💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › anonymous-active-vs-passive-nihilism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 06:20:36. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Active vs. Passive Nihilism Author: anonymous Date: 2012 Language: en Topics: anarcho-nihilism, nihilism, nihilist, insurrectionary anarchy Source: https://antimodernist.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/active-vs-passive-nihilism/
A great many philosophers have dedicated considerable amounts of their
waking moments wrestling with the problem of nihilism; or more
specifically, the problem of overcoming nihilism. Nevertheless, nihilism
itself remains a mystery — least of all its consequences for mankind. To
be sure, an adequate definition of nihilism is wanting. In the most
general sense, nihilism refers to the absence of any objective,
universal or intrinsic value. From this, it necessarily follows that our
metaphysical beliefs, our moral/ethical values, and even our own
existence, are completely and utterly lacking any inherent meaning.
As a direct consequence of nihilism, man is forced to see reality for
what it is: a random, irrational, and chaotic existence in which our
role is infinitesimal. Nihilism, in this capacity, serves to break down
all the illusions, myths, and all other social, cultural constructions
that have hitherto given us a false sense of security and hope.
In its active form, nihilism is likened to a hammer — used not only to
chisel away all artificial meaning, but to smash them. Active nihilism
paves the way for the creation of new values, the overcoming of the self
by taking a new relation to oneself as an autonomous creator. In effect,
this is the transformation of living as the “one-self,” into “my-self.”
Thus, the end result of nihilism in its active form is nothing short of
paving the way for the grounds to becoming my own self.
Passive nihilism, on the other hand, is epitomized by resignation; the
prognosis that life is an “unprofitable episode,” (in Schopenhauer’s
words). Nietzsche equated passive nihilism with Schopenhauer’s
repudiation of life via the denial of the Will as a great threat.
Nihilism in its passive form, while adopting the same prognosis of
existence as active nihilism, thus nevertheless takes the opposite
stance of active nihilism as to how we should respond to the problem of
a meaningless, value-less, and chaotic existence.