💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › renzo-novatore-wild-flowers.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:42:16. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Wild Flowers
Author: Renzo Novatore
Date: September 20th, 1917
Language: en
Topics: Abele Ferrari, individualist
Source: Retrieved on July 15, 2009 from http://www.novatore.it/English_Archive.htm
Notes: Appeared in Cronica Libertaria, Milan, a.I, n.8, 20 September 1917, Translated 2009 By Luther Blissett.

Renzo Novatore

Wild Flowers

Premise. Even through the exterminated moor of the barren desert flowers

germinate. Wild flowers that emanate sinful perfumes and that stick

their thorns to bloody the same hands of those who collect them, but yet

they that have their grandiose history of joy, of pain and of love. I

repeat: they are flowers strange and savage that arose from the creative

nothing, were fertilized by the sun and later slammed by the hurricane,

cruelly so!

These flowers are thoughts germinating in the meditative solitude and

deep in my spirit while towards the outside, in the world that no longer

belongs to me the madness rages furiously furrowed from the electrifying

fire of the lightning that breaks implacable.

And I, impenitent vagabond, who loves to gallop in the joyous and

frightening ways of this my solitary kingdom and desert, I feel sorry to

periodically collect a bundle of these wild flowers to crown this rebel

flag that once already cowardly and brutally demolished sings still for

the joyful refrain of eternal return.

The Anarchist is only one who after a long, gasping and desperate search

has retrieved his own self and has placed it, haughty and proud “on the

margins of the society”, denying anything the right to judge it. The one

who knows not to recognize the loftiness of his own actions, him only

judging himself, can even be believed anarchic but is not!

The force of will and potency (not to be confused with power) of the

spirit of autoelevation and individualization are the first steps of a

long and interminable ladder if the one knows that he wills to exceed

even himself above all things.

Only the one who knows to prize with impetuous violence the rusty gates

that close the house of the great lie where the lubricious thieves of I

have given to convene, (God, state, societies, humanity) to retrieve

from the viscid and rapacious hands adorning with the false gold of the

love of piety and of civility, of the sinister predators, their most

grand treasure, can feel boss and signore of himself, and be called

anarchic.

The anarchist, beyond being the most grand rebel also has the virtue of

being a King. The King of himself, understand!!

Who believes that Christ can be the sign and the symbol that man must

wave in order to reach the libertarian synthesis of life, cannot they be

a Socialist or a christian negator of anarchism.

When Socrates, who in spite of everything was without a doubt much

superior to the bestiality of those his people who condemned him,

accepted the hemlock that they imposed him to gulp down, he made one

work of such cowardice and of devotion that anarchism pitilessly

condemns.

To escape, with whatever means, to the invincible bestiality of a people

rendered ferocious and brutal from cannibal prejudices and frightful

ignorance, or to sadistic deprivation of a putrefying society which is

believed to have the right to judge and to condemn a single person

because they have consummated a given action that the aforesaid society

is not at the loftiness to ever understand; it is an act superbly

rebellious and individualistic that only in anarchism can find its

reason for being and its glorification.

Alas! Even the conscience has been in the end a phantom atavistic and

frightening. And it will only stop being so when man will have the

knowledge to render it the image and the mirror of his own and only

will.

The first man who said: “There is not any God”, was without a doubt an

athlete of human thought. But the one who was limited to saying that:

“The of God the priest is not”, cheated in equivocally leaving

sufficient comprise to being, him, a suspicious partisan that already

premeditated to kill the humans perhaps with a new lie. Keep yourselves

well guarded from those who are limited to the sole negation of God.