💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 1115.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 08:16:44. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Europe and NZ poles apart on sex trade

2009-03-18 07:33:21

For the past six years, New Zealand has treated prostitution as a normal

business. Brothels operate legally, and sex workers are subject to ordinary

employment and health and safety rules.

Some European governments, by contrast, have chosen to restrict the trade. Sex

workers are calling for New Zealand-style liberalisation, but as Henri Astier

reports in the second of two articles, they stand little chance of being heard.

When Norway criminalised the purchase of sex services in January, it took its

cue from next-door Sweden, which pioneered the policy in 1999, rather than

far-off New Zealand.

Wholesale decriminalisation may work in a South Pacific island nation, but the

suggestion that it could work on a continent where ruthless gangs move all too

freely strikes many as fanciful.

"New Zealand might be different because it is so isolated," says Anna Narit of

the Nadheim Women's Centre, a church-run shelter in Oslo that looks after

prostitutes rescued from traffickers and criminals.

"We have a lot of migration in Europe, and the borders are open," she says,

defending Norway's new law under which those caught paying for prostitutes can

face a heavy fine or six months in prison.

The idea behind the approach is not to target prostitutes, who are regarded as

victims, but to empower them.

Clamping down on demand for their services is expected to weaken the hold of

those preying on them.

Big lie?

The same rationale applies to a bill making its way through the British

parliament, which will make it a crime to pay for sex with someone "forced into

prostitution" or "controlled for another's gain".

2003 NZ PROSTITUTION REFORM

Brothels allowed to operate

Up to four prostitutes can set up collective as equal partners

Advertising sale of sex legalised

Brothels require certificate and registration by court

Sex work subject to normal employment and health and safety standards

Supporters of the legislation argue that trafficking and other forms of

coercion are rife in the sex industry.

"Something like 80% of women in prostitution are controlled by their drug

dealer, their pimp, or their trafficker," MP Fiona Mactaggart told the BBC in

November.

Another Labour politician, Denis MacShane, estimated in 2007 that there were as

many as 25,000 sex slaves in Britain.

However those speaking for sex workers dispute the figures, and believe that

their rights and safety would be better protected through liberalisation rather

than further repression.

"We think the New Zealand law should serve as a model for the rest of the

world," Cari Mitchell of the England Collective of Prostitutes told the BBC

News website.

She calls the proposed legislation for England and Wales a "moral crusade", and

says the popular picture of an industry dominated by criminals holding girls in

virtual bondage is "a big lie".

Murky numbers

The numbers surrounding trafficking have long been a matter of controversy.

This is partly due to the lack of a clear, agreed definition.

Most people think of "trafficked women" as girls lured abroad under false

pretences and forced by violent men to work off some fictitious debt.

However police reports often use the term to refer to illegal migrants.

The Poppy Project, a British group that has carried out research into

prostitution, has estimated that 80% of women working in brothels in London are

foreign.

The report does not use the word "trafficking", but according to Julia

O'Connell Davidson of the University of Nottingham, advocates quoting the

report have used the term, contributing to public confusion.

"People understand it as meaning that 80% of sex workers have been brought in

at the barrel of a gun and locked into buildings, which is not the case," she

told the BBC news website.

No one knows how many prostitutes in Britain work under duress, but police

raids carried out in more than 1,300 brothels nationwide in 2006 and 2007

suggest the numbers are not as high as many fear.

About 250 of the women rescued were said to have been victims of trafficking,

police said.

NO SEX PLEASE

Sweden: Paying for sex made outlawed in 1999

Norway: Buying sex outlawed in January 2009

England and Wales: MPs considering ban on purchase of sex from "controlled

women"

Netherlands: Ban on buying sex from trafficked people proposed by Cabinet

The total number of people picked up is not known, but assuming an average of

four prostitutes per establishment - a figure commonly used by support groups -

this suggests that less than 5% meet the police definition of "trafficked".

The number is no doubt disturbing, but a far cry from the most alarming

figures.

That proportion, incidentally, is not much more than the 4% share of New

Zealand prostitutes which a 2008 parliamentary report estimated were being kept

by force.

The prostitution industries of both Europe and the South Pacific may not be

poles apart after all.

Both the New Zealand Prostitutes Collective and European organisations

representing sex workers argue that the overwhelming majority of women in the

industry have made a conscious choice, and that Swedish-type laws are

addressing a largely non-existent problem.

Effective lobbying

Liv Jessen of Pro Sentret, a Norwegian support group for prostitutes, contends

that the rationale for Norway's new law is spurious, because trafficking is

already punishable by 10 years in jail.

It's a bit like judging the state of heterosexual relationships in Britain

today by talking just to people who work in domestic violence units

Julia O'Connell Davidson

She says the most notable effect of the legislation is that it has made sex

workers feel more vulnerable, as they view police as hostile.

Ms Jessen says it would have been "fairer and more honest" to ban prostitution

outright. "The women would have a better status as criminals than as victims

harassed by police for their own good."

Neither did sex workers in neighbouring Sweden support the 1999 ban on buying

sex. Sans, a network of Swedish prostitutes' groups, was opposed to it and is

calling for New Zealand-style decriminalisation.

Why is there such a discrepancy between what so many people across Europe

assume about the sex trade and testimony from within the industry?

According to Julia O'Connell Davidson, public perception is heavily influenced

by organisations that support those prostitutes who have had abusive

experiences.

The cases are real and these groups play an important role, but they deal with

extreme situations. The sex industry as a whole should not be judged on the

basis of their advocacy, Ms O'Connell Davidson argues.

"It's a bit like judging the state of heterosexual relationships in Britain

today by talking just to people who work in domestic violence units."

Deaf ears

Effective lobbying by anti-prostitution groups and the revulsion caused by

human traffickers mean that calls for New Zealand-style liberalisation are

falling on deaf ears in Europe.

Lots of trafficked women knew they were going to work as sex workers

Sietske Altink

De Rode Draad, Amsterdam

Nordic-style prohibition is gaining recruits even in the liberal Netherlands,

which legalised brothels in 2000.

Many Dutch politicians point to evidence that the reform has failed to sever

links between prostitution and crime. As a result parliament is considering a

government plan to ban the purchase of sex from trafficked women.

Sietske Altink of De Rode Draad (Red Thread), an advocacy group for Dutch

prostitutes, says such a clampdown is unwarranted. Trafficking may be rife, she

concedes, but it does not mean coercion is.

"Lots of trafficked women knew they were going to work as sex workers," she

says.

In the Netherlands, Ms Altink notes, prostitutes are also strongly opposed to

criminalising punters but few politicians are interested in their views.

"It's very curious they don't want to listen to the people they make the laws

for," she says.