💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3833.gmi captured on 2022-07-16 at 16:39:52. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Once global leaders, Japanese electronics firms are tumbling
Feb 18th 2012 | TOKYO | from the print edition
IN TOKYO S posh Ginza shopping district the Apple Store is packed, but the
nearby Sony showroom is as lifeless as a mausoleum. In recent days the largest
Japanese gadget-makers said they expect to lose a combined $17 billion in the
financial year 2011. Panasonic alone expects to lose $10 billion. Meanwhile
South Korea s Samsung enjoyed profits of $15 billion and America s Apple hauled
in $22 billion.
Since 2000 the big five Japanese electronics firms have lost two-thirds of
their value (see chart). What ails them? High costs and a strong yen don t
help. Nor does a recent legal change that bars them from claiming certain tax
credits they had counted on. But the sickness runs deeper.
Too many Japanese firms make similar things. No fewer than eight crank out
mobile phones; more than ten make rice-cookers and six make televisions. The
overlap is inefficient: it duplicates research and development, reduces
economies of scale and destroys pricing power.
Companies often stay in markets where they cannot compete. This wastes huge
amounts of capital. Rather than sticking to what they do best, they bleed their
strong divisions to feed their losers. This is not sustainable. Fitch, a
ratings agency, recently downgraded the debts of Panasonic and Sony to one
notch above junk status and placed Sharp s on negative outlook.
To understand how Japan s once-mighty electronics industry has grown so flabby,
consider the story of NEC. It used to be one of the world s biggest IT and
telecoms firms, but it has failed to adapt to changing times. Its shares have
fallen by 90% in the past decade and by 40% in the past year alone. It has
sulked from one restructuring plan to another. The latest came on January 26th,
when it forecast a 100 billion ($1.3 billion) loss for the fiscal year instead
of a 15 billion profit, and said it would have to sack 10,000 employees,
around 9% of the workforce.
For most of the time since it was founded in 1899, the Nippon Electric Company
s main customer was the state. So NEC s own culture has long been bureaucratic.
When Japan s telecoms market was liberalised in the 1990s the former monopoly
operator, NTT, was forced to compete. But NEC was not. Quite the opposite. NTT
demanded highly specialised technical specifications from its suppliers. NEC
was happy to churn out weird wireless standards and arcane signalling protocols
for NTT, since its giant customer guaranteed it huge sales at margins that, in
effect, paid all the R&D costs. Moreover, NTT s technical demands acted as a
barrier to entry for rivals both domestic and foreign.
It was a cosy arrangement, but dangerous in the long run. It was not easy for
NEC to modify the complex technology it sold to NTT for other clients. Indeed,
NTT treated sales to domestic rivals as an act of disloyalty and threatened to
cut orders if NEC made too many. These old ties are still strong: even today
NEC holds around 2.6 billion in NTT shares.
Working for NTT, NEC gained little experience of how to operate its equipment
inside a live network. This makes it hard for NEC to do any business outside
Japan, where operators typically want vendors to help run the equipment. Such
services yield recurring revenues with high margins. NEC is stuck with the
hardware, which is rapidly becoming a low-margin commodity business.
NEC also deals with NTT DoCoMo, a mobile operator spun out of NTT. This is just
as clubby. NTT DoCoMo does not let manufacturers devise their own products to
compete against each other. Instead, it demands specific features from each of
them, and tries to keep them all afloat. For example, one maker is instructed
to produce a basic camera in a super-slim handset, while another is told to
make a high-end camera in a brick.
This helps explain why Japan s phone market suffers from the Galapagos effect
. Its technology evolves in isolation and struggles to succeed elsewhere.
Japan produces nearly 30m handsets a year, but sells very few abroad.
After liberalisation, NTT had to cut costs. NEC saw its earnings dip, but life
was still comfortable. So it did not bother with the drastic reforms that
telecoms equipment-makers elsewhere undertook. When it did try to diversify, it
landed in trouble: the acquisition in the 1990s of Packard Bell, an American PC
maker, was a failure. So NEC mostly stayed at home in Japan.
Despite its plodding management, NEC has often been technically brilliant. It
used to vie with Cray and IBM to build the world s fastest supercomputers. Its
know-how was critical to the success of Japan s space-satellite programme. Yet
these are small markets. NEC s research labs may be among the best in the
world, but it has been forced to slash its R&D budget this year to half the
level of 2008.
As its difficulties have mounted, NEC has sold assets, including stakes in its
LCD-display unit, its mobile-phone arm and its personal-computer division. By
dawdling, it received less. And it has not made a clean break; it retains
minority stakes.
Today, NEC produces little that other firms don t make as well. Alas for Japan,
it is far from alone. Sharp s cellphones and LCD televisions have to battle
Panasonic s and Sony s and Toshiba s and Hitachi s. All are losing market share
to Samsung and Apple. When other Japanese companies see NEC, they can t think
it is only NEC s problems, says a former grandee at a big electronics firm.
Will they do anything about it? He looks away and sighs. Everyone knows we
need to change, and no one can make the changes, he says.
from the print edition | Business