💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › suzy-subways-love-and-rage-now.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 14:10:10. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Love and Rage Now
Author: Suzy Subways
Language: en
Topics: Love and Rage Revolutionary Anarchist Federation
Source: Retrieved on 2016-06-13 from https://web.archive.org/web/20160613072557/http://loveandrage.org/?q=node/23

Suzy Subways

Love and Rage Now

In the 1990s, the Love and Rage Revolutionary Anarchist Federation

helped build strong, radical groups like Anti-Racist Action and SLAM,

movements for queer liberation, reproductive freedom and more. Yet when

activists disrupted the WTO in Seattle, LnR had been dead for a year and

a half, leaving our mistakes to be repeated, our lessons forgotten.

That’s what spurred my old comrade Roy San Filippo to put together a

book of LnR’s writings, A New World in Our Hearts (AK Press, 2003).

Although 19 of the 20 pieces are by men — meaning vital insights from

women are missing — the book revives valuable debates cut short by LnR’s

split in 1998.

Love and Rage was always on the anarchist movement’s fringes. Yet we

ended up splitting on two questions that are hot topics among anarchists

today: whether anti-authoritarians can learn from other revolutionary

tendencies, and how racism relates to capitalism. Most of the writings

in New World deal with these two issues.

I was of the quiet majority in the middle on the first question. Solidly

an anarchist, I’d worked three years with excellent, principled

organizers of various communist and nationalist stripes for access to

education at CUNY. I’d learned a lot from them about strategizing for

revolution and building multi-racial, democratic participation while

engaging in a reform struggle. Chris Day (New York LnR) wrote “The

Historical Failure of Anarchism” after Marxists we worked with

challenged him on anarchism’s weaknesses. The feisty document put many

Love and Ragers on the defensive but inspired others to study

revolutionary history for ideas to move us beyond Bakunin.

It was an internal document by Jessica (New York LnR) that won me over

to “mass line” from Maoist theory. The Zapatistas called it mandar

obedeciendo — leading by obeying. Jessica gave examples from LnR’s

activism, explaining that we worked best when our politics responded to

the communities we worked with: “We cannot discount the ideas of the

people...only when we start from where the people are at, and struggle

with them to make the changes they want, can we put forward the ideas of

anarchist revolution with any effectiveness.” She also pointed out that

the LnR members most hostile to borrowing ideas from authoritarian

tendencies were not doing any activist work — which explained why they

offered no concrete solutions, only generalizations that our problems

could be solved “from within anarchism.”

Most Love and Ragers agreed that anarchism itself — having adopted

feminism, queer liberation and environmentalism — is multi-tendency. A

majority also supported the theory of white skin privilege, that the

white working class has real benefits under racism — as opposed to the

view that it’s been won over to capitalism by “petty and apparent”

privileges. Carolyn (New York LnR) wrote in 1998: “In Brooklyn, where I

grew up, there are numerous white working class neighborhoods filled

with homeowners right next to Black and Latino neighborhoods filled with

people living in public housing projects...every time a Black family

saves enough to buy a house in Canarsie, the house is firebombed within

the first week.”

What finally plowed LnR under was the quiet middle majority, those of us

who failed to save it. The final year’s Coordinating Committee never

met, flaking out completely, and LnR’s Working Groups — meant to be the

link between theory and practice, where we’d hash out our movement

strategies — never functioned well. In 1997, Justine (Minneapolis LnR)

wrote: “It’s crazy that Working Groups didn’t have time to meet at the

last conference. This should have been a priority over...the political

statement.” Spending all our energy on the two questions splitting us

apart meant we didn’t cultivate ideas for strategy that could have

brought us together. Most members outside New York decided the

ideological debates, and LnR itself, were irrelevant to their movement

work.

Jessica, Carolyn and Justine’s writings would have enriched New World,

but they were left out because — like most of the documents by LnR women

— they invoke details of our activism, references to other members’

statements and messy specifics. But any generalized theory can sound

great on paper — wouldn’t you rather hear about how it works out in

practice?

After the split, I helped start the Fire by Night Organizing Committee,

a tiny multi-tendency group. FbN’s long self-criticism of LnR, already

published as a pamphlet, has the book’s last word — but without the

Afterword explaining that FbN dissolved in 2000, acknowledging mistakes

it made in New York as an all-white group in a people of color-led

movement. Also missing are writings by two members who became

Marxist-Leninists that could have either won readers to their ideas or

shown that there may actually be a slippery slope to Stalinism.

Five of the 20 pieces are by Chris Day, which seems like a lot. Chris is

a committed activist and theoretical thinker — a valuable asset when

every revolutionary theory is either outdated or must be defended

against the crimes of its true believers. Yet he would have been hated

(by the same anarchists who read Malatesta) if he’d put out a book of

his own writing. New World is essential reading for anarchists willing

to grapple with the questions Chris and others raised, but unwilling to

leave anarchism behind just because it hasn’t answered those questions

yet. You can’t join Love and Rage now, but I recommend reading this book

and finding your own way to working collectively for revolution.

Former Love and Rage members are currently working on a range of

political projects and organizations. Here are some of them:

Bring the Ruckus (name is a work in progress) — www.agitatorindex.org

Freedom Road Socialist Organization/Marxist-Leninist — www.frso.org.

Freedom Road Socialist Organization/Left Refoundationist —

www.freedomroad.org

Northeastern Federation of Anarcho-Communists- www.nefac.net