đŸ’Ÿ Archived View for library.inu.red â€ș file â€ș leslie-h-chen-chen-jiongming.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 12:04:27. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

âžĄïž Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Chen Jiongming
Author: Leslie H. Chen
Language: en
Topics: Chinese Anarchism, China, history, anarchist history, biography, anarchist biography
Source: Retrieved on 2007-03-11 from  https://web.archive.org/web/20070311092406/http://www.chen-jiongming.com/English/material/paper/chen_paper4.htm

Leslie H. Chen

Chen Jiongming

Introduction

Several major events occurred in China’s search for modernization in the

twentieth century: (1) the New Policies Reform and Constitutional

movement of the late Qing period, 1898–1911; (2) the Republican

Revolution of 1911; (3) the New Culture movement of the May Fourth

period in 1919; (4) the Federalist movement of 1920–1926; (5) the

Nationalist (Guomindang) Revolution of 1926–1949 and (6) the Communist

Revolution of 1949.

Chen Jiongming (1878–1933) played an important role in the first four of

these events. He was by training a lawyer and became a Qing legislator,

a republican revolutionary, a military leader, a civil administrator and

a federalist who sought to reconstruct China as a democratic

republic.[1]

Chen has sunk into obscurity, however, because he disagreed with Sun

Yat-sen about the direction that reform should take. Sun wanted to unite

the country by force and institute change through a centralized

government based on a one-party system. Chen advocated a multiparty

federalism and the peaceful unification of China. Following a revolt of

Chen’s troops in 1922 that forced Sun to flee Canton (Guangzhou) and

delayed his Northern Expedition (beifa), Sun turned on Chen. Sun’s

Nationalist Party (Guomindang) quickly began to publish slanderous

material about Chen to discredit him.[2] The Communists, who had entered

into an alliance with Sun and who still regard him as the founding hero

of the Chinese Revolution have continued to characterize Chen as a

traitor and a reactionary warlord.

The conflict between Sun and Chen was a conflict between two different

concepts of nation building – centralism versus federalism (Chen 1991;

Duara 1995, 177–204). Four years later, in 1926, when the Northern

Expedition of the Nationalist-Communist alliance swept across the

southern and central provinces, all provincial constitutions, provincial

and local assemblies, and local self-government societies associated

with the vision of a federated state ceased to exist. The story of Chen

Jiongming and federalism has since remained hidden behind Nationalist

and Communist accounts of modern Chinese history.

A paper by Winston Hsieh published in 1962 was the first Western

scholarly work that gives a sympathetic analysis of Chen’s political

career with emphasis on his ideas and ideals (Hsieh 1962). Hsieh

observes that Chen had strong intellectual affinity and political

connections with many Chinese anarchists and that he was a great patron

of the anarchist movement whenever he was in power. Three decades later,

in the 1990s, similar remarks have been made in the three definitive

works written on Chinese anarchism respectively by Zarrow (1990), Dirlik

(1991) and Krebs (1998).

Since Hsieh’s work we have known much more about Chen Jiongming’s

lifelong political activities, including his writings in Zhangzhou

during the May Fourth period and in Hong Kong in his last years. Chen

was one of the founders and patrons of an anarchist assassination group

during the Republican revolutionary movement of 1910–1911. The group was

the most idealistic and morally-conscious among all the radical

organizations in the movement.After the successful overthrow of the Qing

dynasty, the group was dissolved; Chen continued to be the patron and

protector of his anarchist friends and comrades who now engaged in a

social and cultural reform movement in Canton. During the May Fourth

period, Chen created with the help of anarchist intellectuals a “model”

city of New Culture in Zhangzhou, Fujian, which won the critical acclaim

both in China and abroad. Back in Guangdong in the 1920s, Chen actively

promoted peaceful unification of the country through “Chinese

federalism” - a “bottom-up” form of federalism that clearly has its

anarchist origin.

Anarchism is known in China as wuzhengfu zhuyi, meaning literally

“without a government”.[3] This simplified term unfortunately leads to

much misinterpretations as is also the case in the West. In the words of

George Woodcock, the stereotype of the anarchist is that of the

“cold-blooded assassin who attacks with dagger or bomb the symbolic

pillars of established society” and “anarchy, in popular parlance, is

malign chaos”(Woodcock 1962, 10). [4]

John P. Clark defines anarchism as a political theory which must

contain: (1) a view of an ideal, noncoercive, nonauthoritarian society;

(2) a criticism of existing society and its institutions, based on this

antiauthoritarian ideal; (3) a view of human nature that justifies the

hope for significant progress toward the ideal; and (4) a strategy for

change, involving immediate institution of noncoercive, nonauthoritarian

and decentralist alternatives (Clark 1978, 13). By invoking Clark’s

definition, Zarrow concludes that the early Chinese anarchists meet all

these four requisites, “at least to a degree” (Zarrow 1990, 239)

Chinese anarchists propagated their ideas and belief by publishing

journals, books and pamphets in Paris, Canton, Zhangzhou and Shanghai.

Liang Bingxian sums up where they stood:

of private property; Kropotkin’s communism and theory of mutual aid to

supplement social Darwinism; and Kropotkin’s philosophy of living.

love.

organized society.

Harmony (datong).

human wisdom to enrich physical world. (Liang 1978, 6)

Chinese anarchists were among the first to condemn Confucianism, to

discuss feminism, to promote language reform, and to organize modern

labor union (Zarrow 1990, 2; Dirlik 1991, 128). They inherited a

Confuscian philosophy of human-goodness,.and they believed that there

are qualities of human beings which enable them to live together in a

world of Great Harmony. Thus, they rejected the idea of a Utopia that

exists outside of the existing world, and asserted that Great Harmony is

achievable by commencing reforms in each community (Mo 1997, 66).

For the anarchist, there could be no separation of the revolutionary

process from the revolutionary goal. It is on this issue of ends versus

means that “anarchists and Marxists part company, rather than on their

visions of the ideal society” (Clark 1978, 11; Carter 1978, 333–36).

Chinese anarchists opposed class struggle to achieve a classless

society. They criticized Marxism for establishing a center authority

“either in the ‘proletariat’ or in its ‘representative’, the Communist

party, that reproduced the very power structures that in theory it

rejected” (Dirlik 1991, 9; Joll 1964, 278).

We shall proceed to explore the influence of anarchism on Chen

Jiongming’s lifelong political career using Clark’s definition and

certain characteristics of Chinese anarchists as guidance.

1. Early Revolutionary Activities

Chen Jiongming was born in 1878 in Haifeng, Guangdong, to a landlord

family that enjoyed moderate wealth and a reputation for scholarship. He

began to study the Confucian classics at the age of five, and won the

xiucai degree when he was twenty-two. In 1906, he enrolled in the

Academy of Law and Political Science in Canton and graduated two years

later at the top of his class. The Qing government intended the newly

established academy to train future officials, especially

parliamentarians. Part of a reform program designed to prepare China for

a constitutional monarchy, the effort resembled that of Japan following

the Meiji Restoration of 1868. The academy invited Japanese and Chinese

educated in Japan to give courses on the Japanese constitutional

movement and Western learning.

Two events characterize Chen Jiongming’s early commitment to local and

national affairs. the first resulted in the successful impeachment of a

magistrate for cruel and improper conduct. As the obscure law student

from a remote township in East Guangdong, Chen gained a reputation in

the provincial capital for leadership and for being willing to risk his

life to fight injustice. He also refused to benefit financially from his

efforts (Chen 1999, 13).

The second event took place during Chen’s vacation from the Academy in

February of 1908. At the historical shrine of Wen Tianxiang in Haifeng,

Chen persuaded over thirty young men of the village to swear secret

support for a national revolution.[5] Chen’s group was made up of

gemuine, homegrown “village intellectuals” in the anti-Manchu movement,

they were neither foreign-educated nor members of one of the

long-established secret societies. While China’s many revolutionary

groups shared strong nationalistic and anti-dynastic views, the Haifeng

group differed from their overseas compatriots, like Sun Yat-sen, who

preached the overflow of the Manchu regime from the haven of foreign

countries. For these village intellectuals, revolution was the means to

an immediate goal, the eradication of the misery and social injustice

that surrounded them every day. They paid special attention to the

problem of local reconstruction and social reform. Like the anarchists,

they wanted “a social revolution (shehui geming) to follow immediately

the successful national revolution (minzu geming)” (Mo 1997, 52).

After graduating from the Academy in 1908, Chen returned home, where in

1909 he established the Haifeng zizhi bao (Haifeng self-government

gazette). Chen was the editor-in-chief with several others of his

village comrades as editors. They did not hesitate to point out social

ills, constantly adding, for instance, the headline “the evil of

inequalities” to reports of buglaries or robberies. In October, only a

year over the minimun age of thirty, Chen was elected to the first

Guangdong Provincial Assembly in Canton. There he simultaneously helped

develop practical policies while secretly working to overthrow the Qing

Dynasty.

Prior to the successful revolt in Wuchang that sparked the Revolution of

1911, Chen had participated in two abortive revolts in Canton: the

Revolt of the New Army of February 12, 1910 and the Uprising of April

27, 1911. The failures forced Chen to change his strategy to avoid

focusing on the heavily armed and fully alerted capital city of the

province. When the news of the Wuchang Revolt of October 10, 1911

reached Canton, Chen secretly left for his home districts in East

Guangdong to raise a revolutionary army. Peasants formed the bulk of

this army; they were led by a mixed group of former military officers,

secret society members, local intelligentia, and overseas Chinese from

Southeast Asia. Chen Jiongming , for the first time in his political

career, found himself the commander-in-chief of an army - an army one

might justifiably called a “people’s revolutionary army”. Chen adopted

the ancient sign of a well-field system for the flag of his army,

signifying the old Chinese saying “land to the tiller” (gengzhe you qi

tian) (Chen 1999. 41–45).

Chen’s army captured Huizhou, a capital city in East Guangdong on

November 8, 1911, which led to the province’s declaration of

independence on the next day without firing another shot. Chen

subsequently became governor-general of the province’s new Republican

government. In the critical period following a tumultuous revolution,

his administration had provided Guangdong the continuity of a strong and

stable government. His accomplishments were, as described by the

American consul general, Leo Bergholz, “nothing less than a miracle”

(USDS 1264, March 11, 1912)

2. Associations with the Anarchists

After the failure of the New Army revolt in February 1910, Chen

Jiongming secretly left for Hong Kong where he and ten others joined

with Liu Shifu (1884–1915) to organize a secret revolutionay society

called the China Assassination Corps. The Corps was successful in the

assassination of a Manchu general, but failed in its attempts on two

other high Qing officials with the loss of two members. When Guangdong

declared its independence, the Corps voluntarily disbanded. Supposedly

in the spirit of despising worldly fame, the Corps decided to keep its

history secret. They burned all documents except certain items kept in

memory of their martyrs. As a consequence, the activities of the Corps

were shrouded in mystery until several decades later when two survivors

chose to break their silence.[6]

The unofficial but unquestioned leader of the Corps was Liu Shifu, who

became the doyen of the Chinese anarchism. In an article meant to

propagate anarchist ideas to the common people, Liu states his goal:

All the people of the world are like brothers. Naturally we love one

another. But the governments invented patriotism. Soldiers are trained

to kill ........The laws are simply established customs, as said by the

great anarchist Kropotkin....Disorders came from contention, and

contentions, from evil society, and when society is evil, the laws fail

to do good.....

The necessities of life are clothing, food and home. Clothing, food and

home are derived from goods and goods are the product of the earth and

labor......Anarchy destroys the system of private property and promotes

communism. Everyone works as he can and gets what he wants.... There is

no contention for money.....All men live an equal life and are free to

work. Quarrelsome society turns into a loving one.[7]

And how to achieve this idealistic society of Great Harmony, Liu

explains:

The principle of anarchism may not be easily understood by unintelligent

persons. The responsibility to reach them rests with the

intelligent....In preaching anarchism one has to make the principle

understood. When the majority of the people believe in anarchism,

government will be abolished. At that time the minority of the

population may be ignorant of the principle, but there will be no

difficulty in making them understand (USDS 893.00B/4, April 24, 1920).

Liu’s is a passive approach by persuasion and example. He was

preoccupied with the importance of individual regeneration in the

reformation of society. He listed twelve rules of personal conduct for

members of his Conscience Society (Xinshe) to follow, which prohibited

the consumption of meat, liquor, and tobacco, the employment of

servants, riding in rickshaws, marriage, family surnames and

participation in government, the parliament and assemblies, political

parties, the armed forces, or any religious organization (Krebs 1998,

105–106).

Liu and his fellowers were men of action. In addition to publication of

magazines and pamphlets, they conducted schools to learn Esperanto and

even attempted to establish a village of Great Harmony (Datong cun).[8]

Six years later in Zhangzhou, Chen Jiongming confided to a follower of

Liu :

It is difficult to dislodge the burden of evil. It is even more

difficult for someone who is willing to shoulder that burden himself.

[Liu] Shifu teaches people to dislodge it. Let me take it on my

shoulders for the rest of my life!” (Liang 1978, 11).

Chen chose to take a different approach to achieve a similar goal.[9]

Liu Shifu was widely respected for his seriousness of purpose and deeply

committed to practising what he preached - traits that Chen Jiongming

had shared in his lifelong political career.

Chen also befriended Wu Zhihui (1864–1953), another doyan of anarchism.

Wu, a promoter of the popular “Work and Thrift” study movement in the

early 1920s , came south to solicit Chen’s support and succeeded in

getting a donation of $100,000 for the building fund of the

Franco-Chinese Institute in Lyon, France (Mo1997, 24). Wu later became

an elder statesman of Sun Yat-sen’s Nationalist Party. In 1924, he

failed to effect a reconciliation between Sun and Chen (Chen 1999,

239–41). In a letter to Chen, Wu explained the necessity of grooming Sun

Yat-sen for a leader of the party, like Lenin in Russia. Wu confessed

that he was still a “talking” anarchist, but, in reality, one who “holds

a pair of grass shoes” [is a humble follower] under the banner of the

patriotic [Nationalist] party (Chen 1999, 291–96).

3. The Zhangzhou Experiment

The two years (August 1918 – November 1920) that Chen Jiongming spent in

Zhangzhou gave his first extended opportunity to put his reform ideas

into action. His apprenticeship in the Guangdong Provincial Assembly and

his experiences as governor-general in 1912 now bore fruit. He knew he

had to maintain military strength while working to build strong civil

institutions. The guidelines that shaped his actions came from the New

Culture movement. The idea of this movement had emerged from the anger

stimulated by Japan’s Twenty-one Demands and the events of May 4 1919.

Chen’s army, now called the Guangdong Army, was led by men who fought

with him in the Revolution of 1911. In a proclamation to his army, Chen

explains his political objective in veracular language:

Question: What is the Principle of Nation-Building (jianguo zhuyi) ?

Answer: It is democracy (minzhu zhuyi).

Q: The Republic of China is a democracy. What is the safeguard for it?

A: Before the promulgation of a national constitution, the safeguard is

provided by the Provisional Constitution [of 1912] (Duan and Ni 1998,

1:320).

As commander-in-chief, Chen set himself up to a high standard of

morality; his army was the most disciplined in the era.[10]

Chen embarked on a program of social reform and economic development in

the twenty-six counties under his control in southern Fujian. So

striking was the scope of reform that it soon attracted attention

abroad. A newspaper in Germany, for example, referred to Zhangzhou as

“the shining star in the East” (Chen 1963, 42). Some Peking University

students, afire with idealistic visions of the new communist regime in

Russia, were so much impressed after visiting Zhangzhou that they

commented in their student publication: “[Chen] is a man devoted to

revolution....[The practices] in an age of communism could not be better

than what Chen has carried out in Zhangzhou .... Zhangzhou is the Moscow

of southern Fujian” (WSQK 1959, 389). The American consul at Amoy

commented: “The Chinese saw what could be done without undue hardship

and heavy taxation” (USDS 4091, August 31, 1921). Indeed Zhangzhou was

referred to by some contemporaries as “Little Model China” (Chen 1999,

294).

On the cultural side, Chen had the help of a group of “freedom

socialists”, mostly Liu Shifu’s followers who came to Zhangzhou “to

reform education, publish books and newspapers, change the attitudes of

society, raise the people’s level of knowledge, and transform the

twenty-six counties of southern Fujian into a healthy and autonomous

region.” They believed this piece of clean and healthy land could serve

as a shining model to the rest of China, thus inducing reform of the

whole country (Liang 1978, 12).

Chen Jiongming had had little time to write during his active political

career. However, in Zhangzhou, he managed to author several articles and

some poems. His writings reveal unmistakenly the profound influence of

the anarchistic ideas for absolute equality, moral purity, democracy,

mutual aid and emancipation from institutional yokes.

In the center of Zhangzhou’s first public park, which Chen had built as

a symbol of the new era, he erected a tower. On its four sides were

inscribed in large characters the four central concepts of the New

Culture movement: ziyou (freedom), pingdeng (equality), bo’ai (fraternal

love), and huzhu (mutual aid). In his forword to Minxing bao (Fujian

Star), Chen explored the meaning of these words and the philosophy

underlying the new movement.[11] He argued that the New Culture movement

must necessarily involve the reform of human thought, but in reforming

human thought, he cautioned against the use of force or anything that

resembled what we would call brainwashing. He believed that China must

follow an evolutionary process based on fraternal love and the principle

of mutual aid. Utimately, he believed, human society would evolve to a

stage where people enjoyed the happiness of full equality and suffered

no bondage of states, nations, or individuals. What we need is, Chen

argued, a great awakening of every mind so that all may be free of the

prevailing erroneous thinking that “each must struggle for his own

existence without any concern for the life and death of others.”

As a student at the Academy of Law and Political Science in Canton, Chen

had expressed his enthusiasm for social Darwinism by giving himself the

courtesy name of Jingcun (struggle for existence) (Chow 1960, 64n-t). At

this point, however, he had obviously deviated from the doctrine of

social evolution, considering a brutish struggle for existence morally

inadequate.

At the time of rising nationalism, Chen held that nationalism

constituted a far from sacred or complete vision of human society. He

argued forcefully against its tenets as a categorical imperative.

Instead, he believed in the truer and more lasting principles of

fraternal love and mutual aid:

Men have the natural capacity for brotherly and fraternal love (bo’ai).

If one knows how to love his country, why not teach him to extend his

full capacity to love all of human society? Te be able to love all

mankind means that one cannot discard his compasion for others since it

is linked at least in part to all mankind in the historical past.....If

any nation is being oppressed today, we can rush to offer her assistance

without being in conflict with the compassion we hold for other nations

......Is not the concept of “socialism of all mankind” (quanrenlei

shehui zhuyi) a better doctrine? (Duan and Ni 1998, 404–405).

In another publication, the Minxing ribao (Fujian Star Daily News), Chen

wrote a manifesto outlining the paper’s mission. He reiterated the

themes of building a new society by shaking off the yoke (shufu) of the

old society for freedom, by discarding class distinctions for equality,

and by putting aside competition for mutual aid (Duan and Ni 1998,

441–45).

Contrary to anarchist teaching, Chen was not opposed to religion. When

his friend Xu Qian, a noted jurist, decided to “escape from Confucianism

to convert to Christianity” (tao ru gui ye), Chen was inspired to write

an article entitled Don’t Be a Slave to Evils in praise of Christianity.

Jesus of Nazareth, Chen observes, was a man who preached equality,

freedom, fraternal love and self-sacrifice and who was willing to bear

the painful burden to save the world. Chen credited Christianity as the

prime moving force for the freedom and equality enjoyed by the people in

the Western countries (Duan and Ni 1998, 408–18).

In both British and American diplomatic reports, Chen Jiongming was

occasionally referred to as “the Bolshevik general”, but the report of

an American missionary at Zhangzhou to the consul at Amoy offered a

milder assessment: “At a large athletic meet held here the past week,

[Bolshevist] literature was distributed and some speeches made. The

General [Chen] himself a socialist (but I cannot believe of the most

radical type) has apparently aided in this movement.”[12]

Wu Zhihui visited Zhangzhou in 1919–1920. His remarks typify the

prevailing attitude of most Chinese intellectuals at the time, including

Chen Jiongming:

As to Marxism, we had studied it and debated over it many times in our

publication The New Century in Paris more than ten years ago. We finally

rejected it [as inapplicable to China].... In reality, every country has

its own ways and conditions that accompany the outbreak of a social

revolution. We had no idea what Lenin had up his sleeve (Liang 1978,

17).

Although the Chinese were not sure “what Lenin had up his sleeve”, they

neither feared nor disliked the new Soviet state. They were curious

about it and sincerely admired Lenin’s leadership in the fight of the

oppressed Russian people against czarist imperialism. The Soviet Union

was in its infancy, and the Chinese Communist Party did not yet born. It

was still a time when everyone was exploring a variety of new social

ideas.

4 The Federalist State

After returning from Fujian with the Guangdong Army in November 1920,

Chen Jiongming immediately embarked upon a fervent program to make

Guangdong a model province so as to “gain the confidence of the nation

(mofan qixin)”. In an interview with Rodney Gilbert, the American

correspondent of the North China Daily News (Shanghai) two months after

his return to Guangdong, Chen explained the underlying philosophy and

ultimate goal of Guangdong’s reform programs:

The people of China are not organized to express themselves or to make

their collective will felt. They are accustomed, however, to

self-government in their village communities, and if there is democracy

in China, it will have to evolve from these communities and their

tradition of self rule. We must work from the bottom up, and not from

the top down as we have been trying to do for so many years......

We believe that if we begin the application of our ideas in Kuangtung

[Guangdong] and if we are at all successful, the example will prompt the

people of the provinces around us to insist upon a similar system, and

that the movement will spread throughout China.........If we can get a

few provinces we can federate and bring in the others, one by one, until

we have made over into a lien sheng cheng fu [liansheng zhengfu] — a

Government of United Provinces (USDS 3809, February 18, 1921).

In the two-year period of 1921–1922, significant and unprecedented

results were achieved for the reconstruction of Guangdong in all fronts

– in establishing modern municipalities, election of county magistrates

and assemblymen, reform of education, industrial development, judicial

reform, labor movement, commerce and transportation (Chen 1999, 120–56).

The election of county magistrates and assemblymen was unprecedented in

China’s history. The Guangdong government fostered the organization of

labor unions, but it “sternly cautioned” them against strikes as a means

to settle labor grievances. At the same time , the government launched a

drive to eliminate illiteracy among the labor force by establishing

evening schools in the factories (Huang 1922, 59). By early 1922 there

were more than 130 unions registered with the provincial government

representing more than 300,000 members (Huazi ribao, February 10, 11, 12

and 14, 1925). The Machinery Workers Union was among the most powerful ,

and its leaders were prominent anarchists (Mo 1997, 26).

Without a written law and with little precedent, Governor Chen took upon

himself to put into practice what workers of advanced industrial nations

only gained a decade later – the right of the workers to collective

bargaining through their own representation without interference,

restraint or coercion by the employers. Using such an approach, he

helped settle the great Hong Kong Seamen’s strike of 1922 (FO 371/8030

March 11, 1922, 92; Qun bao March 6, 1922 [SRYS 5:100]; Chen 1999,

142–48). Chen had similar idea for organizing peasant unions as a

vehicle for agrarian reforms; he put it into practice in East Guangdong

in 1923–1925 (Chen 1999, 148–50).

Chen Jiongming’s idea of building democracy from the bottom up clearly

had its anarchist origin.[13] The noted American educator and

philosopher John Dewey, who visited China for a two-year lecture tour in

1919–1921, had high praise for Chen and the federalist program in

Guangdong. Dewey visited Guangdong in the spring of 1921. In July he

reported for The New Republic on Chen’s views on unifying China “by the

people themselves, employing not force but the methods of normal

political evolution.” [14]

While the Guangdong Provincial Assembly was working on the provincial

constitution in early 1921, Chen Jiongming was drafting a

“reconstruction plan” (jianshe fanglue) - a proposal for a national

constitution. The plan was, in essence, a political “initiative” by the

Guangdong federalists, which sought immediate action towards the goal of

unifying the country (Chen 1999, 159–62). In the North, Hu Shi and a

number of prominent scholars, writing for the Peking periodical Nuli

zhoubao (Edeavor Weekly) advised both Sun Yat-sen and Wu Peifu that only

by the adoption of a federal system of government could the nation be

saved from partitioning by warlords (Li 1971, 583). A dissenting voice

was raised by Chen Duxiu who would later become the founder of the

Chinese Communist Party.[15] Chen Duxiu mounted a vehement attack on the

federalists: “Those who advocate ‘ a federation of provinces’ are simply

using ‘federation of self-governing provinces’ (liansheng zizhi) as a

pretext to effect the seizure of territories by military governors.”[16]

After forging an alliance with the Chinese Communist Party in 1924, Sun

Yat-sen took up Chen Duxiu’s line of attack:

If we were to imitate the American federal system and change China into

united provinces, it would become necessary for each province to have

its constitution and to govern itself. After the provincial

constitutions are implemented, then a federal constitution could be

built up.

But in reality that would be changing a united China into some twenty

independent units and then reuniting them, just like those ten old

independent states of America a hundred years ago. That solution....is

utterly wrong [for China]. (GFYJ 1960, 253; d’Elia 1974, 312)

Sun never did discuss the pros and cons of a federal system of

government in China. Instead, he played with two pairs of antonyms to

advance his argument - “united” (tongyi) versus “separate” or “disunit”

(fenlie), and “centralized-authority government” (jiquan) versus a

“shared-authority or federal government “ (fenzhi). Sun led his

listeners to believe that a united provinces system, in which authority

was shared between the central and local governments (fenzhi), was

actually a disunited or splintered (fenlie) state of affairs. Sun also

used the term “unification” (tongyi) erroneously as a synonym for

concentrating all power in the central government (jiquan). Following

the Soviet example, unification by force with a highly centralized

regime run according to the the wishes of the party leader became the

single, unalterable program of Sun’s reorganized party in 1924.

Such a fusion of words - tongyi and jiquan - held great appeal for the

divided nation. Aided by Soviet techniques of mass propaganda and

political action, Sun was able to discredit the federalist principle of

building democracy from the bottom up, a doctrine that had been

enormously popular in China for more than a decade.

To allay the fears of the Chinese people about the establishment of a

Soviet-style totalitarian state, Sun shrouded his program with two new

principles. In the Nationalist Party’s Declaration at its First National

Convention in January 1924, Sun announced the adoption of the Principle

of Equalization of Power (junquan zhuyi) and of county (xian)

self-governemnt. In the former, the division of power between the

central and local governments will “favor neither the

centralized-authority (zhongyang jiquan) nor the shared-authority

(difang fenquan) system of government”. The governor of a province is to

be elected by the people, but he “receives orders from the central

govrnment to perform his duties”. The county is designated as the basic

unit for local self-government (GFYJ 1960, 606). In essence, what Sun

proposed was a Soviet-style federation or union of “self-governing”

counties.

After the defeat of the Guangdong Army in 1925 by Sun’s Soviet-trained,

Soviet-equipped force, Chen Jiongming made his home in Hong Kong, where

he continued to seek the unification of China by political means. He

found a new political party, called the Zhigong Party, with its

membership primarily from overseas Chinese in the Americas and Southeast

Asia. The party stipulated federalism as the fundamental principle for

the nation-building of the Chinese Republic (Chen 1999, 267–68).

In his book A Proposal for the Unification of China published in 1927,

Chen sees Chinese federalism coordinating four levels of geographical

division - the village, the district, the county or city, and the

province - with two types of organization, the traditional geographical

organization and the occupational or trade organization (Chen 1999,

269–72). Here we can sense an anarchistic system of “extreme”

decentralization in which power is delegated upwards from the smallest

unit - the Jeffersonian township or the village (See, for example, Nock

1970, 56–57). The new participation of the occupational or trade

organizations reminds one of Bakunin’s free federation of workers’

associations, industrial as well as agricultural, and scientific as well

as literary associations (See, for example, Maximoff 1964, 298).

During his last years in Hong Kong, Chen advocated the extension of the

federalist principle to the reconstruction of Asia, Europe and America,

eventually leading to a world federation:

equality of rights, and the equality of enjoyment.

organization. To achieve a world in harmony (datong), Asia, Europe and

America must be separately organized into federations.

equality and peaceful co-existence. Abolish military organizations in

every nation. China should play the role of founding member in such a

world federation. (Chen 1927, 28–29; Nianpu 1957, 36–37)

In the years around 1920 many people worldwide were advocating world

federalism, for they had been sickened during World War I with the

meaningless slaughter and destruction brought about in the name of

nationalism. The League of Naions had been established, but that

painfully weak institution could not stand against the forces of fascism

and nazism. Many Chinese intellectuals had had hope for the League of

Nations; notably among them was the Marxist Li Dazhao. Li saw a

historical progress to higher levels of organization: “The Americas,

Europe and Asia would each unite. Finally, they would join together and

abolish all racial and national boundaries” (Zarrow 1990, 218).

There appears to be no significant difference between what Chen

Jiongming advocated and what Li Dazhao forsaw in leading to a world of

Great Harmony. The important difference lies in the strategies that one

takes to achieve his goals. The federalist Chen Jiongming would apply

the concept of federation to every levels of organization, building

democracy from the bottom up - an anarchist strategy that ends should

not be separated from the means in the process of change. Li Dazhao took

the Marxists’ approach. To the anarchists, the Marxists’ goal is not

necessarily wrong, but “given the methods they advocate, they can be

certain never to reach it” Clark 1978, 11).

Conclusion

Nationalism, revolution and communism have dominated the study of modern

Chinese history from the late Qing period to the present. Federalism and

anarchism have long been ignored by those who regard all history through

the eyes of the victors. Study of Chen Jiongming’s political career

provides a glimpse of federalism and its interplay with nationalism and

anarchism on the eve of the communist expansionism in China. As observed

by James Joll , “the belief that triumphant causes alone should interest

the historian leads to the neglect of much in the past that is valuable

and curious, and narrows our view of the world” (Avrich 1967, 4).

The first quarter of the twentieth century was a golden age for Chinese

intellectuals. During the late Qing reform movement, about one hundred

journals circulated at any one time, containing numerous essays on

Western thought and practices (Bailey 1990, 5–6). Within six months of

the May Fourth student incident in 1919, more than four hundred new

periodicals, all in vernacular language, appeared in the newsstands

(Dewey 1973, 13). The noted educator Cai Yuanpei later recalled the

situation of the 1910s and 1920s nostalgically: “At that time, freedom

of thought and speech developed nearly to their utmost” (Yuan 2000, 47).

The pivotal turn came in 1924 when Sun Yat-sen reorganized the

Nationalist Party to follow Soviet Russia’s example and implemented

“partification” (danghua) of education, civil service, judiciary and the

armed forces.[17] Four years after Sun’s death, in 1929, Hu Shi, at

which time he was serving as chancellor of a private university in

Shanghai, reported: “[At present] to deny the existence of God is

acceptable, but criticizing Sun Yat-sen is forbidden....It is forbidden

not to read Sun’s ‘Last Will and Testament’ or not to observe the weekly

commemorative ceremony.”[18] From this time on, the most influential

theory was always the ruler’s speech and writing.

Chen Jiongming’s commitment to federalism was the natural outgrowth of

his experience and philosophy. He believed in reform from the bottom up.

He thought that the country should draw on traditional Chinese

strengths, especially its long experience with self-government on the

local levels. By strengthening those capacities, Chen thought that his

fellow Chinese would learn to govern themselves successfully at the

regional and ultimately the national level. He lives, wrote John Dewey

in The New Republic, “an almost Spartan life in a country where official

position is largely prized for the luxuries it makes possible” (Dewey

1921, 235).

Was Chen Jiongming an anarchist? He was no more an anarchist than John

Dewey was.[19] If a label is desired, Chen was unquestionably a

federalist, who had embraced certain important ideas and ideals of

anarchism. He was, above all, a man who was totally committed to

practising what he preached.

---

Note on the Author

Leslie Chen is the son of Chen Jiongming (Chen Chiung-ming), governor of

Guangdong Province in early Republican China. He was trained as an

engineer at the National Chiao-Tung (Jiaotong) University, Shanghai, and

Harvard University. After a thirty-year career in engineering, he

retired and devoted his time to studying his father’s political career.

He has compiled a collection of historiographic materials as welll as

two Chinese language biographies of Chen Jiongming. He is the author of

a recent book Chen Jiongming and the Federalist Movement: Regional

Leadership and Nation Building in Early Republican China, Center for

Chinese Studies, University of Michigan.

List of References

Avrich, Paul. 1967. The Russian Anarchists. Princeton: Princeton

University Press.

Bailey, Paul J. 1990. Reform the People: Changing Attitudes Towards

Popular Education in Early Twentieth-Century China. Vancouver:

University of British Columbia Press.

Carter, April. 1978. “Anarchism and Violence” in Anarchism NOMOS XIX,

edited. by J. R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman. New York: New York University

Press.

Chen Jiongming. 1927 Zhongguo tongyi chuyi (A proposal for the

unification of China). Hong Kong

Chen, Leslie H. 1995. “On Sun Yat-sen’s Three Principles of the People”.

Paper presented to the 1955 ASPAC Conference of the Association for

Asian Studies, Pacific University. Published in Selected Paper Series,

Pacific University, Forest Grove, Oregon.

____________. 1991. “Chen Jiongming (1878–1933) and the Chinese

Federalist Movement”. In Republican China 17.1:21–37

____________ (Dingyan). 1999. Leslie H. Dingyan Chen, Chen Jiongming and

the Federalist Movement: Regional Leadership and Nation Building in

Early Republican China, Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies,

University of Michigan.

Chen, Qiyou. 1963. “Chen Qiyou xiansheng fangwen ji” (An interview with

Mr. Chen Qiyou), by Zeng Wen, Beijing. In Haifeng wenshi (Historical

accounts from Haifeng County), vol.1, edited by Haifeng zhengxie wenshi

ziliao yanjiuhui (Haifeng Political Consultative Historical Documents

Research Committee). Haifeng, Guangdong, 1985.

Chow Tse-tsung. 1960. The May Fourth Movement: Intellect Revolution in

Modern China, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Clark, John P. 1978. “What is Anarchism?”. In Anarchism, NOMOS XIX,

edited. by J. R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman. New York: New York University

Press.

d’Elia, P.M., s.j. 1974. The Triple Demise of Sun Yat-sen. Wuchang,

1931. Reprinted, New York: AMS Press.

Dewey, John. 1921. “Divided China”. In New Republic (July 20) 27:

212–15; 235–37.

__________. 1973 Lectures in China 1919–1920, translated by Robert W.

Clopton and Tsuin-chen Ou. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.

Dirlik, Arif. 1991. Anarchism in Chinese Revolution. University of

California Press.

Duan Yunzhang and Ni Junming. 1998. Chen Jiongming ji (Collected Works

of Chen Jiongming), Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press.

Duara, Prasenjit. 1995 Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning

Narratives of Modern China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gerrin, Daniel. 1970. Anarchism: From Theory to Practice. New York:

Monthly Review Press.

GFYJ. 1960. Gufu yijiao sanmin zhuyi zongji (Sun Yat-sen’s teaching and

the Three Principles of the People). Taipei: Nationalist Archives.

Goldman, Emma. 1969. Anarchism and Other Essays. New York: Dover.

FO. British Foreign Office general correspondence. Public Records

Office, London. Papers are listed by document group, document number,

date, and page.

Hsieh, Winston. 1962. “The Ideas and Ideals of a Warlord: Chen

Chiung-ming (1878–1933)” Paper on China, vol.16, Cambridge, Mass: East

Asia Research Center, Harvard University.

Hu Shi. 1998. “Xinwenhua yundong yu Guomindang” (The New Culture

Movement and the Nationalist Party). In Ouyang Zhesheng, comp., Hu Shi

wenji (The Collected works of Hu Shi) Beijing.

Huang Yanpei. 1922. Yi sui zhi Guangzhoushi (Canton at year one).

Shanghai: Commercial Press.

Huazi ribao. (The Chinese Daily News). Hong Kong

Joll, James. 1964. The Anarchists. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.

Keenan, Barry. 1977. The Dewey Experiment in China: Education Reform and

Political Power in the Early Republic. Cambridge: Harvard University

Press.

Krebs, Edward. 1998. Shifu: Soul of Chinese Anarchism. Lanham, MD:

Rowman and Littlefield Publishing.

Li Dajia. 1986. Minguo chunian de liansheng zizhi yundong (The

Federalist movement in the early years of the Republic). Taipei: Hongwen

Press..

Li Jiangnong 1971. Zhongguo ji bainian zhengzhishi (A political history

of China in the past one hundred years). 8^(th) edition. Taipei:

Commercial Press.

Liang, Bingxian. 1978. Jiefang bielu (A Story of Liberation). Hong Kong,

1951–1952. Reprinted in Jindai Zhongguo shiliao congkan, vol.19, edited.

by Shen Yunlong. Taipei: Wenhai Publishing.

Manicas, Peter T. 1992. “John Dewey: Anarchism and the Political State”.

In John Dewey – Critical Assessments, edited. by J. E. Tiles, 2: 407–29.

New York: Chapman and Hall.

Maximoff, G.P. The Political Philosophy of Bakunin. New York,: Free

Press.

Mo Jipeng. 1997. The Reminiscences of Mr. Mo Jie-peng, Oral History

Series No.64, Taipei: Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica.

Nianpu. 1957 Chen Jingcun xiansheng nianpu (A chronological biography of

Mr. Chen Jingcun [Jiongming]). [By Chen Yansheng, et al.] Hong Kong,

1957.

______. 1995.Chen Jingcun (Jiongming) xiansheng nianpu (A chronological

biography of Mr. Chen Jingcun [Jiongming]). 2 vols. edited by Chen

Dingyan (Leslie H.). Taipei: Guiguan Publishing Company, 1995.

Nock, Albert Jay. 1973. Our Enemy the State. New York: Free Life

Editions.

Qun bao. (Community Daily News). Canton.

Shen bao. (The Shanghai Daily News). Shanghai.

SRYS. 1994. Shanweishi renwu yanjiu shiliao (Collection of historical

materials for research on natives of Shenwei municipality). Shanwei,

Guangdong: Shanweishi renwu yanjiu shiliao bianzuan weiyanhui.

USDS. United States Department of State documents. Document group 893

concerns China’s internal affairs. National Archives, Washington, D.C.

Woodcock, George. 1962. Anarchism — A History of Libertarian Ideas and

Movement. Cleveland: World Publishing.

WSQK. 1959. Wusi shiqi qikan jieshao (Introduction to the periodicals

published in the May Fourth period) vol.3. Beijing.

Xiangdao zhoubao (Guidance Weekly). 1922–1927. Shanghai

Yuan Zheng. 2000. “The ‘Partification’ of Education: A Pivotal Turn in

Modern Chinese Education, 1924–1929”. In Twentieth Century China, 25.2:

33–53 (April 2000). Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, University of

Michigan.

Zarrow, Peter. 1990. Anarchism and Chinese Political Culture. New York:

Columbia University Press.

[1] A detailed account of Chen Jiongming’s political career may be found

in Chen 1999. Interested reader may want to consult with the

Chinese-language section of the website: (

www.chen-jiongming.com

)

[2] For example, less than five months after the troop revolt, Sun’s

followers published a book entitled Chen Jiongming panguo shi [A history

of Chen Jiongming’s high treason against his country], by Li Shuxian, Lu

Zhizhi and Xie Shengzhi, Fuzhou, Fujian, 1922. Reprinted in Jiandai

Zhongguo shiliao congkan [A collection of historical materials on modern

China] vol.3, ed. by Shen Yunlong, Taipei: Waihai Publishing, 1978

[3] In Mo 1997, Mo uses a straight phonetic transliteration, An Na Qi

zhuyi; while Liang calls himself and fellow anarchists ziyou shehui

zhuyizhe (Freedom socialists). For a discussion of the word anarchism,

see, for example, Clark 1978, 3–6.

[4] To generations of Chinese intellectuals in the twentieth century,

anarchism is a political theory for scorn and ridicule. The dominance of

modern Chinese historiography by the Nationalists and Communists is one

factor. Another factor that often escapes attention is the fact that

generations of Chinese intellectuals have been subjected to

“party-guided” education or the “partification” of education (danghua

jiaoyu) since 1924 when Sun Yat-sen reorganized the Nationalist Party to

follow Soviet Russia’s example and implemented an educational system

controlled by the party. See, for example, (Yuan 2000). Yuan points out

that “although the term sounds strange today, partification of education

was the supreme guiding principle in Chinese education for

decades...(It) stifled freedom of thought in schools ...No theory was

allowed to contradict the government orthodoxy.”

[5] See Chen 1999, 13–14. Wen Tianxiang (1236–1282) symbolized Chinese

(Hans) resistance to foreign invaders. As prime minister to the last

Song emperor, Wen had led a war against the Mongol (Yuan) invaders.

[6] Obviously the Corps was not proud of what they did. Violence is

inconsistent with anarchist values and it is essential to anarchism that

ends not be separated from means. The issue of violence and anarchism is

complex and contentious. For example, Tolstoy insisted on the intrinsic

importance of nonviolence for anarchism (Carter 1978, 320). Others,

however, contended that “campared with the wholesale violence of capitol

and government, political acts of violence are but a drop in the ocean.”

(Goldman 1969, 107)

[7] This article, entitled “Sketch of Anarchism” was distributed in

Zhangzhou, Fujian by Liu’s followers in 1920, five years after Liu’s

death. It was translated by the American Consulate at Amoy (Xiamen) as

enclosure to USDS 893.00B/4, April 24, 1920.

[8] Mo 1997, 61–62, 67–68. The village project was abandoned when Yuan

Shikai’s loyalists took over Chen’s government in August 1913.

[9] After the Revolution of 1911, Liu and several other members of the

assassination corps worked under the new Governor Chen, organizing the

Association of the Army Corps to help disband citizen soldiers. Two

years later, when Yuan Shikai loyalists took over Canton, Liu and his

followers finally left for Shanghai where they continued to publish the

magazine Voice of the People (Minsheng). Liu died of tuberculosis in

1915 at the early age of 31. Chen was then in exile in Malaysia and

later sent funds to Liu’s brother for support of the magazine. (Mo 1997,

76).

[10] Chen Jiongming commanded a successful regional army that, for most

part, remained loyal to him to the bitter end. It was easy for

Nationalist propagandists to label the Guangdong Army as “Chen’s private

army” and Chen as a “warlord” or a “militarist”, as they did immediately

after Chen’s split with Sun in 1922. The label lingers to this date due

in large measure to the “partification” of Chinese education for the

past three quarters of a century (See Note 4)

[11] Minxing bao was published twice a week. The full text of Chen’s

Foreword is reprinted in Duan and Ni 1998, 402–406.

[12] USDS 893.00B/2, April 26, 1920. The literature was produced and

distributed by followers of Liu Shifu. It was anarchist, not Bolshevist.

The confounding of anarchism and Bolshevism was typical of the confusion

that prevailed at the time over the relationship of these radical

ideologies. See, for example, Dirlik 1991, 151

[13] For anarchism and the federalist idea, see, for example, Clark

1978, 6; also Gerrin 1970, 63–65

[14] Dewey 1921, 235. Apparently Dewey and Chen shared many views on

solving China’s problem. Dewey’s pragmatism was “more socialist than

libertarian, more anarchist than communist or liberal”. (See Manicas

1992, 407).

[15] Both Hu Shi and Chen Duxiu were prominent leaders in the May Fourth

movement. For the split between them, see, for example, Keenan1977, 74

[16] Li 1986, 193. Chen Duxiu’s article was originally printed in

Xiangdao zhoubao 1:2, September 13, 1922. In September 1922, Chen Duxiu

attempted to persuade Chen Jiongming to join the Communist Party and

lead the revolution in South China; see Liang 1978, 39.

[17] See Note 4 for the meaning of the word “partification”

[18] Yuan 2000, 48; originally from Hu 1998, 5:579.

[19] See, for example, Manicas 1992 for comments on Dewey’s political

philosophy.