š¾ Archived View for library.inu.red āŗ file āŗ kevin-tucker-egocide.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 11:54:54. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
ā”ļø Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Egocide Author: Kevin Tucker Date: 2005 Language: en Topics: anti-civ, anti-egoist, Green Anarchy, Green Anarchy #20, nihilism, primitivist, spirituality Source: From Green Anarchy, #20 Summer 2005
The primal war is a spiritual war.
It began as the spirit of wildness was buried beneath the interests of
domesticators: within history and within ourselves.
At its core lies the spiritual connection, the wordless sense of being
that flows through the world. It is not about fighting for āNatureā or
about individual desire. It is about egocide: killing the self/Other
split that underpins all civilized relationships.
There is no āNatureā, alone and isolated outside of our grasp. There is
only the life that is in and of us. This is something that cannot be
taught, written about or described. Itās not filling in space for god/s,
nothingness, economics or science. It is not a cognitive force that
hears every prayer.
I canāt say what it is that I feel. I canāt objectively prove its
existence. But without my soul, I am as good as dead.
The domesticators have known this for a long time.
I can say that I feel something. Itās something that I know is real.
Itās something worth fighting for.
Thatās something that wild peoples and places have been telling us for
ten thousand years.
Ā
Humans, like all beings, are intrinsically spiritual. Not in the sense
of elaborate ritual or religious beliefs or anything of that sort, but
spiritual in a much different way: a lived spirituality.
There is a flowing, organic nature to the world. Itās something you can
feel as you follow tracks through the new snowfall. Something felt in a
handful of wild berries or the smell of roots. Itās something you see in
the eyes of an animal as their pupils dilate for the last time. The
sting of a thorn, the protests of squirrels, and the ambience of rain on
leaves, the sound of rushing water: there is life in all of these
things. An essence that simply living brings you into.
The world of the nomadic gatherer/hunter knows no āOtherā. There is no
concept of nature. But there is a greater connectivity. There is no
survival, no smallness or grandiose feeling. There is only life and
death, interwoven and honestly laid out before you.
An individual exists as a part of this. Not in the manufactured sense of
communistic groupthink, but in the spiritualistic sense. Life is
inseparable. There is no dependency. There is no fear of a Future. No
path of Progress. You can say there is an implicit sense of trust and
honesty, but neither word does it justice. No word does it justice. Life
simply is.
That needs to be restated: for most of us, life simply is an ideal. Itās
a utopian desire or an irretrievable past. We simply can get closer to
it or we canāt. But life can simply be life. It always has and always
will be there. But we donāt think of it like that. We canāt think of it
like that. Weāve been trained to see it differently. Life is simply
something āOtherā: either as a religious/anti-religious ideal or as a
deadened scientific definition.
It must always be distant.
Ā
How do you turn someone against themselves? Against those around them?
How do you tame the spirit? These are the issues that domesticators have
always had to answer. The necessary response is what makes up our
everyday lives: to domesticate, you must break someone mentally,
physically, and spiritually.
Simply put, you must disconnect.
That disconnection, that mediation, has always been the primary goal of
domesticators. The reason why is simple: domestication is about
dependency. But that dependency is not about necessity, itās about
perceived dependency. It comes down to belief.
Most people believe that the state and civilization are necessary now
because we know nothing else. We are raised in a manufactured reality. A
sterile, planned world complete with heated seats, air conditioning, and
power locks. Food is the processed side note to our consumption. Work is
something you must do and the boss is someone you must obey.
The idea of living without civilization, and even more so, living well,
is about as alien to us as the idea of living in this reality would be
to anyone who lives without it. These are intrinsically different ways
of viewing and being in reality. One is about the vital freedom to
choose between the lesser of two evils and the better of two brands. The
other is about the difficult choice about which direction you feel like
roaming in today and which leaf looks most tempting.
How did we get from the latter to the former? How did we come to accept
so little from life? How did we become so dependent?
How did food in storehouses become more important than the world
outside? Filling those storehouses with large amounts of wild grains or
dried meat or fish is an easy enough thing to do. For the most part, it
may take a few days for a huge amount of food for the societies willing
to do so. Becoming the person to ration the surplus isnāt that
complicated either. Making people listen to that person, however, is.
The issue is about control. Power flows from control. But control
requires physical and mental force. You can force someone in a cage, but
itās another thing to get them to accept it.
To successfully gain control over another being, that cage must be
internalized.
For us, unfortunately, that cage has been internalized. This is the
domestication process at work.
Ā
No one gives up their autonomy freely. The spirit of wildness which
flows through all life must be broken.
To break the spirit, you must first isolate it. This is both the hardest
and most important thing that must be done. We are born physically and
mentally for a life of nomadic gathering and hunting. Like wildness/life
everywhere, our spirit is inseparable from the world around us.
This needs some clarification.
Iām not talking about some new age āonenessā anymore than Iām pushing
for some kind of universal āindigenous perspectiveā. Iām talking about
an unmediated relationship with the world. Iām talking about something
that is felt and known without words. Nearly all human societies to have
existed have lived with this spirit in their being. Iām talking about
the same spirit that must be killed so that we can become who we are
now. The spirit must be killed so that we can turn against ourselves and
the earth.
Killing that spirit is impossible. It exists in all life. But at some
point people began burying it: began accepting cheap substitutes. It was
a long, hard and isolated problem, but the original trauma of
domestication is a deep wound. One that spreads quickly and destroys
anything in its path: always moving and searching for some kind of
meaning. What that meaning is will always change shape and form, but the
seekers are trained to look everywhere and destroy anything that stands
in the way.
We are trained to look everywhere but our own damaged souls. We are
trained to look for something, but never to feel. That, of course, is
intentional.
No matter how we view the world, be it egocentric, anthropocentric,
biocentric, etc.: we must always see the world (read: āNatureā) as
someplace wholly separate. Certain people are/were a part of that (read:
āIndigenousā), but that is gone, at least as far as weāre supposed to be
concerned. The earth is a place, life is an ideal: you have only
yourself.
Disconnected, lonely and desperate, we sink or swim in their reality.
This is domestication. This is us occupying land that we have little
sense of and alone in an environment flooded with billions of others.
This is your soul on Prozac.
Ā
The self/Other split begins with domestication. You canāt take control
over a world that you are a part of. According to the monotheists, Adam
and Eve took the first step by naming the animals in Eden. They may very
well be right to a certain degree: life dissected and categorized is far
more of an experiment than a community.
But the greatest damage was the one that turned life into property. It
turned the spirit into wild grains, fish and large mammals into surplus:
into wealth. The world of the gardener turns the world of the
gatherer/hunter into a world of weeds, crops, gardens-in-use, fallowing
gardens, and the village. The farmer dissects that even more into rows
of crops in fields, animals-as-food or animals-as-workers, thinkers and
doers. The capitalist sees consumers, distributors, managers, producers,
and guards.
The world of wildness becomes processed and refined. The spirit of all
things becomes the spirit of all things āusefulā. The divide continues:
we are no longer mere apes or wild beasts. We are the stewards of the
earth, the bringers of the Future. Subject, object.
The soul must be isolated to be re-contextualized.
This is done subtly at first. As people in some places did settle and
did start taking stored food, the initial roles for power began to
emerge. But that power needed to be implicit even for the power of
suggestion that Big Men would wield. This meant tinkering with the
spirit. That became the job of shamans: the first specialists.
The role of the shaman spreads from the healer. A shaman is usually
still a healer, but there is rarely a shortage of healers. For nearly
all nomadic gatherer/hunters, healing is a communal activity. Healers
deal with their reality through that communal spirit. Everyone is
involved. The shaman, on the other hand, interprets that reality. That
is extremely important.
Many shamans only slightly inserted their message into their
interpretations of the spirit. The most important idea was implicit in
their existence: the soul of the world is more open to certain
individuals. Their position was as mediator between the individual and
the rest of the world. And through this, the seeds for a self/Other
split are born.
The message of the shaman, like the message of the preacher and the
pundit, validates the social and political reality. As society becomes
increasingly dependent on certain foods, the gods become specialized to
ensure their growth (sun, water, earth/soil, and seed). As the political
realm becomes more hierarchical, so does the cosmic one. As settlements
become more permanent and spread into villages, the once unified world
turns into the village, the gardens, and the forest. The dead become
ancestors to fear as witches, werewolves, and sorcerers become the all
seeing eye of morality.
The interpretation of the world around us becomes subject to the
ancestors, to gods, then to god and science. But at the base of this is
the self/Other split. The world of the nomadic gatherer/hunter based on
cooperation and openness is replaced by competition and fear. People
follow the hand that feeds as it substitutes their unmediated connection
with the world through its vision.
First we split from the world and then we fear it. Thatās where
domestication begins. Fear and dependency grow to the point where
anything else is unthinkable and even more so, frightening.
This is the world we are born into. This is our dependency. This is our
inheritance.
We are raised to accept it and continue substituting the spirit of
wildness for the soulless world of domestication and mediation. The only
spirit left is the self.
In a dog-eat-dog world, you sink or swim.
Subject or object. At least that much is supposed to be up to you.
Ā
The domesticators have been at their job a long time. For the most part
they are successful at replacing the total world that we know in our
hearts with the totality they have placed around our minds. But their
job can never be complete. They sedate, distract and occupy us, but the
wildness will always slip through the cracks.
For too many the uncontrollable urge to live free is too far beyond
reach. It ends in self destruction or in the splitting of the mind.
The shell cracks only partially.
The totality of civilization in our minds is mirrored by the world it
has created. Concrete, steel, glass, and iron do for the body what the
church and state have done for the mind. Hierarchy and domination become
structural. Our smallness and insignificance is constantly reinforced.
The revolt against civilization means that we must attack both
internally and externally. In reality, there is no separation between
the two. This attack is a response: a response to the totality weāve
been lulled into that seeks to destroy everything. For some that is
meant literally. Their goal is to eliminate everything from concrete to
Nature so that you are free to do anything or go anywhere. Itās a
nihilistic rage that seeks honesty only where the individual remains
isolated: to remove any and all conceivable chains.
To a degree I can understand this active nihilism. When everything you
know feels tainted, it seems instinctive to deconstruct not only
everything you know but how you think and feel. It makes sense as part
of a process of shedding the totality of civilization, but that is it.
Far too often it is seen as a goal in itself: a methodology towards the
radical purity and free from all constraint. It stands as a deadening
response to the sterile corpse of the city and country.
But nihilism, like its more honest relative, egoism, fails to break free
of that initial grasp of domestication: the self/Other split. Both rely
on that isolation, that Neverland of Self. To the nihilist and egoist
there can be no greater connectivity without morality. The two
oppositions remain: self and Other.
The initial lie of the domesticators comes full circle.
Ā
Civilization kills the spirit. It must in order to exist.
We think, build and maintain civilization. It is the reality created for
us and the reality that we recreate daily. It is our addiction. It is
everything we are given so that the soul cannot breathe: all the cheap
replacements for wildness, for spirit. It is what we are given so that
the spirit cannot remember wildness. So that we will no longer desire
wildness.
It has always been this way. It must always be this way for civilization
to exist.
It comes back to domestication.
But domestication is not irreversible any more than it is evolutionary.
It has always been resisted by the spirits that refused to be tamed.
Wild beings, human or not, have always fought against it: if not in mind
and soul than in body.
This is the primal war: the refusal of life to be domesticated. It is
the refusal of wildness to become ordered and civilized. It is the
spirit that refuses to die.
It is not about a certain people, place or time: it is about life. Those
who know that spirit without mediation have always put up the hardest
fight. There was no fight or revolution for abstract ideals, for some
unknown or unknowable place of undefined and questionable freedom as
individuals. The fight was about something felt, something innate. The
fight, then, now and always, is the rage of the spirit of life and
wildness. It knows no isolation or mediation. It grows through the
cracks in the sidewalk and the refusal of toxins in our bodies. It will
stop for nothing and it is extremely deadly.
It is within us, anxiously waiting. It cries for the healing of the
spirit (rewilding) and the healing of the body (resistance). Both are
one in the same. Our deepest wound cries for healing. That is a cry for
action.
Ā
For the nihilists and egoists, resistance comes from the immediate need
to destroy what destroys you. Its only construction is in its
destruction. Iām not going to say that is always a bad thing. But I will
say this: I have no question in my being that there is something that I
am fighting for, not just something Iām fighting against. It is not
about morality or about some lofty new age crap: itās about something
unmediated and present. Something real.
As my ideas of self and Other dissolve, Iāve come to realize that there
is life in this world. I know it is interconnected. It comes through the
spirit that is never dead, but it is channeled and caged by the
domesticators. The end result of ten thousand years of mediation.
I know this like I know civilization must be destroyed. My spirit knows
this. My spirit feels this. The spirit of all life knows this. It has
always known this.
Iāve only begun to listen.