💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › henry-seymour-mikhail-bakunin.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:49:50. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Mikhail Bakunin
Author: Henry Seymour
Date: 1888
Language: en
Topics: Mikhail Bakunin, biography
Source: Retrieved on 31st August 2021 from https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_-yIvAAAAYAAJ/

Henry Seymour

Mikhail Bakunin

Mikhail Bakunin was born of an ancient aristocratic Russian family in

1814. At an early age, his father, who was then a wealthy proprietor of

Torchok in the governmental department at Twer, sent him to a cadet

school in St. Petersburg ; here he was soon entered as an artillery

ensign. In those days this service was one which was reserved especially

for the most favored nobles, the Czars traditional policy being to grant

greater freedom of research in this than in other services. It is not to

be wondered at, then, that Bakunin here nurtured the germs of those

great revolutionary ideas which afterwards made him the terror of

tyrants all over the world.

He longed to master the leading philosophical thought of his day, and

never lacked opportunity by losing it. Quartered with his battery in the

Polish provinces, the sight of the regime of absolute repression to

which these provinces were subjected filled him with horror. He resigned

his commission and went to live at Moscow, where he studied philosophy

with Belinski. Towards 1846 he left Russia and visited Berlin, in order

to study the more thoroughly the Hegelian philosophy, which was his wont

to characterize as the Algebra of Revolution. He visited Dresden,

Leipzig, and in fact, every locality where he imagined it possible to

exchange opinions with the leading thinkers of the times. He published

many philosophical dissertations over the signature of Jules Elisard. He

visited Paris in 1843, and there he became an enthusiastic admirer of

Proudhon. Bakunin was undoubtedly indebted more to Proudhon than to any

other man for the latest development of his thought. Bakunin’s style is

akin to Proudhon’s. The effect of Proudhon’s ideas unmistakably led to

the acceptance of those anarchistic sentiments which resulted in his

setting on foot the great and invincible Nihilist party in Russia, and

which made him one of the most prominent features of the modern

revolutionary movement.

He visited Switzerland, and remained there four years. He entered heart

and soul into the new social movement on foot there, being en rapport

with the Polish exiles. He excited grave suspicions on the part of the

Russian government, and was ordered to immediately return to Russia. But

he returned to Paris instead, and there daringly delivered a public

appeal to the Poles and Russians to organize a grand Pan-Slavonic

revolutionary confederation. The Czar of Russia was enraged to the

highest pitch. He demanded Bakunin’s expulsion from France. The French

government, ever the tool of tyranny, acceded to Russia’s request, and

then ten thousand roubles were offered for his arrest and transportation

into Russian territory. The Revolution of February soon brought him back

to France, but he quickly quitted to attend at the Congress of Slavs.

After this he went to Dresden and became one of the chiefs of the May

revolution. Forced to fly from Dresden, he was arrested, sent to prison,

and condemned to death in May, 1850, which sentence was afterwards

commuted to imprisonment for life. But jails, like laws, as Swift says,

are only cobwebs, which may catch small flies, and let wasps and hornets

break through. Bakunin escaped to Austria, but was relentlessly pursued

and again arrested, and sentenced to death for high treason. And aeain a

commutation of the death -sentence was secured, and he was doomed to

life-imprisonment. After repeated appeals varied with a few significant

threats from Russia, the Austrian government was compelled to hand him

over to the tender mercies of the Czar. Even then Bakunin was buoyed up

with hope. He was confined in a filthy dungeon in the fort

Petropavlofifski for several years, and, after surmounting almost

insuperable obstacles to life, he was finally transported to Siberia, a

region where all Russian reformers, friends of the people, are sent to

be cruelly tortured to death. Luckily, Bakunin found there, as governor,

Muravieff-Amurski, a cousin of General Muravieff, Bakunin being by

marriage also a cousin of General Muravieff. Owing to this, he was

allowed exceptional latitude, and he even pursued, in a manner, his

philosophic studies. It was on account of this comparative immunity that

Bakunin was enabled to perform what under ordinary circumstances would

have been a miracle. He escaped from Siberia, suffering untold hardships

; wandering footsore over many a mile of rough and rugged country, he

reached the sea ; and after many a fierce encounter with all sorts of

surroundings, he contrived to obtain passage to Japan. From here he

sailed to California. In 1860, he alighted, like a thunderbolt, in

London.

Such struggles as this man experienced, and the sufferings he endured,

would have softened the activity of most men, but our hero was a

Bakunin! He had scarcely stepped foot in England when he redoubled his

enthusiasm for the cause of social revolution. He appealed to the Poles

and Russians to join hands in a revolutionary confederation. He assisted

Herzen and Ogareff in editing and publishing the “Kolokol” (The Bell), a

revolutionary sheet, but it had no immediate effect owing to its great

depth and searching into philosophy; which was far beyond the mental

grasp of his co-workers. His anarchistic ideas manifested themselves

more largely than ever, and he at this time entered into sharp conflict

with the revolutionary politicians of the Marx school. In 1869 he

founded the Alliance of the Socialist Democracy, and on Sep. 28, 1870,

he organized an insurrection at Lyons, the failure of which necessitated

his flight to Geneva. The ’71 movement in Paris is attributed, if not

entirely, at least, very largely to the propagandism of Bakunin. At the

Geneva Congress in 1870 he took positive issue with the political wing

of the revolutionary party. He settled in Geneva for a little while, and

started a revolutionary journal, entitled “Egalité”. About this time he

was summarily expelled from the Hague International Congress of 1872,

but he carried thirty delegates with him, who finally overthrew the

International, which the delegates re-organized under their own

direction later.

Like most valuable literature, that which contains the innermost thought

and feeling, Bakunin’s assumed the shape of correspondence. No end of

time he spent in elaborating letters to those who approached him in a

spirit of inquiry. In these letters, some of which were aimed to arouse

the sluggish and animate the timorous, others to propound philosophical

deductions from fundamental truths, Bakunin specially formulated his

system of scientific Anarchy. His earliest pamphlet I have been able to

discover is “Odezwa do Slawian przez Ruskiego patriote” which was

published in 1849. In 1862 he published in London a pamphlet in Russian,

entitled “Romanoff, Pugatcheff, or Pestel?” occasioned by Alexander II,

decreeing the abolition of “serfdom” in 1861. He issued an address at

Leipzig, entitled “A mes amis Russeset Polonais”. “La Revolution sociale

ou la Dictature militaire” and “La Theologie politique de Mazzini et

l’lnternationale” were two other important pamphlets. At other times he

published “L’Empire Knoutogermanique et la Revolution Sociale”, “Paroles

Addressees aux Etudiants”, “The Principles of the Revolution”.

“Revolutionary Catechism” was not put into type, and was in cipher, but

it was first made public by being read by the public prosecutor at the

trial of Netchaieff on July 8^(th), 1871. But the most important of all

is the unfinished fragment, “God and the State”, which splendidly posits

Anarchy as the basis of true order. Given an equality of conditions, he

contended, and Church and State become unnecessary. Absence of equal

conditions, or opportunities, is due to the existence of the State,

which, although originating naturally and necessarily, has now no

further title to exist, in the present order of social development, and

which only assumes a claim itself to exist to protect Society from evils

that directly result from its own existence. He demonstrates the really

inseparable relation of Church and State. He disposes, with an

unanswerable and convincing array of argument, of the god-belief, and

its accompanying superstitions. Citing Voltaire’s famous phrase “If god

did not exist it would be necessary to invent him”, Bakunin

scientifically illustrates the nonsense of such a notion, and argues out

the opposite conclusion that “If god existed, it would be necessary to

abolish him”. He also reviews the various experimental forms of

government, and vigorously assails the final form — the government of

science. “The government of science, and of men of science, even be they

positivists, disciples of Auguste Comte, or, again, disciples of the

doctrinaire school of German communism, cannot fail to be impotent,

ridiculous, inhuman, cruel, oppressive, exploiting, maleficent.” The

mission of science is to enlighten life, not to govern it.

Bakunin died at Berne, in Switzerland, July 2, 1876. A crude simple

stone marks his memory there. And let the consciousness of his struggles

and triumphs, and the loftiness of his life-purpose animate all

possessed of heart and brain to make a noble man’s memory immortal by

unceasingly striving to finish the glorious work which Mikhail Bakunin

begun.