💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › emile-armand-letter-from-orleans-france.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 09:26:27. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Letter from Orleans, France Author: Émile Armand Date: January 1915 Language: en Topics: anti-militarist, anti-war, war, World War I Source: Retrieved on December 22, 2011 from http://libertarian-labyrinth.org/archive/Letter_from_Orleans,_France][libertarian-labyrinth.org]]. Proofread online source [[http://www.revoltlib.com/?id=3768, retrieved on July 14, 2020. Notes: From Mother Earth
Orleans, France, November 8^(th).
Dear Comrade:
I read in The Spur your few lines to Guy Aldred. A large number of our
comrades, especially the Individualist Anarchists, have withstood the
jingo contagion.
Others have enlisted as volunteers, it is true, but they are a small
minority. On the other hand, I am literally terrified by the ideas
revealed by the communists and the syndicalists.
As an Individualist Anarchist, I am against war, ever and forever. First
of all, because, in a country at war, what few liberties an individual
possessed are taken from him. Everything under the arbitrary control of
the military administration; every plan of meeting, all literature,
every newspaper, must pass the military censor. You no longer belong to
yourself, neither your person nor your property. Not only this, but
Nationalism and Clericalism develop into frightful proportions. Under
the pretext of “unity,” the advanced parties give up hard won liberties
to the reactionaries, who always profit from times such as these. The
military caste, and the clerical caste are the masters of the day. How
much of our propaganda can we restore the moment war is over is what I
ask? And what will the reactionaries not dare to do against us?
I know well enough that the problem is complex. The victory of
“Kaiserism” will not profit our propaganda. But neither do I believe
that French jingoism, English imperialism and Tzarism will be favorable
for the spread of our ideas. It seems to me that, though I am not a
Communist, Kropotkin, Malato, Cornelissen and others could have shown
another point of view.
We live in sad days and the future does not appear very clear to me.
I have read with pleasure “The Social Significance of the Modern Drama.”
You know that “Chanticler” made rather (from a literary standpoint) an
unfavorable impression on us.
Sincerely,
E. Armand.