💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › john-zerzan-anarchy-after-september-11.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 11:39:21. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Anarchy After September 11 Author: John Zerzan Language: en Topics: 9/11 Source: Retrieved on July 21, 2009 from http://www.insurgentdesire.org.uk/anarchyaftersep11.htm
Every day it is clearer that the global cancer of capital and technology
devours more of life in every sphere. More species, cultures, and
ecosystems are under attack, at every level. The cancer of the
megamachine is always at work, consuming its host. And if it ever stops
expanding, economic alarm bells go off worldwide.
This relentless colonization/globalization has ignited resistance
everywhere. In this painful twilight struggle, as the crisis deepens,
some of this opposition has taken the desperate form of religious
fundamentalism. From this desperation arises the ultimate gesture of
suicidal violence, hopeless and indefensible on any level.
Novelist V.S. Naipal reminds us that “The world is getting more and more
out of reach of simple people who have only religion. And the more they
depend on religion, which of course solves nothing, the more the world
gets out of reach.”
But as New York Times Magazine writer Joseph Lelyveld (10/28/01)
discovered through interviews with families and supporters, suicide
bombers are recruited by a promise with widespread appeal among
disaffected youth: “better a meaningful death than a pointless life.”
Heidegger described our period of history as one of “consummate
meaninglessness.” The loss of the possibility of personal fulfillment is
hardly confined to the Third World. In fact, the standardized barrenness
of the First World is quite as devastating, in its own way. In the
postmodern void that is the United States today, tens of millions of all
ages take anti-depressant and anti-anxiety medication. It’s not
unimaginable that before long, psychotropic drugs will be routinely
prescribed for everyone, beginning in infancy. And this is just one
example in a list of well-known pathologies that bridge the personal and
social spheres. Why are people willing, even eager, to accept a
drug-induced state as normal in themselves and their children? Perhaps
because of fear, more widespread lately. Adorno wrote penetratingly
about the fear of death: “The less people really live or, perhaps more
correctly, the more they become aware that they have not really lived
the more abrupt and frightening death becomes for them, and the more it
appears as a terrible accident.”
For those in the U.S. on the threshold of adult life, suicide is the
third leading cause of death. For every two murders there are three
suicides. Painful life pointless life.
Ignoring these omnipresent realities, the American Spectator (Sept 2001)
focused on the anti-technology aspect of the 9/11 suicide hijackings.
“Luddites Over Broadway” argues that only technology can save us, since
“nature is brutal, deadly, and Darwinian.” Opposing “creativity” to the
“Luddite” sensibility of the attackers, AS argues that creativity is our
key endowment. Asserting that creativity flourishes only under
capitalism, AS reveals what kind of “creativity” they’re talking about —
fueled by instrumental reason, and grounded in domination.
In no way, in my opinion, does the anti-technological, Luddite,
primitivist vision of anarchy have anything to do with the viciously
misogynist and theocratic Bin Laden types. Which is not to say that the
relentless technologizing of the world should not be indicted and
reversed. As psychotherapist Robert Marchesani wrote recently, “The more
technology we have, the more we seem to be burdening people and
dehumanizing them, perhaps making them into these pieces of technology
themselves so that they can’t feel anything anymore.”
In Turkey, according to some anarchists there, a bridge from religious
fundamentalism to primitivism has been built, at least by a few. They
have traded the escapist (and therefore always reactionary) utopia of
the afterlife for the effort to confront technology and capital in the
here and now. A very hopeful, if so far inadequately discussed
phenomenon.
About two years ago (Tikkun, Jan/Feb 1999), David Ehrenfeld predicted
“The Coming Collapse of the Age of Technology.” His summary:
“Techno-economic globalization is nearing its apogee; the system is
self-destructing. There is only a short but very damaging period of
expansion left.”
To redeem the collapse and avoid further victimization, we must find
renewed resolve and solidarity. It’s crucial that we undertake the
inevitable deconstruction of technology energetically and consciously.
Those who elect to passively endure ever-worsening personal, social, and
planetary conditions, or to flame out in suicidal acts of terror, are
fundamentally powerless against a massively destructive system.
“No one could have believed that these massive towers could just come
down like this,” declared an incredulous CNN reporter on September 11.
They did fall, social systems and even civilizations fall, this order
will fall. Creative resistance and resilience have never been so needed.
Never has there been so much at stake; never has the prospect of
liberation from the no-future death march of civilization been perhaps
more feasible.