💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › hakim-bey-post-anarchism-anarchy.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:44:34. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Post-Anarchism Anarchy
Author: Hakim Bey
Date: 1987
Language: en
Topics: spirituality, Peter Lamborn Wilson
Source: Retrieved on 23 November 2010 from http://www.tsuibhne.net/mt/archives/cat_articles_hakim_bey.html

Hakim Bey

Post-Anarchism Anarchy

The Association for Ontological Anarchy gathers in conclave, black

turbans & shimmering robes, sprawled on shirazi carpets sipping bitter

coffee, smoking long chibouk & sibsi. Question: What’s our position on

all these recent defections & desertions from anarchism (esp. in

California-Land): condemn or condone? Purge them or hail them as

advance-guard? Gnostic elite... or traitors?

Actually, we have a lot of sympathy for the deserters & their various

critiques of anarchism. Like Sinbad & the Horrible Old Man, anarchism

staggers around with the corpse of a Martyr magically stuck to its

shoulders — haunted by the legacy of failure & revolutionary masochism —

stagnant backwater of lost history.

Between tragic Past & impossible Future, anarchism seems to lack a

Present — as if afraid to ask itself, here & now, what are my true

desires? — & what can I do before it’s too late ?... Yes, imagine

yourself confronted by a sorcerer who stares you down balefully &

demands, “What is your True Desire?” Do you hem & haw, stammer, take

refuge in ideological platitudes? Do you possess both Imagination &

Will, can you both dream & dare — or are you the dupe of an impotent

fantasy?

Look in the mirror & try it...(for one of your masks is the face of a

sorcerer)...

The anarchist “movement” today contains virtually no Blacks, Hispanics,

Native Americans or children... even tho in theory such genuinely

oppressed groups stand to gain the most from any anti-authoritarian

revolt. Might it be that anarchism offers no concrete program whereby

the truly deprived might fulfill (or at least struggle realistically to

fulfill) real needs & desires?

If so, then this failure would explain not only anarchism’s lack of

appeal to the poor & marginal, but also the disaffection & desertions

from within its own ranks. Demos, picket-lines & reprints of 19^(th)

century classics don’t add up to a vital, daring conspiracy of

self-liberation. If the movement is to grow rather than shrink, a lot of

deadwood will have to be jettisoned & some risky ideas embraced.

The potential exists. Any day now, vast numbers of americans are going

to realize they’re being force-fed a load of reactionary boring

hysterical artificially-flavored crap. Vast chorus of groans, puking &

retching... angry mobs roam the malls, smashing & looting... etc., etc.

The Black Banner could provide a focus for the outrage & channel it into

an insurrection of the Imagination. We could pick up the struggle where

it was dropped by Situationism in ’68 & Autonomia in the seventies, &

carry it to the next stage. We could have revolt in our times — & in the

process, we could realize many of our True Desires, even if only for a

season, a brief Pirate Utopia, a warped free-zone in the old Space/Time

continuum.

If the A.O.A. retains its affiliation with the “movement,” we do so not

merely out of a romantic predilection for lost causes — or not entirely.

Of all “political systems,” anarchism (despite its flaws, & precisely

because it is neither political nor a system) comes closest to our

understanding of reality, ontology, the nature of being. As for the

deserters... we agree with their critiques, but note that they seem to

offer no new powerful alternatives. So for the time being we prefer to

concentrate on changing anarchism from within.

Here’s our program, comrades:

discrimination as one of the most disgusting aspects of our society.

Imaginative participation in other cultures, esp. those we live with.

Black’s pro-tem slogan): neither collectivist nor individualist. Cleanse

the temple of vain idols, get rid of the Horrible Old Men, the relics &

martyrologies.

radical & perhaps violent attack on Education & the serfdom of children.

publishing/propaganda tactics. Pornography & popular entertainment as

vehicles for radical re-education.

need a new music, totally insane but life-affirming, rhythmically subtle

yet powerful, & we need it now.

2-dimensional 19^(th) century scientism. “Higher states of

consciousness” are not mere spooks invented by evil priests. The orient,

the occult, the tribal cultures possess techniques which can be

“appropriated” in true anarchist fashion. Without “higher states of

consciousness,” anarchism ends & dries itself up into a form of misery,

a whining complaint. We need a practical kind of “mystical anarchism,”

devoid of all New Age shit-&-shinola, & inexorably heretical &

anti-clerical; avid for all new technologies of consciousness & metanoia

— a democratization of shamanism, intoxicated & serene.

the avant-pseud “post-sexuality” movement, & even more subtly by

Spectacular Recuperation in media & advertising. Time for a major step

forward in SexPol awareness, an explosive reaffirmation of the

polymorphic eros — (even & especially in the face of plague & gloom) — a

literal glorification of the senses, a doctrine of delight. Abandon all

world-hatred & shame.

Leftism. Emphasize practical, material & personal benefits of radical

networking. The times do not appear propitious for violence or

militancy, but surely a bit of sabotage & imaginative disruption is

never out of place. Plot & conspire, don’t bitch & moan. The Art World

in particular deserves a dose of “Poetic Terrorism.”

(e.g. computer networking) but can also manifest as a form of oppression

(homelessness, gentrification, architectural depersonalization, the

erasure of Nature, etc.) The communes of the sixties tried to circumvent

these forces but failed. The question of land refuses to go away. How

can we separate the concept of space from the mechanisms of control? The

territorial gangsters, the Nation/States, have hogged the entire map.

Who can invent for us a cartography of autonomy, who can draw a map that

includes our desires?

Anarchism ultimately implies anarchy — & anarchy is chaos. Chaos is the

principle of continual creation...& Chaos never died.

— A.O.A. Plenary Session

March ’87, NYC