đŸ’Ÿ Archived View for library.inu.red â€ș file â€ș sovereign-beast-arm-trans-women.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:51:11. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

âžĄïž Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Arm Trans Women
Author: Sovereign Beast
Language: en

Sovereign Beast

Arm Trans Women

ARM TRANS WOMEN

INTRODUCTION

There is an ongoing campaign to exterminate trans women.

It doesn’t take a particularly attentive observer to notice this. Anyone

paying any attention at all has probably put it together, at this point-

between figures like Lily Cade and Robert Foster calling for the

execution of trans people and their allies, far-right conspiracies of

child abuse, and the rabid hatred visited on any random trans woman who

is active on social media, it is- if anything- harder to ignore than it

is to see it.

Much like the satanic panic, a reactionary witch hunt- ‘justified’

through accusations of pedophilia, abuse, and degeneracy- has spread

like wildfire, with trans women as the primary targets. This hatred

forms the heart of a reactionary political project aimed at destroying

queerness and re-affirming patriarchal gender norms as an unquestionably

normative way of being.

As we speak, fascist paramilitaries perform assassination drills,

training to draw and fire on unsuspecting targets before they are

noticed. Politicians pass laws against transition, against the use of

public spaces, against the very act of existing as a trans person. Trans

men- often erased in the reactionary propaganda, when they aren’t

treated as the victims of trans women’s supposed corrupting influence-

become targets as well, almost by accident, as the reactionary hate cult

targets any ‘unclear’ or explicitly queer gender presentation.

In light of our current situation, trans people must quickly adapt new

strategies to survive in a quickly changing social and political

environment which is opposed to our very existence. To fail could quite

possibly mean death.

So what is to be done?

FIRST STEPS

It is easy to fall into various maladaptive coping mechanisms when

considering the extent of the dilemma we face as trans people. We must

oppose both the despair of believing it is impossible for us to act and

the illusion that we can succeed without first developing successful

strategies and organizing to implement them.

The first step is to come to terms with our situation. To do this, we

must understand our situation- both on the macro scale, and in our own

narrower individual conditions. Every one of us has our own context, and

in order to develop strategies which will succeed, we must take into

account both our individual and collective circumstances.

Begin by considering what resources you personally have available. How

much money do you have? What tools do you have- cars, first aid kits,

etc? What skills do you have? Be honest with yourself when making these

assessments- both underestimating and overestimating your resources and

capabilities lead to making poor strategic decisions long term.

After this, consider your flaws- the weaknesses you have. Again, be

honest when considering this. Ignoring a personal flaw or weakness is

bad- but so is hyperfixating on your flaws and becoming obsessed with

them. Your weaknesses and faults can be worked around, or even fixed if

given time.

Next, consider your social situation. What is your community like? Does

your community offer you resources? Do you have friends and allies who

would be willing to help? Can you make friends and allies? On the flip

side, what threats does your community pose to you? Do you have enemies,

or people who seem likely to become your enemies/opposition when you

begin to act?

If it helps, frame this analysis in terms of identifying Strengths,

Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. This ‘SWOT Analysis’ is a tool

used by business schools to teach students the basic elements of

strategic analysis- although in their case, the focus is ostensibly on

identifying exploitable skills and resources for building a business.

Regardless, once you have a clear idea of your individual situation, you

can move on to step two- actually building your strategy.

You should already have identified the resources you have personally

available, the skills you have to offer, who your existing and potential

allies and enemies are, and what resources you can get access to in your

community. From here, you should attempt to reach out to your allies and

begin organizing.

The most simple form of an organization is an affinity group. The

affinity group is just that- a group of people, generally no more than

five or six, who share common goals and interests. To build this group,

you need to identify what your long term goals and interests are, and

the short term goals and objectives you need to accomplish towards these

ends. Given the context, we can safely assume that we all share a

primary long term goal of ‘survival’- but how we go about accomplishing

this is going to depend on our individual contexts. Someone who has few

immediate threats will be able to take a more long-term approach,

preparing for the non-immediate threats they face, whereas someone who

is in a dangerous situation will need to address that situation as

quickly as they can. This will, quite obviously, affect your goals- and

the goals of any affinity groups you form- quite significantly.

Over time, your situation will change, and organizations must change to

adapt to it. Some affinity groups will likely grow in size, and become

more centrally organized- at which point they cease to be affinity

groups and become some other form of organization. Others will split,

network, and form ties between themselves, other affinity groups, and

other organizations. Both approaches offer certain positives and

negatives.

Personally, coming at things from an anarchist perspective, I prefer the

decentralized organization over the centralized one, and oppose any

organization which would establish a hierarchical system of control.

However, we should avoid being dogmatic about the structure of these

groups, or attempt to restrict calls towards militant trans organization

to exclusively anarchist trans women. All trans people face reactionary

violence. I am not going to tell a liberal- or even conservative- trans

person that they shouldn’t organize to resist the forces of reaction. If

there is a significant number of Maoist trans women who want to form the

Trans Red Guard, or a cadre of socially conservative cottagecore trans

preppers who form a militia, they are my allies in the fight against

those political forces which are calling for my extermination in that

they are quite literally fighting for their lives against the same

people who want to end mine.

While I’m not interested in telling anyone what they should do, or

trying to define and control how they organize ahead of time, however, I

will note that in order to accomplish the ultimate goal here- surviving

a reactionary campaign of violence against trans women- any organization

must necessarily address the pressures of reactionary violence, social

ostracization, and the soft exile from ‘polite’ society which trans

women face.

It is my belief that in order to do this, our organizations must

prioritize building durable communities of mutual aid and support, as

well as a militant dedication to defending trans people from reactionary

violence.

Further, my own analysis of society shows that dedicated trans allies

are few and far between. The majority of allies- even ones which do

genuinely support and promote trans people- will not offer significant

assistance to trans causes. You will not find many allies willing to put

their bodies between trans people and reactionary violence. Hell- you

will not find many trans people willing to put their bodies between

other trans people and reactionary violence.

Because of this, it seems likely that the ultimate form of the

organization we speak of here will be primarily (but not entirely) trans

women who recognize that in order for them to survive, they must build

militant communities with strong frameworks of mutual aid and support.

So how do we get there?

BUILDING COMMUNITIES

The key here is mutual aid and the structure of the affinity group.

Mutual aid forms the basis of a strong social and material structure.

This structure lays the groundwork for a self-sustaining community- one

which can rapidly expand due to the structure of networked affinity

groups.

Even outside the immediate framework of the networked affinity groups,

the structure of mutual aid encourages the formation of community. In

this sense the framework becomes a backbone or scaffolding around which

community grows.

It is, however, of VITAL importance that this community- and especially

the framework of networked affinity groups- be able to defend themselves

against reactionary violence. In order to do this, the mutual aid

framework must be expanded with the understanding that mutual aid also

includes mutual defense and support.

So, what is mutual defense?

At the core of mutual defense is the recognition that we can not resist

reactionary violence on our own. There is no way for any single person

to develop all the skills necessary for the task, and even if such a

hyper-competent person were to exist, they would still need to take time

to rest.

Individuals form communities because supporting one another means better

support for themselves. In order to provide security for ourselves, we

must provide security for one another as well.

The forms this takes aren’t fixed. Despite common misconceptions

propagated by right wing gun culture, defense and security security

doesn’t just mean having guns or being ‘an operator.’ Look at the

military. There are many skills and roles involved in providing

‘defense’ beyond being a person with a gun, including (but not limited

to) cybersecurity, legal counsel, radar technicians, even intelligence

operatives. The context of ‘defense’ and ‘security’ is situational, and

the necessary skillset for one set of security needs is going to be

entirely different from the skillset required elsewhere, for another set

of security needs.

Mutual defense is the recognition that security is a need which can- and

indeed, in some cases must- be provided through the framework of mutual

aid. The security needs of the trans community include the ability to

resist explicit violence- but also legal security, secure housing,

access to food, and countless other issues. Because the skills and

proficiencies involved can be learned, and the equipment and resources

required can be obtained, even if an individual or group does not

initially have these skills and tools they can develop them- but in

order to do so, they must first recognize the need exists.

Ideally, every individual will develop the essential skills of strategic

analysis to the point that they will be able to recognize security needs

and identify them. To be safe, however, it is probably a good idea to

deliberately foster a culture which promotes both this strategic

outlook, and a militant approach to security and defense.

A FINAL NOTE

Unfortunately, we do not have infinite time to organize. On the

‘positive’ side, due to the nature of the pressures the trans community

faces, it is likely that people will be forced to organize- and existing

organizations (even ones of minimal size, like the affinity group) can

take advantage of the pressure to expand relatively quickly. It’s hard

to predict what strategies, organizational structures, etc. will emerge

as things get worse, but don’t get too caught up in worrying about

predicting or controlling things.

Build what networks you can, where you can. Don’t be dogmatic, or wait

for the perfect opportunity to act- instead, try to make the most of the

opportunities and resources you have.

Above all else, there is a single goal you must keep in sight.

Survive.