💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › tasneem-project-discussing-eid-al-adha.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 14:21:56. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Discussing Eid al-Adha
Author: Tasneem Project
Date: 10 January 2006
Language: en
Topics: islam
Source: Retrieved on February 8, 2006 from https://web.archive.org/web/20060208005953/http://www.bayyinat.org.uk/eidmeat10.htm

Tasneem Project

Discussing Eid al-Adha

I’ve never really ‘done’ Eid al-Adha. This is one Muslim festival I have

problems engaging fully with. I’m vegetarian, and putting aside the

short periods where I ate meat to be a ‘proper’ Muslim, and the dark

years in the 1990s when I didn’t believe in or care much about anything,

I have been a plastic shoe wearing vegetarian since 1981.

Nevertheless, I intend to keep the days in my own way. For the special

meal, I will be cooking an East African beanie korma, much beloved by my

good friend Jo, and for my daughters and possibly Julie I will be making

a warm, homely tarragon flavoured pea and potato soup, from my own

recipe, insha Allah! And in this meat-free environment, I will

contemplating my understanding of this Eid.

What does Eid al-Adha mean to me? The idea of having a faith so absolute

that one is prepared to casually snuff your own son no doubt appeals to

a certain mindset, with its connotations of unquestioning faith and

superiority of revealed commands over human will and morality. Not me!

Time to revisit the story, I think, care of my newly acquired ‘Stories

of the Qur’an’ by Mohammad Hifzur Rehman Seoharvi.

Rather than taking the tale literally, I want to explore the story’s

wider meaning. In my own interpretation, the story of Ibrahim and

Isma’il is one of series of narratives surrounding the Prophetic life of

Ibrahim, where the common theme is discussion. The first is the

discussion between Ibrahim and his father, where Ibrahim is forced to go

his own way in order to remain true to his belief in tawhid.

However, such differences were not a matter of animosity, for Ibrahim

was “tender hearted, forebearing” (9:114). Indeed, the idea of quiet

reasoning continues in the second discussion, with King Namrud. Here,

the King attempts to assert God-like qualities, such as being able to

take life; but his reasoning is undermined when asked if he was able to

make the sun rise in the West.

The theme of discussion continues in the story of the aborted sacrifice

of Isma’il. On receiving the revelation calling on him to sacrifice his

son, Ibrahim does not leap up and begin sharpening his knife grimly, but

first tells his son of the dreams. Only with his son’s consent does he

try to enact the sacrifice. His son complies not from fear of or

devotion to his father, but from an understanding of tawhid.

Tawhid is at the heart of Ibrahim’s prophetic mission. But even this

fundamental understanding is not imposed upon him by a shot of

revelation, but instead comes about through a debate with himself, in

which he compares the impermanence of the world, including the setting

sun, with his own religious feelings of awe and humility at the heart of

his God-consciousness.

I do not believe it is necessary to participate in blood sacrifice in

order to comply with the will of Allah, at Eid or on any other day. I

could never knowingly take the life of an animal, either for food or

clothing, in a state of taqwa. This would contradict my belief that

Raheem (Mercy) is at the very heart of such awareness. But I will never

demand that such practices be abolished.

I simply invite other God-conscious Muslims to a peaceful discussion of

the issue. Better still, and perhaps more fitting for this special time,

I invite you to consider the issues put forward by vegetarians and

vegans, and like Ibrahim (aws), undergo an honest debate with yourself.

Allah knows better.

Wasalaam