is:

the bus, in school, online — anywhere where people already know us. This

may seem challenging at times, but it’s becoming clear that far more

people are uneasy about the prospect of war than the media leads us to

think. By opening up this new space for communication, we undermine some

of the usual power relationships and creating space for new kinds of

solidarity and friendship.

going on a march, coming to a meeting, putting up posters, circulating a

letter. We’re trying to “push people’s boundaries” enough so that they

feel they are becoming active, but not so much that they see activism as

beyond their reach.

yet know how: ask them to speak at meetings or write leaflets, help them

to put press releases or websites together, show them how to organise a

public meeting or a march. Be careful of patronising people: the trick

is to be confident that they can do whatever they set their mind to, and

make sure they have the backup they need to do it. The second time

somebody does something, we should leave them to it!

most of us are going to have to find out more about all kinds of issues,

from foreign policy to Islam to international law. This also gives us a

chance to build connections by inviting speakers from other groups, from

local Muslim associations to college lecturers to development

organisations.

welcomed, we should work and argue for making links to other issues,

most importantly foreign policy, “development” and world economics,

racism and intolerance, and civil liberties. To stop the war and leave

the system ready for another war tomorrow is not enough.

Encourage people to take independent action (and support them when they

do); work to create networks between different groups and initiatives,

without imposing a single “line” that everyone has to follow.

This war may run for years in various forms, and a movement that can

stop it will need to include many different social groups. So there’s

space for all sorts of different action, and it’s important to respect

this, because it’s how new people will both find their way to the

movement and how other people can contribute something we might not have

thought of. Different actions also have different purposes (though some

overlap):

leaflets, videos, etc.

websites, gatherings, benefit gigs, etc.

occupations, peace observers, supporting deserters, blockades, etc.

releases, photo opportunities, etc.

We learn as movements, not just as individuals, and the dialogue between

us is important. There is no book that can tell us authoritatively how

we are going to stop this war; it’s something we will work out together

in practice. We can certainly learn from other movements and past

history (several campaigns have produced excellent “how-to” guides that

are a real goldmine of ideas), but at the end of the day none of us

knows exactly what will work, and we won’t know until we’ve managed to

stop the war (if then!) In the process, though, we are also learning

something else of immense value: how to treat each other as equals, how

to cooperate and communicate without bosses and laws, and how to build

the kind of world that we want to live in.