💾 Archived View for gemini.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc4396.txt captured on 2023-01-29 at 06:11:37.
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Network Working Group J. Rey
Request for Comments: 4396 Y. Matsui
Category: Standards Track Panasonic
February 2006
RTP Payload Format
for 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Timed Text
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
This document specifies an RTP payload format for the transmission of
3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) timed text. 3GPP timed
text is a time-lined, decorated text media format with defined
storage in a 3GP file. Timed Text can be synchronized with
audio/video contents and used in applications such as captioning,
titling, and multimedia presentations. In the following sections,
the problems of streaming timed text are addressed, and a payload
format for streaming 3GPP timed text over RTP is specified.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................3
2. Motivation, Requirements, and Design Rationale ..................3
2.1. Motivation .................................................3
2.2. Basic Components of the 3GPP Timed Text Media Format .......4
2.3. Requirements ...............................................5
2.4. Limitations ................................................6
2.5. Design Rationale ...........................................7
3. Terminology ....................................................10
4. RTP Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text .........................12
4.1. Payload Header Definitions ................................13
4.1.1. Common Payload Header Fields .......................15
4.1.2. TYPE 1 Header ......................................17
4.1.3. TYPE 2 Header ......................................20
4.1.4. TYPE 3 Header ......................................23
4.1.5. TYPE 4 Header ......................................24
4.1.6. TYPE 5 Header ......................................25
4.2. Buffering of Sample Descriptions ..........................25
4.2.1. Dynamic SIDX Wraparound Mechanism ..................26
4.3. Finding Payload Header Values in 3GP Files ................28
4.4. Fragmentation of Timed Text Samples .......................31
4.5. Reassembling Text Samples at the Receiver .................33
4.6. On Aggregate Payloads .....................................35
4.7. Payload Examples ..........................................39
4.8. Relation to RFC 3640 ......................................43
4.9. Relation to RFC 2793 ......................................44
5. Resilient Transport ............................................45
6. Congestion Control .............................................46
7. Scene Description ..............................................47
7.1. Text Rendering Position and Composition ...................47
7.2. SMIL Usage ................................................48
7.3. Finding Layout Values in a 3GP File .......................48
8. 3GPP Timed Text Media Type .....................................49
9. SDP Usage ......................................................53
9.1. Mapping to SDP ............................................53
9.2. Parameter Usage in the SDP Offer/Answer Model .............53
9.2.1. Unicast Usage ......................................54
9.2.2. Multicast Usage ....................................57
9.3. Offer/Answer Examples .....................................58
9.4. Parameter Usage outside of Offer/Answer ...................60
10. IANA Considerations ...........................................60
11. Security Considerations .......................................60
12. References ....................................................61
12.1. Normative References .....................................61
12.2. Informative References ...................................61
13. Basics of the 3GP File Structure ..............................64
14. Acknowledgements ..............................................65
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
1. Introduction
3GPP timed text is a media format for time-lined, decorated text
specified in the 3GPP Technical Specification TS 26.245, "Transparent
end-to-end packet switched streaming service (PSS); Timed Text Format
(Release 6)" [1]. Besides plain text, the 3GPP timed text format
allows the creation of decorated text such as that for karaoke
applications, scrolling text for newscasts, or hyperlinked text.
These contents may or may not be synchronized with other media, such
as audio or video.
The purpose of this document is to provide a means to stream 3GPP
timed text contents using RTP [3]. This includes the streaming of
timed text being read out of a (3GP) file, as well as the streaming
of timed text generated in real-time, a.k.a. live streaming.
Section 2 contains the motivation for this document, an overview of
the media format, the requirements, and the design rationale.
Section 3 defines the terminology used. Section 4 specifies the
payload headers, the fragmentation and re-assembly rules for text
samples, the rules for payload aggregation, and the relations of this
document to RFC 3640 [12] and RFC 2793 [22]. Section 5 specifies
some simple schemes for resilient transport and gives pointers to
other possible mechanisms. Section 6 addresses congestion control.
Section 7 specifies scene description. Section 8 defines the media
type. Section 9 specifies SDP for unicast and multicast sessions,
including usage in the Offer/Answer model [13]. Sections 10 and 11
address IANA and security considerations. Section 12 lists
references. Basics of the 3GP File Structure are in Section 13.
2. Motivation, Requirements, and Design Rationale
2.1. Motivation
The 3GPP timed text format was developed for use in the services
specified in the 3GPP Transparent End-to-end Packet-switched
Streaming Services (3GPP PSS) specification [16].
As of today, PSS allows downloading 3GPP timed text contents stored
in 3GP files. However, due to the lack of a RTP payload format, it
is not possible to stream 3GPP timed text contents over RTP.
This document specifies such a payload format.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
2.2. Basic Components of the 3GPP Timed Text Media Format
Before going into the details of the design, it is necessary to know
how the media format is constructed. We can identify four
differentiated functional components: layout information, default
formatting, text strings, and decoration. In the following, we
shortly explain these and match them to their designations in a 3GP
file:
o Initial spatial layout information related to the text
strings: These are the height and width of the text region
where text is displayed, the position of the text region in
the display, and the layer or proximity of the text to the
user. In 3GP files, this information is contained in the
Track Header Box (3GP file designations are capitalized for
clarity).
o Default settings for formatting and positioning of text: style
(font, size, color,...), background color, horizontal and
vertical justification, line width, scrolling, etc. For 3GP
files, this corresponds to the Sample Descriptions.
o The actual text strings: encoded characters using either UTF-8
[18] or UTF-16 [19] encoding.
o The decoration: If some characters have different style,
delay, blink, etc., this needs to be indicated. The
decoration is only present in the text samples if it is
actually needed. Otherwise, the default settings as above
apply. In 3GP files, within each Text Sample, the decoration
(i.e., Modifier Boxes) is appended to the text strings, if
needed. At the time of writing this payload format, the
following modifiers are specified in the 3GPP timed text media
format specification [1]:
- text highlight
- highlight color
- blinking text
- karaoke feature
- hyperlink
- text delay
- text style
- positioning of the text box
- text wrap indication
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
2.3. Requirements
Once the basic components are known, it is necessary to define which
requirements the payload format shall fulfill:
1. It shall enable both live streaming and streaming from a 3GP
file.
Informative note: For the purpose of this document, the
term "live streaming" refers to those scenarios where
the timed text stream is sent from a live encoder. Upon
reception, the content may or may not be stored in a 3GP
file. Typically, in live streaming applications, the
sender encapsulates the timed text content in RTP
packets following the guidelines given in this document.
At the receiving side, a buffer is used to cancel the
network delay and delay jitter. If receiver and sender
support packet loss resilience mechanisms (see Section
5), it may also be possible to recover from packet
losses. Note that how sender and receiver actually
manage and dimension the buffers is an implementation
design choice.
2. Furthermore, it shall be possible for an RTP receiver using this
payload format, and capable of storing in 3GP format, to obtain
all necessary information from the RTP packets for storing the
received text contents according to the 3GP file format. This
file may or may not be the same as the original file.
Informative note: The 3GP file format itself is based on
the ISO Base Media File Format recommendation [2].
Section 13.1 gives some insight into the 3GP file
structure. Further, Sections 4.3 and 7.3 specify where
the information needed for filling in payload headers is
found in a 3GP file. For live streaming, appropriate
values complying with the format and units described in
[1] shall be used. Where needed, clarifications on
appropriate values are given in this document.
3. It shall enable efficient and resilient transport of timed text
contents over RTP. In particular:
a. Enable the transmission of the sample descriptions by both
out-of-band and in-band means. Sample descriptions are
important information, which potentially apply to several
text samples. These default formatting settings are
typically transmitted out-of-band (reliably) once at the
initialization phase. If additional sample descriptions
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
are needed in the course of a session, these may also be
sent out-of-band or in-band. In-band transmission,
although unreliable, may be more appropriate for sending
sample descriptions if these should be sent frequently, as
opposed to establishing an additional communication channel
for SDP, for example. It is also useful in cases where an
out-of-band channel may not be available and for live
streaming, where contents are not known a priori. Thus,
the payload format shall enable out-of-band and in-band
transmission of sample descriptions. Section 4.1.6
specifies a payload header for transmitting sample
descriptions in-band. Section 9 specifies how sample
descriptions are mapped to SDP.
b. Enable the fragmentation of a text sample into several RTP
packets in order to cover a wide range of applications and
network environments. In general, fragmentation should be
a rare event, given the low bit rates and relatively small
text sample sizes. However, the 3GPP Timed Text media
format does allow for larger text samples. Therefore, the
payload format shall take this into account and provide a
means for coping with fragmentation and reassembly. Section
4.4 deals with fragmentation.
c. Enable the aggregation of units into an RTP packet for
making the transport more efficient. In a mobile
communication environment, a typical text sample size is
around 100-200 bytes. If the available bit rate and the
packet size allow it, units should be aggregated into one
RTP packet. Section 4.6 deals with aggregation.
d. Enable the use of resilient transport mechanisms, such as
repetition, retransmission [11], and FEC [7] (see Section
5). For a more general discussion, refer to RFC 2354 [8],
which discusses available mechanisms for stream repair.
2.4. Limitations
The payload headers have been optimized in size for RTP. Instead
of using 32-bit (S)LEN, SDUR, and SIDX header fields, which would
carry many unused bits much of the time, it has been a design
choice to reduce the size of these fields. As a consequence, this
payload format has reduced maximum values with respect to sizes and
durations of (text) samples and sample descriptions. These maximum
values differ from those allowed in 3GP files, where they are
expressed using 32-bit (unsigned) integers. In some cases,
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
extension mechanisms are provided to deal with larger values.
However, it is noted that the values used here should be enough for
the streaming applications targeted.
The following limitations apply:
1. The maximum size of text samples carried in RTP packets is
restricted to be a 16-bit (unsigned) integer (this includes the
text strings and modifiers). This means a maximum size for the
unit would be about 64 Kbytes. No extension mechanism is
provided.
2. The sample description index values are restricted to be an 8-
bit (unsigned) integer. An extension mechanism is given in
Section 4.3.
3. The text sample duration is restricted to be a 24-bit (unsigned)
integer. This yields a maximum duration at a timestamp
clockrate of 1000 Hz of about 4.6 hours. Nevertheless, an
extension mechanism is provided in Section 4.3.
4. Sample descriptions are also restricted in size: If the size
cannot be expressed as a 16-bit (unsigned) integer, the sample
description shall not be conveyed. As in the case of the sample
size, no extension mechanism is provided.
5. A further limitation concerns the UTF-16 encodings supported:
Only transport of text strings following big endian byte order
is supported. See Section 4.1.1 for details.
2.5. Design Rationale
The following design choices were made:
1. 'Unit' approach: The payload formats specified in this document
follow a simple scheme: a 3-byte common header (Common Payload
Header) followed by a specific header for each text sample
(fragment) type. Following these headers, the text sample
contents are placed (Section 4.1.1 and following). This
structure is called a 'unit'.
The following units have been devised to comply with the
requirements mentioned in Section 2.3:
a. A TYPE 1 unit that contains one complete text sample,
b. A TYPE 2 unit that contains a complete text string or a
fragment thereof,
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
c. A TYPE 3 unit that contains the complete modifiers or only
the first fragment thereof,
d. A TYPE 4 unit that contains one modifier fragment other
than the first, and
e. A TYPE 5 unit that contains one sample description.
This 'unit' approach was motivated by the following reasons:
1. Allows a simple classification of the text samples and
text sample fragments that can be conveyed by the
payload format.
2. Enables easy interoperability with RFC 3640 [12].
During the development of this payload format, interest
was shown from MPEG-4 standardization participants in
developing a common payload structure for the transport
of 3GPP Timed Text. While interoperability is not
strictly necessary for this payload format to work, it
has been pursued in this payload format. Section 4.8
explains how this is done.
2. Character count is not implemented. This payload format does
detect lost text samples fragments, but it does not enable an
RTP receiver to find out the exact number of text characters
lost. In fact, the fragment size included in the payload
headers does not help in finding the number of lost characters
because the UTF-8/UTF-16 [18][19] encodings used yield a
variable number of bytes per character.
For finding the exact number of lost characters, an additional
field reflecting the character count (and possibly the character
offset) upon fragmentation would be required. This would
additionally require that the entity performing fragmentation
count the characters included in each text fragment.
One benefit of having a character count would be that the
display application would be able to replace missing characters
through some other character representing character loss. For
example:
If we take the "Some text is lost now" and assume the loss
of a packet containing the text in the middle, this could
be displayed (with a character count):
"Some ############now"
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
As opposed to:
"Some #now"
which is what this payload format enables ("#" indicates a
missing character or packet, respectively).
However, it is the consensus of the working group that for
applications such as subtitling applications and multimedia
presentations that use this payload format, such partial error
correction is not worth the cost of including two additional
fields; namely, character count and character offset. Instead,
it is recommended that some more overhead be invested to provide
full error correction by protecting the less text sample
fragments using the measures outlined in Section 5.
3. Fragment re-assembly: In order to re-assemble the text samples,
offset information is needed. Instead of a character or byte
offset, a single byte, TOTAL/THIS, is used. These two values
indicate the total number and current index of fragments of a
text sample. This is simpler than having a character offset
field in each fragment. Details in Section 4.1.3.
4. A length field, LEN, is present in the common header fields.
While the length in the RTP payload format is not needed by most
RTP applications (typically lower layers, like UDP, provide this
information), it does ease interoperability with RFC 3640. This
is because the Access Units (AUs) used for carriage of data in
RFC 3640 must include a length indication. Details are in
Section 4.8.
5. The header fields in the specific payload headers (TYPE headers
in Sections 4.1.2 to 4.1.6) have been arranged for easy
processing on 32-bit machines. For this reason, the fields SIDX
and SDUR are swapped in TYPE 1 unit, compared to the other
units.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
3. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [5].
Furthermore, the following terms are used and have specific meaning
within the context of this document:
text sample or whole text sample
In the 3GPP Timed Text media format [1], these terms refer to a
unit of timed text data as contained in the source (3GP) file.
This includes the text string byte count, possibly a Byte Order
Mark, the text string and any modifiers that may follow. Its
equivalent in audio/video would be a frame.
In this document, however, a text sample contains only text
strings followed by zero or more modifiers. This definition of
text sample excludes the 16-bit text string byte count and the
16-bit Byte Order Mark (BOM) present in 3GP file text samples
(see Section 4.3 and Figure 9). The 16-bit BOM is not
transported in RTP, as explained in Section 4.1.1.
text strings
The actual text characters encoded either as UTF-8 or UTF-16.
When using this payload format, the text string does not contain
any byte order mark (BOM). See Figure 9 for details.
fragment or text sample fragment
A fraction of a text sample. A fragment may contain either text
strings or modifier (decoration) contents, but not both at the
same time.
sample contents
General term to identify timed text data transported when using
this payload format. Sample contents may be one or several text
samples, sample descriptions, and sample fragments (note that,
as per Section 4.6, there is only one case in which more than
one fragment may be included in a payload).
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
decoration or modifiers
These terms are used interchangeably throughout the document to
denote the contents of the text sample that modify the default
text formatting. Modifiers may, for example, specify different
font size for a particular sequence of characters or define
karaoke timing for the sample.
sample description
Information that is potentially shared by more than one text
sample. In a 3GP file, a sample description is stored in a
place where it can be shared. It contains setup and default
information such as scrolling direction, text box position,
delay value, default font, background color, etc.
units or transport units
The payload headers specified in this document encapsulate text
samples, fragments thereof, and sample descriptions by placing a
common header and specific payload header (Sections 4.1.1 to
4.1.6) before them, thus building what is here called a
(transport) unit.
aggregation or aggregate packet
The payload of an aggregate (RTP) packet consists of several
(transport) units.
track or stream
3GP files contain audio/video and text tracks. This document
enables streaming of text tracks using RTP. Therefore, these
terms are used interchangeably in this document in the context
of 3GP files.
Media Header Box / Track Header Box / ...
The 3GP file format makes use of these structures defined in the
ISO Base File Format [2]. When referring to these in this
document, initials are capitalized for clarity.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
4. RTP Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text
The format of an RTP packet containing 3GPP timed text is shown
below:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| timestamp |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
/+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |U| R | TYPE| LEN | :
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ :
U| : (variable header fields depending on TYPE :
N| : :
I< +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
T| | |
| : SAMPLE CONTENTS :
| | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| | |
\+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1. 3GPP Timed Text RTP Packet Format
Marker bit (M): The marker bit SHALL be set to 1 if the RTP packet
includes one or more whole text samples or the last fragment of a
text sample; otherwise, it is set to zero (0).
Timestamp: The timestamp MUST indicate the sampling instant of the
earliest (or only) unit contained in the RTP packet. The initial
value SHOULD be randomly determined, as specified in RTP [3].
The timestamp value should provide enough timing resolution for
expressing the duration of text samples, for synchronizing text
with other media, and for performing RTP Control Protocol (RTCP)
measurements such as the interarrival delay jitter or the RTCP
Packet Receipt Times Report Block (Section 4.3 of RFC 3611
[20]). This is compliant to RTP, Section 5.1:
"The resolution of the clock MUST be sufficient for the
desired synchronization accuracy and for measuring packet
arrival jitter (one tick per video frame is typically not
sufficient)".
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
The above observation applies to both timed text tracks included
in a 3GP file and live streaming sessions. In the case of a 3GP
timed text track, the timestamp clockrate is the value of the
"timescale" parameter in the Media Header Box for that text
track. Each track in a 3GP file MAY have its own clockrate as
specified in the Media Header Box. Likewise, live streaming
applications SHALL use an appropriate timestamp clockrate. A
default value of 1000 Hz is RECOMMENDED. Other timestamp
clockrates MAY be used. In this case, the typical behavior here
is to match the 3GPP timed text clockrate to that used by an
associated audio or video stream.
In an aggregate payload, units MUST be placed in play-out order,
i.e., earliest first in the payload. If TYPE 1 units are
aggregated, the timestamp of the subsequent units MUST be
obtained by adding the timed text sample duration of previous
samples to the RTP timestamp value. There are two exceptions to
this rule: TYPE 5 units and an aggregate payload containing two
fragments of the same text sample. The details of the timestamp
calculation are given in Section 4.6.
Finally, timestamp clockrates MUST be signaled by out-of-band
means at session setup, e.g., using the media type "rate"
parameter in SDP. See Section 9 for details.
Payload Type (PT): The payload type is set dynamically and sent by
out-of-band means.
The usage of the remaining RTP header fields (namely, V, P, X, CC, SN
and SSRC) follows the rules of RTP and the profile in use.
4.1. Payload Header Definitions
The (transport) units specified in this document consist of a set of
common fields (U, R, TYPE, LEN), followed by specific header fields
(TYPES 1-5) and text sample contents. See Figure 1 and Figure 2.
In Figure 2, two example RTP packets are depicted. The first
contains an aggregate RTP payload with two complete text samples, and
the second contains one text sample fragment. After each unit header
is explained, detailed payload examples follow in Section 4.7.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
+----------------------+
| |
| RTP Header |
| |
---------+----------------------+
| | |
| |COMMON + TYPE 1 Header|
| ........................
UNIT 1 - | |
| | Text Sample |
| | |
|-------\........................
-------/| |
| |COMMON + TYPE 1 Header|
| ........................
UNIT 2 - | |
| | Text Sample |
| | |
| | |
---------+----------------------+
+----------------------+
| |
| RTP Header |
| |
---------+----------------------+
| | COMMON + TYPE 2 |
| | (or 3 or 4) Hdr |
| ........................
UNIT 3 - | |
| | Text Sample Fragment |
| | |
| | |
---------+----------------------+
Figure 2. Example RTP packets
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
4.1.1. Common Payload Header Fields
The fields common to all payload headers have the following format:
0 1 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE | LEN |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3. Common payload header fields
Where:
o U (1 bit) "UTF Transformation flag": This is used to inform RTP
receivers whether UTF-8 (U=0) or UTF-16 (U=1) was used to encode
the text string. UTF-16 text strings transported by this payload
format MUST be serialized in big endian order, a.k.a. network byte
order.
Informative note: Timed text clients complying with the 3GPP
Timed Text format [1] are only required to understand the big
endian serialization. Thus, in order to ease interoperability,
the reverse serialization (little endian) is not supported by
this payload format.
For the payload formats defined in this document, the U bit is only
used in TYPE 1 and TYPE 2 headers. Senders MUST set the U bit to
zero in TYPE 3, TYPE 4, and TYPE 5 headers. Consequently,
receivers MUST ignore the U bit in TYPE 3, TYPE 4, and TYPE 5
headers.
o R (4 bits) "Reserved bits": for future extensions. This field MUST
be set to zero (0x0) and MUST be ignored by receivers.
o TYPE (3 bits) "Type Field": This field specifies which specific
header fields follow. The following TYPE values are defined:
- TYPE 1, for a whole text sample.
- TYPE 2, for a text string fragment (without modifiers).
- TYPE 3, for a whole modifier box or the first fragment of a
modifier box.
- TYPE 4, for a modifier fragment other than first.
- TYPE 5, for a sample description. Exactly one header per
sample description.
- TYPE 0, 6, and 7 are reserved for future extensions. Note
that future extensions are possible, e.g., a unit that
explicitly signals the number of characters present in a
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
fragment (see Section 2.5). In order to guarantee backwards-
compatibility, it SHALL be possible that older clients ignore
(newer) units they do not understand, without invalidating the
timestamp calculation mechanisms or otherwise preventing them
from decoding the other units.
o Finally, the LEN (16 bits) "Length Field": indicates the size (in
bytes) of this header field and all the fields following, i.e., the
LEN field followed by the unit payload: text strings and modifiers
(if any). This definition only excludes the initial U/R/TYPE byte
of the common header. The LEN field follows network byte order.
The way in which LEN is obtained when streaming out of a 3GP file
depends on the particular unit type. This is explained for each
unit in the sections below.
For live streaming, both sample length and the LEN value for the
current fragment MUST be calculated during the sampling process or
during fragmentation.
In general, LEN may take the following values:
- TYPE = 1, LEN >= 8
- TYPE = 2, LEN > 9
- TYPE = 3, LEN > 6
- TYPE = 4, LEN > 6
- TYPE = 5, LEN > 3
Receivers MUST discard units that do not comply with these values.
However, the RTP header fields and the rest of the units in the
payload (if any) are still useful, as guaranteed by the requirement
for future extensions above.
In the following subsections the different payload headers for the
values of TYPE are specified.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
4.1.2. TYPE 1 Header
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE | LEN (always >=8) | SIDX |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR | TLEN |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TLEN |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4. TYPE 1 Header Format
This header type is used to transport whole text samples. This unit
should be the most common case, i.e., the text sample should usually
be small enough to be transported in one unit without having to
separate text strings from modifiers. In an aggregate (RTP packet)
payload containing several text samples, every sample is preceded by
its own TYPE 1 header (see Figure 12).
Informative note: As indicated in Section 3, "Terminology", a
text sample is composed of the text strings followed by the
modifiers (if any). This is also how text samples are stored in
3GP files. The separation of a text sample into text strings
and modifiers is only needed for large samples (or small
available IP MTU sizes; see Section 4.4), and it is accomplished
with TYPE 2 and TYPE 3 headers, as explained in the sections
below.
Note also that empty text samples are considered whole text samples,
although they do not contain sample contents. Empty text samples may
be used to clear the display or to put an end to samples of unknown
duration, for example. Units without sample contents SHALL have a
LEN field value of 8 (0x0008).
The fields above have the following meaning:
o U, R, and TYPE, as defined in Section 4.1.1.
o LEN, in this case, represents the length of the (complete) text
sample plus eight (8) bytes of headers. For finding the length of
the text sample in the Sample Size Box of 3GP files, see Section
4.3.
o SIDX (8 bits) "Text Sample Entry Index": This is an index used to
identify the sample descriptions.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
The SIDX field is used to find the sample description corresponding
to the unit's payload. There are two types of SIDX values: static
and dynamic.
Static SIDX values are used to identify sample descriptions that
MUST be sent out-of-band and MUST remain active during the whole
session. A static SIDX value is unequivocally linked to one
particular sample description during the whole session. Carrying
many sample descriptions out-of-band SHOULD be avoided, since these
may become large and, ultimately, transport is not the goal of the
out-of-band channel. Thus, this feature is RECOMMENDED for
transporting those sample descriptions that provide a set of
minimum default format settings. Static SIDX values MUST fall in
the (closed) interval [129,254].
Dynamic SIDX values are used for sample descriptions sent in-band.
Sample descriptions MAY be sent in-band for several reasons:
because they are generated in real time, for transport resiliency,
or both. A dynamic SIDX value is unequivocally linked to one
particular sample description during the period in which this is
active in the session, and it SHALL NOT be modified during that
period. This period MAY be smaller than or equal to the session
duration. This period is not known a priori. A maximum of 64
dynamic simultaneously active SIDX values is allowed at any moment.
Dynamic SIDX values MUST fall in the closed interval [0,127]. This
should be enough for both recorded content and live streaming
applications. Nevertheless, a wraparound mechanism is provided in
Section 4.2.1 to handle streaming sessions where more than 64 SIDX
values might be needed. Servers MAY make use of dynamic sample
descriptions. Clients MUST be able to receive and interpret
dynamic sample descriptions.
Finally, SIDX values 128 and 255 are reserved for future use.
o SDUR (24 bits) "Text Sample Duration": indicates the sample
duration in RTP timestamp units of the text sample. For this
field, a length of 3 bytes is preferred to 2 bytes. This is
because, for a typical clockrate of 1000 Hz, 16 bits would allow
for a maximum duration of just 65 seconds, which might be too short
for some streams. On the other hand, 24 bits at 1000 Hz allow for
a maximum duration of about 4.6 hours, while for 90 KHz, this value
is about 3 minutes. These values should be enough for streaming
applications. However, if a larger duration is needed, the
extension mechanism specified in Section 4.3 SHALL be used.
Apart from defining the time period during which the text is
displayed, the duration field is also used to find the timestamp of
subsequent units within the aggregate RTP packet payload (if any).
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
This is explained in Section 4.6.
Text samples have generally a known duration at the time of
transmission. However, in some cases such as live streaming, the
time for which a text piece shall be presented might not be known a
priori. Thus, the value zero SDUR=0 (0x000000) is reserved to
signal unknown duration. The amount of time that a sample of
unknown duration is presented is determined by the timestamp of the
next sample that shall be displayed at the receiver: Text samples
of unknown duration SHALL be displayed until the next text sample
becomes active, as indicated by its timestamp.
The next example illustrates how units of unknown duration MUST be
presented. If no text sample following is available, it is an
implementation issue what should be displayed. For example, a
server could send an empty sample to clear the text box.
Example: Imagine you are in an airport watching the latest news
report while you wait for your plane. Airports are loud, so the
news report is transcribed in the lower area of the screen.
This area displays two lines of text: the headlines and the
words spoken by the news speaker. As usual, the headlines are
shown for a longer time than the rest. This time is, in
principle, unknown to the stream server, which is streaming
live. A headline is just replaced when the next headline is
received.
However, upon storing a text sample with SDUR=0 in a 3GP file, the
SDUR value MUST be changed to the effective duration of the text
sample, which MUST be always greater than zero (note that the ISO
file format [2] explicitly forbids a sample duration of zero). The
effective duration MUST be calculated as the timestamp difference
between the current sample (with unknown duration) and the next
text sample that is displayed.
Note that samples of unknown duration SHALL NOT use features, which
require knowledge of the duration of the sample up front. Such
features are scrolling and karaoke in [1]. This also applies for
future extensions of the Timed Text format. Furthermore, only
sample descriptions (TYPE 5 units) MAY follow units of unknown
duration in the same aggregate payload. Otherwise, it would not be
possible to calculate the timestamp of these other units.
For text contents stored in 3GP files, see Section 4.3 for details
on how to extract the duration value. For live streaming, live
encoders SHALL assign appropriate values and units according to [1]
and later releases.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
o TLEN (16 bits), "Text String Length", is a byte count of the text
string. The decoder needs the text string length in order to know
where the modifiers in the payload start. TLEN is not present in
text string fragments (TYPE 2) since it can be deductively
calculated from the LEN values of each fragment.
The TLEN value is obtained from the text samples as contained in
3GP files. Refer to Section 4.3. For live content, the TLEN MUST
be obtained during the sampling process.
o Finally, the actual text sample is placed after the TLEN field. As
defined in Section 3, a text sample consists of a string of
characters encoded using either UTF-8 or UTF-16, followed by zero
or more modifiers. Note also that no BOM and no byte count are
included in the strings carried in the payload (as opposed to text
samples stored in 3GP files [1]).
4.1.3. TYPE 2 Header
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE | LEN( always >9) | TOTAL | THIS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR | SIDX |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SLEN |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 5. TYPE 2 Header Format
This header type is used to transport either a whole text string or a
fragment of it. TYPE 2 units SHALL NOT contain modifiers. In
detail:
o U, R, and TYPE, as defined in Section 4.1.1.
o SIDX and SDUR, as defined in Section 4.1.2.
Note that the U, SIDX, and SDUR fields are meaningful since
partial text strings can also be displayed.
o The LEN field (16 bits) indicates the length of the text string
fragment plus nine (9) bytes of headers. Its value is calculated
upon fragmentation. LEN MUST always be greater than nine (0x0009).
Otherwise, the unit MUST be discarded.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
According to the guidelines in Section 4.4, text strings MUST be
split at character boundaries for allowing the display of text
fragments. Therefore, a text fragment MUST contain at least one
character in either UTF-8 or UTF-16. Actually, this is just a
formalism since by observing the guidelines, much larger fragments
should be created.
Note also that TYPE 2 units do not contain an explicit text string
length, TLEN (see TYPE 1). This is because TYPE 2 units do not
contain any modifiers after the text string. If needed, the length
of the received string can be obtained using the LEN values of the
TYPE 2 units.
o The SLEN field (16 bits) indicates the size (in bytes) of the
original (whole) text sample to which this fragment belongs. This
length comprises the text string plus any modifier boxes present
(and includes neither the byte order mark nor the text string
length as mentioned in Section 3, "Terminology").
Regarding the text sample length: Timed text samples are not
generated at regular intervals, nor is there a default sample size.
If 3GP files are streamed, the length of the text samples is
calculated beforehand and included in the track itself, while for
live encoding it is the real time encoder that SHALL choose an
appropriate size for each text sample. In this case, the amount of
text 'captured' in a sample depends on the text source and the
particular application (see examples below). Samples may, e.g., be
tailored to match the packet MTU as closely as possible or to
provide a given redundancy for the available bit rate. The
encoding application MUST also take into account the delay
constraints of the real-time session and assess whether FEC,
retransmission, or other similar techniques are reasonable options
for stream repair.
The following examples shall illustrate how a real-time encoder may
choose its settings to adapt to the scenario constraints.
Example: Imagine a newscast scenario, where the spoken news is
transcribed and synchronized with the image and voice of the
reporter. We assume that the news speaker talks at an average
speed of 5 words per second with an average word length of 5
characters plus one space per word, i.e., 30 characters per
second. We assume an available IP MTU of 576 bytes and an
available bitrate of 576*8 bits per second = 4.6 Kbps. We
assume each character can be encoded using 2 bytes in UTF-16.
In this scenario, several constraints may apply; for example:
available IP MTU, available bandwidth, allowable delay, and
required redundancy. If the target were to minimize the
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
packet overhead, a text sample covering 8 seconds of text
would be closest to the IP MTU:
IP/UDP/RTP/TYPE1 Header + (8-second text sample)
= 20 + 8 + 12 + 8 + (~6 chars/word * 5 word/s * 8 s * 2 chars/word)
= 528 bytes < 576 bytes
For other scenarios, like lossy networks, it may happen that just
one packet per sample is too low a redundancy. In this case, a
choice could be that the encoder 'collects' text every second, thus
yielding text samples (TYPE 1 units) of 68 bytes, TYPE 1 header
included. We can, e.g., include three contiguous text samples in
one RTP payload: the current and last two text samples (see below).
This accounts to a total IP packet size of 20 + 8 + 12 + 3*(8 + 60)
= 244 bytes. Now, with the same available bitrate of 4.6 Kbps,
these 244-byte packets can be sent redundantly up two times per
second:
RTP payload (1,2,3)(1,2,3) (2,3,4)(2,3,4) (3,4,5)(3,4,5) ...
Time: <----1s------> <----1s------> <-----1s-----> ...
This means that each text sample is sent at least six times,
which should provide enough redundancy. Although not as
bandwidth efficient (488*8 < 528*8 < 576*8 bps) as the
previous packetization, this option increases the stream
redundancy while still meeting the delay and bandwidth
constraints.
Another example would be a user sending timed text from a
type-in area in the display. In this case, the text sample is
created as soon as the user clicks the 'send' button.
Depending on the packet length, fragmentation may be needed.
In a video conferencing application, text is synchronized with
audio and video. Thus, the text samples shall be displayed
long enough to be read by a human, shall fit in the video
screen, and shall 'capture' the audio contents rendered during
the time the corresponding video and audio is rendered.
For stored content, see Section 4.3 for details on how to find the
SLEN value in a 3GP file. For live content, the SLEN MUST be
obtained during the sampling process.
Finally, note that clients MAY use SLEN to buffer space for the
remaining fragments of a text sample.
o The fields TOTAL (4 bits) and THIS (4 bits) indicate the total
number of fragments in which the original text sample (i.e., the
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
text string and its modifiers) has been fragmented and which order
occupies the current fragment in that sequence, respectively. Note
that the sequence number alone cannot replace the functionality of
the THIS field, since packets (and fragments) may be repeated,
e.g., as in repeated transmission (see Section 5). Thus, an
indication for "fragment offset" is needed.
The usual "byte offset" field is not used here for two reasons: a)
it would take one more byte and b) it does not provide any
information on the character offset. UTF-8/UTF-16 text strings
have, in general, a variable character length ranging from 1 to 6
bytes. Therefore, the TOTAL/THIS solution is preferred. It could
also be argued that the LEN and SLEN fields be used for this
purpose, but while they would provide information about the
completeness of the text sample, they do not specify the order of
the fragments.
In all cases (TYPEs 2, 3 and 4), if the value of THIS is greater
than TOTAL or if TOTAL equals zero (0x0), the fragment SHALL be
discarded.
o Finally, the sample contents following the SLEN field consist of a
fragment of the UTF-8/UTF-16 character string; no modifiers follow.
4.1.4. TYPE 3 Header
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE | LEN( always >6) |TOTAL | THIS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 6. TYPE 3 Header Format
This header type is used to transport either the entire modifier
contents present in a text sample or just the first fragment of them.
This depends on whether the modifier boxes fit in the current RTP
payload.
If a text sample containing modifiers is fragmented, this header MUST
be used to transport the first fragment or, if possible, the complete
modifiers.
In detail:
o The U, R, and TYPE fields are defined as in Section 4.1.1.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
o LEN indicates the length of the modifier contents. Its value is
obtained upon fragmentation. Additionally, the LEN field MUST be
greater than six (0x0006). Otherwise, the unit MUST be discarded.
o The TOTAL/THIS field has the same meaning as for TYPE 2.
For TYPE 3 units containing the last (trailing) modifier fragment,
the value of TOTAL MUST be equal to that of THIS (TOTAL=THIS). In
addition, TOTAL=THIS MUST be greater than one, because the total
number of fragments of a text sample is logically always larger
than one.
Otherwise, if TOTAL is different from THIS in a TYPE 3 unit, this
means that the unit contains the first fragment of the modifiers.
o The SDUR has the same definition for TYPE 1. Since the fragments
are always transported in own RTP packets, this field is only
needed to know how long this fragment is valid. This may, e.g., be
used to determine how long it should be kept in the display buffer.
Note that the SLEN and SIDX fields are not present in TYPE 3 unit
headers. This is because a) these fragments do not contain text
strings and b) these types of fragments are applied over text string
fragments, which already contain this information.
4.1.5. TYPE 4 Header
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE | LEN( always >6) |TOTAL | THIS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 7. TYPE 4 Header Format
This header type is placed before modifier fragments, other than the
first one.
The U, R, and TYPE fields are used as per Section 4.1.1.
LEN indicates as for TYPE 3 the length of the modifier contents and
SHALL also be obtained upon fragmentation. The LEN field MUST be
greater than six (0x0006). Otherwise, the unit MUST be discarded.
TOTAL/THIS is used as in TYPE 2.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
The SDUR field is defined as in TYPE 1. The reasoning behind the
absence of SLEN and SIDX is the same as in TYPE 3 units.
4.1.6. TYPE 5 Header
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE | LEN( always >3) | SIDX |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 8. TYPE 5 Header Format
This header type is used to transport (dynamic) sample descriptions.
Every sample description MUST have its own TYPE 5 header.
The U, R, and TYPE fields are used as per Section 4.1.1.
The LEN field indicates the length of the sample description, plus
three units accounting for the SIDX and LEN field itself. Thus, this
field MUST be greater than three (0x0003). Otherwise, the unit MUST
be discarded.
If the sample is streamed from a 3GP file, the length of the sample
description contents (i.e., what comes after SIDX in the unit itself)
is obtained from the file (see Section 4.3).
The SIDX field contains a dynamic SIDX value assigned to the sample
description carried as sample content of this unit. As only dynamic
sample descriptions are carried using TYPE 5, the possible SIDX
values are in the (closed) interval [0,127].
Senders MAY make use of TYPE 5 units. All receivers MUST implement
support for TYPE 5 units, since it adds minimum complexity and may
increase the robustness of the streaming session.
The next section specifies how SIDX values are calculated.
4.2. Buffering of Sample Descriptions
The buffering of sample descriptions is a matter of the client's
timed text codec implementation. In order to work properly, this
payload format requires that:
o Static sample descriptions MUST be buffered at the client, at
least, for the duration of the session.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
o If dynamic sample descriptions are used, their buffering and
update of the SIDX values MUST follow the mechanism described in
the next section.
4.2.1. Dynamic SIDX Wraparound Mechanism
The use of dynamic sample descriptions by senders is OPTIONAL.
However, if they are used, senders MUST implement this mechanism.
Receivers MUST always implement it.
Dynamic SIDX values remain active either during the entire duration
of the session (if used just once) or in different intervals of it
(if used once or more).
Note: In the following, SIDX means dynamic SIDX.
For choosing the wraparound mechanism, the following rationale was
used: There are 128 dynamic SIDX values possible, [0..127]. If one
chooses to allow a maximum of 127 to be used as dynamic SIDXs, then
any reordered packet with a new sample description would make the
mechanism fail. For example, if the last packet received is SIDX=5,
then all 127 values except SIDX=6 would be "active". Now, if a
reordered packet arrives with a new description, SIDX=9, it will be
mistakenly discarded, because the SIDX=9 is, at that moment, marked
as "active" and active sample descriptions shall not be re-written.
Therefore, a "guard interval" is introduced. This guard interval
reduces the number of active SIDXs at any point in time to 64.
Although most timed text applications will probably need less than 64
sample descriptions during a session (in total), a wraparound
mechanism to handle the need for more is described here.
Thereby, a sliding window of 64 active SIDX values is used. Values
within the window are "active"; all others are marked "inactive". An
SIDX value becomes active if at least one sample description
identified by that SIDX has been received. Since sample descriptions
MAY be sent redundantly, it is possible that a client receives a
given SIDX several times. However, active sample descriptions SHALL
NOT be overwritten: The receiver SHALL ignore redundant sample
descriptions and it MUST use the already cached copy. The "guard
interval" of (64) inactive values ensures that the correct
association SIDX <-> sample description is always used.
Informative note: As for the "guard interval" value itself, 64
as 128/2 was considered simple enough while still meeting the
expected maximum number of sample descriptions. Besides that,
there's no other motivation for choosing 64 or a different
value.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
The following algorithm is used to buffer dynamic sample descriptions
and to maintain the dynamic SIDX values:
Let X be the last SIDX received that updated the range of active
sample descriptions. Let Y be a value within the allowed range for
dynamic SIDX: [0,127], and different from X. Let Z be the SIDX of
the last received sample description. Then:
1. Initialize all dynamic SIDX values as inactive. For stored
contents, read the sample description index in the Sample to
Chunk box ("stsc") for that sample. For live streaming, the
first value MAY be zero or any other value in the interval
above. Go to step 2.
2. First, in-band sample description with SIDX=Z is received and
stored; set X=Z. Go to step 3.
3. Any SIDX within the interval [X+1 modulo(128), X+64 modulo(128)]
is marked as inactive, and any corresponding sample description
is deleted. Any SIDX within the interval [X+65 modulo(128), X]
is set active. Go to step 4 (wait state).
4. Wait for next sample description. Once the client is
initialized, the interval of active SIDX values MUST change
whenever a sample description with an SIDX value in the inactive
set is received. That is, upon reception of a sample
description with SIDX=Z, do the following:
a. If Z is in the (closed) interval [X+1 modulo(128), X+64
modulo(128)] then set X=Z, store the sample description, and
go to step 3.
b. Else, Z must be in the interval [X+65 modulo(128), X], thus:
i. If SIDX=Z is not stored, then store the sample
description. Go to beginning of step 4 (wait state).
ii. Else, go to the beginning of step 4 (wait state).
Informative note: It is allowed that any value of SIDX=X be sent
in the interval [0,127]. For example, if [64..127] is the
current active set and SIDX=0 is sent, a new sample description
is defined (0) and an old one deleted (64); thus [65..127] and
[0] are active. Similarly, one could now send SIDX=64, thus
inverting the active and inactive sets.
Example:
If X=4, any SIDX in the interval [5,68] is inactive. Active
SIDX values are in the complementary interval [69,127] plus
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
[0,4]. For example, if the client receives a SIDX=6, then the
active interval is now different: [0,6] plus [71,127]. If the
received SIDX is in the current active interval, no change SHALL
be applied.
4.3. Finding Payload Header Values in 3GP Files
For the purpose of streaming timed text contents, some values in the
boxes contained in a 3GP file are mapped to fields of this payload
header. This section explains where to find those values.
Additionally, for the duration and sample description indexes,
extension mechanisms are provided. All senders MUST implement the
extension mechanisms described herein.
If the file is streamed out of a 3GP file, the following guidelines
SHALL be followed.
Note: All fields in the objects (boxes) of a 3GP file are found
in network byte order.
Information obtained from the Sample Table Box (stbl):
o Sample Descriptions and Sample Description length: The Sample
Description box (stsd, inside the stbl) contains the sample
descriptions. For timed text media, each element of stsd is a
timed text sample entry (type "tx3g").
The (unsigned) 32 bits of the "size" field in the stsd box
represent the length (in bytes) of the sample description, as
carried in TYPE 5 units. On the other hand, the LEN field of
TYPE 5 units is restricted to 16 bits. Therefore, if the
value of "size" is greater than (2^16-1-3)[bytes], then the
sample description SHALL NOT be streamed with this payload
format. There is no extension mechanism defined in this case,
since fragmentation of sample descriptions is not defined
(sample descriptions are typically up to some 200 bytes in
size). Note: The three (3) accounts for the TYPE 5 header
fields included in the LEN value.
o SDUR from the Decoding Time to Sample Box (stts). The
(unsigned) 32 bits of the "sample delta" field are used for
calculating SDUR. However, since the SDUR field is only 3
bytes long, text samples with duration values larger than
(2^24-1)/(timestamp clockrate)[seconds] cannot be streamed
directly. The solution is simple: Copies of the corresponding
text sample SHALL be sent. Thereby, the timestamp and
duration values SHALL be adjusted so that a continuous display
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
is guaranteed as if just one sample would have been sent.
That is, a sample with timestamp TS and duration SDUR can be
sent as two samples having timestamps TS1 and TS2 and
durations SDUR1 and SDUR2, such that TS1=TS, TS2=TS1+SDUR1,
and SDUR=SDUR1+SDUR2.
o Text sample length from the Sample Size Box (stsz). The
(unsigned) 32 bits of the "sample size" or "entry size" (one
of them, depending on whether the sample size is fixed or
variable) indicate the length (in bytes) of the 3GP text
sample. For obtaining the length of the (actual) streamed
text sample, the lengths of the text string byte count (2
bytes) and, in case of UTF-16 strings, the length the BOM
(also 2 bytes) SHALL be deducted. This is illustrated in
Figure 9.
Text Sample according to 3GPP TS 26.245
TEXT SAMPLE (length=stsz)
.--------------------------------------------------.
/ \
TEXT STRING (length=TBC)
.------------------------------------.
/ \
TBC BOM MODIFIERS
+---+---+----------------------------------+-----------+
||
|| TBC BOM -> TLEN field
|| +---+---+ U bit
||
\/
Text Sample according to this Payload Format
TEXT SAMPLE (length=SLEN w/o TBC,BOM)
.--------------------------------------------.
/ \
TEXT STRING (length=TLEN)
.--------------------------------.
/ \
TEXT STRING MODIFIERS
+----------------------------------+-----------+
KEY:
TBC = Text string Byte Count
BOM = Byte Order Mark
Figure 9. Text sample composition
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
Moreover, since the LEN field in TYPE 1 unit header is 16 bits
long, larger text sample sizes than (2^16-1-8) [bytes] SHALL
NOT be streamed. Also, in this case, no extension mechanism
is defined. This is because this maximum is considered enough
for the targeted streaming applications. (Note: The eight (8)
accounts for the TYPE 1 header fields included in the LEN
value).
o SIDX from the Sample to Chunk Box (stsc): The stsc Box is used
to find samples and their corresponding sample descriptions.
These are referenced by the "sample description index", a
32-bit (unsigned) integer. If possible, these indices may be
directly mapped to the SIDX field. However, there are several
cases where this may not be possible:
a) The total number of indices used is greater than
the number of indices available, i.e., if the static
sample descriptions are more than 127 or the dynamic ones
are more than 64.
b) The original SIDX value ranges do not fit in the
allowed ranges for static (129-254) or dynamic (0-127)
values.
Therefore, when assigning SIDX values to the sample
descriptions, the following guidelines are provided:
o Static sample descriptions can simply be assigned
consecutive values within the range 129-254 (closed
interval). This range should be well enough for static
sample descriptions.
o As for dynamic sample descriptions:
a) Streams that use less than 64 dynamic sample
descriptions SHOULD use consecutive values for SIDX
anywhere in the range 0-127 (closed interval).
b) For streams with more than 64 sample descriptions,
the SIDX values MUST be assigned in usage order, and if
any sample description shall be used after it has been
set inactive, it will need to be re-sent and assigned a
new SIDX value (according to the algorithm in Section
4.2.1).
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
Information obtained from the Media Data Box:
o Text strings, TLEN, U bit, and modifiers from the Media Data
Box (mdat). Text strings, 16-bit text string byte count, Byte
Order Mark (BOM, indicating UTF encoding), and modifier boxes
can be found here.
For TYPE 1 units, the value of TLEN is extracted from the text
string byte count that precedes the text string in the text
sample, as stored in the 3GP file. If UTF-16 encoding is
used, two (2) more bytes have to be deducted from this byte
count beforehand, in order to exclude the BOM. See Figure 9.
4.4. Fragmentation of Timed Text Samples
This section explains why text samples may have to be fragmented and
discusses some of the possible approaches to doing it. A solution is
proposed together with rules and recommendations for fragmenting and
transporting text samples.
3GPP Timed Text applications are expected to operate at low bitrates.
This fact, added to the small size of timed text samples (typically
one or two hundred bytes) makes fragmentation of text samples a rare
event. Samples should usually fit into the MTU size of the used
network path.
Nevertheless, some text strings (e.g., ending roll in a movie) and
some modifier boxes (i.e., for hyperlinks, for karaoke, or for
styles) may become large. This may also apply for future modifier
boxes. In such cases, the first option to consider is whether it is
possible to adjust the encoding (e.g., the size of sample) in such a
way that fragmentation is avoided. If it is, this is preferred to
fragmentation and SHOULD be done.
Otherwise, if this is not possible or other constraints prevent it,
fragmentation MAY be used, and the basic guidelines given in this
document MUST be followed:
o It is RECOMMENDED that text samples be fragmented as seldom as
possible, i.e., the least possible number of fragments is created
out of a text sample.
o If there is some bitrate and free space in the payload available,
sample descriptions (if at hand) SHOULD be aggregated.
o Text strings MUST split at character boundaries; see TYPE 2 header.
Otherwise, it is not possible to display the text contents of a
fragment if a previous fragment was lost. As a consequence, text
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
string fragmentation requires knowledge of the UTF-8/UTF-16
encoding formats to determine character boundaries.
o Unlike text strings, the modifier boxes are NOT REQUIRED to be
split at meaningful boundaries. However, it is RECOMMENDED that
this be done whenever possible. This decreases the effects of
packet loss. This payload format does not ensure that partially
received modifiers are applied to text strings. If only part of
the modifiers is received, it is an application issue how to deal
with these, i.e., whether or not to use them.
Informative note: Ensuring that partially received modifiers can
be applied to text strings in all cases (for all modifier types
and for all fragment loss constellations) would place additional
requirements on the payload format. In particular, this would
require that: a) senders understand the semantics of the
modifier boxes and b) specific fragment headers for each of the
modifier boxes are defined, in addition to the payload formats
defined below. Understanding the modifiers semantics means
knowing, e.g., where each modifier starts and ends, which text
fragments are affected, which modifiers may or may not be split,
or what the fields indicate. This is necessary to be able to
split the modifiers in such a way that each fragment can be
applied independently of previous packet losses. This would
require a more intelligent fragmentation entity and more complex
headers. Given the low probability of fragmentation and the
desire to keep the requirements low, it does not seem reasonable
to specify such modifier box specific headers.
o Modifier and text string fragments SHOULD be protected against
packet losses, i.e., using FEC [7], retransmission [11], repetition
(Section 5), or an equivalent technique. This minimizes the
effects of packet loss.
o An additional requirement when fragmenting text samples is that the
start of the modifiers MUST be indicated using the payload header
defined for that purpose, i.e., a TYPE 3 unit MUST be used (see
Section 4.1.4). This enables a receiver to detect the start of the
modifiers as long as there are not two or more consecutive packet
losses.
o Finally, sample descriptions SHALL NOT be fragmented because they
contain important information that may affect several text samples.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
4.5. Reassembling Text Samples at the Receiver
The payload headers defined in this document allow reassembling
fragmented text samples. For this purpose, the standard RTP
timestamp, the duration field (SDUR), and the fields TOTAL/THIS in
the payload headers are used.
Units that belong to the same text sample MUST have the same
timestamp. TYPE 5 units do not comply with this rule since they are
not part of any particular text sample.
The process for collecting the different fragments (units) of a text
sample is as follows:
1. Search for units having the same timestamp value, i.e., units
that belong to the same text sample or sample descriptions that
shall become available at that time instant. If several units
of the same sample are repeated, only one of them SHALL be used.
Repeated units are those that have the same timestamp and the
same values for TOTAL/THIS.
Note that, as mentioned in Section 4.1.1, the receiver
SHALL ignore units with unrecognized TYPE value.
However, the RTP header fields and the rest of the units
(if any) in the payload are still useful.
2. Check within this set whether any of the units from the text
sample is missing. This is done using the TOTAL and THIS
fields; the TOTAL field indicates how many fragments were
created out of the text sample, and the THIS field indicates the
position of this fragment in the text sample. As result of this
operation, two outcomes are possible:
a. No fragment is missing. Then, the THIS field SHALL be used
to order the fragments and reassemble the text sample
before forwarding it to the decoding application. Special
care SHALL be taken when reassembling the text string as
indicated in bullet 4 below.
b. One or more fragments are missing: Check whether this
fragment belongs to the text string or to the modifiers.
TYPE 2 units identify text string fragments, and TYPE 3 and
4 identify modifier fragments:
i. If the fragment or fragments missing belong to the text
string and the modifiers were received complete, then
the received text characters may, at least, be
displayed as plain text. Some modifiers may only be
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
applied as long as it is possible to identify the
character numbers, e.g., if only the last text string
fragment is lost. This is the case for modifiers
defining specific font styles ('styl'), highlighted
characters ('hlit'), karaoke feature ('krok'), and
blinking characters ('blnk'). Other modifiers such as
'dlay' or 'tbox' can be applied without the knowledge
of the character number. It is an application issue to
decide whether or not to apply the modifiers.
ii. If the fragment missing belongs to the modifiers and
the text strings were received complete, then the
incomplete modifiers may be used. The text string
SHOULD at least be displayed as plain text. As
mentioned in Section 4.4, modifiers may split without
observing meaningful boundaries. Hence, it may not
always be possible to make use of partially received
modifiers. However, to avoid this, it is RECOMMENDED
that the modifiers do split at meaningful boundaries.
iii. A third possibility is that it is not possible to
discern whether modifiers or text strings were received
complete. For example, if the TYPE 3 unit of a sample
plus the following or preceding packet is lost, there
is no way for the RTP receiver to know if one or both
packets lost belong to the modifiers or if there are
also some missing text strings. Repetition, FEC,
retransmission, or other protection mechanisms as per
section 4.6 are RECOMMENDED to avoid this situation.
iv. Finally, if it is sure that neither text strings nor
modifiers were received complete, then the text strings
and the modifiers may be rendered partially or may be
discarded. This is an application choice.
3. Sample descriptions can be directly associated with the
reassembled text samples, via the sample description index
(SIDX).
4. Reassembling of text strings: Since the text strings transported
in RTP packets MUST NOT include any byte order mark (BOM), the
receiver MUST prepend it to the reassembled UTF-16 string before
handling it to the timed text decoder (see Figure 9). The value
of the BOM is 0xFEFF because only big endian serialization of
UTF-16 strings is supported by this payload format.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
4.6. On Aggregate Payloads
Units SHOULD be aggregated to avoid overhead, whenever possible. The
aggregate payloads MUST comply with one of the following ordered
configurations:
1. Zero or more sample descriptions (TYPE 5) followed by zero or more
whole text samples (TYPE 1 units). At least one unit of either
type MUST be present.
2. Zero or more sample descriptions followed by zero or one modifier
fragment, either TYPE 3 or TYPE 4. At least one unit MUST be
present.
3. Zero or more sample descriptions, followed by zero or one text
string fragment (TYPE 2), followed by zero or one TYPE 3 unit. If
a TYPE 2 unit and a TYPE 3 unit are present, then they MUST belong
to the same text sample. At least one unit MUST be present.
Some observations:
o Different aggregates than the ones listed above SHALL NOT be used.
o Sample descriptions MUST be placed in the aggregate payload before
the occurrence of any non-TYPE 5 units.
o Correct reception of TYPE 5 units is important since their contents
may be referenced by several other units in the stream.
Receivers are unable to use text samples until their corresponding
sample descriptions are received. Accordingly, a sender SHOULD
send multiple copies of a sample description to ensure reliability
(see Section 5). Receivers MAY use payload-specific feedback
messages [21] to tell a sender that they have received a particular
sample description.
o Regarding timestamp calculation: In general, the rules for
calculating the timestamp of units in an aggregate payload depend
on the type of unit. Based on the possible constellations for
aggregate payloads, as above, we have:
o Sample descriptions MUST receive the RTP timestamp of the
packet in which they are included.
Note that for TYPE 5 units, the timestamp actually does not
represent the instant when they are played out, but instead
the instant at which they become available for use.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
o For the first configuration: The first TYPE 1 unit receives
the RTP timestamp. The timestamp of any subsequent TYPE 1
unit MUST be obtained by adding sample duration and
timestamp, both of the preceding TYPE 1 unit.
o For the second and third configuration, all units, TYPE 2,
3, and 4, MUST receive the RTP timestamp.
Refer to detailed examples on the timestamp calculation
below.
o As per configuration 3 above, a payload MAY contain several
fragments of one (and only one) text sample. If it does, then
exactly one TYPE 2 unit followed by exactly one TYPE 3 unit is
allowed in the same payload. This is in line with RFC 3640 [12],
Section 2.4, which explicitly disallows combining fragments of
different samples in the same RTP payload. Note that, in this
special case, no timestamp calculation is needed. That is, the RTP
timestamp of both units is equal to the timestamp in the packet's
RTP header.
o Finally, note that the use of empty text samples allows for
aggregating non-consecutive TYPE 1 units in the same payload. Two
text samples, with timestamps TS1 and TS3 and durations SDUR1 and
SDUR3, are not consecutive if it holds TS1+SDUR1 < TS3. A solution
for this is to include an empty TYPE 1 unit with duration SDUR2
between them, such that TS2+SDUR2 = TS1+SDUR1+SDUR2 = TS3.
Some examples of aggregate payloads are illustrated in Figure 10.
(Note: The figure is not scaled.)
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
N/A TS1 TS2 TS3
+------+-----+------+-----+
|TYPE5 |TYPE1|TYPE1 |TYPE1|
+------+-----+------+-----+
N/A sdur1 sdur2 sdur3
N/A TS4
+-----+-------+
|TYPE5| TYPE 1| a)
+-----+-------+
N/A sdur4
TS4 TS4 TS4
+--------------+ +--------------+
| TYPE2 | |TYPE2 |TYPE 3 | b)
+--------------+ +--------------+
sdur4 sdur4 sdur4
TS4 TS4
+--------------+ +--------------+
| TYPE2| TYPE 3| | TYPE4 | c)
+--------------+ +--------------+
sdur4 sdur4 sdur4
|----------PAYLOAD 1------| |--PAYLOAD 2---| |--PAYLOAD 3---|
rtpts1 rtpts2 rtpts3
KEY:
TSx = Text Sample x
rtptsy = the standard RTP timestamp for PAYLOAD y
sdurx = the duration of Text Sample x
N/A = not applicable
Figure 10. Example aggregate payloads
In Figure 10, four text samples (TS1 through TS4) are sent using
three RTP packets. These configurations have been chosen to show how
the 5 TYPE headers are used. Additionally, three different
possibilities for the last text sample, TS4, are depicted: a), b),
and c).
In Figure 11, option b) from Figure 10 is chosen to illustrate how
the timestamp for each unit is found.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
N/A TS1 TS2 TS3 TS4 TS4 TS4
+------+-----+------+-----+ +--------------+ +--------------+
|TYPE5 |TYPE1|TYPE1 |TYPE1| | TYPE2 | |TYPE2 |TYPE 3 |
+------+-----+------+-----+ +--------------+ +--------------+
N/A sdur1 sdur2 sdur3 sdur4 sdur4 sdur4
(#1) (#2) (#3) (#4) (#5) (#6) (#7)
|----------PAYLOAD 1------| |--PAYLOAD 2---| |--PAYLOAD 3---|
rtpts1 rtpts2 rtpts3
Figure 11. Selected payloads from Figure 10
Assuming TSx means Text Sample x, rtptsy represents the standard RTP
timestamp for PAYLOAD y and sdurx, the duration of Text Sample x, the
timestamp for unit #z, ts(#z), can be found as the sum of rtptsy and
the cumulative sum of the durations of preceding units in that
payload (except in the case of PAYLOAD 3 as per rule 3 above). Thus,
we have:
1. for the units in the first aggregate payload, PAYLOAD 1:
ts(#1) = rtpts1
ts(#2) = rtpts1
ts(#3) = rtpts1 + sdur1
ts(#4) = rtpts1 + sdur1 + sdur2
Note that the TYPE 5 and the first TYPE 1 unit have both the
RTP timestamp.
2. for PAYLOAD 2:
ts(#5) = rtpts2
3. for PAYLOAD 3:
ts(#6) = ts(#7) = rtpsts2 = rtpts3
According to configuration 3 above, the TYPE2 and the TYPE 3
units shall belong to the same sample. Hence, rtpts3 must be
equal to rtpts2. For the same reason, the value of SDUR is
not be used to calculate the timestamp of the next unit.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
4.7. Payload Examples
Some examples of payloads using the defined headers are shown below:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| timestamp |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE1| LEN (always >=8) | SIDX |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR | TLEN |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TLEN | |
+---------------+ |
| text string (no.bytes=TLEN) |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| modifiers (no.bytes=LEN - 8 - TLEN) |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE1| LEN (always >=8) | SIDX |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR | TLEN |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TLEN | |
+---------------+ |
| text string (no.bytes=TLEN) |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| modifiers (no.bytes=LEN - 8 - TLEN) |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 12. A payload carrying two TYPE 1 units
In Figure 12, an RTP packet carrying two TYPE 1 units is depicted.
It can be seen how the length fields LEN and TLEN can be used to find
the start of the next unit (LEN), the start of the modifiers (TLEN),
and the length of the modifiers (LEN-TLEN).
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| timestamp |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE5| LEN( always >3) | SIDX |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| sample description (no.bytes=LEN - 3) |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE1| LEN (always >=8) | SIDX |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR | TLEN |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TLEN | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| text string fragment (no.bytes=TLEN) |
| |
| |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 13. An RTP packet carrying a TYPE 5 and a TYPE 1 unit
In Figure 13, a sample description and a TYPE 1 unit are aggregated.
The TYPE 1 unit happens to contain only text strings and is small, so
an additional TYPE 5 unit is included to take advantage of the
available bits in the packet.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| timestamp |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE2| LEN( always >9) |TOTAL=4|THIS=1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR | SIDX |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SLEN | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| text string fragment (no.bytes=LEN - 9) |
| |
: :
: :
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 14. Payload with first text string fragment of a sample
In Figures 14, 15, and 16, a text sample is split into three RTP
packets. In Figure 14, the text string is big and takes the whole
packet length. In Figure 15, the only possibility for carrying two
fragments of the same text sample is represented (see configuration 3
in Section 4.6). The last packet, shown in Figure 16, carries the
last modifier fragment, a TYPE 4.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| timestamp |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE2| LEN( always >9) |TOTAL=4|THIS=2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR | SIDX |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SLEN | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| text string fragment (no.bytes=LEN - 9) |
| |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE3| LEN( always >6) |TOTAL=4|THIS=3 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| |
| modifiers (no.bytes=LEN - 6) |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 15. An RTP packet carrying a TYPE 2 unit and a TYPE 3 unit
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| timestamp |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| R |TYPE4| LEN( always >6) |TOTAL=4|THIS=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SDUR | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| |
| modifiers (no.bytes=LEN - 6) |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 16. An RTP packet carrying last modifiers fragment (TYPE 4)
4.8. Relation to RFC 3640
RFC 3640 [12] defines a payload format for the transport of any non-
multiplexed MPEG-4 elementary stream. One of the various MPEG-4
elementary stream types is MPEG-4 timed text streams, specified in
MPEG-4 part 17 [26], also known as ISO/IEC 14496-17. MPEG-4 timed
text streams are capable of carrying 3GPP timed text data, as
specified in 3GPP TS 26.245 [1].
MPEG-4 timed text streams are intentionally constructed so as to
guarantee interoperability between RFC 3640 and this payload format.
This means that the construction of the RTP packets carrying timed
text is the same. That is, the MPEG-4 timed text elementary stream
as per ISO/IEC 14496-17 is identical to the (aggregate) payloads
constructed using this payload format.
Figure 17 illustrates the process of constructing an RTP packet
containing timed text. As can be seen in the partition block, the
(transport) units used in this payload format are identical to the
Timed Text Units (TTUs) defined in ISO/IEC 14496-17. Likewise, the
rules for payload aggregation as per Section 4.6 are identical to
those defined in ISO/IEC 14496-17 and are compliant with RFC 3640.
As a result, an RTP packet that uses this payload format is identical
to an RTP packet using RFC 3640 conveying TTUs according to ISO/IEC
14496-17. In particular, MPEG-4 Part 17 specifies that when using
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
RFC 3640 for transporting timed text streams, the "streamType"
parameter value is set to 0x0D, and the value of the
"objectTypeIndication" in "config" takes the value 0x08.
+--------------------------------------+
Text samples | +--------------+ +--------------+ |
as per 3GPP | |Text Sample 1 | |Text Sample N | |
TS 26245 | +--------------+ +--------------+ |
+--------------------------------------+
\/
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Partition Text Samples into units. TTU[i]= TYPE i units. |
| |
|[U R TYPE LEN][{TOTAL,THIS}SIDX{SDUR}{TLEN}{SLEN}][SampleContents] |
|{..} means present if applicable, [..] means always present |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
\/ \/
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Aggregation (if possible) |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
\/ \/
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| RTP Entity adds and fills RTP header and Sends RTP packet, where |
| RTP packets according to this Payload Format = |
| RTP packets carrying MPEG-4 Timed Text ES over RFC 3640 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 17. Relation to RFC 3640
Note: The use of RFC 3640 for transport of ISO/IEC 14496-17 data does
not require any new SDP parameters or any new mode definition.
4.9. Relation to RFC 2793
RFC 2793 [22] and its revision, RFC 4103 [23], specify a protocol for
enabling text conversation. Typical applications of this payload
format are text communication terminals and text conferencing tools.
Text session contents are specified in ITU-T Recommendation T.140
[24]. T.140 text is UTF-8 coded as specified in T.140 [24] with no
extra framing. The T140block contains one or more T.140 code
elements as specified in T.140. Code elements are control sequences
such as "New Line", "Interrupt", "String Terminator", or "Start of
String". Most T.140 code elements are single ISO 10646 [25]
characters, but some are multiple character sequences. Each
character is UTF-8 encoded [18] into one or more octets.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
This payload format may also be used for conversational applications
(even for instant messaging). However, this is not its main target.
The differentiating feature of 3GPP Timed Text media format is that
it allows text decoration. This is especially useful in multimedia
presentations, karaoke, commercial banners, news tickers, clickable
text strings, and captions. T.140 text contents used in RFC 2793 do
not allow the use of text decoration.
Furthermore, the conversational text RTP payload format recommends a
method to include redundant text from already transmitted packets in
order to reduce the risk of text loss caused by packet loss. Thereby
payloads would include a redundant copy of the last payload sent.
This payload format does not describe such a method, but this is also
applicable here. As explained in Section 5, packet redundancy SHOULD
be used, whenever possible. The aggregation guidelines in Section
4.6 allow redundant payloads.
5. Resilient Transport
Apart from the basic fragmentation guidelines described in the
section above, the simplest option for packet-loss-resilient
transport is packet repetition. This mechanism may consist of a
strict window-based repetition mechanism or, simply, a repetition
mechanism in a wider sense, where new and old packets are mixed, for
example.
A server MAY decide to use repetition as a measure for packet loss
resilience. Thereby, a server MAY send the same RTP payloads or just
some of the units from the payloads.
As for the case of complete payloads, single repeated units MUST
exactly match the same units sent in the first transmission; i.e., if
fragmentation is needed, it SHALL be performed only once for each
text sample. Only then, a receiver can use the already received and
the repeated units to reconstruct the original text samples. Since
the RTP timestamp is used to group together the fragments of a
sample, care must taken to preserve the timing of units when
constructing new RTP packets.
For example, if a text sample was originally sent as a single
non-fragmented text sample (one TYPE 1 unit), a repetition of
that sample MUST be sent also as a single non-fragmented text
sample in one unit. Likewise, if the original text sample was
fragmented and spread over several RTP packets (say, a total of
3 units), then the repeated fragments SHALL also have the same
byte boundaries and use the same unit headers and bytes per
fragment.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
With repetition, repeated units resolve to the same timestamp as
their originals. Where redundant units are available, only one of
them SHALL be used.
Regarding the RTP header fields:
o If the whole RTP payload is repeated, all payload-specific fields
in the RTP header (the M, TS and PT fields) MUST keep their
original values except the sequence number, which MUST be
incremented to comply with RTP (the fields TOTAL/THIS enable to
re-assemble fragments with different sequence numbers).
o In packets containing single repeated units, the general rules in
Section 3 for assigning values to the RTP header fields apply.
Keeping the value of the RTP timestamp to preserve the timing of
the units is particularly relevant here.
Apart from repetition, other mechanisms such as FEC [7],
retransmission [11], or similar techniques could be used to cope with
packet losses.
6. Congestion Control
Congestion control for RTP SHALL be implemented in accordance with
RTP [3] and the applicable RTP profile, e.g., RTP/AVP [17].
When using this payload format, mainly two factors may affect the
congestion control:
o The use of (unit) aggregation may make the payload format more
bandwidth efficient, by avoiding header overhead and thus reducing
the used bitrate.
o The use of resilient transport mechanisms: Although timed text
applications typically operate at low bitrates, the increase due to
resilient transport shall be considered for congestion control
mechanisms. This applies to all mechanisms but especially to less
efficient ones like repetition.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
7. Scene Description
7.1. Text Rendering Position and Composition
In order to set up a timed text session, regardless of the stream
being stored in a 3GP file or streamed live, some initial layout
information is needed by the communicating peers.
+-------------------------------------------+
| <-> tx | +-------------+
| +-------------------------------+ |<---|Display Area |
| ^ | | | +-------------+
| : | | |
| :ty| | | +-------------+
| : | |<---------|Video track |
| : | | | +-------------+
| : | | |
| : | | |
| : | | |
| v | | |
| - | x-------------------------+ | | +-------------+
|h ^ | | |<-----------|Text Track |
|e : +---|-------------------------|-+ | +-------------+
|i : | +---------------------+ | |
|g : | | | | | +-------------+
|h : | | |<------------ |Text Box |
|t v | +---------------------+ | | +-------------+
| - +-------------------------+ |
+-------------------------------------------+
<........................>
w i d t h
Figure 18. Illustration of text rendering position and composition
The parameters used for negotiating the position and size of the text
track in the display area are shown in Figure 18. These are the
"width" and "height" of the text track, its translation values, "tx"
and "ty", and its "layer" or proximity to the user.
At the same time, the sender of the stream needs to know the
receiver's capabilities. In this case, the maximum allowable values
for the text track height and width: "max-h" and "max-w", for the
stream the receiver shall display.
This layout information MUST be conveyed in a reliable form before
the start of the session, e.g., during session announcement or in an
Offer/Answer (O/A) exchange. An example of a reliable transport may
be the out-of-band channel used for SDP. Sections 8 and 9 provide
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
details on the mapping of these parameters to SDP descriptions and
their usage in O/A.
For stored content, the layout values expressing stream properties
MUST be obtained from the Track Header Box. See Section 7.3.
For live streaming, appropriate values as negotiated during session
setup shall be used.
7.2. SMIL Usage
The attributes contained in the Track Header Boxes of a 3GP file only
specify the spatial relationship of the tracks within the given 3GP
file.
If multiple 3GP files are sent, they require spatial synchronization.
For example, for a text and video stream, the positions of the text
and video tracks in Figure 18 shall be determined. For this purpose,
SMIL [9] MAY be used.
SMIL assigns regions in the display to each of those files and places
the tracks within those regions. Generally, in SMIL, the position of
one track (or stream) is expressed relative to another track. This
is different from the 3GP file, where the upper left corner is the
reference for all translation offsets. Hence, only if the position
in SMIL is relative to the video track origin, then this translation
offset has the same value as (tx, ty) in the 3GP file.
Note also that the original track header information is used for each
track only within its region, as assigned by SMIL. Therefore, even
if SMIL scene description is used, the track header information
pieces SHOULD be sent anyway, as they represent the intrinsic media
properties. See 3GPP SMIL Language Profile in [27] for details.
7.3. Finding Layout Values in a 3GP File
In a 3GP file, within the Track Header Box (tkhd):
o tx, ty: These values specify the translation offset of the
(text) track relative to the upper left corner of the video
track, if present. They are the second but last and third but
last values in the unity matrix; values are fixed-point 16.16
values, restricted to be (signed) integers (i.e., the lower 16
bits of each value shall be all zeros). Therefore, only the
first 16 bits are used for obtaining the value of the media
type parameters.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
o width, height: They have the same name in the tkhd box. All
(unsigned) 32 bits are meaningful.
o layer: All (signed) 16 bits are used.
8. 3GPP Timed Text Media Type
The media subtype for the 3GPP Timed Text codec is allocated from the
standards tree. The top-level media type under which this payload
format is registered is 'video'. This registration is done using the
template defined in [29] and following RFC 3555 [28].
The receiver MUST ignore any unrecognized parameter.
Media type: video
Media subtype: 3gpp-tt
Required parameters
rate:
Refer to Section 3 in RFC 4396.
sver:
The parameter "sver" contains a list of supported
backwards-compatible versions of the timed text format
specification (3GPP TS 26.245) that the sender accepts
to receive (and that are the same that it would be
willing to send). The first value is the value
preferred to receive (or preferred to send). The first
value MAY be followed by a comma-separated list of
versions that SHOULD be used as alternatives. The order
is meaningful, being first the most preferred and last
the least preferred. Each entry has the format
Zi(xi*256+yi), where "Zi" is the number of the Release
and "xi" and "yi" are taken from the 3GPP specification
version (i.e., vZi.xi.yi). For example, for 3GPP TS
26.245 v6.0.0, Zi(xi*256+yi)=6(0), the version value is
"60". (Note that "60" is the concatenation of the
values Zi=6 and (xi*256+yi)=0 and not their product.)
If no "sver" value is available, for example, when
streaming out of a 3GP file, the default value "60",
corresponding to the 3GPP Release 6 version of 3GPP TS
26.245, SHALL be used.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 49]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
Optional parameters:
tx:
This parameter indicates the horizontal translation
offset in pixels of the text track with respect to the
origin of the video track. This value is the decimal
representation of a 16-bit signed integer. Refer to TS
3GPP 26.245 for an illustration of this parameter.
ty:
This parameter indicates the vertical translation offset
in pixels of the text track with respect to the origin
of the video track. This value is the decimal
representation of a 16-bit signed integer. Refer to TS
3GPP 26.245 for an illustration of this parameter.
layer:
This parameter indicates the proximity of the text track
to the viewer. More negative values mean closer to the
viewer. This parameter has no units. This value is the
decimal representation of a 16-bit signed integer.
tx3g:
This parameter MUST be used for conveying sample
descriptions out-of-band. It contains a comma-separated
list of base64-encoded entries. The entries of this
list MAY follow any particular order and the list SHALL
NOT be empty. Each entry is the result of running
base64 encoding over the concatenation of the (static)
SIDX value as an 8-bit unsigned integer and the (static)
sample description for that SIDX, in that order. The
format of a sample description entry can be found in
3GPP TS 26.245 Release 6 and later releases. All
servers and clients MUST understand this parameter and
MUST be capable of using the sample description(s)
contained in it. Please refer to RFC 3548 [6] for
details on the base64 encoding.
width:
This parameter indicates the width in pixels of the text
track or area of the text being sent. This value is the
decimal representation of a 32-bit unsigned integer.
Refer to TS 3GPP 26.245 for an illustration of this
parameter.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 50]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
height:
This parameter indicates the height in pixels of the
text track being sent. This value is the decimal
representation of a 32-bit unsigned integer. Refer to
TS 3GPP 26.245 for an illustration of this parameter.
max-w:
This parameter indicates display capabilities. This is
the maximum "width" value that the sender of this
parameter supports. This value is the decimal
representation of a 32-bit unsigned integer.
max-h:
This parameter indicates display capabilities. This is
the maximum "height" value that the sender of this
parameter supports. This value is the decimal
representation of a 32-bit unsigned integer.
Encoding considerations:
This media type is framed (see Section 4.8 in [29]) and
partially contains binary data.
Restrictions on usage:
This media type depends on RTP framing, and hence is only
defined for transfer via RTP [3]. Transport within other
framing protocols is not defined at this time.
Security considerations:
Please refer to Section 11 of RFC 4396.
Interoperability considerations:
The 3GPP Timed Text media format and its file storage is
specified in Release 6 of 3GPP TS 26.245, "Transparent end-to-
end packet switched streaming service (PSS); Timed Text Format
(Release 6)". Note also that 3GPP may in future releases
specify extensions or updates to the timed text media format in
a backwards-compatible way, e.g., new modifier boxes or
extensions to the sample descriptions. The payload format
defined in RFC 4396 allows for such extensions. For future 3GPP
Releases of the Timed Text Format, the parameter "sver" is used
to identify the exact specification used.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 51]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
The defined storage format for 3GPP Timed Text format is the
3GPP File Format (3GP) [30]. 3GP files may be transferred using
the media type video/3gpp as registered by RFC 3839 [31]. The
3GPP File Format is a container file that may contain, e.g.,
audio and video that may be synchronized with the 3GPP Timed
Text.
Published specification: RFC 4396
Applications which use this media type:
Multimedia streaming applications.
Additional information:
The 3GPP Timed Text media format is specified in 3GPP TS 26.245,
"Transparent end-to-end packet switched streaming service (PSS);
Timed Text Format (Release 6)". This document and future
extensions to the 3GPP Timed Text format are publicly available
at http://www.3gpp.org.
Magic number(s): None.
File extension(s): None.
Macintosh File Type Code(s): None.
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Jose Rey, jose.rey@eu.panasonic.com
Yoshinori Matsui, matsui.yoshinori@jp.panasonic.com
Audio/Video Transport Working Group.
Intended usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jose Rey
Yoshinori Matsui
Change controller: IETF Audio/Video Transport Working Group delegated
from the IESG.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 52]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
9. SDP Usage
9.1. Mapping to SDP
The information carried in the media type specification has a
specific mapping to fields in SDP [4]. If SDP is used to specify
sessions using this payload format, the mapping is done as follows:
o The media type ("video") goes in the SDP "m=" as the media name.
m=video <port number> RTP/<RTP profile> <dynamic payload type>
o The media subtype ("3gpp-tt") and the timestamp clockrate "rate"
(the RECOMMENDED 1000 Hz or other value) go in SDP "a=rtpmap" line
as the encoding name and rate, respectively:
a=rtpmap:<payload type> 3gpp-tt/1000
o The REQUIRED parameter "sver" goes in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute by
copying it directly from the media type string as a semicolon-
separated parameter=value pair.
o The OPTIONAL parameters "tx", "ty", "layer", "tx3g", "width",
"height", "max-w" and "max-h" go in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute by
copying them directly from the media type string as a semicolon
separated list of parameter=value(s) pairs:
a=fmtp:<dynamic payload type> <parameter
name>=<value>[,<value>][; <parameter name>=<value>]
o Any parameter unknown to the device that uses the SDP SHALL be
ignored. For example, parameters added to the media format in
later specifications MAY be copied into the SDP and SHALL be
ignored by receivers that do not understand them.
9.2. Parameter Usage in the SDP Offer/Answer Model
In this section, the meaning of the SDP parameters defined in this
document within the Offer/Answer [13] context is explained.
In unicast, sender and receiver typically negotiate the streams,
i.e., which codecs and parameter values are used in the session.
This is also possible in multicast to a lesser extent.
Additionally, the meaning of the parameters MAY vary depending on
which direction is used. In the following sections, a
"<directionality> offer" means an offer that contains a stream set to
<directionality>. <directionality> may take the values sendrecv,
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 53]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
sendonly, and recvonly. Similar considerations apply for answers.
For example, an answer to a sendonly offer is a recvonly answer.
9.2.1. Unicast Usage
The following types of parameters are used in this payload format:
1. Declarative parameters: Offerer and answerer declare the values
they will use for the incoming (sendrecv/recvonly) or outgoing
(sendonly) stream. Offerer and answerer MAY use different
values.
a. "tx", "ty", and "layer": These are parameters describing
where the received text track is placed. Depending on the
directionality:
i. They MUST appear in all sendrecv offers and answers and
in all recvonly offers and answers (thus applying to
the incoming stream). In the case of sendrecv offers
and answers and in recvonly offers, these values SHOULD
be used by the sender of the stream unless it has a
particular preference, in which case, it MUST make sure
that these different values do not corrupt the
presentation. For recvonly answers, the answerer MAY
accept the proposed values for the incoming stream (in
a sendonly offer; see ii. below) or respond with
different ones. The offerer MUST use the returned
values.
ii. They MAY appear in sendonly offers and MUST appear in
sendonly answers. In sendonly offers, they specify the
values that the offerer proposes for sending (see
example in Section 9.3). In sendonly answers, these
values SHOULD be copied from the corresponding recvonly
offer upon accepting the stream, unless a particular
preference by the receiver of the stream exists, as
explained in the previous point.
2. Parameters describing the display capabilities, "max-h" and
"max-w", which indicate the maximum dimensions of the text track
(text display area) for the incoming stream "tx" and "ty" values
(see Figure 18). "max-h" and "max-w" MUST be included in all
offers and answers where "tx" and "ty" refer to the incoming
stream, thus excluding sendonly offers and answers (see example
in Section 9.3), where they SHALL NOT be present.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 54]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
3. Parameters describing the sent stream properties, i.e., the
sender of the stream decides upon the values of these:
a. "width" and "height" specify the text track dimensions.
They SHALL ALWAYS be present in sendrecv and sendonly
offers and answers. For recvonly answers, the answerer
MUST include the offered parameter values (if any) verbatim
in the answer upon accepting the stream.
b. "tx3g" contains static sample descriptions. It MAY only be
present in sendrecv and sendonly offers and answers. This
parameter applies to the stream that offerers or answerers
send.
4. Negotiable parameters, which MUST be agreed on. This is the
case of "sver". This parameter MUST be present in every offer
and answer. The answerer SHALL choose one supported value from
the offerer's list, or else it MUST remove the stream or reject
the session.
5. Symmetric parameters: "rate", timestamp clockrate, belongs to
this class. Symmetric parameters MUST be echoed verbatim in the
answer. Otherwise, the stream MUST be removed or the session
rejected.
The following table summarizes all options:
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 55]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
+..---------------------------+----------+----------+----------+
| ``--..__ Directionality/ | sendrecv | recvonly | sendonly |
+ Type of ``--..__ O or A +----------+----------+----------+
| Parameter ``--..__ | O/A | O/A | O/A |
+--------------+------------``+----------+----------+----------+
| Declarative |tx, ty, layer | M/M | M/M | m/M |
| | | | | |
+--------------+--------------+----------+----------+----------+
| Display |max-h, max-w | M/M | M/M | -/- |
| Capabilities | | | | |
+--------------+--------------+----------+----------+----------+
| Stream |height, width | M/M | -/(M) | M/M |
| properties |tx3g | m/m | -/- | m/m |
| | | | | |
+--------------+--------------+----------+----------+----------+
| Negotiable |sver | M/M | M/M | M/M |
| | | | | |
+--------------+--------------+----------+----------+----------+
| Symmetric |rate | M/M | M/M | M/M |
+--------------+--------------+----------+----------+----------+
Table 1. Parameter usage in Unicast Offer / Answer.
KEY:
o M means MUST be present.
o m means MAY be present (such as proposed values).
o (M) or (m) means MUST or MAY, if applicable.
o a hyphen ("-") means the parameter MUST NOT be present.
Other observations regarding parameter usage:
o Translation and transparency values: In sendonly offers, "tx",
"ty", and "layer" indicate proposed values. This is useful for
visually composed sessions where the different streams occupy
different parts of the display, e.g., a video stream and the
captions. These are just suggested values; the peer rendering
the text ultimately decides where to place the text track.
o Text track (area) dimensions, "height" and "width": In the case
of sendonly offers, an answerer accepting the offer MUST be
prepared to render the stream using these values. If any of
these conditions are not met, the stream MUST be removed or the
session rejected.
o Display capabilities, "max-h" and "max-w": An answerer sending a
stream SHALL ensure that the "height" and "width" values in the
answer are compatible with the offerer's signaled capabilities.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 56]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
o Version handling via "sver": The idea is that offerer and
answerer communicate using the same version. This is achieved by
letting the answerer choose from a list of supported versions,
"sver". For recvonly streams, the first value in the list is the
preferred version to receive. Consequently, for sendonly (and
sendrecv) streams, the first value is the one preferred for
sending (and receiving). The answerer MUST choose one value and
return it in the answer. Upon receiving the answer, the offerer
SHALL be prepared to send (sendonly and sendrecv) and receive
(recvonly and sendrecv) a stream using that version. If none of
the versions in the list is supported, the stream MUST be removed
or the session rejected. Note that, if alternative non-
compatible versions are offered, then this SHALL be done using
different payload types.
9.2.2. Multicast Usage
In multicast, the parameter usage is similar to the unicast case,
except as follows:
o the parameters "tx", "ty", and "layer" in multicast offers only
have meaning for sendrecv and recvonly streams. In order for all
clients to have the same vision of the session, they MUST be used
symmetrically.
o for "height", "width", and "tx3g" (for sendrecv and sendonly),
multicast offers specify which values of these parameters the
participants MUST use for sending. Thus, if the stream is
accepted, the answerer MUST also include them verbatim in the
answer (also "tx3g", if present).
o The capability parameters, "max-h" and "max-w", SHALL NOT be used
in multicast. If the offered text track should change in size, a
new offer SHALL be used instead.
o Regarding version handling:
In the case of multicast offers, an answerer MAY accept a multicast
offer as long as one of the versions listed in the "sver" is
supported. Therefore, if the stream is accepted, the answerer MUST
choose its preferred version, but, unlike in unicast, the offerer
SHALL NOT change the offered stream to this chosen version because
there may be other session participants that do support the newer
extensions. Consequently, different session participants may end
up using different backwards-compatible media format versions. It
is RECOMMENDED that the multicast offer contains a limited number
of versions, in order for all participants to have the same view of
the session. This is a responsibility of the session creator. If
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 57]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
none of the offered versions is supported, the stream SHALL be
removed or the session rejected. Also in this case, if alternative
non-compatible versions are offered, then this SHALL be done using
different payload types.
9.3. Offer/Answer Examples
In these unicast O/A examples, the long lines are wrapped around.
Static sample descriptions are shortened for clarity.
For sendrecv:
O -> A
m=video <port> RTP/AVP 98
a=rtpmap:98 3gpp-tt/1000
a=fmtp:98 tx=100; ty=100; layer=0; height=80; width=100; max-h=120;
max-w=160; sver=6256,60; tx3g=81...
a=sendrecv
A -> O
m=video <port> RTP/AVP 98..
a=rtpmap:98 3gpp-tt/1000
a=fmtp:98 tx=100; ty=95; layer=0; height=90; width=100; max-h=100;
max-w=160; sver=60; tx3g=82...
a=sendrecv
In this example, the offerer is telling the answerer where it will
place the received stream and what is the maximum height and width
allowable for the stream that it will receive. Also, it tells the
answerer the dimensions of the text track for the stream sent and
which sample description it shall use. It offers two versions, 6256
and 60. The answerer responds with an equivalent set of parameters
for the stream it receives. In this case, the answerer's "max-h" and
"max-w" are compatible with the offerer's "height" and "width".
Otherwise, the answerer would have to remove this stream, and the
offerer would have to issue a new offer taking the answerer's
capabilities into account. This is possible only if multiple payload
types are present in the initial offer so that at least one of them
matches the answerer's capabilities as expressed by "max-h" and
"max-w" in the negative answer. Note also that the answerer's text
box dimensions fit within the maximum values signaled in the offer.
Finally, the answerer chooses to use version 60 of the timed text
format.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 58]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
For recvonly:
Offerer -> Answerer
m=video <port> RTP/AVP 98
a=rtpmap:98 3gpp-tt/1000
a=fmtp:98 tx=100; ty=100; layer=0; max-h=120; max-w=160; sver=6256,60
a=recvonly
A -> O
m=video <port> RTP/AVP 98..
a=rtpmap:98 3gpp-tt/1000
a=fmtp:98 tx=100; ty=100; layer=0; height=90; width=100; sver=60;
tx3g=82...
a=sendonly
In this case, the offer is different from the previous case: It does
not include the stream properties "height", "width", and "tx3g". The
answerer copies the "tx", "ty", and "layer" values, thus
acknowledging these. "max-h" and "max-w" are not present in the
answer because the "tx" and "ty" (and "layer") in this special case
do not apply to the received stream, but to the sent stream. Also,
if offerer and answerer had very different display sizes, it would
not be possible to express the answerer's capabilities. In the
example above and for an answerer with a 50x50 display, the
translation values are already out of range.
For sendonly:
O -> A
m=video <port> RTP/AVP 98
a=rtpmap:98 3gpp-tt/1000
a=fmtp:98 tx=100; ty=100; layer=0; height=80; width=100;
sver=6256,60; tx3g=81...
a=sendonly
A -> O
m=video <port> RTP/AVP 98..
a=rtpmap:98 3gpp-tt/1000
a=fmtp:98 tx=100; ty=100; layer=0; height=80; width=100; max-h=100;
max-w=160; sver=60
a=recvonly
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 59]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
Note that "max-h" and "max-w" are not present in the offer. Also,
with this answer, the answerer would accept the offer as is (thus
echoing "tx", "ty", "height", "width", and "layer") and additionally
inform the offerer about its capabilities: "max-h" and "max-w".
Another possible answer for this case would be:
A -> O
m=video <port> RTP/AVP 98..
a=rtpmap:98 3gpp-tt/1000
a=fmtp:98 tx=120; ty=105; layer=0; max-h=95; max-w=150; sver=60
a=recvonly
In this case, the answerer does not accept the values offered. The
offerer MUST use these values or else remove the stream.
9.4. Parameter Usage outside of Offer/Answer
SDP may also be employed outside of the Offer/Answer context, for
instance for multimedia sessions that are announced through the
Session Announcement Protocol (SAP) [14] or streamed through the Real
Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) [15].
In this case, the receiver of a session description is required to
support the parameters and given values for the streams, or else it
MUST reject the session. It is the responsibility of the sender (or
creator) of the session descriptions to define the session parameters
so that the probability of unsuccessful session setup is minimized.
This is out of the scope of this document.
10. IANA Considerations
IANA has registered the media subtype name "3gpp-tt" for the media
type "video" as specified in Section 8 of this document.
11. Security Considerations
RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification
are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP
specification [3] and any applicable RTP profile, e.g., AVP [17].
In particular, an attacker may invalidate the current set of active
sample descriptions at the client by means of repeating a packet with
an old sample description, i.e., replay attack. This would mean that
the display of the text would be corrupted, if displayed at all.
Another form of attack may consist of sending redundant fragments,
whose boundaries do not match the exact boundaries of the originals
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 60]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
(as indicated by LEN) or fragments that carry different sample
lengths (SLEN). This may cause a decoder to crash.
These types of attack may easily be avoided by using source
authentication and integrity protection.
Additionally, peers in a timed text session may desire to retain
privacy in their communication, i.e., confidentiality.
This payload format does not provide any mechanisms for achieving
these. Confidentiality, integrity protection, and authentication
have to be solved by a mechanism external to this payload format,
e.g., SRTP [10].
12. References
12.1. Normative References
[1] Transparent end-to-end packet switched streaming service (PSS);
Timed Text Format (Release 6), TS 26.245 v 6.0.0, June 2004.
[2] ISO/IEC 14496-12:2004 Information technology - Coding of audio-
visual objects - Part 12: ISO base media file format.
[3] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson,
"RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64,
RFC 3550, July 2003.
[4] Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description
Protocol", RFC 2327, April 1998.
[5] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[6] Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings",
RFC 3548, July 2003.
12.2. Informative References
[7] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An RTP Payload Format for
Generic Forward Error Correction", RFC 2733, December 1999.
[8] Perkins, C. and O. Hodson, "Options for Repair of Streaming
Media", RFC 2354, June 1998.
[9] W3C, "Synchronised Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 2.0)",
August, 2001.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 61]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
[10] Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K.
Norrman, "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)", RFC
3711, March 2004.
[11] Rey, J., Leon, D., Miyazaki, A., Varsa, V., and R. Hakenberg,
"RTP Retransmission Payload Format", Work in Progress, September
2005.
[12] van der Meer, J., Mackie, D., Swaminathan, V., Singer, D., and
P. Gentric, "RTP Payload Format for Transport of MPEG-4
Elementary Streams", RFC 3640, November 2003.
[13] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model with
Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264, June 2002.
[14] Handley, M., Perkins, C., and E. Whelan, "Session Announcement
Protocol", RFC 2974, October 2000.
[15] Schulzrinne, H., Rao, A., and R. Lanphier, "Real Time Streaming
Protocol (RTSP)", RFC 2326, April 1998.
[16] Transparent end-to-end packet switched streaming service (PSS);
Protocols and codecs (Release 6), TS 26.234 v 6.1.0, September
2004.
[17] Schulzrinne, H. and S. Casner, "RTP Profile for Audio and Video
Conferences with Minimal Control", STD 65, RFC 3551, July 2003.
[18] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", STD
63, RFC 3629, November 2003.
[19] Hoffman, P. and F. Yergeau, "UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646",
RFC 2781, February 2000.
[20] Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control Protocol
Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", RFC 3611, November 2003.
[21] Ott, J., Wenger, S., Sato, N., Burmeister, C., and J. Rey,
"Extended RTP Profile for RTCP-based Feedback (RTP/AVPF)", Work
in Progress, August 2004.
[22] Hellstrom, G., "RTP Payload for Text Conversation", RFC 2793,
May 2000.
[23] Hellstrom, G. and P. Jones, "RTP Payload for Text Conversation",
RFC 4103, June 2005.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 62]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
[24] ITU-T Recommendation T.140 (1998) - Text conversation protocol
for multimedia application, with amendment 1, (2000).
[25] ISO/IEC 10646-1: (1993), Universal Multiple Octet Coded
Character Set.
[26] ISO/IEC FCD 14496-17 Information technology - Coding of audio-
visual objects - Part 17: Streaming text format, Work in
progress, June 2004.
[27] Transparent end-to-end Packet-switched Streaming Service (PSS);
3GPP SMIL language profile, (Release 6), TS 26.246 v 6.0.0, June
2004.
[28] Casner, S. and P. Hoschka, "MIME Type Registration of RTP
Payload Formats", RFC 3555, July 2003.
[29] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.
[30] Transparent end-to-end packet switched streaming service (PSS);
3GPP file format (3GP) (Release 6), TS 26.244 V6.3. March 2005.
[31] Castagno, R. and D. Singer, "MIME Type Registrations for 3rd
Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Multimedia files", RFC
3839, July 2004.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 63]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
13. Basics of the 3GP File Structure
This section provides a coarse overview of the 3GP file structure,
which follows the ISO Base Media file Format [2].
Each 3GP file consists of "Boxes". In general, a 3GP file contains
the File Type Box (ftyp), the Movie Box (moov), and the Media Data
Box (mdat). The File Type Box identifies the type and properties of
the 3GP file itself. The Movie Box and the Media Data Box, serving
as containers, include their own boxes for each media. Boxes start
with a header, which indicates both size and type (these fields are
called, namely, "size" and "type"). Additionally, each box type may
include a number of boxes.
In the following, only those boxes are mentioned that are useful for
the purposes of this payload format.
The Movie Box (moov) contains one or more Track Boxes (trak), which
include information about each track. A Track Box contains, among
others, the Track Header Box (tkhd), the Media Header Box (mdhd), and
the Media Information Box (minf).
The Track Header Box specifies the characteristics of a single track,
where a track is, in this case, the streamed text during a session.
Exactly one Track Header Box is present for a track. It contains
information about the track, such as the spatial layout (width and
height), the video transformation matrix, and the layer number.
Since these pieces of information are essential and static (i.e.,
constant) for the duration of the session, they must be sent prior to
the transmission of any text samples.
The Media Header Box contains the "timescale" or number of time units
that pass in one second, i.e., cycles per second or Hertz. The Media
Information Box includes the Sample Table Box (stbl), which contains
all the time and data indexing of the media samples in a track. Using
this box, it is possible to locate samples in time and to determine
their type, size, container, and offset into that container. Inside
the Sample Table Box, we can find the Sample Description Box (stsd,
for finding sample descriptions), the Decoding Time to Sample Box
(stts, for finding sample duration), the Sample Size Box (stsz), and
the Sample to Chunk Box (stsc, for finding the sample description
index).
Finally, the Media Data Box contains the media data itself. In timed
text tracks, this box contains text samples. Its equivalent to audio
and video is audio and video frames, respectively. The text sample
consists of the text length, the text string, and one or several
Modifier Boxes. The text length is the size of the text in bytes.
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 64]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
The text string is plain text to render. The Modifier Box is
information to render in addition to the text, such as color, font,
etc.
14. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dave Singer, Jan van der Meer, Magnus
Westerlund, and Colin Perkins for their comments and suggestions
about this document.
The authors would also like to thank Markus Gebhard for the free and
publicly available JavE ASCII Editor (used for the ASCII drawings in
this document) and Henrik Levkowetz for the Idnits web service.
Authors' Addresses
Jose Rey
Panasonic R&D Center Germany GmbH
Monzastr. 4c
D-63225 Langen, Germany
EMail: jose.rey@eu.panasonic.com
Phone: +49-6103-766-134
Fax: +49-6103-766-166
Yoshinori Matsui
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD.
1006 Kadoma
Kadoma-shi, Osaka, Japan
EMail: matsui.yoshinori@jp.panasonic.com
Phone: +81 6 6900 9689
Fax: +81 6 6900 9699
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 65]
RFC 4396 Payload Format for 3GPP Timed Text February 2006
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to
bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent
applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology
that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the
information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Rey & Matsui Standards Track [Page 66]