💾 Archived View for zaibatsu.circumlunar.space › ~solderpunk › phlog › asahi-pentax-spotmatic-sp-100… captured on 2022-07-16 at 15:54:58.
⬅️ Previous capture (2020-09-24)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Asahi Pentax Spotmatic SP-1000 review ------------------------------------- It's been about one year and one month since my last (and first) camera review in this phlog[1], so we're certainly due for another! Earlier this year my wife and I spent a weekend in Stockholm, mostly to visit a friend of ours who is studying in Sweden. On Sunday morning we stumbled upon a nice big fleamarket and spent some time picking over the stuff there, which is one of my favourite things to do. There are always old cameras at any decent fleamarket and I usually check them out by so far I've been extremely good about not buying any. This is due to a combination of always being wary about buying a camera whose working condition is unclear in a situation where there's no possibility of a return, and also just because, somehow, I've been remarkably strong willed so far about not buying photography stuff I don't really need just because I like it. But on this trip I faltered. I've always thought that Asahi's Spotmatic cameras were especially handsome. That might sound odd since, until you get quite close, just about all 60s and 70s SLRs look just about exactly the same and it's hard to imagine one being much better looking than another. But once you *do* get up close their are all sorts of small design details which a camera its own particular feel (for whatever reason, I am very readily seduced by the typography on a lot of old Japanese cameras. The company name on the front of the pentaprism is almost always in a really lovely font!), and the Spotmatic really pulls off a great look. So when I saw a Spotmatic sitting on one buyer's table, surrounded by less interesting things, I ventured a closer look. Aside from the lightmeter (and who needs that?![2]) the Spotmatic is entirely mechanical, which means in some sense there is not too much to go wrong with them. After confirming that the shutter fired (and the slow speeds sounded approximately correct) and the mirror moved, I tentatively asked the buyer how much they wanted. I expected them to ask more than I was willing to pay on a whim, and was really surprised when they asked for 150 SEK - about 15 EUR. Of course, I didn't actually have any Swedish krona on me, because cash is almost entirely superfluous in 21st century Scandinavia, but happily my friend had exactly 150 SEK on her, so she gave me the cash for the Spotmatic and I bought her coffee and beer for the rest of the day until we were even. Earlier this week I finally got my first roll of film from the camera developed and scanned. I didn't try too hard with it, not knowing whether the light seals were intact, or whether some other non-obvious problem with the body might spoil things. As it turned out, the camera works just fine, and the only bad shots were due to me still finding my feet estimating exposures manually. So, here's a review of the camera based on a single roll (here's one of my favourite shots[3] from it). Asahi released a couple of Spotmatic models over the several decades long lifespan of the brand - mine is the Spotmatic SP-1000. This is one of the "budget" models designed to be less featureful and a little cheaper than the "true" Spotmatic, but the only feature it's missing compared to the original Spotmatic is the self timer. I can count the number of times I've used a self timer on any of my cameras on a single hand, so for me this is just as good as a proper Spotty. I'll be comparing it throughout this review to the Canon AE-1, the only 35mm SLR with which I have extensive experience. Obviously, there's quite a bit of a technological difference between the two, given the roughly 10 years separating their designs. The AE-1 has an electronically-controlled shutter, with shutter-priority autoexposure and open-aperture TTL metering. The SP-1000 has a mechanical shutter and fully manual exposure with stopped-down TTL metering. The AE-1 also has a self-timer, for what little it's worth. Aside from that, there is not too much difference. Both cameras feature horizontal cloth shutters with maximum speeds of 1/1000 (hence the SP-1000's model number - there was an even more budget version called the SP-500 which only went to 1/500), both have a DOF preview feature (which the SP-1000 requires for metering) and neither have mirror lock-up nor any other advanced features. Pretty well any photo you could take on one you could take on the other, so the real difference comes down to look and feel, lens range and user interface and ergonomics. I think the Spotmatic certainly wins with regard to look and feel. The look I think I attribute mostly to the gently curved corners of the top plate, which look nicer to me than the much more angular AE-1. The feel I put down mostly to the Spotmatic being 100% metal and glass. While it doesn't look it at first glance, the AE-1's body is actually plastic, specifically ABS. In fact, if I remember rightly, it may have been the first SLR with a plastic body. Of course nowadays this sounds like a bad thing, but I guess in '76 plastic may still have had a little bit of its "space age" appeal. The Spotmatic is the heavier camera because of this, unsurprisingly, but not by as much as I'd have expected. With battery but without lens or film, the Spotmatic is 601g compared to about 580g or 590g for the AE-1: my AE-1 has a neck strap on it which I was too lazy to remove and which I could only very unscientifically correct for the weight of by trying to hold it up off the scales, but not so up that it was bearing any weight of the camera. The difference is basically negligible. I have lightweight plsatic-bodied "nFD" lenses for my Canon, which makes it feel a little lighter with a lens on than the Spotmatic, but I'd still describe the Spotmatic as "having a reassuring heft" before I'd call it "heavy". That might just be sentimentality, though. Probably the biggest difference in usability between the two cameras is that the Canon has a split screen focussing aid while the Asahi has a microprism. I have to say I prefer the Canon's split screen, but this could simply be a matter of perferring what I'm used to. The Asahi is by no means difficult to focus. In terms of ergonomics, both cameras are pretty similarly layed out. I think it's easier to adjust the shutter speed on the Canon while you have the viewfinder up to your eye than on the Asahi, but again doing it on the Asahi is not exactly difficult. The top plate of the Spotmatic has a little window to the shutter release which displays a red indicator when the shutter is cocked. At first I thought this was kind of neat and a (small!) advantage of the Spotmatic over the Canon. But to some extent any advantage is cancelled out by the Spotmatic's lack of a shutter lock. Because the Canon has such a lock, I've developed the habit of immediately winding on after I take each photo, and then carrying the camera around "cocked and locked". Because this is a reflex action for me, I did it with the Spotmatic too more often than not, and wasted two exposures when the shutter fired while the camera was in my bag. I complained about this exact same thing in my Yashica ME-35 review[1]. It's becoming clear to me that shutter locks are relatively rare and the Canon has taught me a bad habit; I shouldn't wind on until I'm ready to shoot. Of course, if you use the Spotmatic this way, the shutter status indicator becomes pretty useless. Well, I suppose it's pretty useless also if you always carry it cocked. It's really only of any use if you are inconsistent and forgetful, so it hardly counts for much. In terms of the available range of lenses, things are very different. The AE-1 uses Canon's FD mount, which means the range of really good lenses is basically limited to Canon's own offerings - not that the Canon FD lenses are in any way bad. But the Spotmatic uses the "universal" M42 mount, which means that in addition to Asahi's own famous Super Takumar lenses, you can pick up stuff from a huge range of other manufacturers, including other respectable "big names" from Japan (like Mamiya, Yashica and Ricoh) and Germany (like Carl Zeiss) but also lots of cheap, fun and unusual stuff from smaller companies or old Soviet factories. M42 is basically a big playground, which is really kind of fun. Oh, sadly my camera didn't come with a Super Tak but with a cheap and cheerful East German wide-angle, the Meyer-Optik Görlitz Orestegon 29mm/f2.8. On the whole, I guess the AE-1 has lots of small edges over the SP-1000 in terms of usability, but they're small things and they don't add up to much. For a lot of people, the small subjectively nicer look and feel of the Spotmatic, combined with its reduced reliance on batteries, might be enough to cancel those things out. They're both nice cameras and deserve their status as classics. I have to admit that when I got my photos back and confirmed the Spotmatic was working, my first thought was "Great, now I can buy a Super Takumar lens!". But on second thought, I'm became unsure as to whether I should bother. I like the Spotmatic a lot, but I like the Canon a lot too and, importantly, I've already invested in a kit of 3 FD lenses for it which all work nicely. I can't make any rational argument for why I need a second SLR which is objectively less capable than the one I already have. I *could* almost certainly sell it for more than I paid for it... But these things are never totally rational decisions. In the past few days I've been reading up on Asahi's history. I really enjoy studying what I think of as "industrial history". It's a lot of fun to learn about all the camera models a particular firm released, to understand what order they came out in, when new features appeared, and to place them all in the context of the wider marketplace at the time. I've kind of fixated on the idea of not just buying a Super Tak lens for my Spotmatic, but also hunting down an earlier Pentax, from before the Spotmatic line - maybe a Pentax SV? These have no lightmeter whatsoever, and are basically the most primitive or minimalistic camera which still recognisably belongs to the developed 35mm SLR category. I'm kind of giddy at the idea of a nice big bright viewfinder with absolutely nothing in it to get in the way of composition. Canon *did* release an SLR like this, the FP - and while it was designed for the ealier FL lens series, my FD lenses *would* mount on it and work no problem, because the FD and FL designs are quite compatible. So this would be the most economically rational way for me to explore the world of very bare bones SLRs. But Canon FPs seem pretty darn rare, whereas early Pentaxes are not hard to find on eBay. If I bought an early Pentax with no metering (selling my SP-1000 afterward to slightly recoup the cost), and one day followed up on my very long-standing plan to upgrade my AE-1 to an A-1, then I'd end up with two SLRs which I could at least say represented the something like the least and most advanced ends of the manual focus technology spectrum. That's my new inner "justification" for future purchases, anyway. :) [1] gopher://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space:70/0/~solderpunk/phlog/photos-yashica-35-ME-review.txt [2] gopher://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space:70/0/~solderpunk/phlog/look-ma-no-lightmeter.txt [3] gopher://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space:70/I/~solderpunk/photos/tecsun-in-the-wild.jpg