💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › ransu-pathological-socialising.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:43:01. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Pathological Socialising
Author: Ransu
Date: 2004
Language: en
Topics: anti-civ, Green Anarchist, organization
Source: Retrieved on January 1, 2005 from http://www.greenanarchist.org
Notes: from Green Anarchist #71–74

Ransu

Pathological Socialising

Pathological Socialising: lazy, self-obsessed hippies and their

appropriation of radical thinking by Ransu

People Have Lives! This was what was screamed at me when I criticised

peoples attitudes and commitment towards activism. It was revealed to me

that there are excuses which are taboos — never talked about or

challenged. These excuses include: girl/boy friends, parties,

alcohol/drugs, children, jobs, etc. The painful truth is that as our

movement lacks resources, manpower, support of all kinds and a good

network, and the little hope that is left is wasted by people spending

their time and energy on socialising with friends, going to parties and

getting pissed.

Is it coincidence that any half successful movement or revolution was

achieved only by certain rules which in most cases included limitations

on alcohol and drug use? I’m not advocating a ban on alcohol or drugs —

the will must come from inside.- just pointing out the irony of hippies

idealising the Zapatistas while ignoring the fact that their heroes have

one simple rule which extends on the whole of the occupied zone by

Zapatistas: a total ban on alcohol and other drugs.

‘Fascist’ they call me when I mention the word ‘self-discipline’, yet

what is wrong with someone restraining themselves for a cause because

they respect their friends in the movement and would be ashamed to let

them down?

Even the ‘enlightened’ individuals of our movement seem unconvinced by

the current situation in the world. It seems that only in countries

where peoples baby’s are getting killed people finally realise what the

cost of freedom is. It seems to me that it is not enough in this country

for peoples babys’ being killed by the government slowly with dioxin,

fluoride, BSE, etc. — how can you convince these people? Do you have to

have persons intruding into their apartments shooting the fuck out of

their kids in front of them while wearing tshirts with “THE STATE”

written on them before they SEE? Freedom is not a consumer item one can

purchase from their local Bodyshop. It is the result of a struggle with

commitment, sacrifice, respect and discipline.

Why am I angry? Because I have been pissed on and fucked up by people

doing exactly the things I have described here — wasting my time and

most importantly wasting the little effort I have tried to push toward

saving this planet.

“People Have Lives!”. So I don’t have a life...? I have chosen not to

have lots of friends to go to parties with, or to abuse myself with

alcohol and drugs, or a full-time job, a car and other mod cons, useless

hobbies etc. This is something I have chosen so I can fight for the

destruction of civilisation. If these people’s ‘life’ requires such

trivia to be worthwhile, I don’t see much to recommend it.

Some years ago I voiced these ideas to activists at the EF gathering. I

said that I thought having entertainment, i.e. alcohol, loud music etc.

at a gathering that should be primarily about serious issues isn’t

acceptable. This is because only one thing can be a priority at one

time.

The EF! gathering exhibited some of the most gruesome hypocrites I’ve

seen for a long time. There were a lot of people there who’s priority

wasn’t the serious issues at hand but having a good time generally and

entertainment particularly. Because of these people the gathering was

made into a festival, a ‘happening’, and the Earth was not first but

last.

The entertainment thus became a priority and dispite the limitations of

time and space applied to as camouflage it by-passed the serious issues

we should have been working on. This phenomenon is not exclusive to

Earth Firsters and contributes greatly to the failure of environmental

organizations and movements to bring about real, rather than superficial

change. If we are serious about tackling civilisation we have to be

utterly self-disciplined and focused. Alcohol, drugs, sex, socialising,

etc distract us and re-deploy our energy, weakening our intent and

dissapating our actions.

“My countrymen, shall the glittering trinkets of this rich man, his

deceitful drink that overcomes our mind, shall these things tempt us to

give up our homes, our hunting grounds, and the honorable teaching of

our old men? Shall we permit ourselves to be driven to and fro — to be

herded like the cattle of the white man?” — Oglala Red Cloud

Not only do sex, alcohol, drugs, computer games, tv, etc. sap energy and

time which needs to be devoted to other more important things. But they

make us self-indulgent and dependent on the thing we have to destroy. So

why is there such a dissappointing pattern of substitute activities

among what’s classed as ‘activism’? And why are activists so

self-indulgent and un-self-disciplined?

Jean Liedloff, in “The Continuum Concept” describes the differences

between civilised children and the Indians she lived with in South

America. She noted the following explanation for why the Indian children

were so happy, self-motivated and confident compared to the unhappy,

dependent, self-destructive civilised kids:

“Ironically, the reason it’s possible to make these profoundly social

animals bad or anti-social is because we are so social. Our parents, our

tribesman, our authority figures, clearly expect us to be bad or

anti-social or greedy or selfish or dirty or destructive or

self-destructive. Our social nature is such that we tend to meet the

expectations of our elders.”

— Interview in ‘Touch The Future’

www.continuum-concept.org

Self-destructive, substitute activities are expected of us. And even

activists find it hard to ignore Mother Culture, our modern elder. We

scream for our ‘right’ to get drunk, socialise, etc as loudly as any

pampered brat, truly not knowing how we could live without our

substitutes.

“The world’s full of the walking undead and you want to party?”

— Buffy the Vampire Slayer

If activists were to expect their allies to be sober and

self-disciplined, then we might have a good chance of eliminating our

self-centred indulgent behaviour. If we were expected to act with

determination and dedication then maybe we would start acting that way.

I think a good way to start changing this is to completely eliminate

unneccessaries like drugs, alcohol, parties, tv, etc and incorporate the

idea of self-discipline into our lives. But as I said, the will has to

come from inside, when we’ve decided we’re really serious about kicking

civilisation.

GA Article Not Popular with Lifestyle Activists: Discussion of

‘Pathological Socialising’ from GA 71

The following is part of a discussion sparked by the “Pathological

Socialising” article by Ransu in the last issue. See web board

(www.greenanarchist.org/forum.html) for full discussion and to join in

if you can bear it.

seamimac@yahoo.com:

The milieu that sets its agenda as one of serving a cause is lost from

the start because they immediately prime themselves towards a goal of

subservience to an abstraction. Sacrifice of ones life is therefore

promoted as a good thing.

re-wild@mail.com:

If you look on it as ‘sacrifice’ then your priorities are seriously

fucked up.

If a tiger’s cubs are being attacked, does she view it as a ‘sacrifice’

to fight back? Does she feel it’s a drag to have to forego hanging out

at the watering hole, shagging more tigers? If so, her cubs won’t

survive very long.

Of course, if you view the struggle for survival and liberation as being

a ‘sacrifice’ then you should stick to hanging out with radical cliques,

socialising, being cool, etc. But don’t pretend to yourself that that in

itself is radical or liberating.

Self-discipline isn’t ‘subservience to an abstraction’ — it’s a

practical way of living which doesn’t put short-term goals (like where

the next joint is coming from, or what party is on at the weekend) ahead

of doing something to make this world a better place for free people to

really live in. If you think drugs and sex are necessary for happiness,

then I feel sorry for you. Maybe you need to get out more. Out of your

closed, civilised mentality that is.

Although I wish it were otherwise, the activist community is just as

fucked in the head as the average consumer. Some are trying to do the

right thing — but because their peer group is obsessed more with

socialising than actually affecting change their efforts come to little.

If our priorities were different this wouldn’t happen. The activist

community would become a vibrant force to be reckoned with (like for

example the black panthers who saw the destructive nature of alcohol and

banned it from their organisation) and individuals within the community

would regain a lot of their personal power in the process.

With this personal power and vibrant community, this would be a

completely different place. But of course, if you prefer to live in an

alcoholic, drug infested pit of sexually dysfunctional, puerille,

apathetic slaves...

seamimac@yahoo.com:

A call for people to sacrifice more is the call of religionists of all

stripes ... Let us be done with all this self-rightiousness and

judeo-christian nonsense.

re-wild@mail.com:

Self-discipline is not exclusively a judeo-christian or even religious

attribute. Martyrdom, hypocrisy and sacrifice are used by those

institutions to keep people servile — the complete opposite of the aim

of real self-discipline. Things like responsibility, selfdiscipline and

commitment are not ‘religious’, they are neccessary ways of dealing with

the current mess we’re in. But of course, it doesn’t sound sexy, what a

turn off maan...

seamimac@yahoo.com:

... breaking the multiplicity of chains that restrain the

insurrectionary instinct, will mean abandoning the old tired concepts

promoted by the rulers and would be rulers down through the years, many

of them promoted as “revolutionary” despite them being the complete

opposite.

re-wild@mail.com:

“As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends

compensatingly to increase. In conjunction with the freedom to daydream

under the influence of dope and movies and the radio, it will help to

reconcile the subjects to the servitude which is their fate.” — Aldous

Huxley, Forward to “Brave New World”, 1932, Harper Collins.

I’m sorry, maybe I missed something, but aren’t sex and drugs completely

condoned by the rulers and the ruled, as long as they don’t interfere

with production. The rulers and the ruled have a long tradition of

believing they are free simply because they can indulge in whatever

they’ve been told is fashionable at that time. Like a bit of activism at

the weekend... As long as none of this interferes too much with the

churning of civilisation it’s perfectly acceptable to the rulers and the

ruled.

seamimac@yahoo.com:

The whole issue of imposing “good” and “bad” on people who are merely

escaping the monotony of daily life is replicating civilisation, who

decides who is a worthy activist and who isn’t? will there be written

rules? what happens to tresspassers of this new code of conduct?

re-wild@mail.com:

I agree that codes of conduct, issued diktat-like, would only enslave

others even more. That’s why I haven’t advocated this. I am asking for

people to be aware of the detrimental effects of things like drink and

drugs on their hearts, minds and willpower, and to ask themselves if

this is what they really want. Of course this isn’t effective unless it

comes from the individual — something Ransu was at pains to point out in

“Pathological Socialising”. In that article Ransu explicitly states that

the will to be self-disciplined must of course come from the individual

and not from any organisation. The more astute readers might have

realised by now that this is actually the meaning of the term

“self-disciplined”!

seamimac@yahoo.com:

For the re-wild poster to then use the example of the stalinist black

panthers as something positive is strange to say the least. Sure we are

up against it but will demanding more tight lipped, grim faced

“determination” lead us anywhere?

re-wild@mail.com:

I used the Black Panthers as an example of a movement that recognised

the destructiveness of certain activities and therefore eliminated them.

I didn’t say we should model our struggle on them, just that they had a

certain amount of sucess due to their appraisal of the situation they

were in at that particular time and place. Looking around us now, you

can’t help but be struck by how destructive many of our practices are

and therefore should we not be looking for ways to end them? In order to

make ourselves stronger and freer — not to strengthen a power base for

any organisation.

seamimac@yahoo.com:

So you are seemingly very pissed off that the activist club does not do

what you would like them to do, fuck ‘em you are responsible for

yourself [full stop!] organise outside the “cliques”, organise on your

basis, from the point of your dreams, do what you want, if it is

inspirattional it will spark a fire, if not it won’t, but at least try

and enjoy doing it?

re-wild@mail.com:

I am not pissed off that activists don’t do what I would like them to

do. I am pissed off because they are doing exactly what their enemies

want them to do. It is perfectly acceptable to civilisation for vast

amounts of time, energy and passion to be squandered in pointless

displacement activities. It would be nice if this didn’t happen and that

activists started prioritising their freedom. They would become, as the

Panthers did in their time and place, a force to be reckoned with and

some real change might come about. Until then we just keep on posturing,

throwing dust in the face of a dragon...