💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 4750.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 05:52:55. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tech in cars: Does hands-free mean harmless?

2013-06-13 05:04:11

By Tanya Mohn

Motorists know that texting and talking with hand-held mobile phones is risky

behaviour, but what about texting, talking or even checking social media

accounts via voice-activated controls?

A new study suggests that even as automakers rush to accommodate consumers

mobile lifestyles by designing hands-free features into their products, drivers

can still be dangerously distracted.

The study, released by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, a non-profit

research and education organisation based in the US, has ranked common forms of

distraction on a numerical scale of gravity, in the manner of hurricanes. For

example:

Listening to the radio is a 1 level of distraction, or a minimal risk

Talking on a mobile phone, both handheld and hands-free, is a 2, or a

moderate risk

Listening and responding to in-vehicle, voice-activated email features received

a 3 ranking, or extensive risk

We ve known for a long time that it s important to keep your hands on the

wheel and your eyes on the road, said Peter Kissinger, president and chief

executive of the non-profit, which released its findings on 12 June. Now we

have additional evidence that it s essential to keep your mind on the driving

task at hand. As counter-intuitive as it seems, hands-free is not risk-free.

The dangers are real.

The auto industry is a global industry. And this clearly is a global issue.

Peter Kissinger

The report, Measuring Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile, noted that

in-vehicle technologies were expected to increase five-fold in new vehicles by

2018. But while increased hands-free functionality may make drivers feel safer,

extensive usage could present a public safety crisis.

The research was conducted by Dr David Strayer, a cognitive distraction expert,

and his research team at the University of Utah. The group measured brainwaves,

eye movement and other metrics to assess what happens to drivers when they

simultaneously perform multiple tasks. Cameras were mounted inside an

instrumented car to track eye and head movements. A so-called

Detection-Response-Task (DRT) was used to record driver reaction time. The

crowning feature, quite literally, was an electroencephalographic (EEG)

-configured skull cap, which was used to monitor mental workload. Drivers

engaged in common tasks such as listening to audio books, talking on the phone

and listening and responding to voice-activated emails.

Over all, Dr Strayer s team found that mental workload and cognitive

distractions increased, reaction time slowed and brain function was

compromised. Drivers scanned the road less frequently and missed important

visual cues. In real-world driving scenarios, such behaviour could lead to what

the authors called inattention blindness, whereby drivers would not register

potential hazards, important objects like stop signs or pedestrians that were

directly in front of them.

Police crash reports are filled with examples where the driver looked but did

not see a critical item, Kissinger said.

The study s intention, Kissenger added, was to educate the public as well as

foment more collaboration with the auto and electronics industries, with an eye

toward developing international guidelines and standards for safer cockpits

for drivers. The auto industry is a global industry. And this clearly is a

global issue, he said.

Preliminary response from the road safety community has been positive.

David Teater, a senior director at the National Safety Council, a nonprofit

US-based advocacy group, said the findings echoed "what cognitive psychologists

have known for years." But the scope and findings of the new study surpassed

previous ones, he added. This is certainly a landmark study and the most

comprehensive one on cognitive distraction to date. I hope the auto industry

and policy makers take a hard look at this research.

To view the full report, visit http://NewsRoom.AAA.com