💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › anarcho-afghanistan-from-tragedy-to-comedy.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 06:20:46. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Afghanistan: From Tragedy to Comedy Author: Anarcho Date: March 3, 2009 Language: en Topics: Afghanistan, film review, US foreign interventions, Soviet Union Source: Retrieved on 29th January 2021 from https://anarchism.pageabode.com/?p=221 Notes: A review of the film Charlie Wilson’s War, discussing what the film did not mention and how the activities of the USA in Afghanistan started before the Soviet invasion and its unintended consequences.
Marx famously said that history repeats itself, first time as tragedy,
second time as farce. Tom Hanks has placed a Hollywood spin on Karl’s
comments by producing and starring in “Charlie Wilson’s War”. It is
about the role of Texas Democratic congressman Charlie Wilson in getting
the US to arm those in Afghanistan fighting the Soviet Union occupation
in the 1980s. It is, apparently, presented as a comedy.
The firm is based on a book by George Crile and its original subtitle
gives an indication of a key problem with both book and film: “The
Extraordinary Story of the Largest Covert Operation in History — the
Arming of the Mujahideen.” For Crile, the key was that lots of Soviet
soldiers were killed in a war which contributed to the disintegration of
the Soviet Union. Strangely, he fails to mention the subsequent
activities of his “freedom fighters” – their attacks on the US after the
Soviet collapse.
In other words, Wilson’s work in relation to Afghanistan led directly to
the blowback that peaked on September 11 and, with some help from the
Bush Junta, to the current bloody invasion and occupation of Iraq. The
film follows in this. There is a vague reference to subsequent events.
In an “epilogue” to the book, Crile quoted Wilson: “These things
happened. They were glorious and they changed the world. And the people
who deserved the credit are the ones who made the sacrifice. And then we
fucked up the endgame.” The film also ends with this just before the
credits roll.
Unless you are well versed in geopolitical history neither the reader
nor the audience member would know that this was referring to how the
Afghan “freedom fighters” of the 1980s turned into the al Qaeda and
Taliban of the 1990s and 2000s. For all the joy in presenting Wilson’s
“out of channel” attempts to garner secret appropriations of millions of
dollars to the guerrillas, it fails to discuss the consequences of such
acts or the fact when the Soviet Union withdrew in 1989 the US lost
interest in the country and left it to descend into civil war. The
“endgame”, you would think, turns this “comedy” into a tragedy of epic
proportions. Surely the US helping to build Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda
base and how the millions of dollars worth of weapons Wilson helped to
secretly supply ended up being turned on the US are important facts?
Another important fact which the book and film fail to note is that the
CIA started to support the mujahedeen before the USSR invasion. For the
CIA legally to carry out a covert action, the president must authorise
it. The book repeatedly says that President Carter authorised the CIA to
provide covert backing to the mujahedeen after the Soviet Union invaded
Afghanistan in December 1979. In reality, he did so on July 3, 1979,
i.e., six months before the Soviet invasion. This was done on the advice
of his national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who confirmed
this in January 1998 in an interview in the French newspaper “Le Nouvel
Observateur”: “I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to
him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military
intervention.” He had no regrets, stating it “had the effect of drawing
the Russians into the Afghan trap ... The day that the Soviets
officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have
the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.” Secretary of
Defense, and former CIA Director, Robert Gates confirms this in his 1996
memoirs.
So the “freedom fighters” of the mujahedeen were used as cannon fodder
by Washington to give the USSR its own Vietnam. Which they did – but
with horrific consequences not only for the Soviet Union. Mentioning
those would, undoubtedly, have undermined the comic potential of the
illegal activities of a politician subverting the normal channels of
democratic accountability within the U.S. government to bolster the
covert actions of the secret state in pursuit of American imperialist
ends.