💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › glenn-hall-forms-of-freedom.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:32:30. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Forms of Freedom
Author: Glenn Hall
Date: June 2019
Language: en
Topics: social ecology, Dual Power, communalism
Source: http://social-ecology.org/wp/2019/06/forms-of-freedom-dual-power-in-fiji/
Notes: The following is an edited excerpt from an upcoming article that will be published in Harbinger: A Journal of Social Ecology.

Glenn Hall

Forms of Freedom

With renewed interest in North America of building dual-power, and

forming strategies to achieve these objectives, it is important to look

around the world at existing modes of resistance and power-building.

This strategy is well known to anyone following efforts of the

Zapatistas, the Self-Administration of Northern Syria (Rojava), Bakur,

and recently the Mapuche people in the Wallmapu region of South America.

These struggles forsake the creation or control of the State as a goal,

and create a dual-power scenario within the states they occupy. This

approach broadly aligns with Murray Bookchin’s political vision of

Communalism, adapted and to specific programs for specific contexts.

Indeed, many of these struggles predate Bookchin or have developed

parallel to his work.

It is in this context that I bring up the iTaukei (E-tow-kay) people of

Fiji, for whom many aspects of the dual-power struggle for autonomy

against the state are built into the foundations of local

self-government. Dual-power in Fiji shows us the importance of

communally-controlled land and taking power from local and municipal

government organs, as well as how these can contribute, even in a latent

context, the weakening of state power that Communalism calls for. In

addition, it shows how these institutions can indeed become the forms of

freedom, and that it is up to people and organizations to give it

content.

First, a brief sketch of the elements of grassroots, confederated direct

democracy found among the iTaukei peoples. Villages throughout Fiji only

have limited penetration by the cash economy and state control—which

leaves the community largely free to direct and decide its own

development. They are confederated by region into larger council bodies.

Issues are raised in a monthly village meeting called a bose va koro,

wherein people take part in the indigenous practice of talanoa (story

telling). Talanoa functions as a sort of unity of work and play—people

discuss the goings-on in the village, air grievances, laugh, joke, and

report from the various councils—all while drinking kava and smoking

cigarettes. In this way, the tedium of the meeting is suffused with

care, humor, and interest. There exist various councils that the

villagers can be a part of, depending on the village itself. These

councils include: crime and mediation, water sanitation, health and

safety, finance and investment, community development, women and youth

groups, church groups, and elder care. This is combined with the iTaukei

concept of living vaka vanua, or with the land. Vanua has multiple

connotations: it can simply mean the land itself, or can be reference to

both the land and the people that inhabit it. In addition, it implies a

style of living—in harmony with the land, with one’s community, and

putting the well-being of both above profit for oneself (Parke, 2014).

The bose va koro have been codified into the government through the

Ministry of iTaukei Affairs, which has a number of other interesting

features, including the National Land Trust Board (NLTB), which keeps

track of lineages and doles out money made from leasing to the clans.

The grassroots meetings connect to a system of district and provincial

meetings comprised of hereditary chiefs to decide the affairs of

villages on the regional, provincial, and national level. While these

councils are currently controlled by chiefly elites, this was not always

the case. There is historical and anthropological evidence to show that

making these positions hereditary and giving them so much control over

these councils is a result of British colonialism (Macnaught, 2016;

Parke, 2014). Before that, the leaders of these councils came about

through support of their people in various ways (valor in war, service

to people, or as a compromise between various factions) and their power

over the rest of the village was in many places negligible. Another

major aspect of this ministry is the communalization of land rights.

Over 80% of the land of Fiji is owned communally by various clans—it is

inalienable and the financial proceeds of leases and other development

projects are distributed to clan members annually through the NLTB. This

has in large part stunted capitalist penetration into the villages of

Fiji and prevented their proletarianization (Norton, 2012). The iTaukei

people can participate in commerce at will, and have land to farm and

live available to them without rent or tax.

In this brief outline, we can see elements of the “forms of freedom”

that Boookchin discussed. The power given to village and municipality,

even in latent form, is worth investigating deeper for Communalists

interested in building dual-power. In the bose va koro, villages have

the potential to shape their development and culture as they see fit,

which leads both to instances of domination and control but also

mutualism and horizontal decision-making. Despite this, looking to

indigenous struggles for autonomy is an important cornerstone of Social

Ecology, and the iTaukei people of Fiji have been grappling with

autonomy for well over a century.

Works Cited

Chodorkoff, Dan. (2014). The Anthropology of Utopia: Essays on Social

Ecology and Community Development. Norway: New Compass Press.

Macnaught, Timothy. (2016). The Fijian Colonial Experience: A Study of

the Neotraditional Order Under British Colonial Rule Prior to World War

II. Acton, A.C.T.: ANU Press.

Norton, Robert. (2012). Race and Politics in Fiji (Second edition. ed.,

Pacific studies series). St Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland

Press.

Parke, Aubrey. (2014). Degei’s Descendants: Spirits, Place and People in

Pre-Cession Fiji. Australia: ANU Press.