💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › anathema-a-fork-in-the-road.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 06:19:26. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: A Fork in the Road Author: Anathema Date: April 2020 Language: en Topics: COVID-19 Source: Retrieved on 2020-04-16 from https://anathema.noblogs.org/files/2020/04/mar-apr_2020.pdf
The COVID-19 pandemic is bringing us to a fork in the road. On one side
we see the near future that power wants: an atomized and remote
workforce, a drastic decrease in spontaneous in-person social life, a
big increase in who is considered surplus population as “non-essential”
work is cancelled, and a bunch more surveillance, policing, and social
control. On the other hand, the state is scared, it’s showing that
government is capable of providing social security when the choice is
between that and an uncontrolled breakdown in the social order. Neither
of these paths lead to places that we, as anarchists, can feel good
about. As this pandemic runs its course and society changes because of
it, a new normal will slowly congeal as things cool down. What that
normal looks like and how it comes about is still up in the air.
In the name of “public health” all sort of security measures are coming
together to create an authoritarian wet dream. Internationally borders
are becoming more difficult to cross, and anti-immigrant and
specifically anti-Asian sentiment is on the rise as racists in the media
and politics stir up fear hostility toward China. Earlier in the month
video surfaced of an Asian couple being beaten by a group of people on a
SEPTA platform, and Philly isn’t the only place seeing this sort of
harassment, New York and Los Angeles have also experienced similar
attacks. The state is encouraging what is being called “social
distancing.” People are advised to stay home, cut down on social outings
and gatherings, stay six feet apart, and digitize or give up on
in-person social life. Schools and universities are closing left and
right. At least one school is taking it even further, the University of
Pennsylvania sent an email to its students March 14 explaining that
social distancing is encouraged and that students “congregating on
campus, or off campus, will face immediate intervention by Penn Police.”
It would not be surprising to see other institutions or even the city
itself take on similarly drastic measures. The Board of Health has made
forcing people to quarantine legal. Many workplaces are asking their
workers to work from home, reducing their hours, or laying them off.
Workers that are considered non-essential are falling through the cracks
financially. What we see forming is a way of life that is sterile,
policed, mediated, and closed off. When this pandemic tapers off, who’s
to say that bosses, cops, and politicians won’t like the peace and quiet
enough to keep using all these new ways of controlling the population?
Once those in power have the means and the compliance of the population,
how easy would it be for them to simply keep the ball rolling? Is what
we’re seeing as a crisis response a glimpse into the new “normal” we’ll
live after the crisis?
At the same time, power is scared. The state and capitalists have made
some proposals and offers that would have seemed outrageous a few months
ago. Comcast is offering free access to its internet networks to the
poor, offering unlimited data, and has put a hold on shutting off
connections. Verizon is making a similar offer. PECO, PGW, and
Philadelphia Water Department have all pledged to not disconnect
utilities even if they are owed money (for the time being). A resolution
has passed that prevents utility shutoffs and also places a moratorium
on evictions, foreclosures, and tax-lien sales until the pandemic
clears. This means that the issue of losing ones housing during the
crisis could be less likely if your landlord doesn’t decide to lock you
out illegally (although rent and tax debt will continue to drain our
wallets). Federally the state is expanding who qualifies for
unemployment, and figuring out how to send $1200 to millions of US
citizens. These offers and proposals go to show that the means of
existence — shelter, warmth, water, and communication — could be
provided to everyone by the state and capital. Of course these kinds of
actions by the state are unlikely to last, the aversion of US
politicians to anything that remotely resembles consideration for social
well-being is derided as socialism or communism. Either way the services
and infrastructure to take care of each other and our needs exist and
outside a capitalist economy could be much more accessible than our
current setup. With that in mind why would or should we entrust our
health and social life to the institutions that could, but do not and
never will, meet our needs? This pandemic only makes more clear the
absurd priorities of the state and capitalists. In the unlikely event
that the state and capitalists decided to adopt a welfare state model we
still have no guarantees that this wouldn’t be coupled with intense
policing and isolation, that it would last, or would include those who
are most oppressed.
There is a third way: resisting the isolation and policing, and also
sidestepping a social safety net that could be pulled out from beneath
us as soon as we’re well enough to work and pay, we can take
responsibility for ourselves and self-organize. As we lose our hours or
jobs we are still expected to pay to live, to eat, to move about the
city. As we worry for our individual and collective health, we can
figure out how to meet our needs outside the systems that would rather
see us sick and alone. Schools, offices, stores, and many other places
are sitting empty. Can we imagine open-sourcing test kits and occupying
labs to make them readily available? People are already organizing rent
strikes and opening up squats to make life without work go from a crisis
imposed disaster to a joyful freeing of our time and space? When food
and health care supplies are in short supply, will we have squatted
gardens and autonomous clinics to meet our needs?* Will the local
pharmacy continue to profit off our fears and desire to take care of
ourselves, or will it be taken over to provide medicine, snacks, and
hygiene supplies to whoever needs? Will we take advantage of the crisis
to leave the city to start a farm or food forest on some under-policed
plot of land? This pandemic is making power’s disdain for free and
healthy life more than clear. Will we respond by folding into ourselves,
losing ourselves behind glowing blue screens and locked doors or will we
make our lives our own and create the health and freedom we need to life
in the midst of crisis?