💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › robert-louzon-counter-revolution-in-spain.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:40:22. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Counter-Revolution in Spain
Author: Robert Louzon
Date: October 1937
Language: en
Topics: Spain 1936, IWW, State socialism, syndicalist, anti-fascist
Source: Retrieved on September 1, 2012 from http://recollectionbooks.com/CS/Spain2/CounterRevolution.htm
Notes: In the Paris La Revolution Proletarienne, under the title “Notes on Spain”  Introduction and translation by Joseph Wagner  One Big Union Monthly, October, 1937

Robert Louzon

Counter-Revolution in Spain

Introduction

The articles on Spain prepared by me for the One Big Union Monthly,

consisting largely of translations appearing in the current and two

previous issues of this magazine, were not meant to serve as news

articles of the Spanish War Front.

The news about the ups and downs, of victories and defeats, on the

various fronts of fighting Spain are abundantly covered by the papers of

all shades and creeds. Each of them colors the news according to the

interests or the principles of the writer writing them up or of the

publication printing them. The lessons drawn from the developments of

the events differ from writer to writer and from publication to

publication. That cannot be helped, and perhaps it should not. The

questions involved in the Spanish struggles are much too complex to be

lightly disposed of.

Neither was the intent of these articles to pass judgment over what is

being done in Spain by the anti-fascists, nor to take sides with one or

another of the various contending parties and groups that grim

circumstances brought together in a common fight against the gory beast

of fascism.

But even though we are not so situated as to take a direct hand in the

great struggle on the Iberian Peninsula, we are greatly interested in

it, because as workers and as revolutionists we feel that the struggle

going on in Spain is our struggle as well.

Different political parties, radical groups with varying philosophies

are thrown together to form the anti-fascist front. And although they

have one common aim, these component groups are separated by class

interests and by philosophical and political views. In the course of the

war in Spain, the political supremacy of what is called loyalist Spain

has shifted more than once, and before the end comes there will be very

likely more shifts taking place. With these shiftings, tactics of

struggle also change. The ones at the helm at a given moment are prone

to claim credit for every victory that takes place while they are

holding the reigns of government, blaming the opposition for the

reverses taking place. The opposition looks upon it in just the opposite

way.

Because of the complexity of the question, I intended to place before

the readers of the O.B.U.M. the views of serious working class

observers, and who, moreover, had first hand knowledge of the situation,

and speak not by hearsay, but from actual observation.

In this issue I present an article by R. Louzon, one of the founders and

present editors of that admirable and well-known semi-monthly French

syndicalist magazine La Revolution Proletarienne. The article appeared

in the second July issue of the magazine mentioned.

Fellow Worker Louzon is one of the old guard of the pre-war French

General Confederation of Labor. He is still a French syndicalist with

the old revolutionary, non-political meaning of the term. He was

personally acquainted with Haywood; has closely followed the development

of our own I.W.W. with great sympathy ever since the I.W.W. was founded.

In spite of his multiple activity in the French labor movement, he has

been closely watching our own General Defense Committee cases and at

times has made financial contributions towards them. At the outbreak of

the Civil War in Spain, where Louzon is well acquainted in the

revolutionary world, he went over immediately to Catalonia, to secure

first hand information and to be able to write understandingly in his

magazine. He has visited Spain often in the last year, and made faithful

and objective reports of his findings to his readers. The following

article is one of his latest.

Notes on Spain

by R. Louzon

When I wrote in this magazine nearly a year ago my “Notes on Barcelona”

they were notes on Revolutionary Spain, as the subhead indicated. My

notes of today, however, are on the Counterrevolutionary Spain.

I left Spain by the end of May; I returned there at the beginning of

July. One month is a tremendously long time in revolutionary ... or

counterrevolutionary times. During that month of June the events have

succeeded themselves with great rapidity. Things that could be dimly

outlined as possible hypothesis in the May days, have since been

realized in an accelerated rhythm.

The present situation in Spain can be summed up in two facts:

First: total loss of power by the working class;

Second: transfer of power into the hands of the Spanish fascists, by the

intermediary of the communist party.

Working Class Loses Power

When I say that the working class lost the power, I am naturally not

alluding to the fact that now the C.N.T has no longer representatives

either in the Valencia or the Catalonian governments. Cabinet ministers

are but cogs in the bourgeois-capitalist State machinery, therefore it

is not by its participation in the machinery of the bourgeois State

machinery, but by the creation of its own institutions, that the working

class develops its own power.

If the working class of Spain was partially in power until recently,

that was due to the fact that alongside of the bourgeois State power the

working class was able to impose the power of its own organs: the labor

unions, workers’ committees, etc.

Today, this power of the working class is nonexistent. It cannot be

stated too often, that political power is essentially — one can almost

say exclusively — a power of repression; it is the police force and the

armed force. Today the working class of Catalonia no longer has police

or armed power.

The “Patrols of Control” of Barcelona and vicinity, of which I spoke in

my former article in this magazine, have disappeared. This workers’

police force, that was functioning since August 1936, alongside the

police force of the State, was dissolved last month, and this time not

only on paper, but in fact: all of its members have been disarmed, the

most active of them were imprisoned, the leading militants have

“disappeared,” a euphemism signifying murdered.

The same holds true of the workers’ militias. Wherever these militias

existed, whose duty it was to enforce revolutionary order upon avowed or

camouflaged fascists, especially along the extensive frontiers, they

have been completely disarmed, their best elements were imprisoned, a

certain number of them murdered.

In Barcelona and in the entire Catalonia, nothing was left in the way of

organized armies except the mercenary corps of the State police: the

assault guards, the civil guards, carabiniers.

The same has taken place with the army. Working under the Catalonian

C.N.T. War Minister, the C.N.T. formerly had the control over the army

of Aragon; after this Cabinet post was taken over by General Pozas, an

appointee of the Valencia government, the commanding machinery was lost

by the workers’ organizations and it fell into the hands of the State.

The labor militants, the creators of the militia, who after the

“militarization” were supposed to merely transfer their title from

“delegations” to army “ranks,” are now obliged to ask the Minister of

War for confirmation of such transfers and the Minister confirms those

of whom he thinks he has nothing to fear, while postponing indefinitely

the confirmation of those he doubts, thus eliminating the ones and

placing the others in the position of being under obligation. By this

twofold scheme the entire hierarchy of the army passes under the direct

control of the State.

Thus, the workers’ police and army has been done away with. To be sure,

there are still men on the police force, especially among the assault

guards, who are at heart with the working class and with the C.N.T.;

certainly the soldiers of the Aragon front and a good number of

“confirmed” army officers have not forgotten their origin and when the

day comes they will be on the side of the people and not with the State.

And certain it is that besides the visible arms, there are plenty of

hidden arms, for the Catalonian proletariat, it seems, has conserved its

hidden arms. But, all that does not alter the fact that today there are

no longer any regularly and publicly functioning workers armed

institutions. The working class still has means of fighting the power,

but it no longer possesses organs of power.

Removed from the police force and from the army, the working class is

just as naturally removed from all auxiliary institutions of power. The

representatives of the F.A.I. (Iberian Anarchist Federation) have been

excluded from the popular courts of law, where the representation of the

workers have been reduced to a feeble minority. The C.N.T.

representatives likewise have been excluded from a large number of

municipal councils that have replaced the former municipal revolutionary

committees (but which were nothing in reality but committees, since they

had been composed of representatives of all the anti-fascist

organizations, in a determined proportion) under the pretext that the

C.N.T. has not repudiated their protest movement in the days of May. The

district workers’ committees can no longer function and there hardly

passes a week without some new decree being issued suppressing the

representation of the C.N.T. as well as of the U.G.T. in this or that

Council or administration.

Everywhere the State, the bourgeois State, constituted in its

traditional forms, re-establishes its sole and entire power. In

Catalonia as in Valencia, the working class is now completely excluded

from power: It has lost the power. Such is the first truth that we have

to establish, but there is a second.

What the Spanish Communist Party Is

The much lauded policy of the Spanish Communist Party, as dictated by

Stalin, is well enough known by now: it is the defense of the

bourgeoisie and of the private property; no more expropriation is to be

countenanced; the landed proprietors to be re-established into their

“rights”; the small and not-so-small employers to be organized in

“labor” unions. Such is the program. A program of hindrance and of

destruction of the conquests of the revolution; a program of bourgeois

defense.

Such a program of bourgeois defense naturally should have attracted the

entire bourgeoisie, and it has not failed to do so. The bourgeoisie

flocked in masses into the communist party and into its annex, the

Unified Socialist Party of Catalonia, as well as into the Catalonian

U.G.T. (General Workers Union), founded for their convenience. They

joined partly because the communist party program was their program,

their class program. But above all, they joined for reasons of personal

security. To be suspected of fascism was until recently a very serious

matter. But, by the very nature of things, the bourgeois is always in

danger of being suspected of that very thing. What better way of

avoiding suspicion than of having in his pocket a membership card in the

communist party or in one of the locals of the U.G.T.?

The Spanish communist party and its annexes have, therefore, become

bourgeois organizations not only in virtue of their program, but also by

their social composition. But this first fact was bound to be soon

followed by a second: Of all the bourgeois, the most interested in

averting the suspicion of fascism were the very ones who were actually

fascists. And that is how the communist party in its composition soon

became not only bourgeois, but above all, fascist bourgeois. Whether in

Valencia, where the district secretary of the Gil Robles party, among

others, is at present a member of the communist party, or in villages

far removed from Catalonia, the most active members of the communist

party are former members of the “Patriotic Union” of the CEDA, etc. etc.

Republican Spain Passes into the Hands of Fascism

It naturally follows that the Spanish communist policy is not only a

bourgeois policy, but actually a fascist policy. Through the racket in

connection with the furnishing of arms to the Spanish government, the

Russians having succeeded in giving the State powers to “their” party,

the fascist followers of the communist party made the party follow a

policy favoring Franco, and the Russians were much too dense to notice

it. The facts, however, are evident.

While hundreds of the militants of the antifascist organizations were

murdered and thousands imprisoned, and while the help rendered to Spain

by the foreign organizations was systematically sabotaged, the Falange,

yes the Spanish Phalanx, the Phalanx of Franco, is making open

propaganda and is recruiting almost openly in Catalonia. The Falangistas

arrested by the workers’ Control Patrols (before their dissolution) for

attempts of sabotage, are now free. And while the anti-fascists arrested

during the last two months, especially the foreigners, are lamentably

treated, kept in airless cells from which they are not taken out for a

moment, and are forced, like the prisoners in Calle Corcega in

Barcelona, to go on hunger strike, the imprisoned fascists enjoy all

manner of favors, so much so that the anti-fascist prisoners of Carcel

Modelo of Barcelona demanded that they be granted the same rights as

enjoyed by the fascist prisoners in the same prison! Finally, as they

cannot absolve all the fascists without too much open scandal, the

authorities decided to free them on bail of several thousand pesetas.

The most notorious fascists, who are rich or who have rich friends, can

thus leave the prison ... for an indefinite time.

Government of Defeat

The facts related above are serious enough, but what follows is even

more so. It is openly said that the fall of Bilbao was due to treason.

The fall of Bilbao is the masterstroke realized by the fascists, through

the medium of the communist party, by the overthrow of the Caballero

government in May.

To relieve the pressure on the Biscayan front, the Caballero government

had prepared a vast offensive to the south of Madrid, where the front is

not far from the Portuguese frontier, with the intention of cutting the

rebel armies in two. Everything was ready for the offensive that was to

begin early in May: 75,000 men had been assembled with adequate war

materials on hand.

But, a couple of days before the launching of the offensive, the

communist party torpedoed the Caballero government, forcing his cabinet

to resign and replacing him with the Negrin government, whose first task

as government head was to countermand the prepared offensive; the

assembled troops were scattered and during the entire month following

nothing was done to relieve the hard pressed Biscayan front. The Basque

minister’s letter of resignation (because of lack of aid from the

central government) was prevented publication by the censors, and the

Madrid journal C.N.T. was ordered suspended because it had published it

nevertheless. But nothing was done to save Bilbao; it was necessary for

the city to fall, for so it was decided by the fascists in the Stalinist

party.

Only after the fall of Bilbao — and the fall enabled Franco to withdraw

without danger a part of his northern troops — that they started an

offensive, for after all it was necessary for them to appear doing

something ... especially at the wrong time.

The sum total of all the above facts cannot leave room for doubt: The

Negrin government is entirely dominated by treason. The cleverness of

the fascists, acting under the cover of the Stalinist stupidity, makes

the Negrin government, nilly-willy a government of defeat.

If the Negrin government holds out, if the evil forces that brought them

to power are not destroyed, the defeats will succeed each other

continually. That will be certain victory for Franco and the certain

defeat not only of the revolution but of the republic itself. This is

the second truth that needed telling.

Causes for the Defeats of Russian Imperialism

The defeat of the Spanish republic will also be a defeat of Stalin. And

on this subject it is interesting to note that the serious defeats

suffered in the last ten years by Russian imperialism are all due to the

same cause.

The Stalinist imperialism had experienced two notable defeats: that of

China with the boosting of Chiang Kai Shek, and that of Germany, with

the ascension of Hitler to power. Spain is reserving him a third defeat,

for he will either be beaten inside of republican Spain by the other

anti-fascist forces, or, if he maintains his hold over the Spanish

republic, it will be beaten by Franco. But the cause of these three

defeats are one and the same. Odd as it may appear, that cause is

Stalin’s absolute lack of understanding of the class struggle: in all

three cases the policy that led Stalin to defeat consisted in his

disregarding of the class antagonism.

In China he imagined himself able to marry the fish to the hare: the

bourgeois Kuomintang to the revolutionary workers and peasants. To

hinder such a marriage, the Kuomintang massacred everything that was

Russian. After having furnished Chiang Kai Shek the means with which to

conquer all China from Canton to Peking, Stalinist imperialism found

itself expelled, from one day to another, by this same Chiang Kai Shek.

In Germany, Stalin imagined that the revengeful Hitler would turn to be

a better support for his struggle against Poland and the other neighbors

on the western border of Russia than the timid social-democrats. The two

dictators could divide the existing spoils if the States emerged from

the Versailles treaties, just as their royal and imperial predecessors

had, in the past divided up and annexed Poland. Therefore, every time

before the advent of Hitler the communists of Germany were ready for

action, the Communist International sternly forbade them doing anything.

But, the attraction of the “corridor” did not cut much figure in the

class interests of Hitler’s backers. No matter how anti-socialist the

Stalinist regime had become, the absence of private property in Russia

was not agreeable to them; no matter how opposite to the October

revolution Stalin’s regime was, to the bulk of the world proletariat,

and especially to the German working class, it appeared to be the

continuation of that revolution and the symbol of their emancipation;

hence the fight inside of Germany against communism and against the

working class was not compatible with an alliance with Russia. That is

the reason that Hitler, brought to power by the Ruhr magnates to

extirpate communism and socialism in Germany, could not base his foreign

policy on a Russian alliance, but on the contrary on a struggle against

the U.S.S.R. From Hitler’s coming to power Stalin expected a

strengthening of the Rapallo treaty; the first act of Hitler was the

destruction of Rapallo.

Under different forms, this same misunderstanding of the fact that the

class struggle dominates the foreign as well as the domestic policies of

States is the cause that leads Russian imperialism to its defeat in

Spain.

It was Russia that saved Spain last November. The fact is incontestable:

it is foolish to deny it or to belittle the fact. Without the Russian

planes and without the International Brigade, which was a communist

creation, it would have been all over for republican Spain. The blockade

of Mr. Blum — the greatest treason ever committed by social-democracy in

the entire course of its history — was accomplishing its work. Just as

it was Russian help that enabled the Kuomintang to conquer China, it was

Russia that enabled the Spanish republic to save Madrid... and the rest.

But again, the same as in China, where Stalin believing thus to best

serve his imperialistic interests, ordered the communist party of China

to collaborate with the Kuomintang, to uphold the interests of the

Chinese bourgeoisie, just so in Spain, he forced his party to defend the

Spanish bourgeoisie against the revolution.

The result will be the same: as in China where one nice day, Stalin saw

his followers massacred at Nanking and at Hankow by the soldiers of

Chiang Kai Shek, so in Spain he will wake up one of these days to the

fact that his party is but an annex of the Falange, which has secured

victory for Franco.

The C.N.T. Continues to Live

In the presence of the situation as described above, what is the C.N.T.

doing? How does it react to the loss of power by the proletariat and to

the fascist control of the bourgeois power?

The C.N.T. is playing dead. It keeps itself carefully from reacting. The

C.N.T. allowed without the least protestation the disarming of the

Patrols of Control; it forbids any retaliation for the murdering of its

militants (official figures: 60 C.N.T. members “disappeared”), and

against the imprisonment of its members (official figures: 800 C.N.T.

members imprisoned); it is opposing only with respectful interventions

and legal defense.

In the meantime its forces — so it seems — are intact. In Valencia as in

Barcelona, the C.N.T. press is the most widely read. One comrade even

claimed — and his claim seems to be very nearly the general opinion —

that the C.N.T. never was as strong as it is now, for the prestige it

may have lost while participating in power, it now has regained, and the

Stalinists’ stupidity makes them grow stronger every day.

On the other hand, it is certain that it still retains its arms, keeping

them in the most unexpected places.

Finally, the economic attainments of the revolution are being preserved

almost entirely. As a general rule, the labor unions and collectives are

functioning the same as before. Stripped of political power, the working

class still retains economic control.

Thus in Puigcerda, of which I said last month that I don’t know whether

the work of collectivization that I had seen in February is still in

existence, and which is one of the places where the exclusion of the

workers from power was most complete and most brutal (seven murdered

since the end of May, without counting former murders; 50 imprisoned;

continuous presence of 500 guards in a town of 4,000 inhabitants). The

collectives are still in force almost entirely, according to what one of

the local militants told me, whom I met in the middle of July: only the

rayon cooperative was closed; a few tailors and certain other bourgeois

elements belonging to the UGT have seceded from the cooperative; “but,”

added the comrade, “this was fine, for on account of them we were

obliged to admit representatives of the UGT in the administration of the

cooperative; now that we are to ourselves, we can go ahead more openly

than before.”

The C.N.T. unions in Puigcerda have been dispossessed of their hall, but

they have simply occupied another hall, a little less imposing than the

old one. And they are only waiting for the arrival of their paper supply

in order to resume publication of their local Libertarian Youth paper,

Sembrador (The Sower).

Thus, under the storm, the Puigcerda comrades have bent down, after the

storm they are straightening out. And this is not a specialty of

Puigcerda; it is, I believe, the traditional policy of the C.N.T.: “let

the storm pass.”

To let the storm pass and saving everything that can be saved. Advancing

step by step, and maintaining its least attacked and most solid

positions as intact as possible. These positions at present are the

economic sectors. Not to engage its forces in order to save them for the

favorable moment, when circumstances are favorable for a new offensive.

However, this is not a new tactic with the C.N.T. and the F.A.I.: it is

their traditional, historical tactic. When the foreign comrades, alarmed

by these repeated retreats, of these abandoning positions of primary

importance without a struggle, communicate their fears to the Spanish

fellow workers, they invariably receive the following answer: “This is

not the first time that we are persecuted, we have known many others;

after every persecution we came out stronger than before. It will be the

same now as it happened in the past.”

The optimism that results from the strength of the C.N.T., a strength

that is not based on the mass of its members, nor on the wealth of its

treasures, but, if I may say, on the morale.

Through their principles, through their manner of being and of acting,

the C.N.T. and F.A.I. have deep and many-fold roots in the entire

Spanish proletariat. Due to that, they dispose at any moment, an

important number of active militants who can at the first favorable

opportunity raise the flag and take spontaneously the necessary action.

The labor union action and the anarchist morale are at present so rooted

into the body of the Spanish proletariat that they cannot be separated;

that bond cannot be severed without destroying the proletariat itself.

It is that, no doubt, that explains the expectant tactics followed at

present by the C.N.T. and which perhaps justifies it.