💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › hippolyte-havel-what-s-anarchism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:47:16. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: What’s Anarchism?
Author: Hippolyte Havel
Date: 1932
Language: en
Topics: introductory
Source: Retrieved on October  8, 2010 from http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bright/havel/whatis.html

Hippolyte Havel

What’s Anarchism?

Preface

Every great movement since the beginning of history has been a movement

to lift the bottom dog and put him on his feet. And every such movement

has been led by extremists. All the great names of history have been the

names of extremists. The brave pioneers who blazed the trail through the

unknown forest had to fight their way against the many dangers of wild

nature, wild beasts, and wilder men. The heroic men who first raised

their voices in the cause of religious liberty had to pass through years

of cruel persecution. They were hounded to the scaffold or the state

with execration and abuse. The wheel slowly turns full circle, and the

malefactor of yesterday become the hero-martyr of to-day, and the

faithful tread weary miles to his shrine to pay homage to his memory.

Those who dared to raise a protest against political slavery had to face

a tempest of slander and vituperation. To-day the market-places that

witnessed their humiliation are adorned with cherished monuments in

their honor, and their names glow from the pedestals with an added

brilliance bought by their belated recognition.

But the greatest, the bitterest, the fiercest fight of all the ages is

now being fought. The struggle for economic freedom is being waged in

every country, race and nation. Compared with this conflict, the

contests of the past are as the mimic warfare of happy children

marshalling their tiny tin warriors on the nursery floor. No passion is

too sordid, no cruelty is too severe, no persecution is too fierce to

find its place and use in this campaign. It began when the first chattel

slave raised his voice in protest against a corroding chain. Right down

the ages the din of its conflict has kept time like a Greek chorus to

the discordant jazz that mars the harmony of the world’s advance.

The working-class does not need leadership so much as it needs

comradeship. The world has had enough of leaders. The hero and the

leader, even the teacher and the prophet, will in time go the way of the

king, the baron, and the capitalist. In the last analysis, it is the

friend and companion that the people need; it is the co- operation and

fellowship of all people working together for the exaltation of the

common life.

What’s Anarchism?

The spectre of Communism is haunting the world. Not only the powers of

Europe, but those of America and Asia as well have entered into a holy

alliance to exercise this spectre and — oh, cruel irony of history — the

erstwhile followers of Marx and Engels, the Socialists of all countries,

join the holy alliance against Communism. “Whence this Communism?” they

cry out in despair, and exercising the spectre they murmur pitifully mea

culpa, mea maxima culpa.

What is this terrible spectre of Communism? Is Communism a state of

Society to be established and managed by the people themselves or a new

form of government over them? Is it Communism of the people when a

political party captures the State power and decrees a set of laws for

others to obey? Is it even a “Transition Stage” as Engels and Lenin

prophesied?

State Capitalism — a Transition Stage from private Capitalism — is

evolving right now in all countries. But will this transition period

usher in a Communist society? On the contrary, we witness a gradual

evolution of the State, wherein an all powerful political bureaucracy

controls the life of the producers, by controlling the means of

production and the products for consumption.

The Bolshevik State Communism is the last form of reaction fooling the

workers. Anarchist-Communism is the antidote and protection against

bureaucratic State slavery, and the only theory of a free society

recognizing the just claim of each to the fullest satisfaction of all

his needs, physical, moral and intellectual.

Anarchism is no hypocritical scheme. It cannot dupe men in the manner of

political parties which pretend to be saviors of the working class,

promising to do wonders if the workers will only give them their

confidence. The Anarchists have the far more difficult mission of making

the workers realize that neither this nor that political party can do

naught for their salvation, and that the sole hope lies in their own

insight and energy.

Anarchism may be briefly defined as the negation of all government and

all authority of man over man; Communism as the recognition of the just

claim of each to the fullest satisfaction of all his needs, physical,

moral and intellectual. The Anarchist, therefore, whilst resisting as

far as possible all forms of coercion and authority, repudiates just as

firmly even the suggestion that he should impose himself upon others,

realizing as he does that this fatal propensity in the majority of

mankind has been the cause of nearly all the misery and bloodshed in the

world.

He understands just as clearly that to satisfy his needs without

contributing, to the best of his ability, his share of labor in

maintaining the general well-being, would be to live at the expenses of

others — to become an exploiter and to live as the rich drones live

today. Obviously, then, government on the one hand and private ownership

of the means of production on the other, complete the vicious circle —

the present social system — which keeps mankind degraded and enslaved.

There will be no need to justify the Anarchist’s attack upon all forms

of government, history teaches the lesson he has learned on every page.

But that lesson being concealed from the mass of the people by

interested advocated of “law and order”, and even by Social Democrats

and the Bolsheviks, the Anarchist deals his hardest blows at the

sophisms that uphold the State, and urges workers in striving for their

emancipation to confine their efforts to the economic field.

It follows, therefore, that politically and economically his attitude is

purely revolutionary; and hence arises the vilification and

misrepresentation that Anarchism, which denounces all forms of social

injustice, meets with in the press and from public speakers.

Rightly conceived, Anarchism is no mere abstract ideal theory of human

society. It views life and social relations with eves disillusioned.

Making an end of all superstitions, prejudices and false sentiments it

tries to see things as they really are; and without building castles in

the air it finds by the simple correlation of established facts that the

grandest possibilities of a full and free life can be placed within the

reach of all, once that monstrous bulwark of all our social iniquities —

the State — has been destroyed, and common property declared.

Modern jurists frequently speak of the atomization of the State in the

Middle Ages. In reality it was not atomic. The truth is that the Middle

Ages were atomized in the centuries that followed them. The

characteristic fact of European societies between the fifteenth and

nineteenth centuries was that the corporations were abandoned by their

most energetic members. And from this dissolution of the corporate life

has arisen the modern unitary state, as an historic and temporal

necessity; not as a category of social life. But if the State is not a

category, if it is purely an historic institution which arises at the

bidding of a momentary necessity, it runs the risk of vanishing from

history with the necessity which has called it into existence. And that,

in fact, was what occurred in the mentality of thinkers and was on the

point of happening in reality.

When the war of 1914 broke out the institution of the State was on the

point of disappearing from among the peoples of Western Europe. The

thinkers, at least, had already ceased to believe in the necessity for

it. It was defended only by the politicians; but there did not remain a

single public man who enjoyed the confidence placed in his predecessors.

This was not the fault of the men. Personally, they may have been as

clever and good then as were the statesmen of old. But we called them

politicians and not statesmen, for we no longer believed in the State.

What, aster all, is this State idea, this idea of the organized

Community to which the individual has to be immolated? Theoretically it

is the subordination of the individual to the good of all that is

demanded; practically it is his subordination to a collective egoism,

political, military, economic, which seeks to satisfy certain collective

aims and ambitions shaped ad imposed on the great mass of the

individuals by a smaller or larger number of ruling persons who are

supposed in some way to represent the community. It is immaterial

whether these belong to a governing class or emerge as in modern States

from the mass partly by force of character, but much more by force of

circumstances; are imposed more by hypnotism of verbal persuasion than

by overt and actual force. In either case there is no guarantee that

this ruling class or ruling body represents the best minds of a nation

or its noblest or its highest instincts.

Nothing of the kind can be asserted of the modern politician in any part

of the world; he does not represent the soul of the people or its

aspirations; what he does usually represent is all the average

pettiness, selfishness, egoism, self-deception that is about him and

these he represents well enough as well as a great deal of mental

incompetence and moral conventionality, timidity and pretence. Great

issues often come to him for decision but he does not deal with them

greatly; high words and noble ideas are on his lips, but they are only

the clap-trap of a party. The disease and falsehood of modern political

life is present in every country of the world and only the hypnotized

acquiescence that men yield to everything that is habitual and makes the

present atmosphere of their lives, cloaks and prolongs the malady. Yet

it is by such minds that the good of all had to be decided, to such

hands that it has to be entrusted, to such an agency calling itself the

State the individual is being more and more called upon to give up his

entire activity.

Even if the governing instrument were better constituted and of a higher

and moral character, still the State would not be what the State idea

pretends to be. Theoretically, it is the collective wisdom and force of

the community as the particular machinery of the State organization will

allow to come to the surface which uses that machine but is also caught

in it and hampered by it, and hampered also by the large among of folly

and selfish weakness that comes up in the same wave. Things would be

much worse if there were not a field left for a less trammeled

individual effort doing what the State cannot do, employing and using

the sincerity, energy, idealism of the best individuals to attempt that

which the State has not the wisdom or courage to attempt, getting that

done which a collective conservatism and imbecility leave undone or

actively oppose and suppress. It is this which is the really effective

agent of collective progress. But we are now tending towards such an

increase of organized State-power and such a huge irresistible and

complex State activity as will either eliminate or leave it dwarfed and

cowed into helplessness. Thus the necessary corrective to the defects,

limitations ad inefficiency of the State machine is rapidly

disappearing.

The State is neither the best mind of the nation or is it even the sum

of the communal energies. It leaves out voluntary action, suppresses the

working force and thinking mind of important minorities often of those

which represent that which is best in the present State of Society.

The regeneration of Society, or better still, the formation of a new

Society, is possible along through Anarchism, i.e. through the

re-establishment of natural relations of men to one another. This can be

accomplished by Anarchist Communism, guaranteeing to each individual

full liberty. Each member of such a Society stands free and equal among

his fellow beings, and any attempt to establish other standards will

constitute an act of violence against the principle of a free Society.

There is no natural right for the possession of private property, nor

for authoritarian leadership; once permitted they inevitably destroy the

peace and general welfare. The whole history of mankind proves this

statement.

Let us consider Anarchism as the scientific teaching of the natural

relationship of men. Realizing that our knowledge of the world reaches

no further than our senses can reach the Anarchist rejects all fruitless

dreams. All that takes place in the universe is the result of activity

inherent in matter. Upon this view, is based our moral doctrine, which

may be summarized as follows:

Every living being strives unceasingly for enjoyment of life; this

endeavor is the basis of all his actions. Each human being seeks to

learn by what ways and means he can attain the highest purpose of life.

Through experience and observation one arrives at the conclusion that

the individual separated from the society f his fellow-men, produces the

mere necessities of life by the utmost wearisome labor, but that through

the common labor of many, these necessities are wearily readily

obtained, allowing leisure for the pursuit of arts and sciences, by

which life is made pleasanter and richer; this knowledge imposes upon

one the duty of working for the common well, since each individual

welfare is assured only through universal well being.

The fact that the gifts, powers and dispositions of men are very

different, leads one to the conclusion that the participation in the

various labors of a group or community must be entirely voluntary, free

from outward pressure, as free as the right to use and enjoy in

unlimited measure the goods produced by common labor.

By experience and clear knowledge of the qualities of man, we arrive at

the firm conviction that a lasting welfare of Society can be established

only through free fellowship, i.e. through Communistic-Anarchist

Society.

By what means can such a Society be accomplished? Through the propaganda

in word and deed, i.e. through the distribution of Anarchist literature

and the courageous determination of a sufficient number of men and women

not to participate in the present system of exploitation and slavery.

Anarchism is not only a beautiful philosophy of life but it is also the

only logical theory for an economically and intellectually free society.

It is not the careless thinker or a wild theorizer who can appreciate

the ideal of a society based on free agreements of equals without law

and bureaucracy. It is the Socialist politician who believes that rule

and laws are a necessary part of life.

At the back of every law is the element of coercion. It is impossible to

escape from that fact. Politicians and bureaucrats may argue that it is

coercion for the good of underdeveloped workers. This means that

coercion is not merely pure despotism but something even worse — the

driving about of helpless human sheep. All tyrants and priests use the

same arguments.

Anarchism alone embodies these days social revolutionary ideals, without

trimming or compromising. It does not aim at success that spells

Dictatorship; it does not seek to gain the reins of government, nor

strives to rule workers organizations. It works for the real

enlightenment of the toilers, aiding them to that mental maturity which

will enable them to accomplish their won emancipation.

By education, by free organization, by individual and associated

resistance to economic and political tyranny, the Anarchists hope to

achieve their aims. The task may seem hopeless to many, but it should be

remembered that our movement is spreading in all countries. Modern

science, art and literature are imbued with distinct anarchist

tendencies.

There are certain things that cannot be left to other, to be attended to

by proxy. One of them is thinking. Man had issued to divide Providence

the mandate to direct fate — and came to grief as a result. Political

providence has now crowded the divine into the background, and the

subjects, citizens, voters are again the duped.

Man will have to recover the power with which his ignorance has invented

gods, statesmen, priests, and politicians, before he can achieve

maturity and independence. That is the ABC of Anarchism.

The educated man is revolted by the thought that men and women are such

ill-mannered beings that they can only be kept in order by a system of

rules which might be fairly tolerable inside the boundary walls of a

lunatic asylum.

We can imagine a reasonable man thinking that there are so many lunatics

and financiers, lazy gentlefolk, as present in the world, that it may be

necessary to continue a system of laws until we have got rid of them all

or reduced them to some kind of social discipline. But it seems utterly

preposterous that anyone of education could believe that these temporary

laws can be part of a permanent and ultimate ideal of life.

Men are very quick to repudiate submission to a man; but when the

slavery comes in guise of submission to law or custom or to a government

not directly personal, they are very likely not to recognize it. The

divinity which was formerly thought to hedge a king is now thought to

hedge laws and to sanction them. But a life minutely regulated by laws

and customs may be essentially as far from a free life as one regulated

by the will of a depot. The statement frequently put forward as an axiom

that men must sacrifice many of their liberties in order that they may

live together is not true; that they have sacrificed them is certain;

but to say that they must, betrays a confusion of thought. A man cannot

walk through a crowded street as he would walk through one that is

deserted, but neither can he walk through a tangled forest with the same

freedom with which he would walk through an open meadow; and yet he can

hardly be said to sacrifice his freedom in walking through a tangled

forest. His liberty would be restricted in any of these places if

another man should approach him and force him to turn back, whether the

man happened to be a private citizen or a public officer, and the act

would be tyrannical whether the officer acted in accordance with the

will of a depot or with the will of the people or with the law.

Freedom implies that if a man is doing anything which does not threaten

the freedom of others, no man and no body of men have any right to

interfere with him. “What,” cry many of out philanthropic friends, “If

we are fully persuaded that a certain act is for a man’s own advantage

and for that of society, while another act is greatly for his

disadvantage, shall we not compel him to do the one and to abstain from

doing the other?” No, for it is of more importance that the principle of

freedom shall be preserved than that what you are persuaded is for the

best shall be enforced.

This, of course, simply amounts to saying that freedom will yield better

results in the ling run than slavery.

Civilization and progress are words much conjured with. We boast of our

industrial development and speak with pride of out commercial growth and

even our intellectual achievements. We point the finger of scorn at the

“backward” nations and enlarger upon our own steady progress. But what

is progress? Giants of stone and steel, reared on human bones; mills and

factories, slaughter-houses of body and mind; successful corners in the

necessaries of life; multiplied volumes of statue books; the perfection

of man-killing weapons; increased navies and armies — are these the

meaning of civilization, the acme of progress? We seem to have lost all

sense of criterion. Scarlet piles of stone or gold upon the ruins of

human souls are the measure of our success. We have been stricken with

blindness by the glare of Mammon. We have lost our path on the Broadway

of Success. Yet Life is more, far more than mere success. And Life is

individual. The one purpose of being is development; in free expression

alone is satisfaction. Expression is growth; growth in freedom,

progress. In man alone is progress. The external and the social must but

indicate the inner. Woe to them when they hinder instead of reflecting

the soul. That is barbarism, slavery.

Freedom, liberty, and such words are found in dictionaries, but each

year marks a decrease of the original article. As a man surcingles or

puts a band around a horse, and draws it till he kills the horse or

breaks the band, so are the people of this country, by the chain of

legislation, denying liberty and paving the way for the clouds of evil

that arise from too much law. In this country it is already a fact that,

when a man cannot personally force his ideas into the life of a

neighbor, he sets about rigging up a legislative propellant that shall

bind the victim, and then, with the help of those who skin on shares or

work for fees, pump the objectionable in or draw the milk out. If you

wish an appliance that will sorten the freedom of our neighbor, go the

\legislature and have it made, — that is, if there are none already in

stock. There are some places on the skin not yet covered by some kind of

legislative plaster. A very few breathing pores left open. A few places

where the stomach pump of taxation has not been inserted for the benefit

of the inserter, but these spots or places are fast disappearing under

the operation of the legislative cauterizer and puncturer.

From the respect paid to property flow, as from a poisoned fountain,

most of the evils and vices which render this world such a dreary scene

to the contemplative mind. For it is in the most polished society that

noisome reptiles and venomous serpents lurk under the rank herbage; and

there is voluptuousness pampered by the still sultry air, which relaxes

every good disposition before it ripens into virtue.

One class presses on another, for all are aiming to procure respect due

only to talents and virtue. Men neglect the duties incumbent on man, yet

are treated like demi-gods. The world is almost, literally speaking, a

den of sharpers or oppressors.

There is a homely proverb, which speaks a shrewd truth, that whoever the

devil finds idle he will employ. And what but habitual idleness can

hereditary wealth and titles produce? For man is so constituted that he

can only attain a proper use of his faculties by exercising them, and

will not exercise them unless necessity of some kind first set the

wheels in motion. Virtue likewise can only be acquired by the discharge

of relative duties; but the importance of these sacred duties will

scarcely be felt by the being who is cajoled out of his humanity by the

flattery of sycophants. There must be more equality established in

society or morality will never gain ground, and this virtuous equality

will not rest firmly even when founded on a rock, if one-half of mankind

be chained to its bottom by fate, for they will be continually

undermining it through ignorance or pride.

No man or woman who has looked at society with open, honest eyes can

blind the fact that crime, like all other human actions, is the

inevitable product of existing causes; that it springs up in

poverty-stricken surroundings as surely as the cactus blooms in the

desert. But “society,” the propertied class that for the moment

dominated the situation, steadily refuses to acknowledge this most

obvious of facts, although it bends the knee weekly to a teacher who

said, with all the emphasis language could afford, that men cannot

gather figs of thorns, or grapes of thistles.

This deliberate blindness will continue until the eyes that now remain

obstinately closed are forced to open; and the opening can come only as

the result of education — learned stupidly by the whip of events or

wisely by voluntary acceptance of he truth.

Were it possible for some one to secure full control of the air, leaving

mankind the alternative of paying tribute or strangling or want of

breath, we should all of us become the serfs of the air monopoly. We

should be forced to comply with its conditions, or die. Our dependence

would be most absolute. This unbearable situation would be further

aggravated by irony and scorn if the constitution of the land contained

the solemn proviso: “All citizens are equal before the law; their

liberty must not be abridged by special privileges.” Could anyone but a

fool believe in this constitution-guarantee liberty, always remembering

the command of the air monopolist: Submit of die! The liberty of

choosing between submission and strangulation is but a two-edged slavery

with destruction at either end.

It is this kind of liberty that the people of the “most progressive

countries” enjoy. Instead of air read food, shelter, clothing, and you

have the same terrible dependence of the people on the monopolists of

land, production and money. The existence of the great majority is today

made possible only by their slavish submission to the conditions of

these masters of the earth.

Private property with its thousand and one corrupting influences is

today the ruling power on earth. It dictates t the propertyless masses

the compulsory statutes, to refuse to submit or to sacrifice one’s

independence, means the loss of the means of existence. That is the

punishment visited upon those who, though poor, strive to preserve their

manhood and their individuality.

But — unfortunately? Fortunately? — almost everyone adapts himself to

the slavery of existence, even though many suffer, hesitate, tremble,

and frit their teeth. Some go insane; many — men and women without

number — are crippled bodily or mentally or both; others — and those by

no means the worst — resort to suicide. Statistics throw considerable

light upon these results of our profit-civilization.

The “justice” of this civilization depends neither upon court nor

judges; it works “of itself”, quietly, but is more merciless and

inexorable that the most hard-hearted judge. It is the fate of the

modern man under the rule of a production-system which is not intended

to satisfy the needs of mankind, but which blindly works for the

enrichment of the few.

Whether you work with your hands or your brain, if you refuse to offer

yourself for sale, this “inner justice” will immediately reduce your

rations, will rob you of shelter and home, and finally deprive you even

of the small means necessary to secure mere bread or a ten-cent lodging.

Before long you will have become an outcast, because you have offended

against the discipline of this order which demands absolute economic

submission.

Therefore try hard to sell yourself somehow or other; else you’re lost

and you will become a pauper, or — if you possess courage enough — you

will turn criminal.

Sell your labor, ability, and intelligence; lie, cheat and swindle for

you existence. What matters manhood, personality, self-respect. You are

a mere cog in the machine of the “higher powers”; you are a bond serf

who hates his task, or — if you are a brain worker — an intellectual

helot who propagates opinions not his own, and teaches “fats” he knows

nothing of, but which in some way serve the interests of his

bread-givers. All this must be borne is you are to “do well” in the

world. Why not? Must not the prostitute also follow he business? The

same conditions which force her to sell her body, cause also the

journalist to write what he does not believe, the teacher to teach what

he himself refuses to accept, or the physician to perform operations to

which he would not submit himself.

The difference between the slavery of former days and the

existence-bondage of today is that formerly the salves were forcible

driven to the market, while the serfs of today offer themselves for sale

of “their own free will.” It is ironically called “free competition”;

but behind each miserable free competitor stand want, hunger, and

anxiety, more effective and compelling than the save-driver’s whip.

The marketability of men and things impresses upon society the character

of prostitution. It is prostitution to be forced, for mere existence, to

sell oneself, physically o mentally, to manufacturers or publishers.

Under such conditions who can speak of the dignity of labor? Work which

is forced and hateful, and of the products of which the worker is

deprived, is shameful and unworthy of the thinking man.

This boundless general venality comprises all the vice, evil, and crime

which is the despair of the moralist and reformer, and which serve as a

text to exhort man to honesty, righteousness, and neighborly love. Empty

phrases! Mankind does not live up to the moral laws down on paper,

because the very conditions of existence are based on the principle of

taking advantage of our fellow-men.

In place of the domination of private property, in place of the

shameless tyranny of profit, we would put Anarchist Communism. Its basic

principle is, first of all, to guarantee to each man the right of

existence, making the necessaries of life as accessible and free as air

and sunshine. Without this fundamental right man is a pariah, a pauper

at the mercy of those who own the means of existence.

The propertyless masses forever plead with the lords of the each for

compassion, for mercy and reforms, instead of depriving them of their

robber-monopoly and proclaiming the earth the free homestead and

storehouse of mankind. It is just as if the calves would plead with the

tanner not to tan their skins too deep a hue. The tanners would ignore

their plea, as the owners of the earth will continue their usury in

human flesh so long as they are not deprived of their monopoly of

property.

It is not the bitterest irony that under the domination of sacred

private property the majority of mankind lack all property? Under

Anarchist Communism, which strives to abolish private possession, there

would be no millionaires, billionaires, or stockholders, but every one

would enjoy the means necessary to a wholesome life. If we wished to

express it in a paradox we should say: only Communism will secure a man

the possession of the earth.

Lack of clarity, pusillanimity, and compromise are the worst curse of

the American Labor movement. Of what benefit, for instance, can it be to

the social or economic improvement of the workers if they are

represented in the political dens of the plutocracy? The sole effect of

such “successes” is to supply capitalist exploitation and governmental

tyranny with new supporters bearing the label of Labor or Socialist

parties.

Of what use is it to the workers what here and there some branch strike

is occasionally won? Capitalism possesses no end of means to nullify the

success of such strikers. Its power to revenge itself economically upon

the workers, to intensify exploitation, raise the cost of living, and so

forth, is practically limitless. Local strikes, if conducted in a

revolutionary spirit, with an eye to the ultimate destruction of the

robber system of private property, have propagandistic value. But as a

means to the essential, fundamental emancipation of the toilers, they

can not be seriously considered by the intelligent student.

The solution of the problem of labor — the abolition of wage slavery —

is not to be found within the State regime. Our thoughts and actions

must transcend these narrow boundaries, we must attack the very sources

of wage slavery. These sources are private property, the State and — the

third in the holy trinity — the Church. The rule of this trinity

absolutely excludes the producers from well-being justice and liberty.

No diplomatizing and politicianizing can help in this matter. So long as

this trinity is not overthrown, misery, dependence and slavery are

unavoidable.

That is the point where Anarchists and the labor movement must finally

meet on common ground. If the workers are not to turn utter traitors to

the ideal of the emancipation, they must prepare for the final struggle

with this trinity, and in that struggle the Anarchists will be their

staunchest fellow fighters. The movement that the social revolutionary

philosophy of Anarchism will combine with the intelligence of the

workers, with their energy and strength, the doom of the dominant

institution will be sealed.

In the face of the many dangerous errors and false conceptions

dominating the labor movement, we shall neither bless nor curse, but

persistently continue our agitation toward the hour when the more

intelligent element of the proletariat will learn to understand us and

will hold out to the Anarchists the hand of brotherhood, together to

battle with the common enemy.

Investigations so loudly clamored for by the politicians can only have

the effect of pacifying and weakening labor. These proceedings and their

reports can tell nothing new to the proletarian, even if the

investigations be honest and sincere, which is rarely the case. On the

other hand, their tendency is to arouse vain hopes and false conceptions

of the character of the governmental machinery. And that is highly

injurious to the growth of the revolutionary spirit, in which alone

there is guarantee that the people themselves will conquer industrial

and social Justice.

The workers, grown to maturity, will energetically call “Hands off” to

the politicians, wherever these may seek to fish for voter in the

troubled waters of strikes and other large struggles. Politicians are to

be measured with the same yardstick as priests, — augurs all, who for

thousands of years have been betraying the trust of the people and

exploiting them to further their own personal interests and ambitions.

Among the encouraging signs of the time the most important is that

legislatures, with their statutes and laws, are continually falling into

greater contempt with the people. The sentiment is steadily growing in

larger circles that the legal machinery is perfectly useless for the

necessary social and economic improvement of the masses. The struggle of

the toilers for better conditions takes place outside the halls of

legislation. Wherever the workers have gained comparatively better

living conditions, they did so not because of any laws or politicians,

but exclusively as a result of their own efforts, courage, and

solidarity.

This experience impresses itself daily with greater force upon the

observation of the thinking proletarian. Step by step he is led to the

conclusion that the final emancipation of labor can never come through

any political Providence, but that on the contrary it must be the work

of this initiative and determination.

He learns still more. He grows to understand that government and

legislation are not only useless for the proletarian, but that they are

positively harmful, the conscious enemies of labor, against whose

emancipation they systematically rear new obstacles. Their purpose is to

work for the greater development and glory of capitalism. They divide

the spoils among its sycophants, and cover every injustice and brutality

with the cloak of legal authority.

It is of utmost importance that the workers thoroughly realize all this.

For only clarity of understanding can save them from again and again

becoming the prey of politicians, which signifies the crippling and

paralysis of the labor movement.

In the House of Commons Oliver Cromwell once said: “There is one general

grievance, and that is the law.” A splendid motto for the revolutionary

workers of today.

It is easy to understand why politicians of all parties look askance at

the enlightenment of the masses in this direction. They feel themselves

in danger of becoming superfluous; their inflated dignity and blustering

importance is going to the devil. The more intelligent among them may

occasionally even catch a glimpse of the day when the doors of the law

factories will be closed, and the people will regulate their own affairs

through free co-operative associations.

‘Tis no promising outlook for the politicians, and they must therefore

seek new ways and means to justify their existence.

One of these means, to which Socialist politicians resort to in

particular, consist in playing the tail end on the occasion of the

larger strikes. From that safe background they make a great noise, in

order to impress the people with their importance as the “leaders of the

vanguard” of the movement. The smallest factory boy knows that strikes

can be fought and won only by the workers, but these superfluous

politicians put on a very wise look, as though they were about to

perform a great miracle for the strike, ad then solemnly shout —

legislative investigation!

That’s just their line. Conferences with professional politicians,

bureaucrats and would-be statesmen, exchange of conventional phrases,

committee sessions, great waste of good paper and — much ado about

nothing. The main thing is hat the newspapers should herald the tireless

activity of the Messrs. politicians. They are off — they have departed

for the strike regions — ah, how they sacrifice themselves for the

people, at the same timekeeping a shark eye for a chance to increase

their own political prestige among the ignorant.

If the workers accept as leader one of the intellectuals of

self-appointed reformers in place of a man risen from their ranks, they

are as badly off as ever. They intellectual has his own definite set of

interests, and though they man coincide with those of the proletariat in

calm and sunny weather, they are bound to separate in time of storm and

stress. Artists, scientists, thinkers, in a word of the intellectuals,

do not have an ingrained class consciousness. They have interests which

labor has not yet had the leisure to cultivate; they have possessions,

material and spiritual, which they dare not run the risk of losing. They

are the neutrals, as it were, in the conflict between the capitalists

and the workers. If they favor the proletariat they can render valuable

aid. Labor should never disdain their aid but it should never deliver to

them its independence.

Workers should be less sheep and more like men. Then if their leaders

deserted them their onward movement would not cease. Each mans should

learn to think for himself, to arrive at opinions independently of his

fellows. If each man reached a certain conclusion in his mind played

upon by the logic of events, and all these individual conclusions

happened to shape themselves toward a common end, there would arise in

their collective action, a strength and power that no amount of money

and no force of government could defy.

It is not surprising that investigating the conditions in strike

districts becomes ever more popular with politicians of all shades.

Investigations are well calculated to cover up the rottenness of our

social conditions. The people indeed feel that something is wrong; they

notice the fearful stench coming from somewhere. But the politicians are

immediately at hand to perfume the obnoxious spot with the investigation

disinfectant. And the good citizen thanks them, “Ah, after all,

something is being done to purify the air.” To be sure, something is

being done: the good people are being hoodwinked by the politicians. If

anything of vital importance is to be emasculated of its significance,

all that is necessary is to order a legislative investigation, and the

matter will quickly be demagogically distorted beyond all recognition.

Investigations are the cheapest trick of the masters to get around the

pressing social and economic problems.

The masters argue that because we cannot have equality in a silk factory

we cannot have it anywhere. Because we cannot have good-fellowship in

business we cannot have it at all. They argue that society cannot do

without “labor,” meaning servitude — without the bossing and the firing

and the too old at forty and all the rest of their filth. If society

cannot do without masters and wage slaves, so much the worse for

society. For we are prepared to sacrifice our machines, our wheels and

tunnels and wires and systems and slave lines for one hour of happiness.

Do not be led astray by the towering materialism which dominates the

mind of the wage earners today which rests upon the false assumption

that because a few generations go on doing the same thing over and over

again, we all live in a system of clock-work evolution. Do not let fear

prevent you from leading a free life. Live up to your own ideal and to

the standard inscribed on the banner — No Gods, No Masters.

The development of consciously intelligent units among the working class

is the only factor toward genuine progress. To make labor conscious of

itself, of its tremendous inherent strength and of its limitations, to

foster its sense of critical judgment, its examination into the cogs of

things, to impress upon it the secret of the vast power of concerted

action, to do these things is to emancipate labor from the bondage, not

only of society, but also of itself.

The leaders usually desert the rank and file in an issue of emergency.

They become better educated, adopt a higher standard of living, and get

out of touch with their fellow workmen; they rise in the social scale,

they go into politics, hobnob with the capitalists and compromise the

interests of labor.

Powerful as the master class is depicted to be, owing to the apparent

acquiescence and ignorance of its victims, it is inherently in a weak

and dangerous position. For its very life it now depends upon the

division and delusions which sway the working class. And these divisions

and delusions are fostered and maintained by paid union officials,

writers, and politicians, aided by a venal press.

Perhaps the most popular and enervating idea accepted by the majority of

workers today, is the doctrine of economic evolution, a doctrine which

was formulated by the ‘sociologists’ and which asserts that the

capitalist system of production for profit cannot be broken by any

conscious effort on the part of the workers; that we must have masters

and recognize the authority of masters until the dawn of some ‘ism. The

one thing the sociologists like to talk about is “Evolution,” i.e.,

expansion and development.

The evolutionist, like the madman, is in a prison — the prison of one

idea. These people seem to think it singularly surprising if the worker

suddenly flings to the wind all social theories and raises the banner

“No Masters.” They system must go on, they say. The time is not yet

“ripe” for a change. The “machinery of government” and the “machinery of

production” must be captured and so on.

To tell the workers that they must wait for the accumulation of capital

and for the “economic development” of the capitalist regime is like

telling a prisoner in the penitentiary that he would be glad to hear

that the jail now covers the state of New York. The jailer would have

nothing to show the prisoner except more and more long corridors of

stones lit by ghastly lights and empty of all that is human. So these

expanders and evolutionists have nothing to show us except more and more

infinite multitudes of wage slavery empty of all individuality, courage,

idealism, humanity and spirit, and hopelessly submissive to the demigods

of Capital.

No one doubts that the ordinary worker can get on with the capitalist

system as it is — at a price. The demand of the class-conscious worker

however, is not strength enough to get along with it, but to destroy it.

Under Anarchist Communism work will not be for profit but for use. The

products of free co-operative labor will not be steadily handed over to

speculation, but would be directly at the disposal of the consumer.

Production and consumption would go hand in hand, eliminating the

parasitism for the middle-man and trader. There would be neither room

nor desire for “cold storage”, to create artificial scarcity of

necessaries, to advance prices for the enrichment of the speculator.

Shoes, clothing, and other necessary articles will then not be

manufactured for the trade, but for the needs of the community, for the

men, women and children requiring those articles. Agriculture and cattle

raising will not be for the purpose of giving some speculator a corner

of the products at the cost of human misery and want, but for the sake

of human well-being, to satisfy the physical needs of the people. Under

such a social arrangement men would no longer be the miserable products

of material conditions; they would possess the power and intelligence to

order society in harmony with individual independence, and cease to be

the helpless subjects of environment.

On the basis of assured existence individual liberty will flourish. For

now man need no more prostitute his labor and ability, each free to

follow his inclination and enjoy life to his full capacity.

Labor, science, love will no more be degraded by being sold to the

highest bidder. They are freed form servitude. The place of the

institutions of force and of the whip of hunger is now taken by the

production-associations of free men and women.

We call ourselves Anarchists Communists because we consider the

economics of Communism as the indispensable fundamental condition for

social harmony and of the liberty and independence of the individual.

The hopes of the Anarchists for a grand future are based upon the

exercise of the feeling of solidarity of free individuals. We do not

wish to catechize people. The business of making man uniform we leave to

military drillers. Anarchism recognizes the diversity of life, the

differentiation of individuality in its fullest sense. It finds in

voluntary communism — free enjoyment of commodities — the safest

material basis for the highest development of diversity, which after all

is the only creative source of life. Social institutions can have but

one reason for existence, to lift man out of his bondage; but in the

name of various deities, man had ever been subjugated, he was ever to

lose himself for the sake of something foreign to his real nature. In

Anarchism, however, the individual is to refind himself, and to become a

conscious molder of the conditions fo life.

Leave men free and the needs of the moment will enforce cordial unison.

Man is a social being and in the absence of coercive interference his

own interests would lead him to closer unison with his fellows, to a

kinder regard for their necessities, to a warmer interest in their

welfare and a clearer conception that their distress relieved would be

his own social advancement. This is not the view of a sect, but founded

upon the fundamental principles of human nature. Remove restrictions and

the incentive to greed and selfishness disappears. Proclaim liberty and

the better nature of man will assume control and in the genial warmth of

an emancipated race a closer social feeling would be engendered, in

which disputes relative to the different merits of deeds and needs would

sink into insignificance and deserved derision.

The most oft-quoted objection with by the anarchist is that pertaining

to violence.

It would seem, were one to take this objection seriously, that any form

of government, no matter how despotic, is preferable to no government at

all. To the casual observer this reason is sufficient to preclude any

further investigation of the subject. And yet, if even the superficially

inclined would give but passing thought to the question they would be

bound to admit that all government either in theory or practice depends

finally upon physical force; upon violence for its continuance. The law

of a nation is in itself nothing but a paper threat depending entirely

upon coercion and violence to enforce it.

To say that without authority or the fear of authority, all sorts of

crimes would continually be indulged in is not entirely true. This is

provable, not by mere theory, but by practical observations of facts.

The per capita protection of urban communities in the person of police

is much less on the whole than that of the large cities. Nevertheless

the number of crimes committed in the thickly populated districts far

exceeds those committees in the rural communities. Not only is the

excess actual, but it is also proportional. There are extenuating

circumstances and contributing causes, no doubt, which make for this

abnormal lawlessness in the cities as compared to the villages, but the

fact remains that fewer crimes are committed where fewer minions of

force and brutality patrol the by-ways in their continual hunt for

trouble.

Not even the lowest slum proletarian can vie in corruption with the most

successful policeman. The very nature of his calling deprives him of all

sense of justice. Modern society has no competitor with the policeman

and detective in viciousness unless it is the politician — the master

and maker of both. The individual police officer necessarily different

from any other member of society when he first assumes the role of

public guardian. But the close and continual association with all that

is base inhumanity produces an environment that even educated men would

eventually succumb to, let alone the policeman who is seldom ever

over-intelligent.

If the average quality of what is considered good citizenship were of no

finer degree than the personnel of the forces of law and order we would

each and every one have to be officers to protect ourselves from our

friends. The truth is apparent that all peoples are naturally peaceful

or it would not be possible for a comparatively handful of policemen to

control multitudes of the people and hold them in check.

Sincerity of purpose always expresses itself in action. Such sincerity

never fails to compel attention. So long as you merely talk about your

ideals, they will remain mere ideals. But if your talk is no mere

lip-service, if you feel your convictions, if they permeated your being,

they will inevitably express themselves in your daily life, in your

attitude toward things, in your every action. They will then shape your

life; they will make you different from other people, in proportion as

your ideal is different from theirs. Then your ideal will cease to be

merely an ideal. It will have become a part of yourself; and to that

extent, materialized. Thus, and thus only, are ideals propagated and

transmitted into life.

Anarchy is such an ideal. It expresses the highest conception of

individual liberty and social solidarity. It is not a mere theory to be

realized in some distant future. It is a mode of living, to be practiced

right here and now.