💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › slrnt9amae.1br2.d@tunafish… captured on 2022-07-16 at 13:58:29. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2022-06-04)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Intend to standardize via RFC?

Message headers

From: danrl <d@x.gl>

Subject: Re: Intend to standardize via RFC?

Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 23:54:54 -0000 (UTC)

Message-ID: <slrnt9amae.1br2.d@tunafish.local>

Message content

On 2022-05-30, Szczezuja.space <szczezuja@sdf.org> wrote:

On 2022-05-30, Dan Luedtke <d@x.gl> wrote:
> Furthermore, the specification is a bit blurry around the edges
> as Stephane Bortzmeyer pointed out a while ago.
Could you write something more. Is it on this group? I can't find it
probably.

Here you go:

gemini://gemini.bortzmeyer.org/gemini/missing.gmi

Related

Parent:

Re: Intend to standardize via RFC? (by "Szczezuja.space" <szczezuja@sdf.org> on Mon, 30 May 2022 19:19:01 -0000 (UTC))

Start of thread:

Intend to standardize via RFC? (by Dan Luedtke <d@x.gl> on Mon, 30 May 2022 02:49:03 -0000 (UTC))

Children:

Re: Intend to standardize via RFC? (by Christian Seibold <krixano@mailbox.org> on Wed, 6 Jul 2022 02:24:23 -0500)