💾 Archived View for gmi.derschwarzestrahler.at › en › gemlog › relog › gemlog-responses › update1.gm… captured on 2023-01-29 at 02:42:09. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2023-07-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Gemlog responses - 1st update (after response from Sean Conner)

Initial article

It looks like my idea for the gemlog responses is not as good as I thought in my nativity. Sean Conner gave a critical response:

RE: It still surprises me what some find difficult to do

To sum it up, my idea is rather a hacky workaround for gemini-servers without CGI than a genius idea. I get the point.

As I wrote in the initial post, I am not an expert in programming and have a non-IT engineering background. Nevertheless I have some coding experience (I do some Python coding every now and then), so I understand the argument, that log-parsing is in the more complex than a CGI script. I also have to say that I wrote this post from my perspective, self-hosting my gemini capsule on a virtual Rootserver, which gives me access to all Logs. I see the point, that not every user has access to this.

One more sidenote: In my job I often see, how a lack of IT experience from decision-makers combined with a completely unrealistic underestimation of complexity leads to bad systems with a bad cost-benefit ratio. That's why I'm quite cautious when it comes to IT-topics. I hope this cautiousness was recognisable in my initial article.

Feel free to respond or comment via e-mail:

300nm@derschwarzestrahler.at

CC BY-SA 4.0 Martin Marot-Perz, 04.01.2023

⇑ RE:log

⇑⇑ Gemlog

    ╭────────╮    ╔═════╗
  ╭─╯████████╰─╮  ╔═══╗ ╚═╗
 ╭╯████████████╰╮ ╔══╗╚═╗ ╚╗
╭╯██████████████╰╮╔═╗╚╗ ╚╗ ╚╗
│████████████████   ║ ║  ║  ║
╰╮██████████████╭╯╚═╝╔╝ ╔╝ ╔╝
 ╰╮████████████╭╯ ╚══╝╔═╝ ╔╝
  ╰─╮████████╭─╯  ╚═══╝ ╔═╝
    ╰────────╯    ╚═════╝