💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › anonymous-antifa-in-the-wild-east.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 06:23:45. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Antifa in the Wild East
Author: Anonymous
Date: January 21, 2009
Language: en
Topics: Anti-fascism, Russia
Source: Retrieved on 23rd April 2021 from https://libcom.org/library/antifa-wild-east-internet-warrior-sets-record-straight
Notes: Published in Abolishing the Borders from Below #33.

Anonymous

Antifa in the Wild East

Anti-fascism in Russia is not a political but a social movement. It is

not some irrelevant lefties who imagined that “fascism is an immanent

threat” and started to “fight” it. And that is how it should be —

fascism is not a threat in Russia – they do not have a slightest chance

to take over. At least 95% of the population hates them. State and

capital are the real problem.

As there is no real parliamentarism in Russia, threat of right-wing

electoral populism is also much smaller than in most of the European

countries. Usually authorities intervene quickly to dismiss nationalists

from the elections with dubious legal grounds. Thus only dangerous

fascists are the most marginal, and hated by even most of the other

nationalists – those who kill migrants and other marginalized groups in

the streets.

I do not even quote the statistics of how many people got murdered by

Nazis in Russia this or last or any year, as those statistics only

involve cases which make it to the news. But no matter how many it is,

society does not care a fuck – or if cares, in form of demanding more

powers to cops. Obviously none of those not directly touched by the

problem is interested to fight it on their own. Society is almost

perfectly atomized, people mind their own business. This is obviously

due to bandit capitalism finishing off with the horizontal structures

already in agony due to the authoritarian Soviet rule, but it is the

shape of things to come in the West as well. Russia is not

underdeveloped in terms of the “civil society” — it is overdeveloped, 20

years ahead of the West. Whatever “leftist” there currently exists in

the Western Europe, it is becoming more and more irrelevant and in 20

years nothing will remain of it. Then moral politics will be dead, and

only interest and lifestyle politics will remain.

Of course there is some imagined “civil society” in Russia. It is

created by market law of supply and demand – as xenophobia in Russia is

considered a problem in the West, there is a supply of grants thus a

demand will arise as well. Whatever these NGO’s “monitor”, nobody cares.

But of course their voice is heard anytime you need a “specialist” to

demand more money or powers to cops. More these people have such links

to grassroots antifascists which Nazis may scandalously expose, worse

for grassroots antifascism. To avoid confusion, when I refer to “Antifa”

in this article I do not mean these people — nor do I mean liberal

political parties, all of which even have elements happy to cooperate

with more moderate fascist organisations.

I have a gut feeling that most of the killed Nazis are due to “migrant

Antifa”. Only other group fighting back against Nazis, youth subculture,

is way behind them. There are for sure plenty of migrants and minority

nationals in youth subcultures as well, but these usually come from

mixed or otherwise integrated families, and are in a sense outside of

the diasporas – actually such people are also plenty among the Nazis,

maybe even more than among Antifa. Thus these two “Antifas” do not

really mix. And I am fine with that – I do not cry if some Ingushetian

kills some Nazi, but I believe it should be mainly Russians finishing

off with the Russian fascism, and Ingushetians finishing off with the

Ingushetian fascism. I do not want a race war – Nazis already make

shitloads of noise after cases when migrants have killed their

activists, thus I do not spread these stories.

Mostly “migrant Antifa” also works outside the concept of Antifa. There

are some notable exceptions – such as when football fans in Mahachkala

of Dagestan yelled “Antifa!” in terrace as a reply of Stavropol fans

shouting “Russia for Russians!”, but mainly migrants understand their

conflict differently. Their code of honor does not allow a revenge

against fascists as an entity, but they try to search individual Nazis

who violated them and pay an eye for an eye. This of course usually only

goes for mountaineers, Central Asians and Chinese are usually two

atomized to have any kind of organised blood feud. Also traditionalist

diasporas are organised according to traditional hierarchies, on top of

which is their own bourgeoisie, which occasionally likes to make loud

statements for example about their “2000 fighters ready to fight

skinheads”, but in practice wants to avoid conflict with Russian

authorities at any price, and is mainly interested to silence any

protests against Nazi rampage inside their community. It would be a

rather stupid idea to attempt to build any coalition against fascism

with minority nation elites.

Thus most of the credit for fighting Nazis goes to subcultural youth.

But this is also social, not political – wearing a Mohawk is not a

political statement. Thus of course this “Antifa” comes with any ills

the society has in general – some are sexist, some are homophobic, some

are alcoholics and junkies, some may be just plain loonies or lumpen

criminals (and not that gentleman “Arsene Lupin” flavor).

In the West, I am always puzzled with people who first of all identify

themselves as “squatters” or “Antifa”. What the fuck is the alternative

these people are proposing, a Tobin Tax? Fortunately in Russia almost

all the horizontal grassroots activists consider themselves anarchists

or in few cases (non-authoritarian) communists. Actually in most of the

cities Antifa is organised by a mixed scene of anarchists, punks and

skinheads – Moscow is perhaps only city where anarchists are a clear

(but significant) minority in Antifa. I am obviously concerned if

someone considering himself anarchist is clearly homophobic and sexist,

but if someone is just “Antifa” I do not really care. I do not say that

these ills should be ignored, but one should be realist – no matter how

many columns I write to some zine on how antifascism should be against

homophobia and sexism, these will only influence a minority. Subculture

always reflects values of the society – and as long as consumerism is

order of the day, punks will always be way more interested about tattoos

and collecting records than going to demonstrations. And in Moscow in

particular most of the anti-fascists are themselves former Nazis – one

should be happy just for the fact that they are now beating up their

former comrades and not migrants.

There is a discussion though about sexism in the Russian Antifa

movement. This because in Russian Nazi movement there are many women in

prominent, even leadership positions – actually in terms of gender

balance they are not doing worse than Antifa. For example cameraman and

oldest member of the Ryno group, which is currently facing a court in

Moscow for murdering 20 people, was a woman. Thus there is a discussion

if female Nazis should be beaten up as well. In general Antifa has taken

an anti-sexist position, and Nazi women are beaten up as well. But due

to prevailing sexism in the society, this often backlashes against the

Antifa. For example, when female Nazi Polina Sidorova got wounded during

Antifa attack against Nazi concert in club “Niagara” in Moscow in autumn

of 2006, Nazi video collective “Format 18” made an effective propaganda

video to raise funds for brain surgery she needed. Thus some of the

Antifa argue that Nazi women should not be beaten up, at least not by

men. Of course Nazis themselves are not the gentlemen they claim to be –

for example when Aleksey Krylov was murdered in Moscow last March, Nazis

attempted to also kill a girl going to concert in the same company with

him.

Following news about anti-fascism in Russia one may easily get the

picture an evil and unstoppable horde of Nazis which keeps slaying

hapless anti-fascists. Another victimization issue, another reason for

Western activists to feel guiltiness. Guiltiness, which I have at times

indirectly exploited myself, as money for lawyer, medical and funeral

bills is indeed often very much in need. This is why it is always the

first priority to translate these horror stories. And stories of

victories seldom get translated at all, as nobody wants to be visited by

officials from UBOP (Department for Fight against Organised Crime) or

FSB (ex-KGB). In former Soviet Union, activists already years ago

established closed communication networks which cross borders, but in

the West these are still mostly non-existing. These are not stories

everyone should read – thus you do not hear that violence porn except

maybe many years late.

Talking about violence, you do not often come across pacifists in the

Russian movement, thus if I see some criticism of Russian antifascism

written from pacifist point of view, it is quite likely written by

someone not from around here. If you are subcultural in Russia and

living in a smaller place, you most likely have to fight at least once

in a week. This is why even most of the hippies around know how to kick

some ass.

Violence is for sure romantic, our society is totally fascinated with

it, to most of the movies people go to see some violence. And stories

from real life often beat movies, thus I often eagerly share them

although I never participated myself. And it is not there just for the

beauty of it – after all, there is not a single historical example of

fascism being crushed by non-violent means (state capitalism of the late

80’s was hardly comparable to fascism). Nazi by definition is someone,

who is out there to kill you (unless you are a Nazi yourself, or ready

to pretend to be one). Unless he is crushed, he will get you sooner or

later. If this is not the case, he is not a Nazi but just someone who

thinks too much of himself. Obviously most Nazis are just pretenders,

even in Russia – they do not deserve to carry the NSDAP flag. But some

Nazis are worth of the name, and thus any action against them is a mere

self-defence, even if it happened a year or 20 years before they were to

come after you.

Nazis in Russia are perhaps far from seizing power, but for me and my

comrades it is either us or them. It is easy to make hollow statements

such as “using violence makes you a fascist as well”, but I have no use

for moral superiority if I am dead. Anarchists have been beating and

killing fascists ever since they came around, and I will never piss on

the grave of the comrades who made all those attempts on life of

Mussolini, Hitler and Franco. There are plenty of reasons why

anti-fascists violence in Russia of today should be non-lethal, but all

of them are of only pragmatical, not of moral nature.

But whereas beating up Nazis is not a moral problem (perhaps it is even

a moral imperative), pragmatic record of Antifa in Russia is more in

doubt. It is not clear if Nazi movement is going down due to general

tendency towards welfare, stability and control in Russia, due to state

repression or due to Antifa. Probably all of these factors play some

role, Antifa being the least significant. But Antifa has certainly put

some individual Nazis and crews out from the game, and shown that Nazis

may be beaten by whoever, at times even more effectively than with

sophisticated state machinery of control and violence.

But I am doing fine with pacifists as long as they are comradely. Good

part of other activities of Russian anarchists except anti-fascism are

completely in the realm of the non-violence, often these means simply

work even if you do not treat them as a dogma – thus there is a field

for cooperation. I have a huge respect of those pacifists who are

consistently anti-state and do not call cops to do dirty work for them,

and for whom pacifism is not just a mask which hides cowardice. Most of

the “warriors” who have a beef with pacifists have seldom been there

done that violence themselves.

At least in Moscow, in 90% of the cases it is the Nazis who get the

beating. If you never heard any of them getting killed, it is because

Antifa did things with some skill and they also had good luck – but for

sure all of them who had an encounter with Antifa will remember it for

rest of their lives. Actually probably one of the reasons why Moscow

Nazis are so brutal is that they got beaten up so much. In 2001–2002,

when Moscow Antifa got really launched, it was 1 antifascists to every

50 Nazis, so it was way more easy to find Nazis than Antifa – and in the

streets it is almost always those who have the initiative who do the

beating. And even still, as Nazis are much worse to conspire and they

simply do not care about their rank and file, they take much more

damage. Actually after all these years, Moscow Nazis have still not

managed to kill a single fighter of Moscow Antifa (despite some serious

attempts) – Sasha Ryukhin was in the very periphery of the movement, and

Krylov had no connection to movement at all.

Moscow anarchists were occasionally beating Nazis and

National-Bolsheviks since the early nineties, just as the first

RASH-skinheads who came around 1998–1999. But only in 2001–2002 some

people decided to give that a priority, and since then some ass was

kicked about every week. First 2–3 years of Moscow Antifa are documented

in the book “Dat’ Pizdy”. In the beginning National-Bolsheviks were few

times picked up as a target practice, but although they have some

boneheads they are not really involved in anti-migrant violence, and as

individuals they are pitiful losers, so they are not anymore beaten up

by anarchists or Antifa.

One must understand that what comes to anarchists, this is a war which

we started. Russian Nazis were killing migrants ever since they began to

organise, and occasionally boneheads had fun terrorizing some hapless

gutter punks. But they di d not cared a fuck about the anarchists before

they started to get beaten up — not that Moscow Antifa was organised by

anarchists only, but anarchists were always public about their support

for the direct action. Perhaps harsh reaction of the Nazis, who decided

to revenge not only against Antifa but anarchist, activist and hardcore

punk scene as a whole, was a surprise to someone – to me it was not.

After all, they are Nazis – they are bad on public relations but good on

terror. Differently from Antifa, for Nazis it is beneficial to escalate

the conflict – back in the fistfight days they lost much more of their

cadres to Antifa, but fewer people switch sides now when it is about

life and death.

To me, it was clear from the day one that Antifa activity will result

some burials, and at times I wonder if it is really worth of it. In

another hand, in counter-revolutionary times there are few fields you

may work in from the beginning, and at least Antifa is on public demand

for certain constituencies. Washing your hands from it would mean

relying to your race privilege – it could be possible only as long as

there are no significant anarchist presence in migrant communities.

Not that Antifa in Moscow or elsewhere in Russia cares a lot about

strategy. Mostly it is just people who like to beat up Nazis – doing

something useful and having fun in the same time. That is not where I

get my kicks, but I do not judge. Whoever claims to hate violence is

most likely a hypocrite – he just wants to have it in a sterile, safe

form such as TV serials, movies or computer games. To me a Nazi has less

rights than some digital zombie in my computer screen, as computer

monsters do not murder real people just because of their skin color.

For sure there is also the point that violence corrupts, continuous fear

makes people embittered and brutal. For example case in last August,

where 4 rather irrelevant Moscow Nazis got stabbed before they even

pulled their knives was also for me too much. But again, this is a

flipside of having a social, not a political movement – you do not need

a membership ticket to get into Antifa. Whoever confuses excesses with

general strategy, does not understand what fascism is real about and

what are we fighting against. Violence alone has nothing to do with

fascism – fascist violence is based on hatred of everything

non-conformist and different, and conditioning of that hatred by a

bureaucratic machinery to an extent that you do not see a difference

between your own will and will of the system. No excess of an individual

may ever be fascist, as fascism is never a free moral choice of an

individual but something you do for your “Reich”.

First gene ration of Moscow Antifa never did any claims or statements.

They were not interested about leaflets, stickers or publishing

journals. It was just a group of people – some from anarchist scene,

some from punk scene, some from football hooligan circles, some former

Nazis – who got together for just a one goal: to beat up Nazis. And they

did their job well – they lost fights very seldom and never took any

serious casualties. It is not correct to claim that this way nobody ever

learned about the Antifa – Nazis learned to know them very soon, and

they were terrorized. First generation understood the laws of the

atomization of the society – that nobody fucking cares about murdered

migrants or homeless. Thus they did not even tried to get public

sympathy. Even cops do not really care, as long as there is no moral

panic and their bosses do not demand from them to act. There has been a

moral panic against Nazis since the nineties, and thus Nazis have

suffered – cops randomly arrest them without charges, take fingerprints

and photos, occasionally torture for 1, 2 or 3 days by suffocating and

beatings and then let go. By avoiding publicity, Antifa for a while

managed to avoid most of this.

But as usual people change, there is a big turnover and at some point

some people got the idea to give some interviews to journalists and to

show up in TV. After this, for sure a moral panic – how may someone

pretend to do job of the cops better than the cops!? There was a

discussion in state Duma, in beginning of the year 2007 ultra-right wing

deputy Viktor Alksnis made a public enquiry where pen-names of 10

“leading Moscow anti-fascist terrorists” where published (“Bonecrusher”,

“Dill”, “Foot”, “Journalist”, “Pit”,”Radist”, “Satan”, “Shkobar”,

“Tigran”, “Zog”), some with supposed real names and home addresses. Heat

was on, and number of people were forced to leave Russia for other

countries.

In a way I am involved in an effort to turn a social movement into a

political one – I may point to days or even contemporary places where

anti-fascism is different, where there were ideas and alternative models

of the world. But maybe I am wrong – this far public discussion in

Russia about antifascism has done nothing good for the movement, except

gained the movement few more comrades who maybe would have found us

anyway. After all those TV documentaries and endless internet debates,

nothing has chanced – people are still murdered, still nobody fucking

cares except those people who are being murdered. As far the general

tendencies in the society remain the same, any attempts to create

“movement infrastructure” in form of publications, policies,

organisations, meetings or discussions is the straightest way to torture

chambers and jail. Thus most likely I will do other things, and do not

interfere with activities of those who like to beat up Nazis for

whatever reasons they may have.

I will be there though when another lawyer, hospital or funeral bill is

necessary, but I hope the time of the appeals will also soon be over.

This because after all the amounts are not that big – usually around

1000 Euros for one fundraiser. In terms of financial flows of

international activism, these are not such a big amounts. If we had a

number of constant, reliable long-time sponsors we would quit writing

fundraisers altogether and it would save much time and effort.

As we have managed to put issue of “anti-fascism in Russia” to agenda of

international activist movement, I am often asked what could be done to

help us. It feels kind of stupid only to ask for money, as this is

reducing solidarity to something measured by monetary value. But it is

often hard to imagine what else would be necessary – as I already said,

fascists in Russia are not taking over and in the end only Russians may

deal with the Russian fascism. Obviously most stupid thing to do when

Nazis attack someone would be to set up a demonstration at your local

Russian consulate – issue of street fascism has nothing to do with the

state. This would only repeat the message everyone from liberals to even

less extreme nationalists are repeating – more powers to cops so that

they could curb “skinheads”. Russian state is not protecting Nazis –

sometimes they try to play down or even deny the problem due to protect

their image, but Nazis are facing heavy repression which is probably the

main reason why their movement is going down. But no matter how much

cops torture random boneheads, it is no way they may stop the menace

altogether – Nazis will be active just as long as they feel indifference

of the society. And tactics of “decentralized resistance”, inspired by

famous fantasy book Turner Diaries, have proved itself to be successful

in Russia – no matter how much Nazis are repressed by the state, some

cells will always survive. And in practice bureaucracy, competition and

even hatred between different government repressive structures and very

narrow focus on short-term gains mean that Nazis are surviving even the

vilest government repression, thus you may never count on government on

finishing of with the Nazism.

Sometimes some individual officials may have hopes of using Nazis for

their own purposes, but in general Russian police does not protect

Nazis. There are cases of one police structure protecting their Nazi

informers against charges pressed by other structures, or individual

polices covering up their Nazi relatives – but in general these are

exceptions. some individual cops or even districts may be Nazis (for

example the notorious St. Petersburg district number 76) , but with

others it is the contrary – there are number of cases when cops arrested

anti-fascists after an action, but as their chief was a Chechen or

Armenian they let them go without charges. But most of the time cops

just solidarise with whoever pays them more money. When Antifa attacked

concert of Nazi metal band “Korroziya Metalla” last June and some got

arrested, cops let them go without charges as they hated boneheads, but

anyway cops sold home addresses of the arrested to Nazis as Antifa was

stupid enough not to make a better tender in prior. Actions in

consulates could make sense if it is the state directly attacking

anti-fascists – but in any other cases the best kind of solidarity for

Russian anti-fascists would be to make an action against your local

Nazis, and then put it into international context in a claim.

See you in the streets in the internet!

Anonymous anarchist from Moscow