💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › victoria-law-against-carceral-feminism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 14:36:47. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Against Carceral Feminism
Author: Victoria Law
Date: 2014
Language: en
Topics: abolition, anarcha-feminism, anti-prison, police
Source: Retrieved on  2022-01-23 from https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/10/against-carceral-feminism/
Notes: Victoria Law is an American anarchist activist, prison abolitionist, writer, freelance editor, and photographer.

Victoria Law

Against Carceral Feminism

Cherie Williams, a thirty-five-year-old African-American woman in the

Bronx, just wanted to protect herself from her abusive boyfriend. So she

called the cops. But although New York requires police to make an arrest

when responding to domestic violence calls, the officers did not leave

their car. When Williams demanded their badge numbers, the police

handcuffed her, drove her to a deserted parking lot, and beat her,

breaking her nose and jaw, and rupturing her spleen. They then left her

on the ground.

“They told me if they saw me on the street, that they would kill me,”

Williams later testified.

The year was 1999. It was a half-decade after the passage of the

Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), which deployed more police and

introduced more punitive sentencing in an attempt to reduce domestic

violence. Many of the feminists who had lobbied for the passage of VAWA

remained silent about Williams and countless other women whose 911 calls

resulted in more violence. Often white, well-heeled feminists, their

legislative accomplishment did little to stem violence against less

affluent, more marginalized women like Williams.

This carceral variant of feminism continues to be the predominant form.

While its adherents would likely reject the descriptor, carceral

feminism describes an approach that sees increased policing,

prosecution, and imprisonment as the primary solution to violence

against women.

This stance does not acknowledge that police are often purveyors of

violence and that prisons are always sites of violence. Carceral

feminism ignores the ways in which race, class, gender identity, and

immigration status leave certain women more vulnerable to violence and

that greater criminalization often places these same women at risk of

state violence.

Casting policing and prisons as the solution to domestic violence both

justifies increases to police and prison budgets and diverts attention

from the cuts to programs that enable survivors to escape, such as

shelters, public housing, and welfare. And finally, positioning police

and prisons as the principal antidote discourages seeking other

responses, including community interventions and long-term organizing.

How did we get to this point? In previous decades, police frequently

responded to domestic violence calls by telling the abuser to cool off,

then leaving. In the 1970s and 1980s, feminist activists filed lawsuits

against police departments for their lack of response. In New York,

Oakland, and Connecticut, lawsuits resulted in substantial changes to

how the police handled domestic violence calls, including reducing their

ability to not arrest.

Included in the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, the

largest crime bill in US history, VAWA was an extension of these

previous efforts. The $30 billion legislation provided funding for one

hundred thousand new police officers and $9.7 billion for prisons. When

second-wave feminists proclaimed “the personal is the political,” they

redefined private spheres like the household as legitimate objects of

political debate. But VAWA signaled that this potentially radical

proposition had taken on a carceral hue.

At the same time, politicians and many others who pushed for VAWA

ignored the economic limitations that prevented scores of women from

leaving violent relationships. Two years later, Clinton signed “welfare

reform” legislation. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity

and Reconciliation Act set a five-year limit on welfare, required

recipients to work after two years, regardless of other circumstances,

and instated a lifetime ban on welfare for those convicted of drug

felonies or who had violated probation or parole.

By the end of the 1990s, the number of people receiving welfare (the

majority of whom were women) had fallen 53 percent, or 6.5 million.

Gutting welfare stripped away an economic safety net that allowed

survivors to flee abusive relationships.

Mainstream feminists have also successfully pressed for laws that

require police to arrest someone after they receive a domestic violence

call. By 2008, nearly half of all states had a mandatory arrest law. The

statutes have also led to dual arrests, in which police handcuff both

parties because they perceive each as assailants, or they can’t identify

the “primary aggressor.”

Women marginalized by their identities, such as queers, immigrants,

women of color, trans women, or even women who are perceived as loud or

aggressive, often do not fit preconceived notions of abuse victims and

are thus arrested.

And the threat of state violence isn’t limited to physical assault. In

2012, Marissa Alexander, a black mother in Florida, was arrested after

she fired a warning shot to prevent her husband from continuing to

attack her. Her husband left the house and called the police. She was

arrested and, although he had not been injured, prosecuted for

aggravated assault.

Alexander argued that her actions were justified under Florida’s “Stand

Your Ground” law. Unlike George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed

seventeen-year-old Trayvon Martin three months earlier, Alexander was

unsuccessful in using that defense. Despite her husband’s sixty-six-page

deposition, in which he admitted abusing Alexander as well as the other

women with whom he had children, a jury still found her guilty.

The prosecutor then added the state’s 10-20-LIFE sentencing enhancement,

which mandates a twenty-year sentence when a firearm is discharged. In

2013, an appellate court overturned her conviction. In response, the

prosecutor has vowed to seek a sixty-year sentence during her trial this

December.

Alexander is not the only domestic violence survivor who’s been forced

to endure additional assault by the legal system. In New York state, 67

percent of women sent to prison for killing someone close to them had

been abused by that person. Across the country, in California, a prison

study found that 93 percent of the women who had killed their

significant others had been abused by them. Sixty-seven percent of those

women reported that they had been attempting to protect themselves or

their children.

No agency is tasked with collecting data on the number of survivors

imprisoned for defending themselves; thus, there are no national

statistics on the frequency of this domestic violence-criminalization

intersection. What national figures do show is that the number of women

in prison has increased exponentially over the past few decades.

In 1970, 5,600 women were incarcerated across the nation. In 2013,

111,300 women were in state and federal prisons and another 102,400 in

local jails. (These numbers do not include trans women incarcerated in

men’s jails and prisons.) The majority have experienced physical and/or

sexual abuse prior to arrest, often at the hands of loved ones.

Carceral feminists have said little about law-enforcement violence and

the overwhelming number of survivors behind bars. Similarly, many groups

organizing against mass incarceration often fail to address violence

against women, often focusing exclusively on men in prison. But others,

especially women of color activists, scholars, and organizers, have been

speaking out.

In 2001, Critical Resistance, a prison-abolition organization, and

INCITE! Women of Color against Violence, an anti-violence network,

issued a statement assessing the effects of increased criminalization

and the silence around the nexus of gender and police violence. Noting

that relying on policing and prisons has discouraged organizing

community responses and interventions, the statement challenged

communities to make connections, create strategies to combat both forms

of violence, and document their efforts as examples for others seeking

alternatives.

Individuals and grassroots groups have taken up that challenge. In 2004,

anti-violence advocate Mimi Kim founded Creative Interventions.

Recognizing that alternative approaches to violence need to be

demonstrated, the group developed a site to collect and publicly offer

tools and resources on addressing violence in everyday life. It also

developed the StoryTelling and Organizing Project, where people can

share their experiences of intervening in domestic violence, family

violence, and sexual abuse.

In 2008, social-justice organizers and abuse survivors Ching-In Chen,

Jai Dulani, and Leah Lakshmi Piepnza-Samarasinha compiled “The

Revolution Starts at Home,” a 111-page zine documenting various efforts

in activist circles to hold abusers accountable. Piepnza-Samarasinha

described how trusted friends helped devise strategies to keep her safe

from a violent and abusive ex who shared many of the same political and

social circles:

When he showed up at the prison justice film screening I was attending,

held in a small classroom where we would have been sitting very close to

each other, friends told him he was not welcome and asked him to leave.

When he called in to a local South Asian radio show doing a special

program on violence against women, one of the DJs told him that she knew

he had been abusive and she was not going to let him on air if he was

not willing to own his own violence.

My safety plan included never going to a club without a group of my

girls to have my back. They would go in first and scan the club for him

and stay near me. If he showed up, we checked in about what to do.

In their article “Domestic Violence: Examining the Intersections of

Race, Class, and Gender,” feminist academics Natalie Sokoloff and Ida

Dupont mention another approach taken by immigrant and refugee women in

Halifax, Nova Scotia, one which tackled the economic underpinnings that

prevent many from escaping abusive relationships.

The women, many of whom had survived not just abuse but torture,

political persecution, and poverty, created an informal support group at

a drop-in center. From there, they formed a cooperative catering

business, which enabled them to offer housing assistance for those who

needed it. In addition, women shared childcare and emotional support.

As these examples demonstrate, strategies to stop domestic violence

frequently require more than a single action. They often require a

long-term commitment from friends and community to keep a person safe,

as in Piepnza-Samarasinha’s case. For those involved in devising

alternatives, like the women in Halifax, it may require not only

creating immediate safety tactics, but long-term organizing that

addresses the underlying inequalities that exacerbate domestic violence.

By relying solely on a criminalized response, carceral feminism fails to

address these social and economic inequities, let alone advocate for

policies that ensure women are not economically dependent on abusive

partners. Carceral feminism fails to address the myriad forms of

violence faced by women, including police violence and mass

incarceration. It fails to address factors that exacerbate abuse, such

as male entitlement, economic inequality, the lack of safe and

affordable housing, and the absence of other resources.

Carceral feminism abets the growth of the state’s worst functions, while

obscuring the shrinking of its best. At the same time, it conveniently

ignores the anti-violence efforts and organizing by those who have

always known that criminalized responses pose further threats rather

than promises of safety.

The work of INCITE!, Creative Interventions, the StoryTelling and

Organizing Project, and “The Revolution Starts at Home” (which sparked

so much interest that it was expanded into a book) are part of a longer

history of women of color resisting both domestic and state violence.

Their efforts shows that there is an alternative to carceral solutions,

that we don’t have to deploy state violence in a disastrous attempt to

curb domestic violence.

About the Author

Victoria Law is a freelance writer and editor. She is the author of

Resistance Behind Bars: The Struggles of Incarcerated Women and the

editor of the zine “Tenacious: Art & Writings from Women in Prison.”