💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › no-wing-no-wing-anarchy.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:06:37. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: No-Wing Anarchy
Author: No Wing
Date: 2nd November 2019
Language: en
Topics: post-left
Source: Retrieved on 23rd December 2021 from https://medium.com/@NoWing/no-wing-anarchy-ce249fd43c80

No Wing

No-Wing Anarchy

I am told that anarchism is a “left wing” ideology, by many. I am not

sure those who claim this understand the true meaning of the term.

The terms “left wing” and “right wing” come from the position of seated

delegates during the French Revolution. The bourgeoisie would sit to the

left, and the monarchists would sit to the right. The first leftists

were, in fact, capitalists.

The term anarchy stems from the Greek for “no rulers”. If the original

designations of left and right were pointed at those trying to rule

others, then it follows that anarchism has no place in either the left

or right wings. Anarchism is not considered with how to rule over

others. It is concerned with not being ruled.

“But!”…some will say… “These terms have changed since the French

Revolution!” To that, I would ask “how?”. What is generally considered

the left wing is full of parties and organizations that, like those

early capitalists, claim to work for the people, and promise freedom

under their rule. From the Democratic Party, to the myriad socialist or

communist groups across the globe, those who consider themselves left

wing strive to establish themselves as benevolent rulers over the

people. They act in the name of the people, but always seem to place

themselves apart, or ahead, of those they claim to act for.

As can be seen in the endless talk between those who call themselves

leftists, these types of people always see themselves at the head of the

system, calling the shots in the name of “the people”. Countless

discussions are had about “How will x work?” or “Who will do x?”. These

types of discussions exemplify the managerial personality of the

leftist, as it seems they are more concerned with telling people what to

do, with having a system of rulership, than rolling their sleeves up and

doing something. “Who will grow the food without capitalism?” The people

that need to eat! “Who will build the roads?” Whoever needs to travel!

What chains leftists down to the pillar of rulership is this need for a

blueprint…the need for a plan…that they are presumably at the head of,

or had a part developing. The leftist fears true anarchy. The leftist

fears having to create the world around them as they go, without a

system or framework to work within. In fact, leftists fear this so much,

that in some cases, they even turn to violence against anarchists.

If anarchists and leftists have such similar views that anarchism can be

considered “left wing”, then why is there a history of leftist violence

against anarchists? The Soviets imprisoned and murdered anarchists

within their borders. They declared war on those anarchists outside

them. During the Mexican Revolution, the Red Battalions allied with the

state against the anarchist forces of Emiliano Zapata. In more recent

times, a Greek Communist group, the KKE, played the role of police

during anti-austerity protests, and physically attacked anarchists. With

this history of siding with the power of the system, and using that to

crush anarchists, I question anyone who thinks that anarchism shares any

of the same goals as the left!

The left and right are wings of the same system of capital. Neither

offers freedom, only systems that give the illusion of freedom. I

believe anarchists would do well to separate themselves from leftism,

and maybe even those who call themselves leftists. If we are for a

situation of “no rulers”, then surely the baggage that comes along with

the history of left wing movements is something akin to a form of

rulership that we should shrug off. Why chain ourselves to an ideology

that for centuries has striven to rule over others in the name of some

faux freedom? Reject both left and right wings…We do not need wings to

fly!